体脂肪率減少においてケトジェニックダイエットが有効であることを示そうとした摂食実験は失敗に終わった。 https://t.co/AA2AcUcMze https://t.co/CZ3yq37UAo https://t.co/U2scoCzu8n
A review of the carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
May 2017 – Oct 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter51 posts
-
Facebook48 posts
-
News15 articles
-
YouTube7 videos
-
Blogs5 articles
AI synopsis
What people are saying
These social discussions show a clear consensus that the carbohydrate-insulin model is scientifically falsified, with participants using phrases like 'disproven,' 'time to move on,' and referencing controlled studies to support their points. The tone is assertive and evidence-focused, emphasizing the importance of current research over outdated theories, demonstrating high engagement and impact in informing public perceptions about obesity and diet models.
Most discussions agree that the carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity has been conclusively disproven based on recent scientific evidence.
The discussions reflect a high level of interest, referencing specific studies, scientific concepts, and debates around dietary approaches.
Participants actively reference research, critique hypotheses, and cite scientific sources, indicating deep engagement.
The collective tone suggests that these discussions are shaping current understanding, steering perceptions away from outdated models and toward evidence-based perspectives.
Abstract in brief
- The carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity suggests that high-carb diets cause increased insulin secretion, which promotes fat storage and decreases fat oxidation, leading to hunger, reduced metabolism, and ultimately weight gain.
- Recent controlled studies have tested key predictions of this model but failed to find support, indicating that the model may be too simplistic and not fully accurate in explaining obesity.
- Overall, the review discusses the current understanding of the model and highlights the importance of experimental evidence in evaluating obesity theories.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskySome useful reading for the low carb indoctrinated... https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR https://t.co/AfwFSgEED0
@tf8560 300 kcal of prot & veg is more thermic (greater energy out), more satiating (less energy in), and more preservative of muscle mass. Insulin is a bystander, not a driver. https://t.co/wOi7uWqIk8
Stiżu mi u inboxe u valovima večeras nove objave gospodina NB, pošto znate da sam blokiran
This is good de-programming for the low carb indoctrinated. https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR
All mentions
Fruit and Obesity: Exploring the Paradoxical Effects on Weight Management
Obesity is rapidly increasing worldwide despite efforts to prevent it, prompting interest in dietary changes, particularly fruit consumption, as a potential solution. Most fruits have antiobesity properties and can aid…
Carbohydrates and Fat Loss: Scientific Evidence Explained
Restricting dietary carbohydrates in obesity leads to more fat loss than reducing fat intake, with sustained increases in fat oxidation observed during the study. This 6-day analysis highlights the effectiveness of…
Evaluating the Long-Term Effects and Safety of the Ketogenic Diet
The ketogenic diet (KD) has gained popularity for short-term weight loss. This review discusses its potential metabolic, hormonal, and cardiovascular benefits and risks associated with long-term use, highlighting the…
Debunking the Carbohydrate-Insulin Model of Obesity
The carbohydrate-insulin model suggests high-carb diets increase insulin, promote fat storage, and lead to weight gain. Recent studies question this theory, highlighting the need for more evidence to fully understand…
Reevaluating Obesity Causes: Energy Balance vs Carbohydrate-Insulin Model
This video questions the traditional view that high energy intake is the main cause of obesity, presenting an alternative model that links processed carbs to hormonal responses and fat storage, emphasizing the need to…
Debunking Keto Diet Myths and Clarifying Scientific Evidence
This video addresses misconceptions about the keto diet and reviews scientific studies related to dietary protein for athletes, emphasizing optimal intake for muscle growth and performance, tailored to training focus…
Fructose-Induced Inflammation and Visceral Fat Development Mechanisms
Eating excess fructose causes cell inflammation and increases cortisol, promoting fat storage around organs and contributing to metabolic issues like fatty liver, through a unique mechanism separate from calorie balance…
Exploring Quantum Entanglement: A Scientific Overview
This video delves into the fascinating world of quantum entanglement. We examine its principles, implications in quantum physics, and its transformative potential in information technology and communication.
