Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions prominently highlight specific statistics from the publication, such as the fact that more than 70% of researchers have struggled to replicate others' results, suggesting a systemic issue in the scientific method. Posts employ strong language like 'crisis' and 'urgent need for change,' with phrases such as 'science is far from settled' and reflections on the detrimental effects of publishing pressure, which underscore the urgency and seriousness of the topic.
Many discussions express a general support for the concerns raised by the scientists regarding reproducibility.
There is a strong curiosity about the reproducibility crisis and its implications, as seen in numerous posts referencing the article.
Users engage deeply with the topic, often referencing specific statistics and studies related to reproducibility issues.
Most contributors perceive significant long-term effects of the publication on scientific practices and public confidence in research.
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, and more than half have failed to reproduce their own experiments." https://t.co/p3LYLQlJCH https://t.co/MixE8sJgOW
Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come ovvio. Precisamente qui: https://t.co/9ZpVFPTHwc, e si citava (era il 2017!) questo articolo di Nature: https://t.co/1AfOKmM4tj, che riporta dati ancor peggiori. https://t.co/m0wK1s5jTy
@headdock @CanadaPain @AdamGentry2021 @AjayManhapra @HowardWill5 @CContrarus @JenSawyer5 @ThomasKlineMD @hope411adcock @PlayLynny4U @TerriMe3 @vendingcomics @CRPSisaRealPain @PTSDAdvocate @TrumpWontWork @SpicyPurritos @secondchances09 @Chrissy_8675309 @Nashkitty66 @bob69hesperia @MdParangi @PondMichael @Bilked2TheBrink @KatTwisted @aander1987 @FollowingForFu2 @newhickschick @Deeenst @StephenDoheney @EmmaleeLang @TamiLCaldwell1 @Elianok10 @national_pain @kris_lovaas @andrew_massena @elizabe50286054 @Irishbrat1966 @life_is_art___ @ArizonaC50 @Pine_Mtn_Girl @JonelleElgaway @fightpaindaily @buck_shirley @prettycoco23 @Mia_Beotch @cannonarsenal @RobertC94894966 @NANNETTENERENB1 @EndPainStigma @donnelsonguy The institution is also facing a widespread replication crisis. “More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, and more than half have f
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/2zjjcD4AYA https://t.co/qylbsa6RAC
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature | #OpenScience (comprising #OpenData) is a must if we want to remedy this plague. https://t.co/lwmNfook3u
Si la vida es breve y el presupuesto escaso, ¿por qué desperdiciamos tiempo y dinero en crear ciencia basura? No lo digo yo, lo dicen gran parte de los 1576 científicos encuestados por Nature (2016) en DOI: https://t.co/TSj6TysJ4V #ResearchMisconduct #ManzanasPodridas https://t.co/Actdm6fkvL
This video explores the ongoing crisis of reproducibility in science, emphasizing how studies, even from reputable journals, can present unreliable findings. Join us as we discuss the implications of this issue for…
Small sample sizes in task-based fMRI studies lead to lower chances of producing consistent and replicable results, making it hard to confirm findings across different studies. Larger samples are essential for more…
This video discusses the ongoing issue of reproducibility in scientific research, highlighting concerns about the reliability of published studies. A collective of 1,500 scientists emphasizes the need for transparency…
This video discusses the ongoing reproducibility crisis in scientific research, particularly in neuroeconomics. A group of 1,500 scientists emphasizes the importance of transparency, better methodologies, and shared…
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature 2/2 https://t.co/qGKhy6yQkp
@adsuara (2) Baker M. Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature 2015; 533(7604): 452-4. doi: 10.1038/533452a.
