Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions frequently reference key findings from the study, such as the assertion that lowering serum cholesterol does not correlate with reduced mortality rates. For instance, terms like *'22% higher risk of death'* and *'significant reduction in serum cholesterol'* illustrate strong engagement with the research while also critiquing mainstream dietary advice. The tone in these discussions ranges from critical to assertive, reflecting a sense of urgency in debunking longstanding nutritional myths.
Many posts express support for the findings of the study, suggesting a degree of consensus regarding the nonsupportive evidence for the diet-heart hypothesis.
Users convey a high level of curiosity about the study, reflecting a widespread discussion about its implications for dietary guidelines.
Several posts delve deeply into methodological aspects and challenge opposing views, indicating extensive consideration of the topic.
Many believe that the study's findings significantly undermine established dietary recommendations, emphasizing its potential for influencing public health discourse.
@SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement after it didn't work out as expected. Study title: "Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment
@GobbleGoob95380 @jeremykauffman @mechanikalk The best we have are from a time where people's base omega status was much better - but these trials rarely ran long enough to see the effect https://t.co/pO8dKjVQar https://t.co/nrFoH8O0Ab
It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, from dieticians. @DrEenfeldt @DietDoctor https://t.co/sU03LuukIo https://t.co/1qJB6l0PaX
Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) Minnesota Coronary Experiment (MCE)
If you want to read the study re-evaluating the Minnesota Coronary Experiment after 40 years, here it is: https://t.co/Wuq64dCCHK
@ElieJarrougeMD And the Minnesota Coronary Experiment has clearly demonstrated in a proper RCT that lowering cholesterol has no benefit on primary prevention against heart attacks. Unfortunately, most cardiologists are unaware of this landmark study https://t.co/o8AUqQwI7S
In this video, we explore which fat to choose for cooking—butter or oil. The study reevaluates the traditional diet-heart hypothesis by analyzing data from the Minnesota Coronary Experiment, examining the effect of…
This video examines new findings that challenge traditional nutrition guidelines. It reveals that replacing saturated fats with vegetable oils decreased cholesterol but did not reduce mortality rates, highlighting gaps…
The most commonly used diet for weight loss is the low-fat diet, which may not be what you think. This video clearly explains the low-fat diet, including insights from recent research on dietary cholesterol and its…
The idea that saturated fat causes heart disease is one of the biggest myths in modern nutrition. Science shows that saturated fat is not associated with increased mortality, while refined carbohydrates and industrial…
Nutrition Debate is a weekly series featuring nutritionist Felipe Viana and Henrique Autran. They discuss dietary choices, including a randomized trial comparing coconut oil, olive oil, and butter, focusing on their…
This video explores the relationship between dietary fats and cardiovascular disease, clarifying risk factors contributing to heart attacks and strokes. We analyze how replacing saturated fats with vegetable oils…
Short-term dietary changes can quickly alter the gut microbiome, increasing bile-tolerant microbes and decreasing fiber-metabolizing bacteria, which may influence inflammation and overall gut health.
Seed oils, including canola oil, have sparked debate regarding their health effects. This video delves into research suggesting that canola oil may improve cardiometabolic risk factors like cholesterol levels and…
@MidwesternDoc The Christopher Ramadan BMJ study, “Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment”(https://t.co/Cw2vbhRYg1) is a pretty convincing falsification of the hypothesis that vegetable oils are more heart healthy
@naveengmc @JyothiNair76 He is posted only on LDL which has no meaning. Let me post some studies and I suggest you respond to me @naveengmc Don't run away.. 1) Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota
https://t.co/LBUg6ihzDA
@carsalouk Ορίστε και οι πηγές του Omega-6 vegetable oils as a driver of coronary heart disease: the oxidized linoleic acid hypothesis James J DiNicolantonio James H O’Keefe. Openheart 2018. Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota
@Lefteris_Asks Omega-6 vegetable oils as a driver of coronary heart disease: the oxidized linoleic acid hypothesis James J DiNicolantonio James H O’Keefe. Openheart 2018. Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment
@grok @MasalaFry69 @boycrazystacy2 Lowering saturated fat lead to an increased rate of heart disease by 47% to 61%. https://t.co/5S3tUpOZ2C https://t.co/DxUWbvhovm https://t.co/LdVy2wftxr https://t.co/ubFrZel0Bf
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/ZsbUQeulqv
@Xpets4trump @cremieuxrecueil @RichardHanania this was smoking gun: "Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73)" this data had not been published in 70-s because it contradicted saturated fat hypothesis.
