Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Discussions highlight the critical role of behavior in understanding neural mechanisms, with references to Krakauer et al.'s influential paper and comments stressing that neuroscience should adopt a more holistic and behavior-centric perspective. The tone and word choices, such as 'game changer' and 'correcting a bias,' underscore a collective shift toward valuing behavioral context in scientific inquiry.
Most discussions strongly support the article's argument that neuroscience needs to prioritize behavior to avoid reductionism.
The conversations demonstrate high interest, with many references to foundational papers and broad consensus on the importance of behavior in neural studies.
Posts analyze methodological details, emphasize philosophical underpinnings, and cite specific examples, reflecting deep engagement.
The widespread sharing of the article and its citations indicate a significant influence on ongoing scientific debates and approaches.
Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a reminder that you can't escape philosophy
Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ" "埋め草用語［…］は，回路と行動の間のマッピングのための明示的な概念枠組みがないことを示す" https://t.co/Z1UYNoWFr0
اگر علاقه مندید در مورد محدودیت های نگرش تقلیل گرایانه و اهمیت مطالعۀ رفتار (به عنوان یک سطح از سیستم) در نوروساینس بیشتر بدونید، مقالۀ زیر رو مطالعه کنید. https://t.co/7yB9MZWHc3
What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neuroscience" Great paper by Krakauer and Poeppel: Neuroscience needs behavior: Correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron 93, 2016. https://t.co/dBnQOr4q6g
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias by @blamlab, Ghazanfar, Gomez-Marin, Maclver, and @davidpoeppel
@SergeAhmed @yael_niv Related to this, one of a series of slides I often use. Quote at bottom from Krakauer et al., Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias, Neuron, 2017. https://t.co/htr8mam3ET
We explore why we have a brain, how it develops, and its essential functions. The video also discusses misconceptions, neural connectivity, and the importance of behavior in understanding brain activity for a…
Join Dr. John Krakauer as he discusses innovative approaches in neuroscience that challenge traditional methods, emphasizing the importance of integrating behavior analysis with neural research to better understand…
@rtvrn2svbvrb @SashaGusevPosts Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/a98oMKKoJL
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28182904/
RT @BrandonLStone: Movement → Skill → Behavior We often isolate skill and work outward toward movement & behavior. But this can limit our…
RT @BrandonLStone: Movement → Skill → Behavior We often isolate skill and work outward toward movement & behavior. But this can limit our…
Movement → Skill → Behavior We often isolate skill and work outward toward movement & behavior. But this can limit our ability to grasp the fundamental principles of movement—how they shape skill and, together, form behavior. Fig: https://t.co/JBbSUO5BX5 https://t.co/AIltjOxHH1
@patrickmineault Either https://t.co/iZH2P6Cgy4 by Krakauer or Love’s https://t.co/ulYcZeaXbB on the top of my head. Curious about what others share! Glad to see there’s still love for Marr. The way I sometimes explain it: Imperative / problem Organisation of dynamics and structure Physics.
@DoctorZen @neuroecology @yael_niv Ref above, https://t.co/Q3qpqdEjzg And Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias; 2017; Krakauer JW, Ghazanfar AA, Gomez-Marin A, MacIver MA, Poeppel D. Neuron 93:480-490. https://t.co/3pd3H1NG7r 2/END
18) Krakauer et al. (2017). Data scientific methodological "habits" in neuroscience tend to overshadow some very important aspects of the subject matter at hand, behaviour and environment. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28182904/
Sure. When neural circuits are used to explain sound localization (& other behaviors), when network connectivity explains pathological outcomes, & when phobias (eg. arachnophobia) are explained/addressed w exposure variables (in cognitive behavior therapy). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28182904/
RT @encenatur: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/EDSi7ch62P
RT @encenatur: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/EDSi7ch62P
RT @encenatur: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/EDSi7ch62P
RT @encenatur: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/EDSi7ch62P
RT @encenatur: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/EDSi7ch62P
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/EDSi7ch62P
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/8x6KlKfH58
RT @Nima_CNS: اگر علاقه مندید در مورد محدودیت های نگرش تقلیل گرایانه و اهمیت مطالعۀ رفتار (به عنوان یک سطح از سیستم) در نوروساینس بیشتر بدو…
اگر علاقه مندید در مورد محدودیت های نگرش تقلیل گرایانه و اهمیت مطالعۀ رفتار (به عنوان یک سطح از سیستم) در نوروساینس بیشتر بدونید، مقالۀ زیر رو مطالعه کنید. https://t.co/7yB9MZWHc3
@mlflumic https://t.co/oi1OHxKs8q
@elvandy1515 We certainly need to be aware of the ecological validity but it does not imply that the reductionism approach is less valuable. https://t.co/Qs5PPvzLW5
