Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall tone is positive and curious, as exemplified by posts appreciating collaboration between librarians and healthcare agencies, and comments urging the use of guidelines like PRESS to improve search strategies, which indicate strong interest and perceived value of the publication.
Most participants recognize the importance of the PRESS guidelines, supporting their relevance in improving search strategies for systematic reviews.
Posts display high curiosity about the guidelines, with many expressing new awareness of the PRESS publication and its role.
Conversations include specific mentions of collaboration efforts, potential applications, and calls for librarian involvement, showing active participation.
Discussions suggest that the publication could influence best practices in developing search strategies, highlighting its potential effect on evidence synthesis.
[レビュー研究の検索ストラテジーのためのガイド] レビュー論文における、「検索ストラテジー」のための有名なガイドです。 PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement https://t.co/00QuaeNphJ
Was not aware of this until now! PRESS statement to help guide the development of search strategies for systematic reviews. Very nice :) https://t.co/3Uu72KcWyu
Great to hear about collaboration between @hselibrary librarians and @hiqa to peer review search strategies for systematic reviews and HTAs #hslg https://t.co/KUtDlKq6TH
Anunciando el Journal Club en Español presentado por @CochraneECP con @micaelaescb @CochraneArg (https://t.co/17jv4WvjmA) y @IvanSola @CochraneIberoam (https://t.co/NO3g5LaO1k) 18 de Marzo 3pmGMT (9amGMT-6). Detalles de registro: https://t.co/igVEBjJSLc @EstudiantesxME
It's the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies tool: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27005575/
@NixLib They should have used PRESS hey @NixLib @shan_mozziebyte @leila2013m https://t.co/NFJ712sHfe
In Part 1, I introduce you to the 10-part searching school module, focusing on improving the reporting quality of literature searches in systematic reviews. The PRISMA-S checklist facilitates better documentation and…
In Part 3, I introduce the nuances of using AND, OR, and NOT in your searches. This video highlights the importance of the PRISMA-S checklist, which aims to improve reporting quality for literature searches in…
In Part 2 we discuss translating the research question by examining three examples. The PRISMA-S checklist aims to improve the reporting quality of literature searches in systematic reviews, enhancing the original…
This video discusses the significance of subject headings in systematic and comprehensive searches, referencing guidelines and resources to improve search strategies in health research.
In Part 5, we will look at how to incorporate keywords into your systematic and comprehensive searches. The PRISMA-S checklist aims to improve the reporting quality of literature searches in systematic reviews by…
This video discusses key aspects to consider when assessing spelling, syntax, and line numbers in research search strategies, referencing guidelines from PRESS and Cochrane for systematic reviews.
In Part 7, we discuss limits and filters in database searches. The PRISMA-S checklist aims to improve the reporting quality of literature searches in systematic reviews, ensuring transparent and reproducible…
In Part 8, we tackle translating your searches across platforms. The PRISMA-S checklist aims to improve the reporting quality of literature searches in systematic reviews, addressing common issues of poor documentation…
In Part 9, I review elements of the PRISMA-S extension for search reporting. The PRISMA-S checklist aims to improve the reporting quality of literature searches by addressing common documentation issues, with 16 key…
This video concludes the analysis of search techniques for health research, including key guidelines and references. It provides essential resources for conducting effective literature searches in systematic reviews.
It's the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies tool: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27005575/
RT @Takapon_PT_PhD: [レビュー研究の検索ストラテジーのためのガイド] レビュー論文における、「検索ストラテジー」のための有名なガイドです。 PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Gui…
[レビュー研究の検索ストラテジーのためのガイド] レビュー論文における、「検索ストラテジー」のための有名なガイドです。 PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement https://t.co/00QuaeNphJ
RT @BreedaHerlihy: Great to hear about collaboration between @hselibrary librarians and @hiqa to peer review search strategies for systemat…
RT @BreedaHerlihy: Great to hear about collaboration between @hselibrary librarians and @hiqa to peer review search strategies for systemat…
RT @BreedaHerlihy: Great to hear about collaboration between @hselibrary librarians and @hiqa to peer review search strategies for systemat…
RT @BreedaHerlihy: Great to hear about collaboration between @hselibrary librarians and @hiqa to peer review search strategies for systemat…
Great to hear about collaboration between @hselibrary librarians and @hiqa to peer review search strategies for systematic reviews and HTAs #hslg https://t.co/KUtDlKq6TH
Is the 2015 PRESS Guideline the latest version? McGowan J, et al. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2016 Jul 1;75:40-6. #medlib #sysrev #evidencesynthesis
@bibliovirtual @CochraneIberoam Concuerdo, los autores de revisiones siempre deben considerar al bibliotecario, agregaría promover el uso de guías como la PRESS: https://t.co/zi14Qh2Eqr
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement https://t.co/8VYfOzYVFF
@ChelseaMisquith This? https://t.co/C17a2ZHOnZ
Link al artículo de PRESS https://t.co/1LBCpNN9mO presentado por Iván
RT @CochraneNeonate: Anunciando el Journal Club en Español presentado por @CochraneECP con @micaelaescb @CochraneArg (https://t.co/17jv4Wvj…
Anunciando el Journal Club en Español presentado por @CochraneECP con @micaelaescb @CochraneArg (https://t.co/17jv4WvjmA) y @IvanSola @CochraneIberoam (https://t.co/NO3g5LaO1k) 18 de Marzo 3pmGMT (9amGMT-6). Detalles de registro: https://t.co/igVEBjJSLc @EstudiantesxME
@NixLib They should have used PRESS hey @NixLib @shan_mozziebyte @leila2013m https://t.co/NFJ712sHfe
Interesting (free!) read - PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. See ➡️ https://t.co/xXNxadQu33 https://t.co/63PhSKb90g
RT @COsadnik: Was not aware of this until now! PRESS statement to help guide the development of search strategies for systematic reviews. V…
RT @COsadnik: Was not aware of this until now! PRESS statement to help guide the development of search strategies for systematic reviews. V…
Was not aware of this until now! PRESS statement to help guide the development of search strategies for systematic reviews. Very nice :) https://t.co/3Uu72KcWyu