RT @trikomes: Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-7…
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) Replacing saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid (the main omega-6 PUFA in seed oils): - DOES lower serum cholesterol - Does NOT lower risk of https://t.co/VZZDn6LMkP
RT @peto682: @ElieJarrougeMD And the Minnesota Coronary Experiment has clearly demonstrated in a proper RCT that lowering cholesterol has n…
RT @peto682: @ElieJarrougeMD And the Minnesota Coronary Experiment has clearly demonstrated in a proper RCT that lowering cholesterol has n…
RT @peto682: @ElieJarrougeMD And the Minnesota Coronary Experiment has clearly demonstrated in a proper RCT that lowering cholesterol has n…
RT @peto682: @ElieJarrougeMD And the Minnesota Coronary Experiment has clearly demonstrated in a proper RCT that lowering cholesterol has n…
@ElieJarrougeMD And the Minnesota Coronary Experiment has clearly demonstrated in a proper RCT that lowering cholesterol has no benefit on primary prevention against heart attacks. Unfortunately, most cardiologists are unaware of this landmark study https://t.co/o8AUqQwI7S
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) | The BMJ
https://t.co/8iyqRy20vM
@Fletch_8 @gary_gary3325 @newstart_2024 https://t.co/ZA5FycATjp https://t.co/1U71Q8LS5r
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/oh8MSRUlAd There was a 22% higher risk of death for each 30 mg/dL (0.78 mmol/L) reduction in serum cholesterol.
@Sayravem @ne_tlia Minnesota Coronary Experiment: “22% higher(!) risk of death for each 30mg/dL reduction in cholesterol” https://t.co/YKhku4hvHo До речі, мозок на 25% складається з холестерина, де його більшість іде на мієлін, що ізолює нервові клітини. До чого призведе його зниження?
@ElieJarrougeMD https://t.co/Af7svhmMqD
@iltalehti_fi https://t.co/7JvIoQGlpG
Summary of the BMJ Study on the Diet-Heart Hypothesis (Minnesota Coronary Experiment) Title: Re-evaluation of the Traditional Diet-Heart Hypothesis: Analysis of Recovered Data from the Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) Objective: The study aimed to assess the validity https://t.co/PuBAty2xyE
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/8RZxhB5XHO
"Re-evaluation of the Traditional Diet-Heart Hypothesis: Analysis of Recovered Data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73)" by Christopher E. Ramsden and colleagues: https://t.co/vFn24x33ag
https://t.co/6zEgQKfj2Y Varför presenterades inte hela resultatet vid första publikationen? Kanske för att det gick emot konsensus?
@SondreLinde @norgonaut Enig. Derfor er der viktig å finne de gode. Dette er en av dem. Som er blant de få som er randomisert kontrollert studie som viser ingen fordeler med å bytte ut mettet fett med planteoljer med mye linolsyre. Det de fant var motsatt av det de tenkte. https://t.co/6AgbzQLqUD
Ramsden, C. E., Zamora, D., Majchrzak-Hong, S., Faurot, K. R., Broste, S. K., Frantz, R. P., Davis, J. M., Ringel, A., Suchindran, C. M., & Hibbeln, J. R. (2016). Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment
https://t.co/COVQczA8TM
Ouder onderzoek, maar toch.... Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/fc40UAVOM2
https://t.co/IUCTmwE0zS
@deportriggers @exfatloss @maxlugavere https://t.co/nrFoH8O0Ab Muting this because I believe you have a brain, eyes, fingers and internet.
Terveyttä ruuasta - käännä viralliset poliitttiset #ravintosuositukset päälaelleen. #ruoka #terveys #liha #politiikka https://t.co/hbw6ksBZrZ https://t.co/WHj9ClGWMR https://t.co/NtsHo0C0oM https://t.co/MmvJT7NaOw https://t.co/OnNzz49k2F https://t.co/0PLRC5HgXn
@OrthodoxWario @LLastOlympian @memeticsisyphus @hundenrufus https://t.co/DUL032zfes https://t.co/ouOiqJkP4W Or have I found the wrong ones,
@Rokdaddy_ Carbs are toxic at present doses ! Coupled with seed oils a very toxic brew! https://t.co/ZA5FycBr8X https://t.co/1U71Q8MpUZ https://t.co/nvAaH6v1wb https://t.co/MO40hyqCqD Dr. Chris Knobbe: diseases of civilization are seed oils https://t.co/hCt2Kec7SQ
HS mielipidekirj. esitetään väärää tietoa 1)prosessoituja lihatuotteita ei pidä niputtaa #liha an. 2)ihminen on koko evoluution ajan juossut lihan perässä ja pysynyt terveenä kuin pukki. #ruoka #terveys https://t.co/hbw6ksBZrZ https://t.co/WHj9ClGWMR https://t.co/Pn7nrs97yb https://t.co/MLjoLFA84m
https://t.co/b2AsM3qDxd
Uudet Ruokaviraston Pohjoismaiset ravintosuositukset NNR2023, visio 2030 johtaa parempaan suuntaan, meinaan ultraprosessoidun elintarvike teollisuuden ja lääketeollisuuden kassavirtaa. Tässä asia maalaisjärjellä kerrottuna
@GuitoShow O maior ensaio clínico randomizado sobre consumo de gordura saturada já realizado (e que foi arquivado e escondido até 2016): https://t.co/b3cLgzFwJO
