Rev Environ Health March 2016 PMID 26943595

Hydraulic fracturing for natural gas: impact on health and environment.

David O Carpenter

Mentions

5
Peak: 1 in May 2016
across 2 sources since May 2016

Extended reach

6,212
potential audience

Total likes

18

Video views

4,550

Mentions per month

May 2016 – Aug 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter3 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Comments reflect a generally supportive stance towards understanding fracking's risks, with phrases like 'serious and well-documented impacts' and praise for the article's detailed references, indicating a recognition of the importance of this issue. The tone combines concern with appreciation for comprehensive information, highlighting the relevance and potential influence of the publication.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the health and environmental risks associated with fracking, indicating some alignment with concerns raised in the publication.

InterestHigh interest

The discussions show high curiosity, as evidenced by praise for the article's summary and references, encouraging further exploration.

EngagementModerate engagement

Participants reference specific issues like environmental impacts and the importance of detailed information, demonstrating a moderate level of engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

While the conversations recognize the significance of the publication, they don't explicitly discuss its direct impact or policy implications.

Abstract in brief

  • Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, has made it economically feasible to extract natural gas from shale deposits worldwide, offering environmental benefits over coal but also posing health and environmental risks.
  • Immediate health threats include air pollution from carcinogenic volatile organic compounds and toxins like hydrogen sulfide, as well as water contamination from chemicals used in fracking and radioactive materials in wastewater.
  • Long-term concerns involve climate change due to methane emissions and increased seismic activity from tectonic disruption, highlighting the need to prioritize public health over economic gains from fracking.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Doctors for Planetary Health — West Coast
@WCDrs4PH · X

@MarcWest79 @Melissa_Lem @jvipondmd @Renee1130 @CAPE_ACME @CANE_AIIE So good to see this healthy level of curiosity. Lots written, but this is a great summary article; for further information see the 25 references at the end of the article.https://t.co/p6Uc179AIO https://t.co/9K9XblVJf2

Aug 15, 2021 · 2 likes · 1,407 followers View post →
Anas أنس
@AnasInPalestine · X

@cbcwatcher @timhodgsonmt The consumption of LNG is a smaller carbon footprint. But not everything can be measured by carbon footprint alone. The process of LNG extraction via fracking carries serious and well-documented environmental impacts. Just an example: https://t.co/ZwVxT1EnLr

Aug 28, 2025 · 253 followers View post →

All mentions

Anas أنس
@AnasInPalestine · X

@cbcwatcher @timhodgsonmt The consumption of LNG is a smaller carbon footprint. But not everything can be measured by carbon footprint alone. The process of LNG extraction via fracking carries serious and well-documented environmental impacts. Just an example: https://t.co/ZwVxT1EnLr

Aug 28, 2025 · 253 followers View post →
Desemputol Forte
@SofiaMl39900327 · X

@nacional_memes https://t.co/vKPhlEmmQR

Jun 5, 2025 · 3 followers View post →
Doctors for Planetary Health — West Coast
@WCDrs4PH · X

@MarcWest79 @Melissa_Lem @jvipondmd @Renee1130 @CAPE_ACME @CANE_AIIE So good to see this healthy level of curiosity. Lots written, but this is a great summary article; for further information see the 25 references at the end of the article.https://t.co/p6Uc179AIO https://t.co/9K9XblVJf2

Aug 15, 2021 · 2 likes · 1,407 followers View post →