@omendiz Puede falllar (diría Tusam). Igual no indicaría suplementos https://t.co/1gEvCR0J96
Calcium Intake and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2019 – Jun 2024Where it's discussed
-
Facebook45 posts
-
News20 articles
-
X / Twitter4 posts
-
Blogs3 articles
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The summaries reflect a predominance of supportive comments, such as dismissing concerns about calcium below 2000 mg/day and referencing later studies that dispute earlier fears, with some posts sharing the publication details. The tone is mainly reassuring and focuses on clarifying the safety of calcium intake within established limits, which explains the positive agreement and moderate engagement levels.
Most discussions support the findings of the publication, emphasizing that calcium intake below 2000 mg/day is not a concern and that later studies dispute earlier worries about calcium increasing cardiovascular risk.
The discussions show moderate interest, mainly focusing on confirming the safety of calcium intake rather than exploring broader implications.
Participants reference the publication and related studies, indicating some level of engagement, though mostly in the form of brief affirmations or clarifications, rather than deep analysis.
The shared comments suggest the publication adds reassurance to existing dietary guidelines, although they do not indicate a major paradigm shift or widespread debate, resulting in a moderate impact score.
Abstract in brief
- This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between calcium intake and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, analyzing evidence from various studies conducted up to 2016, and found no significant link between calcium intake within recommended levels and increased CVD risk in healthy adults.
- The review included randomized trials and observational studies, which generally showed low to moderate bias, and concluded that calcium supplements or dietary intake did not significantly impact CVD events or mortality, although data on very high calcium intake remains limited.
- Overall, the findings suggest that consuming calcium within established upper limits (2000-2500 mg/day) is not associated with increased cardiovascular risk, despite some inconsistent evidence regarding stroke and very high intake levels.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyRT @EilynGabriela1: Calcium Intake and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. - PubMed - NCBI https:/…
@DrTaksali @MichalLaurent11 @CaseyHumbyrd No concern for calcium less than 2000 mg/day. These concerns were disputed in later studies - some examples below - and also in all bone health practice guidelines. https://t.co/hPBSlrLZoO https://t.co/20JDIepzKT
Calcium Intake and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/26F4T66HBS
All mentions
Understanding Calcium Labels and Supplement Options for Bone Health
This video explains how to understand calcium labels, daily requirements, and evaluates the pros and cons of various calcium supplements to help you choose the right type and amount.
Calcium Intake and Heart Health: Myths and Facts Explored
This video clarifies concerns about calcium consumption from food and supplements, its role in cardiovascular health, and how to safely incorporate calcium-rich foods into your diet. Learn about recent studies and risk…
@omendiz Puede falllar (diría Tusam). Igual no indicaría suplementos https://t.co/1gEvCR0J96
@DrTaksali @MichalLaurent11 @CaseyHumbyrd No concern for calcium less than 2000 mg/day. These concerns were disputed in later studies - some examples below - and also in all bone health practice guidelines. https://t.co/hPBSlrLZoO https://t.co/20JDIepzKT
RT @EilynGabriela1: Calcium Intake and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. - PubMed - NCBI https:/…
Calcium Intake and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/26F4T66HBS
IM
S
JS
EB