RT @milaakso: Punaviherristön ideologiset ravitsemussuositukset tappavat! Syöt kasviksia mistä et saa energiaa tai ravinteita tai sitten s…
Punaviherristön ideologiset ravitsemussuositukset tappavat! Syöt kasviksia mistä et saa energiaa tai ravinteita tai sitten sokeria, mistä saat diabeteksen. Heimolainen lääkäri kertoo mielipiteensä punaviherristön väestönvähennysdieetistä. https://t.co/qoVXhRpHYK
Uudet ravitsemussuositukset. https://t.co/6fYoMUc5PV
On todella parasta, kun syö sitä mikä maistuu. Punainen maito, voi ja lihas runsaasti. On käsittämätöntä, kun nämä yleiset ravitsemus-suositukset sairastittavst ihmisiä vain enemmän ja enemmän! https://t.co/wtWDWvioL3
Uudet #ravintosuositukset eivät edistä terveyttä! sanoo tämä lääkäri ja vähän hymähtelee sille, että mihinkähän ne perustuu, ei ainakaan oikeaan tieteeseen.. https://t.co/RQ7ypt43Tz
Erittäin hyvä läpikäynti ravinto suosituksista. @AriMiettinen3 https://t.co/drg2qsmaW8
@SMarttinen https://t.co/BGbunbrHWT
299 Uudet ravitsemussuositukset eivät auta terveyttä https://t.co/id68mElqFR
RT @silja_koo: Ravitsemussuosituksista https://t.co/xeMBG6ds4T
Ravitsemussuosituksista https://t.co/xeMBG6ds4T
https://t.co/qTegA3RBvL
Iso suositus. https://t.co/DKbYPO8umW
https://t.co/qRQilDSjO6
299 Uudet ravitsemussuositukset eivät auta terveyttä https://t.co/e1v1Ii79Fh lähteestä @YouTube
299 Uudet ravitsemussuositukset eivät auta terveyttä https://t.co/sVAgLQhSKb käyttäen @YouTube
Ehdoton katselusuositus! Ari Miettinen puhuu asiaa. #ravitsemussuositukset #sokerionmyrkkyä https://t.co/IlfTPDp9Ns
@MohammedAlo @RaphaS896035 @jasongordo626 Yeah, sure, it did. https://t.co/umFy7Q3eD0
https://t.co/8qNY9hghdw
299 Uudet #ravitsemussuositukset eivät auta terveyttä #ruoka #terveys https://t.co/9vukVXxysl käyttäen @YouTube
299 Uudet ravitsemussuositukset eivät auta terveyttä https://t.co/zJeZxEa8xg käyttäen @YouTube
Oletko sinäkin sitä mieltä, että uudet ravintosuositukset eivät tule helpottamaan suomalaisten terveyttä? https://t.co/c90kDcsQ4Y https://t.co/nYCbSpSvKA
Oletko sinäkin sitä mieltä, että uudet ravintosuositukset eivät tule helpottamaan suomalaisten terveyttä? https://t.co/c90kDctnUw https://t.co/eAlHQe4Sx0
https://t.co/z3INlsf1IW
https://t.co/ey5y6ARMee
@EliskaSelinger https://t.co/c9OmS3DBxi "... replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support the hypothesis that this translates to a lower risk of death from coronary heart disease or all causes."
@toottootchoo @GrageDustin I think vegetable oils are no better than saturated fats for heart disease. You can look into the complete findings of the Minnesota heart study when it got published by Christopher Ramsden and his group at NIH. https://t.co/YZUoRAYIL2 Lard is better than vegetable oils, but
@alexandrosM https://t.co/zQw7g3GzOs Also, not a huge fan of Malcolm Gladwell but he did cover this study on an episode of Revisionist History, which I think is a good primer. For some reason I can’t directly link to it, but it was called “The basement tapes”
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
@SwipeWright This is a good study, Minnesota Coronary Experiment. https://t.co/kPwQO8a5Nb
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
@drcateshanahan @SwipeWright https://t.co/vz7lLhhaSY "The intervention group (switched from saturated fats -> seed oils) had significant reduction in serum cholesterol compared with controls (saturated fats)... There was a 22% higher risk of death for each 30 mg/dL (0.78 mmol/L) reduction in serum
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
@SwipeWright @Brian_Kennedy https://t.co/npMVhmyw6W https://t.co/OnLJ2z7hlA https://t.co/I5FYsbReY0 https://t.co/iy8ljPBnmP https://t.co/aWDN3n549t https://t.co/kK1cpBIZWv https://t.co/yDSBmojllm
@Jamesss623 @IMAO_ 1. Replacement of Animal fats with vegetable oils conferred no benefit to outcomes https://t.co/QyKw2BUVEf 2. Meta-analysis. Omega-6 vegetable oils may be a driver for CHD https://t.co/EC1KdjJmvy
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
RT @drcateshanahan: @SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement…
@SwipeWright One of my favorites was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment because the authors hid the data in the basement after it didn't work out as expected. Study title: "Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment
@deaflibertarian The proof. 27% increase in all cause mortality in only 3 years. Scientists knew this in 1971 and suppressed the results. https://t.co/H9qdOc1YYi
@BretWeinstein The corruption of the science. PUFA has always driven inflammatory and metabolic disease. https://t.co/H9qdOc1YYi
@SwipeWright https://t.co/H9qdOc1YYi
@zetalyrae A couple papers relevant to both questions: https://t.co/rWk5leASP8 https://t.co/aR6eBfyp25 (how many decades it took for them to come out sheds some light on the second).
