Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussion reflects a cautious interest, with mentions like examining narratives and referencing experimental capacities, which shows some thoughtful engagement but lacks strong enthusiasm or disagreement. Words like 'see' and references to direct trials suggest observational interest rather than active debate or critical analysis.
The posts seem neutral or only mildly supportive, referencing the research with some acknowledgment but no strong endorsement or disagreement.
The discussions show a basic level of curiosity, mentioning the publication but not delving deeply into its implications or methods.
There is some engagement with the mention of specific details like narratives and evaluation of experimental ability, indicating moderate reflection on the topic.
The overall tone suggests the publication is viewed as somewhat interesting but not groundbreaking, with limited broad influence implied.
@SquatUniversity We have data of the ability to do this with our narratives (see: https://t.co/twU8MdQ2l3 & https://t.co/dj4YF2Y8mu). For a direct trial on this ability in an exercise context see: [11
This study is a meta-analysis of fMRI research to understand how placebo treatments reduce pain, showing that placebo effects lead to decreases in activity in brain regions linked to attention and somatomotor functions…
This study is a meta-analysis of fMRI research to understand how placebo treatments reduce pain, showing that placebo effects lead to decreases in activity in brain regions linked to attention and somatomotor functions.
@SquatUniversity We have data of the ability to do this with our narratives (see: https://t.co/twU8MdQ2l3 & https://t.co/dj4YF2Y8mu). For a direct trial on this ability in an exercise context see: [11
MR