The overall tone reflects a respectful but passionate debate, where many discuss the scientific consensus on race and genetics, citing studies and authoritative sources like Yudell et al. and Darwin to validate their views. Words like 'consensus,' 'scientifically invalid,' and references to peer-reviewed research demonstrate a concerted effort to clarify misconceptions and emphasize the impact of scientific understanding on social discussions.
AgreementModerate agreement
Most participants support the idea that race is a social construct and aligns with scientific consensus rejecting biological race distinctions.
InterestModerate interest
Discussions show some curiosity, with participants sharing articles, studies, and referencing notable scientists, indicating shared engagement with the topic.
EngagementModerate engagement
Several replies include citations of scientific sources, challenging misconceptions, and debates about genetics and race, showing active dialogue.
ImpactModerate impact
The exchanges reinforce the scientific consensus, potentially influencing perceptions about race and genetics in society, emphasizing the importance of accurate information.
Abstract in brief
The article discusses how the field of human genetics has historically been influenced by racial classifications, which often led to misconceptions and unequal treatment.
It advocates for removing race as a biological concept in genetics, emphasizing that genetic diversity is better understood through individual and population variation rather than racial categories.
The goal is to promote a more accurate and equitable understanding of genetics, focusing on shared human traits and reducing the misuse of race in scientific research.]
il montre bien qu’un «Noir» et un «Blanc» peuvent être plus proche génétiquement que 2 personnes du même groupe.
On a celui-là (https://t.co/zxOxEuwMPV) qui montre que la génétique humaine moderne abandonne le concept de « race » car scientifiquement inexact et dangereux.
7/15
Jun 16, 2025 · 5 likes · 1 share · 171 followersView post →
Aug 20, 2020 · 4 likes · 1 share · 5,729 followersView post →
NC
Neuro_Colombia
@Neuro_Colombia · X
Por lo tanto, después de muchos estudios en genética el consenso científico actual es que las categorías basadas en razas es una construcción social y no tiene bases biológicas.
Por lo que es mejor no utilizarlos en investigación médica o biológica.
https://t.co/iFagJqyYvq
@nklslick Anthropologists brought this forward 80 years ago.
Psychologists reaffirmed this 50 years ago.
Human genomic studies confirmed this 20 years ago.
https://t.co/ojOAp0eixR
https://t.co/SIeMpCJSCu
https://t.co/plxicav6Oi
My views are not a new concept.
This video explores whether race exists in humans, discussing the influence of racial classifications in genetics and advocating for understanding human diversity through individual and population variations rather than…
Its strange when events that happened thousands of years ago are brought into play during political fights in the modern world. This video explores how ancient history is used to promote ethnicity, nationalism, land…
@MirnaBernal10 @bvm67 @isaacrrr7 Pero es que todo ha sido desmentido.
No se cómo es Usted, por que no la he visto. Pero si es latinoamericana como Yo, Usted y Yo somos más cercanos genéticamente, que lo que lo soy de alguna persona negra de África.
Aquí hay más explicaciones, vea.
https://t.co/CYNSX1ZaJK
@impxsxa @Komita08 Amına kodum cocu adamın 60 Iq olmasının nedeni genetiği değil. Çocukken aldığı kültür, görgü. Çocuğu Tarzan gibi yetiştirirsen (Afrikada olduğu gibi) tabi 60 IQ olur amk Biyolojik olarak ırk diye bir kavram yok. Siktir git önemli dergileri oku en azından https://t.co/Avl7FenXIS
@jcelden https://t.co/IQDh99bAAD
Var det det du fikk ut av det jeg skrev? Sorry, men mentale kortslutninger basert på projeksjonert trangsynthet holder ikke mål. Det var du som ikke forsto hva jeg skrev om likhet for lovens da du ba meg skive på norsk. Jeg har da ikke imot advokater. De
@grok @thunderoussound @6ixFall @Jerrell_Frazier @jakeshieldsajj The article to which you refer https://t.co/TBycTpKatc is a forum letter, not a peer-reviewed article @grok. Just because something is published on the https://t.co/3c371OWQsr domain doesn't automatically make it authoritative or peer-reviewed.
@Xilaf_ @Johndoephth en plus toute façon ça fait longtemps que c'est rejeté la race biologique en science :
https://t.co/MM8F5Xo5WM
https://t.co/zxOxEuwf0n
https://t.co/zSq65ZC9dj
il montre bien qu’un «Noir» et un «Blanc» peuvent être plus proche génétiquement que 2 personnes du même groupe.
On a celui-là (https://t.co/zxOxEuwMPV) qui montre que la génétique humaine moderne abandonne le concept de « race » car scientifiquement inexact et dangereux.