RT @Mqsley: @GobbleGoob95380 @jeremykauffman @mechanikalk The best we have are from a time where people's base omega status was much better…
RT @Mqsley: @GobbleGoob95380 @jeremykauffman @mechanikalk The best we have are from a time where people's base omega status was much better…
@jeremykauffman https://t.co/npMVhmyw6W https://t.co/OnLJ2z7hlA https://t.co/I5FYsbReY0 I have more if you like.
@GobbleGoob95380 @jeremykauffman @mechanikalk The best we have are from a time where people's base omega status was much better - but these trials rarely ran long enough to see the effect https://t.co/pO8dKjVQar https://t.co/nrFoH8O0Ab
@CptAncapistan @jeremykauffman CCBYNC Open access Research Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) BMJ 2016; 353 doi: https://t.co/IvQHRdFzw9 (Published 12 April 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;353:i1246
RT @lguerby: @FPM_Paris 1/2 Pour donner un contexte historique deux papiers interessants sur le sujet : https://t.co/fCfRM00RJU Re-evaluati…
RT @lguerby: @FPM_Paris 1/2 Pour donner un contexte historique deux papiers interessants sur le sujet : https://t.co/fCfRM00RJU Re-evaluati…
@FPM_Paris 1/2 Pour donner un contexte historique deux papiers interessants sur le sujet : https://t.co/fCfRM00RJU Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73)
@MarcoDabizzi https://t.co/HQ9Mr1oLTm
@WALTamath @bigfatsurprise MORE UTTER
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
RT @shashiiyengar: Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evalua…
Bookmark & share widely. Animal Fat Vs Seed oil. This study is buried under a pile of other garbage studies. Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) Minnesota Coronary Experiment (MCE)
@markeatsmeat @bigfatsurprise Meanwhile PUFAs: https://t.co/e9Yn2aWgFF
https://t.co/mMaLSq8QpY
It wasnt that this study was some kind of outlier. Some meta-analyses also found no evidence that reduction in saturated fat consumption may reduce CVD incidence or mortality. Like⤵️ https://t.co/ZtJ9EssWyb https://t.co/LC4lyKWoyf https://t.co/SUiB3vOEB6 https://t.co/TH3YIPmnFf
@akuuttigeriatri @JussiKoskela8 Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) BMJ 2016; 353 doi: https://t.co/9DpjSquZZo (Published 12 April 2016)Cite this as: BMJ 2016;353:i1246
RT @bava23: Don't eat MOTOR OIL Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary…
Don't eat MOTOR OIL Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/29fPJKtWa9
@MrBigNoodle @SteakAndWeights @deportriggers @StuFrugal @MohammedAlo Not much of an explanation or mechanism… but ok, I’m going to try my best to help you out here. It took me some time to piece all of this together myself- Saturated fat does not increase risk of heart disease. 1) https://t.co/R0RfwBROuO 2) https://t.co/TXQ4GutqeZ 3)
@ZKForTre @adamwolach Here is a much more controlled trial. https://t.co/3AskqptORJ https://t.co/3LODovi49s
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/0l3fWgCAa6
RT @CrystalClear_55: @prayingmedic There's no need to ever take one. The higher your cholesterol, the LONGER YOU LIVE. https://t.co/ETRz6I…
@prayingmedic There's no need to ever take one. The higher your cholesterol, the LONGER YOU LIVE. https://t.co/ETRz6Id1wU
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) -
https://t.co/8kCB0PJflA
@zhulape @leldepelde Nekas nenotika, tā arī to hipotēzi nepierādija. Vienīgais kontrolētais pētījums pierādija, ka samazinoties holesterīnam paaugstinās mirstība. Var vēl palasīt par Izraēlas paradoksu un Franču paradoksu, kas īstenībā nav paradoksi :) https://t.co/bSeV1YP0OY
@MEATritionCom If she wonders why there is distrust of nutrition research: Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/SMaRQd5Hlg
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/29fPJKtWa9
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/29fPJKtWa9
@realBlakeOShea @exfatloss Paid? No. Don't know what their motivation is. But they ran a huge experiment to show linoleic acid was good for you, it failed. More people died from eating linoleic acid. Then they hid the results until a @NIH investigation discovered the truth. https://t.co/yAj6wlrjHw You
RT @agingdoc1: Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-…
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/2ck5vJBpqy
@whohead1 @approfre @ElieJarrougeMD Again LDL has zero causal RCT evidence of any disease. IT IS THE HIGH DOSE OF CARBOHYDRATES WHICH IS CAUSAL. 1️⃣ https://t.co/ySLQ4teXWm 2️⃣ https://t.co/8JWOrkLH1r 3️⃣ https://t.co/1U71Q8LS5r 4️⃣ https://t.co/oB2oR4MYHq 5️⃣ https://t.co/VHUc8tcDzU 6️⃣ https://t.co/fXpvHyuGjM
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) | The BMJ - https://t.co/KM2xWcyY3v @holmanm If I'm reading this right, 22% higher risk of death for each 30 mg/dL reduction in serum cholesterol
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/NNV4RtjISO
@drpablocorral That is factually incorrectly proven in the only RCT ever conducted to test this hypothesis… https://t.co/o8AUqQwaik
