October 2016 PMID 26994935

Viruses as living processes.

John Dupré, Stephan Guttinger

Download social card

Mentions

18
Peak: 14 in May 2020
across 2 sources since Mar 2020

Extended reach

1,137,036
potential audience

Total likes

29,361

Video views

1,087,187

Mentions per month

Mar 2020 – Apr 2024

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter17 posts
  • YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall discussion reflects a tension between curiosity about the conceptual framework of viruses as processes and skepticism about its scientific utility, exemplified by comments questioning the distinction between casual usage and deeper analysis, as well as references to ontological debates and the perceived superficiality of the concept.

AgreementNeither agree nor disagree

Discussions show mixed reactions, with some questioning the conceptual framing and others expressing curiosity, leading to an overall neutral stance.

InterestModerate interest

Participants are somewhat interested, especially those engaging with the idea of viruses as processes, but others dismiss the conceptual debate as less engaging.

EngagementModerate engagement

Some users delve into theoretical questions about ontology and the nature of viruses, indicating moderate engagement; however, others dismiss these debates as superficial, reflecting varied depth.

ImpactNeutral impact

The discussions highlight ongoing philosophical debates but lack clear consensus or practical implications, resulting in a neutral impact score.

Abstract in brief

  • The traditional view of viruses as non-living, separate entities is challenged by recent research showing they can collaborate with hosts and be part of biological systems, indicating a more interconnected view of life.
  • The author argues that viruses should be understood as processes rather than fixed objects or substances, which aligns with the idea that life is characterized by ongoing interactions and symbiosis.
  • Recognizing viruses as part of living processes supports the broader perspective that nature is fundamentally interconnected and collaborative, and this also raises the case for considering viruses as living organisms.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Studies C
@BioViewsHPS · X

Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Viruses as living processes" by John Dupré & Stephan Guttinger https://t.co/MGEGZ8V8eJ @UofESPA ESPA

May 7, 2020 · 17 likes · 12 shares · 400 followers View post →
Jensen Suther
@jensensuther · X

@ironick @sckimbriel @deontologistics @lastpositivist Pointing to a bunch of “research” where scientists casually referring to viruses as “living” processes does absolutely nothing to settle the *conceptual* question I’m raising. You seem incapable of distinguishing between casual usage and conceptual analysis.

Apr 18, 2024 · 1 like · 10,651 followers View post →
サメQCU
@sameQCU · X

@IntuitMachine (i would like to note that I really like his 'viruses as living processes', and think that it's interesting and worth reading)

Oct 4, 2021 · 1 like · 2,186 followers View post →
Pit Schultz
@pitsch · X

the virus as substance and process. another example for the inaptness of an ontological approach. its not so important what things "are" but what they "do". https://t.co/TfYrzXx29G

Mar 24, 2020 · 1 like · 682 followers View post →
Dr. Walter Veit
@wrwveit · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 13,435 followers View post →
The BJPS
@TheBJPS · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 6,245 followers View post →

All mentions

Jensen Suther
@jensensuther · X

@ironick @sckimbriel @deontologistics @lastpositivist Pointing to a bunch of “research” where scientists casually referring to viruses as “living” processes does absolutely nothing to settle the *conceptual* question I’m raising. You seem incapable of distinguishing between casual usage and conceptual analysis.

Apr 18, 2024 · 1 like · 10,651 followers View post →
サメQCU
@sameQCU · X

@IntuitMachine (i would like to note that I really like his 'viruses as living processes', and think that it's interesting and worth reading)

Oct 4, 2021 · 1 like · 2,186 followers View post →
dae mo
@dmccoy135 · X

Viruses as living processes https://t.co/4Um0QvvSWa

May 17, 2020 · 19 followers View post →
Anne Sophie Meincke
@ASMeincke · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 9, 2020 · 12 shares · 1,063 followers View post →
Alejandro Frank
@AlejandroFrank · X

https://t.co/y5wX9et0Ht

May 8, 2020 · 2,673 followers View post →
KLI: A Home to Theory that Matters
@KLIAustria · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 2,660 followers View post →
David Montminy
@savvymonty · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 564 followers View post →
Katherine Hawley
@HawleyKatherine · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 2,537 followers View post →
The BJPS
@TheBJPS · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 6,245 followers View post →
rachelle holbein
@rachelleholbein · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 72 followers View post →
Dr. Walter Veit
@wrwveit · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 13,435 followers View post →
Stefano Canali
@StefanoCanali_ · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 612 followers View post →
McGivern Lab
@mcgivernlab · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 125 followers View post →
PhilosophyPaperboy
@thephilpaperboy · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 4,414 followers View post →
Ehud Lamm إيهود
@ehud · X

RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…

May 8, 2020 · 12 shares · 1,224 followers View post →
Studies C
@BioViewsHPS · X

Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Viruses as living processes" by John Dupré & Stephan Guttinger https://t.co/MGEGZ8V8eJ @UofESPA ESPA

May 7, 2020 · 17 likes · 12 shares · 400 followers View post →
Pit Schultz
@pitsch · X

the virus as substance and process. another example for the inaptness of an ontological approach. its not so important what things "are" but what they "do". https://t.co/TfYrzXx29G

Mar 24, 2020 · 1 like · 682 followers View post →