Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Viruses as living processes" by John Dupré & Stephan Guttinger https://t.co/MGEGZ8V8eJ @UofESPA ESPA
Viruses as living processes.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Mar 2020 – Apr 2024Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter17 posts
-
YouTube1 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The overall discussion reflects a tension between curiosity about the conceptual framework of viruses as processes and skepticism about its scientific utility, exemplified by comments questioning the distinction between casual usage and deeper analysis, as well as references to ontological debates and the perceived superficiality of the concept.
Discussions show mixed reactions, with some questioning the conceptual framing and others expressing curiosity, leading to an overall neutral stance.
Participants are somewhat interested, especially those engaging with the idea of viruses as processes, but others dismiss the conceptual debate as less engaging.
Some users delve into theoretical questions about ontology and the nature of viruses, indicating moderate engagement; however, others dismiss these debates as superficial, reflecting varied depth.
The discussions highlight ongoing philosophical debates but lack clear consensus or practical implications, resulting in a neutral impact score.
Abstract in brief
- The traditional view of viruses as non-living, separate entities is challenged by recent research showing they can collaborate with hosts and be part of biological systems, indicating a more interconnected view of life.
- The author argues that viruses should be understood as processes rather than fixed objects or substances, which aligns with the idea that life is characterized by ongoing interactions and symbiosis.
- Recognizing viruses as part of living processes supports the broader perspective that nature is fundamentally interconnected and collaborative, and this also raises the case for considering viruses as living organisms.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@ironick @sckimbriel @deontologistics @lastpositivist Pointing to a bunch of “research” where scientists casually referring to viruses as “living” processes does absolutely nothing to settle the *conceptual* question I’m raising. You seem incapable of distinguishing between casual usage and conceptual analysis.
@IntuitMachine (i would like to note that I really like his 'viruses as living processes', and think that it's interesting and worth reading)
the virus as substance and process. another example for the inaptness of an ontological approach. its not so important what things "are" but what they "do". https://t.co/TfYrzXx29G
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
All mentions
Are Viruses Considered Alive? Scientific Insights Explored
What is the truth about viruses They evolve, grow, and can be killed by our immune system but are they actually alive Learn all about these ferocious little things in this new episode of SciShow hosted by Michael Aranda
@ironick @sckimbriel @deontologistics @lastpositivist Pointing to a bunch of “research” where scientists casually referring to viruses as “living” processes does absolutely nothing to settle the *conceptual* question I’m raising. You seem incapable of distinguishing between casual usage and conceptual analysis.
@IntuitMachine (i would like to note that I really like his 'viruses as living processes', and think that it's interesting and worth reading)
Viruses as living processes https://t.co/4Um0QvvSWa
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
https://t.co/y5wX9et0Ht
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
RT @BioViewsHPS: Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Vir…
Process ontology approach to viruses: available with free access as part of Studies C's COVID-19 related collection: "Viruses as living processes" by John Dupré & Stephan Guttinger https://t.co/MGEGZ8V8eJ @UofESPA ESPA
the virus as substance and process. another example for the inaptness of an ontological approach. its not so important what things "are" but what they "do". https://t.co/TfYrzXx29G
SC
JS
サ
PS
DV
TB
DM
AM
AF
KM
DM
KH
RH
SC
ML
P
Eإ