@goddeketal Jesus Christ, it is exactly the opposite. Omega-6 and omega-3 are anti-inflammatory. The Minnesota study is completely wrong. The replace satured fats to unsaturated fats are clearly beneficit. Big fake news, mate
@Blvck_Vallie @subpharmacist https://t.co/PHwbU7i3Fy sorry but they deceived you unsaturated fats are more poisonous than sniper
@thelowcarb_rd LDL is SCAM ! They the USDA etc all LIED for 70+years ! THEY CAN ALL POUND SAND ! 1️⃣ https://t.co/ySLQ4teXWm 2️⃣ https://t.co/aa3Amh569y 3️⃣ https://t.co/1U71Q8LS5r 4️⃣ https://t.co/VHUc8tcDzU 5️⃣ https://t.co/0pOKHsLsMW https://t.co/GnT6L92nvN
@Carnivore_Diary @MohammedAlo LDL has consistently been shown to be protective for heart disease and all cause mortality https://t.co/pUD85E3ocP Statins are a multibillion dollar business Consistent markers for atherosclerosis are triglycerides, Hba1c, C-peptides- all raised by carbohydrate intake
@drhungo https://t.co/pUD85E3ocP
@Chooi @drhungo https://t.co/pUD85E3ocP
Here is the Minnesota cholestrol study excerpt https://t.co/Q7dDhB0hNq https://t.co/SQtVWpe5RA
Here is more detail, not only did vegetable oils lower cholesterol, but also managed to increase mortality by 22%, in only 4 years !!! Plants are trying to kill you... https://t.co/mnToyntgVe
@haelysays https://t.co/ESe2jD41kU
Does this sound like a good trade-off? Replacing saturated fat with vegetable oil lowers your cholesterol. It also increases your risk of death. https://t.co/W6fi0nxSIn
@fmfclips @foundmyfitness Nonsense!? "...evidence from randomized controlled trials shows that replacement of saturated fat with linoleic acid lowers serum cholesterol but does not translate to a lower risk of death from heart disease or all causes." https://t.co/orC56PTnMd
@speers_tim @FrankZa29750722 @KingBobIIV @ChrisGPackham @Channel4 Third, should I keep going? https://t.co/QkHedBXObu
@TuckerGoodrich @biogeek63 Sharing the link in case others are curious. Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) BMJ 2016 Abstract Objective To examine the traditional diet-heart hypothesis through recovery and
@BenjaminYeezus Which part? No human RCTs? The @NIH did a meta-analysis of the human RCTs a few years back... Ramsden 2016. https://t.co/pVUxphRk2z
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment ... https://t.co/qOOTf9iOkM
@RlyAverageDave @shelly_187 @Konzepts @RichardWebste16 1️⃣ https://t.co/PMuVF3s2pA 2️⃣ https://t.co/J1wb4NwWEN 3️⃣ https://t.co/ySLQ4teXWm 4️⃣ https://t.co/1U71Q8LS5r 5️⃣ https://t.co/oB2oR4MYHq
@TarbuckSam @BHBEnjoyer @EarthlingAus Another review of RCTs, "RCT's show that replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support the hypothesis that this translates to a lower risk of death from CHD or all causes." https://t.co/5U2LBhBfCy
https://t.co/9UrgLwOq2v
RT @Babygravy9: If you want to read the study re-evaluating the Minnesota Coronary Experiment after 40 years, here it is: https://t.co/Wuq…
RT @Babygravy9: If you want to read the study re-evaluating the Minnesota Coronary Experiment after 40 years, here it is: https://t.co/Wuq…
RT @Babygravy9: If you want to read the study re-evaluating the Minnesota Coronary Experiment after 40 years, here it is: https://t.co/Wuq…
RT @Babygravy9: If you want to read the study re-evaluating the Minnesota Coronary Experiment after 40 years, here it is: https://t.co/Wuq…
If you want to read the study re-evaluating the Minnesota Coronary Experiment after 40 years, here it is: https://t.co/Wuq64dCCHK
@zayithyogurt @jason_muthomi Incorrect. For reference: DOIs: 1. 10.1038/s41598-021-01738-w 2. 10.1136/bmj.i1246 3. 10.1136/bmj.i1246 Also, your body, if it isn't in a state of systemic inflammation due to carbs, phytotoxins, and high doses of unsaturated fats, will be perfectly able to burn off excess
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) | The BMJ https://t.co/7XGWEn73Jd
RT @samarsheoran: The experiment showed that high linoleic acid diet reduced serum cholesterol but increased overall mortality by 22% for e…
RT @samarsheoran: The experiment showed that high linoleic acid diet reduced serum cholesterol but increased overall mortality by 22% for e…
The experiment showed that high linoleic acid diet reduced serum cholesterol but increased overall mortality by 22% for each 30mg/dl decrease in serum cholesterol https://t.co/VeHmU3Jk45
@BhagwaneRaunak @suhelnagar1 @mindmusclepro https://t.co/VeHmU3Jk45
@ZKForTre i agree there are more recent ones, like Ramsden et al. 2016, but it more so supports rather than contradicts what i'm claiming https://t.co/c7nLZZ9FRJ https://t.co/7lqqheDDht
@kevtharris @TheBhupiThakur On the other hand, lowering LDL does not lower mortality. The opposite is the case. https://t.co/2f2bspuYQf https://t.co/sokLtPT35J
@Carnivore_DD @tarheals31 Try 8 years ! https://t.co/E04dKILWYv ➡️ Dr. Paul Mason - "Is your cardiologist a clot? Bonus - death by seed oils' (Lecture 3 of 3) https://t.co/aa3Amh569y ➡️ https://t.co/1U71Q8LS5r ➡️ https://t.co/MO40hyq4B5 https://t.co/TVFGfqCqNs
"The MCE principal investigator (Ivan Frantz) and co-principal investigator (Ancel Keys), however, were well aware of the cholesterol raising effects of trans fat prior to initiating the MCE." https://t.co/pVUxphRRS7
@ScepticalDoctor @MoonlightQuant Observation can suggest but does not proof causality. This is a key principle in biomedical research. Btw, do you know the outcome of the Minnesota Coronary Experiment, where a large RCT disproved the diet heart hypothesis? https://t.co/o8AUqQwaik
@TuckerGoodrich More BS data ! With 70 years of dietary myths and lies my N=1 data trumps junk science ! LDL is NOT causal to any disease process! IT IS THE CARBS! With 93% of the US pop are metabolically unhealthy! https://t.co/c97yYApmCj ➡️ https://t.co/nvAaH6utGD➡️ https://t.co/1U71Q8LS5r https://t.co/q4k1x5F7LM
@WemWool @nutrition_facts 7) Ramsden CE, et al. Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73). BMJ. 2016 Apr 12;353:i1246. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1246. PMID: 27071971; PMCID: PMC4836695.
@MohammedAlo https://t.co/V2CQmVooGC https://t.co/g7c79pJKUY
https://t.co/g7c79pJKUY https://t.co/V2CQmVooGC https://t.co/XJsNApQJoo
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experime… https://t.co/JSIvUMOE36
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: @REV_Insulin_Res Even worse, the hypothesis that they would be protective has been tested repeatedly in human RCTs, and…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, f…
It's NEVER been shown in the human RCTs that were performed. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa Only harm... Run, don't walk, from dieticians. @DrEenfeldt @DietDoctor https://t.co/sU03LuukIo https://t.co/1qJB6l0PaX
@REV_Insulin_Res Even worse, the hypothesis that they would be protective has been tested repeatedly in human RCTs, and failed (showed harm, not benefit). She's an ignoramus or a shill... https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa https://t.co/PjvumoFTik
RT @TuckerGoodrich: @MohammedAlo @hormonedietdoc The meta-analysis from the @NIH refutes your point, based on human RCT data, not one mythi…
@MohammedAlo @hormonedietdoc The meta-analysis from the @NIH refutes your point, based on human RCT data, not one mythical mouse study from 1956. https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa
Randomized controlled trial shows that replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support hypothesis that this translates to lower risk of death from coronary heart disease or all causes https://t.co/f6K7uOdx60
@ToYourHealth101 @NicolaiWorm @bigfatsurprise @drdairy50 @fleroy1974 Ramsden 2016 https://t.co/oXTNXIrfwj
@FearZero4 @CarnivoreDad @skydog576 @SBakerMD 2 largest-ever NIH-funded, RCTs, concluded that sat fats had no effect on cardiovascular mortality or total mortality. A 2016 analysis shows 22% higher risk for each 30 mg/dL reduction in serum cholesterol. https://t.co/kvrLK71eEe https://t.co/UpEQUhnPX2 https://t.co/ooUoRPm8DX
@lean_minded @EratheMuse1 @ifixhearts https://t.co/n5cMUpPIEs
@FearZero4 @stopYouOut @SBakerMD “There was a 22% higher risk of death for each 30 mg/dL (0.78 mmol/L) reduction in serum cholesterol” https://t.co/n5cMUpQgu0
@FFoonts @DoctorTro https://t.co/dujwWkQBWw
@AnnChildersMD https://t.co/prqhQ4KQZz
@TyRBeal 2/2 “This finding that greater lowering of serum cholesterol was associated with a higher rather than a lower risk of death in the MCE does not provide support for the traditional diet-heart hypothesis.” https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa
@TyRBeal Dietary modif. of LDL-c is not a useful proxy for CVD outcomes. “This finding that greater lowering of serum chol. was associated with a higher rather than a lower risk of death in the MCE does not provide support for the trad. diet-heart hypothesis.” https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa
RT @shashiiyengar: @ReclaimHealth_I @FastingCoach_MS @PathreSiddhesh @aashishpabari Thanks all for joining Some studies I quoted will be t…
@ReclaimHealth_I @FastingCoach_MS @PathreSiddhesh @aashishpabari Thanks all for joining Some studies I quoted will be tweeted below @John071912 Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/j9pepPdpsb https://t.co/749SybJ3MK
RT @TuckerGoodrich: 6/5 Snapshot mentioned above https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa https://t.co/AfMGFpikYJ
RT @TuckerGoodrich: 2/ "First, lie about the human evidence (see snapshot from https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa) 1. "Surprisingly, no randomized co…
6/5 Snapshot mentioned above https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa https://t.co/AfMGFpikYJ
2/ "First, lie about the human evidence (see snapshot from https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa) 1. "Surprisingly, no randomized controlled clinical trials actually support any of these claims." Second...
RT @AsarCadyn: @mbabco @mackinprof It's just the abstract. The full paper is nowhere to be found. It's probably in someone’s drawer (or bas…
@forktown385 @mackinprof https://t.co/n80VzIKJFR
@mbabco @mackinprof It's just the abstract. The full paper is nowhere to be found. It's probably in someone’s drawer (or basement) along with all the other papers that exonerate meat and saturated fat. Here’s one that was buried for year's by the authors https://t.co/n80VzIKJFR
@drcateshanahan That’s what this RCT shows too https://t.co/dujwWkQBWw
@HopcuttDarryl The biggest human RCT showed lowering chol. was bad: "This finding that greater lowering of serum cholesterol was associated with a higher rather than a lower risk of death in the MCE does not provide support for the traditional diet-heart hypothesis." https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa https://t.co/JjpfQ9Wdr9
@ShawnBarryMDPh1 @Krzyszt02895662 @nicknorwitz The Minnesota Coronary Survey very clearly shows saturated fat is NOT linked to heart disease or mortality - >9000 institutionalized people RCT over 5 years Please read for yourself: https://t.co/dujwWkQBWw
RT @TuckerGoodrich: @Paul_DiBello @williambdamron @SeedOilDsrspctr @RealOilRspctr @drcateshanahan @Mark_Sisson @SolBrah @AlpacaAurelius Har…
@raphaels7 @garytaubes Is Willett & co. aware of this? Yes, yet they persist. That paper w/ Taubes is from 2018. This is from 2016, where Ramsden fisks Willett: https://t.co/imNe8tIAYa One finds it hard to believe Willett isn't aware of current dietary recommendations and practices... https://t.co/G4MAzh4L4j
@theproof @TheNutrivore @MikeMutzel https://t.co/z6VsGsnJNM
RT @TuckerGoodrich: @Paul_DiBello @williambdamron @SeedOilDsrspctr @RealOilRspctr @drcateshanahan @Mark_Sisson @SolBrah @AlpacaAurelius Har…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: @Paul_DiBello @williambdamron @SeedOilDsrspctr @RealOilRspctr @drcateshanahan @Mark_Sisson @SolBrah @AlpacaAurelius Har…
RT @TuckerGoodrich: @Paul_DiBello @williambdamron @SeedOilDsrspctr @RealOilRspctr @drcateshanahan @Mark_Sisson @SolBrah @AlpacaAurelius Har…
@Paul_DiBello @williambdamron @SeedOilDsrspctr @RealOilRspctr @drcateshanahan @Mark_Sisson @SolBrah @AlpacaAurelius Harvard! LOL. Here's a nice meta-analysis of RCTs... "Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73)" https://t.co/YRwTHt86lV
@Johndoe43488019 @BentKees @Wgoorman https://t.co/bhMo1Je2e1
@Addertje2 @di_jelle @CarlaPeeters3 Vervangen van dierlijke vetten door plantaardige olien leidt juist tot hogere sterfte, blijkt uit de ENIGE randomised clinical trial die ooit is uitgevoerd op dit gebied..... https://t.co/bhMo1JvDCB
Incomplete data recovery means “we are not able to determine if the effects of the high linoleic acid diet varied by smoking status, pre-existing coronary heart disease, psychiatric history, or drug use” https://t.co/c7nLZZ9FRJ how sad is that?