@kakaduElvis @spanelx Grok: Odkaz na průzkum z časopisu **Nature** z roku 2016, který se zabývá krizí reprodukovatelnosti ve vědě, je následující: **Název článku**: „1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility“ **Autor**: Monya Baker **Publikováno**: Nature, 25. května 2016 **Odkaz**:
Baker, M. (2016). Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature, 533, 452–454. https://t.co/cwzlfN8yUD Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://t.co/Bp75Uq0cDR
On what basis do you reject it? On the basis that you find it offensive? Or that you don’t want it to be true? This sort of dogmatic head-in-the-sand declaration is actually what “damages public perceptions of science and scientists”. Deeply ironic. https://t.co/Xl0iUlzryO https://t.co/xjjP17jXir https://t.co/ZH1NgDHquj
Grok, in view of the fact that the victor rewrites history, and there is a crisis in science, and the pharmaceutical industry alters science,1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility Monya Baker Nature volume 533, pages452–454 (2016)Cite this article More than 70% of
@SabinehazanMD @joerogan 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/sHdO1s9QCW
@Butler_jinja 大阪大元助教の百日咳に関する論文7本に捏造発覚 https://t.co/QEcrfCoX18 ネイチャーの調査 1,500人の科学者が再現性の秘密を暴露 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/XKyq2Wacs2 ずさんな査読 粗悪学術誌ハゲタカジャーナル 「学術論文の闇」ハゲタカジャーナル
Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016). https://t.co/rR9elPucBw
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature https://t.co/FsJE4Dthi8
RT @thayesKHI: Paper: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature - https://t.co/pqJWLVclLJ
Paper: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature - https://t.co/pqJWLVclLJ
재현성 위기라고 들어는 봤니?? https://t.co/P4p4ytol3X https://t.co/Y7uo76T0iV https://t.co/8Oc3OmZ8LW
RT @RosanaFerrero: Las causas de la crisis de replicación son comunes a todos los científicos en todos los campos (buscar la novedad, “publ…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
RT @AforizmyFraszky: Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come…
Avevamo già letto qualcosa di similare, e pregiudizievole per un corretto dibattito, su https://t.co/hOTyIDwnED, come ovvio. Precisamente qui: https://t.co/9ZpVFPTHwc, e si citava (era il 2017!) questo articolo di Nature: https://t.co/1AfOKmM4tj, che riporta dati ancor peggiori. https://t.co/m0wK1s5jTy
@PoeBrianL @pan_accindex @kristenmag @CDCgov @HHSGov 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/YntYaShu1K
RT @StevenAveryNY: @HamHead5813 @Chris_F_Carson @CarlSmytheCells @Tetrahydropyran @MichelleZeh1968 @dirk_fasshauer @Alex_on_A14 @MaCarsonBo…
@HamHead5813 @Chris_F_Carson @CarlSmytheCells @Tetrahydropyran @MichelleZeh1968 @dirk_fasshauer @Alex_on_A14 @MaCarsonBos @ImAtSeaAgain @macgyvertang20 @dave59_craft @DocDeezWhat @ThomMohr @ViroLIEgy @1984rebooted @dan_gadd @PenOfAPisces @paramaniac9 @ThroneOfCrypto @DdkDav @zwergie1 @MirrorManStanly @ColinPEdge_2024 @provaxtexan @JimeeLiberty @JRJHealey @JefLikesfries @ScooterScience @sunshine_toes @Fornowago @LummHandy @TakethatCt @BoyScou84038220 @PChandr43659403 @hauxton @virusverit78479 @pjholloway @Charlie81207771 @frazzled_rip @SynthIge @PamelaE83716920 @JesperKitos @IMudlet @arrdeearr @DiscernHeal @SamolejJ @rw_christian @niswarth Good info! ===== Baker reported that nearly 80% of biologists cannot repeat the results of others’ experiments, and 60% cannot repeat their own experimental results Baker, Monya 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (201
@vegas_dondiego Peer review is a waste of time https://t.co/6z3Zxy7GPf >70% scientists can't reproduce peer reviewed work https://t.co/Ok8suNMQ4D Only 11% of peer reviewed research can be reproduced https://t.co/NzqAtA9xmP
@jonathanstea @darkwingdutch 'Doh! It's a scientismical study' 70% of Experiments Cannot Be Replicated, 50% of Researchers Cannot Reproduce Their Own Results https://t.co/kDt0WkVFVN
@Epyon_Zerosyste まぁ、分かります。 あとで覗いてみようかな… 顕示欲と金で誤魔化す輩がこの世の牽引役…ってか?