@REV_Insulin_Res @1atRPE9 @realgous @BioLayne A review of the carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity. Hall KD. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018. PMID: 29091077 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.11.010
@LionJudah777 @realDaveFeldman @bryan_johnson It's not hard at all as the science is crystal clear. Sugar bad, sweet potato good. The carbohydrated insulin hypothesis was disproven in a metabolic ward study, ironically funded by a billionaire who was trying to prove carbs are bad. https://t.co/sgACZwbzPH
@ZoeyFeldman @ZKForTre Hah, I knew it, you’re off your rocker. The carb insulin model has been falsified. It’s time to move on. I’m glad your diet works for you, but for the general population there’s no evidence it’s more effective than many other diets. Enjoy your delusions. https://t.co/KNLsYCpX7F
@bakhsh_reda Wrong. The idea that insulin lowering is key to fat loss has been disproven. https://t.co/mwkMroUotf GLP-1 agonists like Ozembic cause weight loss even though they raise insulin. Why? Fewer calories. Please, it's 2024. Time to leave low-carb dogma behind.
@pwdebek Lustig potrafi kompletnie przekręcić wyniki badań o których mówi: https://t.co/2mCJwlSLGf IMO nie jest to ktoś jakkolwiek wiarygodny, a jego tezy zostały eksperymentalnie obalone: https://t.co/SVXHPM8fpJ
@Mindzatwork @ScepticalDoctor I don't think many experts believe in the CIM anymore. It's had too many blows in the scientific literature. https://t.co/L7zCxJ4zr7
@RobertLustigMD @garyruskin @AlikaMD @billmaher @M_Heffernan @adriandix @JacobGersen @DoctorChrisVT @NEJM @SmithDanaG .@KevinH_PhD & Dr Bergman do #BigTobacco in calling #CIM “controversial” & misconstruing it as “diets high in carbohydrates”. Core to CIM is principle the CARBS are “LOW-GLYCEMIC”(quoting
@AimarNils @Coolbreez016 Insulinhypitesen er totalt ubrukelig og ikke støttet av vitenskapen. Når diabetes type 2-pasienter får vektnedgang og forbedrer helseparametre på høykarbo-diett, bør det være grunn til å tenke at lavkarbo ikke er noe magisk i seg selv, men èn strategi? https://t.co/epf0v3Ut1e
@robertlufkinmd Completely untrue. https://t.co/pasUYukPO8
@SevereJury8 @robertlufkinmd @davidludwigmd https://t.co/0DIvXyJBno https://t.co/BW8sOUKnKp Some actual scientists (not youtubers and industry funded journalists) have debunked it
@radekuchytil1 @sdzhl @BajajaVasek Inzulin není sám zodpovědný za ukládání tuků, je v tom více faktorů, např. i hormon ASP, ale hlavně dlouhodobý kalorický surplus. Posílám k tomu nějaké studie, kdybyste se při neděli nudil. https://t.co/6EeVbthHn8 https://t.co/2CEttkiFI5 https://t.co/elHRLef9N7
RT @AriesTerron:
RT @AriesTerron:
RT @AriesTerron:
RT @AriesTerron:
Gran momento para recordar que el azúcar NO es malo per se - y que la causa de la obesidad es comer mucho, de cualquier cosa, y NO de azúcar específicamente: https://t.co/dA14RIpK2j https://t.co/sK0TBf1fC9 https://t.co/lNULlnjs9f
@Donaldlurho @EdLatimore How about you read some actual research instead of whatever keto blog Start with this one: https://t.co/mwkMroUotf https://t.co/Wj6fEQG52m
@ZeeMagistra @EdLatimore @SShideler Read this instead https://t.co/mwkMroUotf https://t.co/TJYkWweOoM
Stiżu mi u inboxe u valovima večeras nove objave gospodina NB, pošto znate da sam blokiran
RT @EscapeLow: Some useful reading for the low carb indoctrinated... https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR https://t.co/AfwFSgEED0
For example: https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR By @KevinH_PhD https://t.co/UA86CE2Zmd
RT @EscapeLow: Some useful reading for the low carb indoctrinated... https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR https://t.co/AfwFSgEED0
@InAStrangeLand @EricaHauver @BenBikmanPhD https://t.co/tVU7Rah5Yg
Some useful reading for the low carb indoctrinated... https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR https://t.co/AfwFSgEED0
@pjungar @KenDBerryMD @The_Nutrivore @KevinH_PhD @whsource Yeah, nah, not incorrect. It's only the low-carbers who ignore well-controlled studies which disprove the carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity. You need to update your views based on the strongest studies. https://t.co/L7zCxJlCt7 https://t.co/Dpi4fSLNPB https://t.co/mBTeplcNOt
@fastreps @DrNadolsky The context is the Carbohydrate-Insulin Model of obesity. https://t.co/yGZLNKM6NS
RT @ToshiyukiHorie: 体脂肪率減少においてケトジェニックダイエットが有効であることを示そうとした摂食実験は失敗に終わった。 https://t.co/AA2AcUcMze https://t.co/CZ3yq37UAo
RT @ToshiyukiHorie: 体脂肪率減少においてケトジェニックダイエットが有効であることを示そうとした摂食実験は失敗に終わった。 https://t.co/AA2AcUcMze https://t.co/CZ3yq37UAo
RT @ToshiyukiHorie: 体脂肪率減少においてケトジェニックダイエットが有効であることを示そうとした摂食実験は失敗に終わった。 https://t.co/AA2AcUcMze https://t.co/CZ3yq37UAo
RT @ToshiyukiHorie: 体脂肪率減少においてケトジェニックダイエットが有効であることを示そうとした摂食実験は失敗に終わった。 https://t.co/AA2AcUcMze https://t.co/CZ3yq37UAo
RT @ToshiyukiHorie: 体脂肪率減少においてケトジェニックダイエットが有効であることを示そうとした摂食実験は失敗に終わった。 https://t.co/AA2AcUcMze https://t.co/CZ3yq37UAo https://t.co/U2scoCz…
RT @ToshiyukiHorie: 体脂肪率減少においてケトジェニックダイエットが有効であることを示そうとした摂食実験は失敗に終わった。 https://t.co/AA2AcUcMze https://t.co/CZ3yq37UAo https://t.co/U2scoCz…
体脂肪率減少においてケトジェニックダイエットが有効であることを示そうとした摂食実験は失敗に終わった。 https://t.co/AA2AcUcMze https://t.co/CZ3yq37UAo https://t.co/U2scoCzu8n
@mrmarkdolan No https://t.co/nEpCM6envR
RT @Gonzalez_JT: Elegant and informative debate from @KevinH_PhD and @davidludwigmd #LCHF #nutrition #diet #obesity https://t.co/Hh9bhlTkDH
RT @TheAlanAragon: @tf8560 300 kcal of prot & veg is more thermic (greater energy out), more satiating (less energy in), and more preservat…
@Saltydo65921796 @TrevorTrtn @BiggestComeback https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR
RT @TheAlanAragon: @tf8560 300 kcal of prot & veg is more thermic (greater energy out), more satiating (less energy in), and more preservat…
RT @TheAlanAragon: @tf8560 300 kcal of prot & veg is more thermic (greater energy out), more satiating (less energy in), and more preservat…
@tf8560 300 kcal of prot & veg is more thermic (greater energy out), more satiating (less energy in), and more preservative of muscle mass. Insulin is a bystander, not a driver. https://t.co/wOi7uWqIk8
@RobertLustigMD @drjasonfung The carbohydrate-insulin model, does it need to be revised? https://t.co/KcrF9LITTj @zoeharcombe Comments? #fatloss #diabetes #insulin #obesity
RT @EscapeLow: This is good de-programming for the low carb indoctrinated. https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR
@Drewman23676282 @practicalbob The research points solidly to total calories and not the glycaemic/ insulinogenic fx of the food per se. Were this not the case we would not have many examples of lean, healthy, high carb-eating people. We do. https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR
@chris37811122 @spion @bigfatsurprise @JoseAntonioPhD Read this great paper if you have the time: https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR I thought like you once.
This is good de-programming for the low carb indoctrinated. https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR
@IdanOnTweeter And this review... https://t.co/eWcqIomyMR
@ChandalScience @PucholJorge Es una hipótesis falsa el modelo carbohidratos-insulina como explicación a la obesidad y las enfermedades metabólicas. https://t.co/1Yq55n5oHj
@PucholJorge https://t.co/1Yq55n5oHj
@shivadas29 @Anurag817 @BioLayne @shivadas29 - or we could look at body comp outcomes in multiple studies equating prot & kcal, and see that you're missing the forest for the trees while incorrectly presuming the direction of causality: https://t.co/2Eszyho8AY More discussion here: https://t.co/wOi7uWqIk8
@LeskiPiotr Trzymaj jeszcze dwa linki, może cie to zainteresować. https://t.co/d6tEY3Vv7M https://t.co/oORyHYCfzm
AR