RT @raphaels7: https://t.co/c7nLZZ9FRJ "If he were alive today, I know my father [doctor Frantz] would have been delighted that the [Minnes…
RT @raphaels7: https://t.co/c7nLZZ9FRJ "If he were alive today, I know my father [doctor Frantz] would have been delighted that the [Minnes…
https://t.co/c7nLZZ9FRJ "If he were alive today, I know my father [doctor Frantz] would have been delighted that the [Minnesota Coronary Experiment] data he had devoted his career to making possible had been painstakingly revisited..."
@ScepticalDoctor @waseemkiani @TheNutrivore @krosenque Chris Ramsden’s recovered data from two trials In which a PUFA-containing margarine or oil was substituted for saturated fat suggest that this raises cardiovascular risk. https://t.co/ZeU9m4ujfY
@Jordan_theCoach I guess if you keep asking that means that you really are interested. I'm sure we could play volleyball with studies. Just remain open. ✌️ https://t.co/jzO1IusSCU https://t.co/82rKOWC2v5 https://t.co/XrI2TSE73R https://t.co/NMq9kLo0qY
@LincolnWDaniel @FatherlyHQ The best random control trial ever done on this topic that favored your view was the Minnesota coronary study. It was later found that the authors had withheld much of the data in order to force the conclusion they wanted. https://t.co/jhQgyG2nOd
RT @Mangan150: Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-…
RT @Mangan150: Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-…
@KickStarter60 @kevinnbass @NutritionMadeS3 Dr. Chris Knobbe: diseases of civilization are seed oils https://t.co/hCt2KebA3i ➡️ https://t.co/Gj5p60eltr ➡️ https://t.co/0VNFVNiAHF ➡️The oiling of America https://t.co/jxmkrk2pcu ➡️ https://t.co/vF1aAYiaXG ➡️ https://t.co/J1wb4NwWEN ➡️ https://t.co/qYvpMvX3Tg
8/10 Philip claims that the Minnesota Coronary Experiment and the Sydney Diet Heart Study prove that SFA doesn't increase CVD risk. The latter was a failed trial with 83% attrition. The former was likely confounded by trans-fat. https://t.co/SItnWK9kDk https://t.co/yi8gqspnGm https://t.co/UefAgTXxBJ
@DavidTestrake @carnivorologist @ScepticalDoctor https://t.co/dujwWl7EYw Avail evidence from RCT shows that replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support the hypothesis that this translates to a lower risk of death from coronary heart disease or all causes.
@MattNassief A few google searches... The Minnesota Coronary Experiment was from 1968-1973 and its subjects were nursing home elderly folks and those in mental hospitals eating their slop. Not exactly relevant... https://t.co/piVwg81eA5
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) , lower cholesterol increase your mortality. https://t.co/d3JMykU6NJ
RT @MintMurray0: @SBakerMD https://t.co/UvbQK6vsN3 ...shows that replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lo…
@SBakerMD https://t.co/UvbQK6vsN3 ...shows that replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support the hypothesis that this translates to a lower risk of death from coronary heart disease or all causes
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) Menor colesterol (LDL), mayor mortalidad.
RT @LowCarbEP: "In meta-analyses, these cholesterol lowering interventions showed no evidence of benefit on mortality from coronary heart d…
RT @LowCarbEP: "In meta-analyses, these cholesterol lowering interventions showed no evidence of benefit on mortality from coronary heart d…
RT @LowCarbEP: "In meta-analyses, these cholesterol lowering interventions showed no evidence of benefit on mortality from coronary heart d…
"In meta-analyses, these cholesterol lowering interventions showed no evidence of benefit on mortality from coronary heart disease (1.13, 0.83 to 1.54) or all cause mortality (1.07, 0.90 to 1.27)" https://t.co/bPoFD7ODtR
@SecoraPearlRem @ted_ryce @SkyZer0_ @fitat45plus It might not. I have the link anyway https://t.co/n80VzIKbQj
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) | The BMJ https://t.co/XwQjwgteeX
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/3DVDv6n4sg
Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73) https://t.co/0aSE5023kg
@FusionProgGuy @Af_donnerwetter @mosca_matthew @ceykoloji @MigraineBook @ScepticalDoctor @MacroFour @dylanarmbruste3 @The_Nutrivore @professionaldog @CarnivoreMD What Keys actually showed was that replacing SFA with n-6 PUFA is harmful. That's from Keys' own experiment. "Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-73)" https://t.co/YRwTHtp9nV
RT @Mangan150: Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-…
RT @Mangan150: Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis: analysis of recovered data from Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-…
I can find epidemiologic studies that favor a lot more SFA than PUFA and also systematic reviews and meta-analysis that show no benefit in reducing SFA. We have RCTs about that. Here are some: - https://t.co/hngn2wuUoM - https://t.co/ajvuTZmDPd - https://t.co/L69bZT8N7X https://t.co/v5GADkZnmp
Almost all of the dietary recommendations pertaining to saturated vs. unsaturated fats have relied on observational studies. One of the few instances of an RCT study was suppressed for decades because it drew a different conclusion from prevailing belief: https://t.co/7HYfIPla6P