RT @Liquid33333: @Dr_RasuKaru はっきり言って再現性の無い論文は
@Dr_RasuKaru はっきり言って再現性の無い論文は
RT @rsdrussell: Peer review isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on! 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature https://t.co/…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @rsdrussell: Peer review isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on! 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature https://t.co/…
RT @rsdrussell: Peer review isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on! 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature https://t.co/…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
Peer review isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on! 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature https://t.co/K8NLfZpY93
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
This tells me the science os far far from settled. #Science 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature https://t.co/vl4gHT8TGX
RT @robinmonotti: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce anothe…
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: "More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, and more than half have failed to reproduce their own experiments." https://t.co/p3LYLQlJCH https://t.co/MixE8sJgOW
RT @KCTaz: @Veritatem2021 @gyneth007 @mikesamerica @Mark_A_Lunn @Robertchef77 @Anvndarnamn5 @BointonGiles @TWTThisIsNow @col_jed @Willard19…
RT @KCTaz: @Veritatem2021 @gyneth007 @mikesamerica @Mark_A_Lunn @Robertchef77 @Anvndarnamn5 @BointonGiles @TWTThisIsNow @col_jed @Willard19…
@Veritatem2021 @gyneth007 @mikesamerica @Mark_A_Lunn @Robertchef77 @Anvndarnamn5 @BointonGiles @TWTThisIsNow @col_jed @Willard1951 @borngeek @Stethereturn @TheDisproof @Callan23474387 @Climatehope2 @glinch72 @AristotleMrs @BradPKeyes @JustThi30117912 @25_cycle @Smithdsd11 @DoesThisW0rk @ammocrypta @0Sundance @3GHtweets @FD2you @Jaisans @S_D_Mannix @paulp1232 @MartinJBern @Data79504085 @ShroedingerBird @ChrisBBacon3 @EthonRaptor @B_Bolshevik100 @rosmadiwahab @Robert76907841 @EricWil06256732 @ProfMickWilson @FillmoreWhite @TommyLambertOKC @ncdave4life @RobMeekel @JohnDublin10 @NoTricksZone @RoelofBoer @DawnJT90 @ConceptualJames @HelenPluckrose @peterboghossian There is this, too, which is evident in all scientific areas. Published: 25 May 2016 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/x9NK2Fti9v 1/3
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature #TrustTheScience
RT @pash22: @ProfJoyceHarper @VPrasadMDMPH @susan_bewley @jimgthornton @hormone_doc @DrJenGunter @Liz_ORiordan @PharmRJ @janewilcock @DrDev…
@ProfJoyceHarper @VPrasadMDMPH @susan_bewley @jimgthornton @hormone_doc @DrJenGunter @Liz_ORiordan @PharmRJ @janewilcock @DrDevora @AnniceMukherjee Chk out "1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility" https://t.co/WgQxOq6g0B via @Monya_science
RT @Balontrico_Dr_J: En los estudios observacionales también se esperaría la reproducibilidad. El problema es que, en general, la investiga…
En los estudios observacionales también se esperaría la reproducibilidad. El problema es que, en general, la investigación no es reproducible. Baker M. Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature 2015; 533(7604): 452-4. doi: 10.1038/533452a. https://t.co/SksDG1A0Mm
First up is https://t.co/djglocycAT My brief takeaways about what's changed in the last 7 years. Preregistration has (somewhat) taken off. Not so much movement on publication of replication studies. Pressure to publish very much still an issue
@elmir1omerovic Ioannidis: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049 van Norden: 10.1038/d41586-017-08404-0 Baker: 10.1038/533452a
RT @bernardrentier: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature | #OpenScience (comprising #OpenData) is a must if we want to…
RT @bernardrentier: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature | #OpenScience (comprising #OpenData) is a must if we want to…
RT @bernardrentier: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature | #OpenScience (comprising #OpenData) is a must if we want to…
RT @bernardrentier: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature | #OpenScience (comprising #OpenData) is a must if we want to…
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature | #OpenScience (comprising #OpenData) is a must if we want to remedy this plague. https://t.co/lwmNfook3u
RT @bernardrentier: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature | #OpenScience (comprising #OpenData) is a must if we want to…
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature | #OpenScience (comprising #OpenData) is a must if we want to remedy this plague. https://t.co/lwmNfook3u
