September 2016 PMID 27602507

Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension.

Peter J Hutchinson, Angelos G Kolias, Ivan S Timofeev, Elizabeth A Corteen, Marek Czosnyka, Jake Timothy, Ian Anderson, Diederik O Bulters, Antonio Belli, C Andrew Eynon, John Wadley, A David Mendelow, Patrick M Mitchell, Mark H Wilson, Giles Critchley

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

109

Peak: 8 in May 2020

across 6 sources since Jan 2019

Extended reach

248,592

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

141

Mentions per month

Jan 2019 – Sep 2025

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter44 posts
News29 articles
Facebook21 posts
Blogs11 articles
YouTube2 videos
Reddit2 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone reflects balanced interest and engagement, with examples such as references to long-term follow-up data and ongoing journal club discussions. Words like 'good study,' 'more recent data,' and mentions of clinical implications suggest that participants view this publication as meaningful, though opinions recognize the complexity and need for further research.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the mixed outcomes of the study, with some emphasizing that the results support cautious optimism, reflecting a moderate level of support.

InterestModerate interest

The posts show consistent interest, with multiple references to journal clubs, ongoing discussions, and calls for further study, indicating engagement with the topic.

EngagementModerate engagement

Posts reference various aspects of the study, including follow-up data, long-term outcomes, and clinical implications, demonstrating active engagement with the research findings.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions highlight the importance of the study in shaping neurosurgical practices and understanding traumatic brain injury treatments, indicating a moderate impact.

Abstract in brief

This study compared the effects of decompressive craniectomy versus medical care in patients with severe traumatic brain injury and high intracranial pressure, measuring outcomes up to 6 and 12 months post-treatment.
The results showed that patients who underwent surgery had a different distribution of recovery outcomes, with fewer deaths and more cases of severe disability compared to those receiving medical care, but the overall difference was complex and varied over time.
Despite the surgical group experiencing shorter durations of high intracranial pressure, their overall recovery outcomes were mixed, indicating that the benefits of decompressive craniectomy in such cases remain uncertain and require careful consideration.

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Management of Intracranial Pressure in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

This educational video provides insights into the management of intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. It outlines a consensus algorithm developed by experts, detailing interventions…

residenciaunchbdf aulas · Oct 4, 2022 96 views

Neurosurgical Insights into Hydrocephalus and Traumatic Brain Injury Management

This week we discuss neurosurgical issues like hydrocephalus, craniectomy in traumatic brain injuries, and DVT prophylaxis, with insights from Dr. Mark Hamilton, a neurosurgeon at Calgary's Foothills Medical Centre.

Cold Steel · Nov 28, 2024 45 views

ong beng hooi

@ongbenghooi1 · X

RT @freemanwd: RESCUE ICP: Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension 1.

Sep 1, 2025 · 2 shares · 551 followers View post →

W David Freeman, MD, FNCS, FAAN

@freemanwd · X

RESCUE ICP: Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension 1.

Aug 31, 2025 · 6 likes · 2 shares · 2,447 followers View post →