February 2017 PMID 28176333

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

Hong Jiang, Xu Qian, Guillermo Carroli, Paul Garner

Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 13 in Aug 2024

across 5 sources since Feb 2017

Extended reach

198,551

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

170

Mentions per month

Feb 2017 – Oct 2025

Where it's discussed

News34 articles
X / Twitter33 posts
Facebook9 posts
TikTok9 posts
YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The group discusses the scientific evidence showing that routine episiotomy is not justified and can cause unnecessary trauma, with comments emphasizing that many doctors lack necessary training. The tone varies from supportive to questioning, and examples referencing research, such as 'episiotomy causes unnecessary pain and trauma,' demonstrate substantial engagement and concern over practice standards, indicating a recognition of the potential impact on clinical and patient outcomes.

AgreementModerate agreement

The majority of discussions reflect support for the evidence against routine episiotomy, emphasizing scientific findings that favor selective use.

InterestHigh interest

Posts demonstrate high interest by referencing scientific evidence, clinical implications, and debates about practice standards.

EngagementModerate engagement

Participants engage with detailed arguments, citing studies, sharing personal opinions, and questioning practices, indicating thoughtful involvement.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions could influence clinical awareness and practice changes by highlighting the importance of evidence-based decision-making in childbirth.

Abstract in brief

This review compares the effects of selective versus routine episiotomy during vaginal births on mothers and babies, based on 12 randomized controlled trials involving over 6,000 women.
It finds that selective episiotomy, used only when needed, aims to reduce unnecessary surgical cuts and trauma, while routine episiotomy is performed in all cases regardless of necessity.
The evidence, evaluated through rigorous analysis, helps inform best practices in childbirth management, considering factors like parity and birth type.]

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Experiences of Extreme Premature Birth and Humanized Twin Delivery

In this episode, Mary shares her experience of delivering a twin after extreme premature birth at 28 weeks, facing obstetric violence and a 45-day neonatal ICU stay. She discusses the importance of emotional maturity…

42 semanas podcast · Sep 2, 2021 150 views

Episiotomy Practices: Evidence, History, and Modern Approaches

For the last 60 to 80 years, vaginal incisions to assist childbirth have been common, with growing debate on the necessity of routine use. This video explores the history, evidence, and current best practices in…

The Birth Link · Sep 9, 2024 20 views

ACS

@C_S_Andre · X

@woldpt @GoncaloAguiar É. Porque diz a evidência que, ou não rasga, ou até rasga na mesma. https://t.co/G5hxCrG3pw

Apr 12, 2025 · 2 likes · 190 followers View post →

ACS

@C_S_Andre · X

@_TeresaPires @GoncaloAguiar Quem disse que é uma escolha entre uma e outra? A evidência científica não foi. https://t.co/G5hxCrG3pw

Apr 12, 2025 · 190 followers View post →

ACS

@C_S_Andre · X

@VitorFerreira @GoncaloAguiar https://t.co/G5hxCrG3pw Há quem saiba.

Apr 12, 2025 · 190 followers View post →

ACS

@C_S_Andre · X

@Xpto78667579 @GoncaloAguiar E se vais anexar imagens sem contexto, anexa que o nível mais alto de evidência científica não preconiza a episiotomia como rotina ou sequer preventiva de lacerações de grau alto. https://t.co/G5hxCrG3pw

Apr 12, 2025 · 1 like · 190 followers View post →