@ERICSORENSEN 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/ygEmIMmRn1 https://t.co/xL4tnRABEd
RT @balajis: A citation typically assumes the cited study is true. In a paper that cites 50 other papers, most of them are not being tested…
RT @agingdoc1: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/2zjjcD4AYA https://t.co/qylbsa6RAC
RT @agingdoc1: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/2zjjcD4AYA https://t.co/qylbsa6RAC
RT @agingdoc1: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/2zjjcD4AYA https://t.co/qylbsa6RAC
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/2zjjcD4AYA https://t.co/qylbsa6RAC
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature https://t.co/k4g5d3jeiT
那些公开发表了的科学研究报告结论的可信度是多少？ 据说有七成的结论都不可被其他科学家们重复；甚至有五成都不可被那些写报告的科学家自己重复。
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature https://t.co/FnHALQylGU
“Trust the Science” 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature https://t.co/IgCkpwVoxk
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature https://t.co/keICOLWw24
RT @hiruandon89: wiki再現性の危機 出典のひとつ。 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/ZUDXBpV9oo ネイチャー。 自然科学・理学の自慢は再現性の高さ。 それが…
RT @piyota0: 意外かもしれないが化学のほうが生物学よりも実験の再現性が低い・・・ 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility Survey sheds light on the ‘crisis’ rocking…
.@benimoturtle それについてはこちらをどうぞ。 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Nature https://t.co/hmStvTNbsh https://t.co/vLhqfVVzTd 「心理学再現性クライシスは、巷で騒がれている通りヤバイ」https://t.co/CJsynj4Rns にコメントしました。
To read more about the #reproducibilitycrisis, check out: Baker, M. (2016). 1,5000 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533, 452-454. https://t.co/fLRvkaad7y
@e_galv 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility https://t.co/ygEmIMnpcz https://t.co/yJB8GMGEYY
RT @agingdoc1: 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility @Monya_science (2015) https://t.co/2zjjcD4AYA
@veen_els @leondewinter
RT @RosanaFerrero: Las causas de la crisis de replicación son comunes a todos los científicos en todos los campos (buscar la novedad, “publ…
El 70% de los resultados científicos no pudieron ser reproducidos Baker M. Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature 2015; 533(7604): 452-4. doi: 10.1038/533452a https://t.co/pHZjsAg3Ly #ciencia #science reproductibilidad #crisis #nature
RT @process_x: @headdock @CanadaPain @AdamGentry2021 @AjayManhapra @HowardWill5 @CContrarus @JenSawyer5 @ThomasKlineMD @hope411adcock @Play…
RT @process_x: @headdock @CanadaPain @AdamGentry2021 @AjayManhapra @HowardWill5 @CContrarus @JenSawyer5 @ThomasKlineMD @hope411adcock @Play…
@headdock @CanadaPain @AdamGentry2021 @AjayManhapra @HowardWill5 @CContrarus @JenSawyer5 @ThomasKlineMD @hope411adcock @PlayLynny4U @TerriMe3 @vendingcomics @CRPSisaRealPain @PTSDAdvocate @TrumpWontWork @SpicyPurritos @secondchances09 @Chrissy_8675309 @Nashkitty66 @bob69hesperia @MdParangi @PondMichael @Bilked2TheBrink @KatTwisted @aander1987 @FollowingForFu2 @newhickschick @Deeenst @StephenDoheney @EmmaleeLang @TamiLCaldwell1 @Elianok10 @national_pain @kris_lovaas @andrew_massena @elizabe50286054 @Irishbrat1966 @life_is_art___ @ArizonaC50 @Pine_Mtn_Girl @JonelleElgaway @fightpaindaily @buck_shirley @prettycoco23 @Mia_Beotch @cannonarsenal @RobertC94894966 @NANNETTENERENB1 @EndPainStigma @donnelsonguy The institution is also facing a widespread replication crisis. “More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, and more than half have f
Viele Forscher*innen berichten auch, dass sie die Arbeit anderer oder auch ihre eigene Arbeit nicht schon mal nicht replizieren konnten (https://t.co/9y93viTzvd).
RT @aabrilru: Si la vida es breve y el presupuesto escaso, ¿por qué desperdiciamos tiempo y dinero en crear ciencia basura? No lo digo yo,…
RT @aabrilru: Si la vida es breve y el presupuesto escaso, ¿por qué desperdiciamos tiempo y dinero en crear ciencia basura? No lo digo yo,…
RT @aabrilru: Si la vida es breve y el presupuesto escaso, ¿por qué desperdiciamos tiempo y dinero en crear ciencia basura? No lo digo yo,…
Si la vida es breve y el presupuesto escaso, ¿por qué desperdiciamos tiempo y dinero en crear ciencia basura? No lo digo yo, lo dicen gran parte de los 1576 científicos encuestados por Nature (2016) en DOI: https://t.co/TSj6TysJ4V #ResearchMisconduct #ManzanasPodridas https://t.co/Actdm6fkvL
#RRID could end the crisis! "1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility" @nature ow.ly/M3Rw300AJep
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility http://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970
Nature: "1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: Survey sheds light on the ‘crisis’ rocking research." http://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureNews