Ebola deaths with no treatment (no remdesivir) were 88%, 60% & 81% in the 1976 & 95 epidemics & “has tended to remain at a similarly high level.” (see p. 393). Thus, remdesivir with a death rate of 53.1% means it actually REDUCES Ebola death by ~7-35%. https://t.co/Q97vgYwaPw
The Pathogenesis of Ebola Virus Disease.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Mar 2018 – Nov 2023Where it's discussed
-
News5 articles
-
X / Twitter2 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions highlight varied perspectives on remdesivir's effectiveness, with some referencing historical death rates (e.g., 'Ebola deaths with no treatment were 88%, 60%, & 81%') and analyzing the relative reduction in mortality, which demonstrates a moderate level of analytical engagement and concern over treatment efficacy in the context of the referenced publication.
Most discussions tend to support the idea that treatments like remdesivir have measurable impacts on Ebola outcomes and challenge some claims about their efficacy.
Participants show moderate interest, referencing specific statistics and debates about treatment efficacy, indicating they care about the subject's significance.
Comments delve into details like death rates and the interpretation of study results, reflecting a reasonable depth of engagement.
The discussions suggest the article influences perspectives on Ebola treatment, with some expressions implying a shift or reinforcement of opinions about the significance of research findings.
Abstract in brief
- Ebolaviruses have caused severe hemorrhagic fever outbreaks in Africa for nearly 50 years, with the 2013-2015 West African epidemic being the most significant in terms of scale and impact.
- This epidemic provided valuable insights into the virus's behavior, symptoms, and potential treatments, highlighting the importance of supportive care for recovery.
- Future challenges include improving early epidemic control, enhancing patient care in resource-limited areas, and continuing the development and implementation of effective vaccines.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@VigilantFox No- remdesivir is expensive & useless post viral rep., but this is clearly false destroying credibility. https://t.co/XzYb6CIt69 https://t.co/duh9eqySku https://t.co/bah3sOuff4 https://t.co/NCF5Pr4h1I @DrDMartinWorld @drpaulmarik1 @PierreKory @LTCTheresaLong @DocPeteChambers https://t.co/5CPEkzegHW
All mentions
Understanding Ebola Virus and Its Global Impact
This video provides an accurate overview of Ebola virus, clarifying misconceptions and highlighting its severity, virus behavior, symptoms, and the importance of supportive care and vaccine development based on recent…
Phylogenetic and Structural Analysis of Ebola Virus VP40 Protein
This video discusses the phylogenetic analysis and structural prediction of Ebola virus VP40 based on bioinformatics approaches, highlighting implications for understanding virus behavior and potential treatments.
@VigilantFox No- remdesivir is expensive & useless post viral rep., but this is clearly false destroying credibility. https://t.co/XzYb6CIt69 https://t.co/duh9eqySku https://t.co/bah3sOuff4 https://t.co/NCF5Pr4h1I @DrDMartinWorld @drpaulmarik1 @PierreKory @LTCTheresaLong @DocPeteChambers https://t.co/5CPEkzegHW
Ebola deaths with no treatment (no remdesivir) were 88%, 60% & 81% in the 1976 & 95 epidemics & “has tended to remain at a similarly high level.” (see p. 393). Thus, remdesivir with a death rate of 53.1% means it actually REDUCES Ebola death by ~7-35%. https://t.co/Q97vgYwaPw
BR
B