7/15
Jun 16, 2025 · 5 likes · 1 share · 171 followersView post →
J
Juang
@juan6339ng · X
@alejogleal @dashkappeii @718esp https://t.co/nJPhhI3pnp
https://t.co/BdhZz9Nykj
https://t.co/z5ktfYkm0k
Subnormal de mierda, le mando verdadera ciencia, no esa pseudociencia sesgada que lee usted. Respete y respétese, idealmente no opine, porque contamina al mundo de la mierda estúpida que sale de su boca.
@JVitorA1989 @AtualizadoSaber Pra não ficar o dito pelo não dito (ou pra não soltar uns gráficos que não tem nada a ver com nada e umas fontes soltas pra tentar parecer certo…):
-https://t.co/hOIEpKLNzT
-https://t.co/6dZCcVMMR7
@acc_enjoyer I recommend you read this (web archive cuz paywalled)
https://t.co/GcwMPUb7dU
Your citing of crime statistics ignores the connection between segregation and systemically racist policies, poverty, and crime. Let me ask you a hypothetical scenario:
Pero si Ud. no es un idiota total, aqui van algunos estudios científicos serios:
1. https://t.co/0evNQHahLg
2. https://t.co/YOcqxy8hgw
3. https://t.co/aGD94Cn2pK
@RalphRhodell @FinalResponse There is no scientifically valid way to group people by any phenotypic genetic traits. Efforts to do so (by DNA companies), like horoscopes, only for entertainment purposes, child.
https://t.co/5opS9kvaRB
https://t.co/Jct76qNbny
https://t.co/usepihMUL8
https://t.co/2PdbHm988H
@HoloCrusader17 @Vivas6804 @EdgarBallester4 @La_SemiYA_dl_VD @malacamarada Creo que acá el único idiota es usted, pero tranquilo acá le dejo artículos científicos reales donde se demuestra que hay más variacion genética en un mismo grupo que entre diferentes grupos, razón por la cual es invalido decir que hay razas. https://t.co/yGDeiw5pki
@Airmanareiks @Boustr0phedon @LeRaptorWild @sanctusexpiatus @GeekNfit @JeReinforme C'est bien beau de jouer avec les nombres, mais il ne faut pas se voiler la face. Le terme race est énormément connoté et son utilisation est déjà remise en question par la communauté scientifique
https://t.co/L4UbC5j0Kf
@HunkyDoryOrBust @guardian SCIENCE AND SOCIETY. Taking race out of human genetics, by Michael Yudell, Dorothy Roberts, Rob DeSalle, and Sarah Tishkoff:
https://t.co/WTRnbXL5bh
@VAraujoDaSilva @Viajantestoria https://t.co/KHO5s7YuqD Sai outro artigo publicado na revista science. Esse conceito de “raça” ñ é só anti científico como é racista. Serve p justificar q negros são inferiores aos brancos. Vc é inferior aos brancos?
@CaroliFiorenzo @il_pat @riccardotani4 @GrazianoMereu Oh ma io non sostengo nulla.
We have giants.
https://t.co/4dOqvpeNEg
Jul 3, 2024 · 1 like · 25,740 followersView post →
DK
Dr. Kidpixo
@kidpixo · X
@DJC_Japanese @kankyo_space @hiragananinja There are at 3 reference in this paragraph, like
Yudell, M.; Roberts, D.; DeSalle, R.; Tishkoff, S. (5 February 2016). "Taking race out of human genetics". Science. 351 (6273).
https://t.co/hFZVEaTabs
@urbanevol We're reading W.E.B. Du Bois's "The Conservation of Races" and this article. https://t.co/lbhh9bz0Wr
You left Fordham before we could teach an ICC together!
Feb 20, 2024 · 1 like · 3,565 followersView post →
RT
riccardo tani
@riccardotani4 · X
@nanoscalebiomed Posso aggiungere un paio di letture?
https://t.co/cIl2KRnjY1
https://t.co/7oulwF0wle https://t.co/Yf6zHa1lTP
Feb 15, 2024 · 1 like · 1,136 followersView post →
CM
Chaise mega
@flottismeoff · X
@Aristarquesamos @JLeurope @WXelka @marc_vanguard Bon aller bz ta mère
https://t.co/mTJTYMfYn7
https://t.co/0NhWbyZQ6K
https://t.co/N59Nxltrk8
https://t.co/ZBXUpL2APv
https://t.co/cvaIFvS2ct https://t.co/iw4capblYB
@belfer70 @RepGalattica @guscabin Rileggiti questo, che sicuramente conosci. Poi forse smetti di parlare di 'razze umane' e di 'razza umana'
https://t.co/i7VzWh3SuP
E questo
https://t.co/cIl2KRnjY1
Feb 11, 2024 · 1 like · 1,136 followersView post →
@TGuthJarkovsky @matschneid @milujupondelky @BobCZap sorry ale tvoje definice rasy je fakt smesna. rasa neni vedecka kategorie. doporucuji k precteni:
https://t.co/NNsOUWfDjD
@StopHyperbole @ThePeterShep @gwea0 @Exnaut_ @DreamLeaf5 @Nullbias https://t.co/BGf3l5UGYS
https://t.co/rM5P0eL9ZE
my bad the science agrees with me :(
@koganew Сорри, я занята ВАЖНЫМ ДЕЛОМ (читаю манхву), поэтому вот первая попавшаяся статья по топику из авторитетного источника. Ключи — 2016 год, Паабо
https://t.co/6kORTLufZ7
@aguy123452 @Steve_Sailer @kattabattik @James7185592828 @therecount Well, the layman *would* assume the latter. But my doctorate-level training in genetics allows me to conclude that there is no combination like that you propose. Thus, the *only* trait that absolutely tracks with "race" is melanin content in the skin.
https://t.co/rvMmMF2Si8
and here are some sources to educate yourself with @0x49fa98 :
https://t.co/I9cW3KUyAU
this one I don't think you'll have access to but still try to read it if you do: https://t.co/XR4CMbNAuT
https://t.co/TkkHsYpvbe
@PilatoTablet @Sbrn65 @itapacifici @VNSmatrix @LamonicaBiagio https://t.co/DrpwWhdFZ6
https://t.co/HVarIeLssf
https://t.co/zBti4k29IN
E posso andare avanti
Mi sa che la figura del cretino la fa lei
Le basi gliele posso anche fare vedere
Ma non credo lei sia in grado di interpretarle
@ArthurCDent @scolerkolo @nicolascgrey @GurusPod And a nice (short) review from Sarah Tishkof which highlights some of the issues.
https://t.co/LYKH8s02k1
@TengoLapizeroS_ @VulpeculaVdL @Rabotnitsa_mad Charles Darwin ya dijo que la idea de raza era totalmente arbitraria.
¿No te vale Darwin?
Aquí tienes un estudio
https://t.co/Vv1AcOJAVX
Tampoco?
La Science
https://t.co/UblBMtfyqm
No?
Un genetista
https://t.co/5tLoBr8pHJ
Otro
https://t.co/9goVaszA8I
+
@FidgetAttack @kel9994two @thetrueskittles @AnzumiiGX @oripiepie @Dishwasher1910 I picked a single article.
I don't need empirical evidence to prove race isn't real, no objective standard for race has ever been presented. History is real, you do not have a history that pre-dates you and neither do I.
https://t.co/OayVNIOC6m
Jun 29, 2023 · 1 like · 1,696 followersView post →
I
isaias
@tudo_ate · X
@_spielfreude @joao_sutter @Vanguarda_PT Em vez de fotos, ta aqui os sites e artigos
https://t.co/npPYTrPAFn
https://t.co/aPSeOQPySi
https://t.co/4VC2wadyl5
https://t.co/VdNEZdPmMi
https://t.co/Xjk9YUHpmD
https://t.co/n6IRJTjEJG
Vendo coisa de 2005, se atualiza paizão
@Theodoart19 Pq o termo foi criado historicamente.
Se referir a nós como raça está errado cientificamente
se pegar 2 dog de raça diferente vão ter grandes diferenças genéticas
Já nos humanos não existe essa grande diferença genética que possa classificar em raças
https://t.co/zN8jnLJCu4
@jonbloomfield2 @GaryLineker @HackneyAbbott @DAaronovitch Great article but I think any use of the noun "race" is complicit with the idea that there is any such classification of humans when the term has no scientific basis. https://t.co/zCj41KAfgZ
May 20, 2023 · 1 like · 20,290 followersView post →
H
Hyperion
@HyperionFalls · X
@Chimpin69854465 @worldpaulcarr @SeibtNaomi @TheRabbitHole84 It is true and even people like Dawkins state it---it isn't just woke magazines lol. The fact that you can't even acknowledge what the consensus position is indicates you are dishonest. https://t.co/qk6xjx77Kb
@nklslick Anthropologists brought this forward 80 years ago.
Psychologists reaffirmed this 50 years ago.
Human genomic studies confirmed this 20 years ago.
https://t.co/ojOAp0eixR
https://t.co/SIeMpCJSCu
https://t.co/plxicav6Oi
My views are not a new concept.
@Marcusgibson @RatioDisputati @MatthewWielicki @SNICKERS Maybe read up on real science instead of spreading fake shit like a moron? https://t.co/IQDh99bAAD
@_Evolutionism @BadSocialisms U are objectively wrong
Here are 8 fucking more so have fun reading u dumb fuck
https://t.co/LPnaarPwe8
https://t.co/nICnJQNHOY
https://t.co/4iCPont7lO
https://t.co/ORf1mEkO7u
https://t.co/uzDdB02Qn0
https://t.co/dcAYymNXE2
https://t.co/1yc7OkXhGD
https://t.co/Llrto3B4lv
@Jett22412809 @LusciousLani @SuperTaliaDX @ArnallLabrador @foxdyke_Argos @ThenonbinaryC It's not just me. It's the emerging consensus among geneticists, historians, medical authorities, etc.
Try google. Learn something.
https://t.co/YzySHBroMJ
https://t.co/vm6ScCZ1Wc
https://t.co/g5qX2OquQH
https://t.co/Wp8ofLoutV
@NJBLondon2015 @ZoSoJade @Baddiel @HadleyFreeman https://t.co/NdfOq1YKi6
This is thr article I was talking about: they argue that conversations about race has led to a lot of pseudoscientific rot and unhelpful effects on public health
@nognverra @KJisms @Aimsel "there's a fairly recent paper" and then you don't link it or give any way of find what you are talking about. Good job.
In contrast I'll provide you this paper from geneticists saying race is not science.
https://t.co/ofglCtYtzs
Por lo tanto, después de muchos estudios en genética el consenso científico actual es que las categorías basadas en razas es una construcción social y no tiene bases biológicas.
Por lo que es mejor no utilizarlos en investigación médica o biológica.
https://t.co/iFagJqyYvq
… hay una base biológica para el concepto de raza en los cimientos de la investigación, indicando que existían más diferencias genéticas en las razas que entre ellas (Lewontin, 1972). *³*
https://t.co/Nv1bDJAUXR *⁴*
…
@supprimeac @hizam_elqahtani بالفعل. عاد المصطلحات الإجتماعية معيارها إجتماعي .. لكن فيه فرق بين Race وEthnicity .. هو مركز على الثانية. بينما Race مشكلتها تستخدم للتحديد (البيولوجي) وليس (الإجتماعي) وفيه محاولات من العلماء لتركها لأنها تسبب الطبقية والعنصرية بدون مبدأ واضح.
https://t.co/Smch3gQxY1
@petersnotes @kennymxu Looks like your mind is made up, so no amount of literature will change it. But, I'll leave you one more.
https://t.co/I6tw7bVxPT
@RickKivari @gator_feed @11Shultz @w_terrence Sorry I didn't consult you for a list of your approved sources. But if you read it, you would know that they were referencing this article:
https://t.co/3M8q6W0iFl
Helping to teach an evolutionary biology course this semester, any ideas for good discussion activities merging DEI and evolution concepts? For example, a discussion on human genetics and race https://t.co/5C4F063IoX
Modern science regards race as a social construct, an identity which is assigned based on ... 10.1126/science.aac4951. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 26912690. S2CID ...
Tamás Nyirkos - Secular Religions - The Key Concepts (Routledge ...
News
Human Genetics', Science, 351(6273), pp. 564, 565. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aac4951. Republicanism The parallel between religion and republicanism ...
Facing Our History-Building An Equitable Future Final Report ...
News
Science. 2016;351(6273):564-565. doi:10.1126/science.aac4951. 107. Byeon YJJ, Islamaj R, Yeganova L, et al. Evolving use of ancestry, ethnicity, and race in ...
Ostherr-2020-Artificial Intelligence and Medical Humanities | PDF ...
News
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4951. Zhan, Andong, Srihari Mohan, Christopher Tarolli, et al. 2018. “Using Smartphones and Machine Learning to. Quantify ...
RFS resolution 2: Denouncing racial essentialism in medicine
News
SCIENCE AND SOCIETY. Taking race out of human · genetics. Science. 2016;351(6273):564-565. doi:10.1126/science.aac4951 · 6. Yudell M, Roberts D, DeSalle R ...
Taking race out of human genetics. Science, 351(6273), 564-565. doi:10.1126/science.aac4951. 26. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved ...
Mimir i Rødt har noen innlegg som er ekstremt bra. Her om Peppa ...
Facebook
... lær, rasist: https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.aac4951. science.org. Taking race out of human genetics · 4 mos · 1. Profile photo of ...