Previous discussions have stated that it is necessary to conduct an independent and detailed study of the behavior before characterizing the neural basis of behavior. Such as in Krakauer et al., 2017. 12/
@EikoFried Reminds me of this piece. https://t.co/VQ48NQ47eK
RT @alephlove: @DrWinarick Funny :) https://t.co/VQ48NQ47eK
@DrWinarick Funny :) https://t.co/VQ48NQ47eK
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/1q5Je9OOFB
RT @dp_moriarity: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias by @blamlab, Ghazanfar, Gomez-Marin, Maclver, and @davidpoepp…
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias by @blamlab, Ghazanfar, Gomez-Marin, Maclver, and @davidpoeppel
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias by @blamlab, Ghazanfar, Gomez-Marin, Maclver, and @davidpoeppel
@jsauce7 @StearnsLab John Krakauer did a very provocative piece in Neuron a few years back which ruffled, quite rightly, a few feathers. https://t.co/wGRMLHHAfs
Though seemingly scandalous, it's in line with what others have recently argued re. strengthening the links between neuroscience and behavior (e.g. @blamlab 's take https://t.co/8JfSDeOfWu) 5
@TonyZador @criticalneuro @gershbrain Agree, but neuroscience has its own challenges: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" https://t.co/UCQzohF3ES "The Life of Behavior" https://t.co/6SHA2KrQMM "A clash of umwelts: Anthropomorphism in behavioral neuroscience" https://t.co/k9NOXSVb0R
Just Read: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias I love the argument the author makes about how we are uncomfortable with the incompleteness in our understanding of behavior. What does it really mean to understand a behavior? Link: https://t.co/qcxEeHblSC
Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias by @blamlab, @LifeofBehavior, @davidpoeppel + others 4/n https://t.co/5cubFkbnQy https://t.co/Yg3PzwvWSl
RT @CarlosEAlvare17: This was addressed nicely for neuroscience (cited >500 times, so far 110 times in 2020): Neuroscience Needs Behavior:…
RT @BMtHart: @StePalminteri Quite the contrary: brain without behavior is bullshit. https://t.co/olRVfwKnZF @blamlab
@StePalminteri Quite the contrary: brain without behavior is bullshit. https://t.co/olRVfwKnZF @blamlab
@StePalminteri It is amazing that in such a great institute as yours, a program manager (!) has such a low level of understanding of the brain/behavior relation. Another good paper showing how one can understand behavior mechanistically without looking in the brain is https://t.co/NqcO6LOluj
17. I am wondering if the idea that brains tell time is not an archetypical form of confusion between Marr’s implementation and algorithmic levels. Would love to hear @blamlab about that based on https://t.co/5IdUWVCSb6
@blamlab John Krakauer et al. (2017) "...there is no escape from philosophy. Every scientist takes a philosophical position, either tacitly or explicitly, whenever they state that a result is 'important', 'fundamental,' or 'interesting'...." https://t.co/skvupLgpw6
The field of neuroscience needs to focus on a behavior-centric view of studying neural circuitry in order to gain a holistic understanding of the brain. A brain in a vat's a tad less cool. __ https://t.co/i3DQGmy8bm https://t.co/M1G8JSd7Wk
@jaime_faure Creo que están en ello. A veces me parece importante diferenciar la neurociencia cognitiva, de la neuropsicología (que sería cognitiva por definición). La NPS si tiene en cuenta la conducta o comportamiento y la neurociencia a veces la olvida https://t.co/Ma86pD6EB0
@gialdegheri @yael_niv Yup! I really liked this paper. https://t.co/GNCq9GMvr5
RT @cjrichier: @awaisaftab Not about explicitly about psychopathology per se, but this is one my favorite recent theory papers in neuroscie…
@awaisaftab Not about explicitly about psychopathology per se, but this is one my favorite recent theory papers in neuroscience: https://t.co/VIB2XCGJn5
RT @SustainHistory: #Neuroscience Needs #Behavior: Correcting a #Reductionist #Bias https://t.co/TLfhylMxph
#Neuroscience Needs #Behavior: Correcting a #Reductionist #Bias https://t.co/TLfhylMxph
#Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias: Neuron https://t.co/SjK4KzfYrt
"Understanding something is not the same as just describing it or knowing how to intervene to change it.", Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias. #MachineLearning https://t.co/JVGx5FHqyi https://t.co/156j5b7BqX
RT @PeppeGanga: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/iE0KIgBawR
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/iE0KIgBawR
@personalitygeni @_fernando_rosas @eboychile Also the original comment I made was half-joking since there are still Skinnerians out there, and in some ways the cognitive revolution did not live up to its promise. Papers like this may represent a much-needed dialectical synthesis. https://t.co/GNCq9GMvr5
18) Krakauer et al. (2017). Data scientific methodological "habits" in neuroscience tend to overshadow some very important aspects of the subject matter at hand, behaviour and environment. https://t.co/asvTtvvbWv
@parsamtwt @Vivamous_mori https://t.co/UV4RvBK3JH اینو اگه ندیدی یه نکاه بنداز، اون سه تا مرحلهی مار رو بجور. خیلیا میگن اصن شما تو آزمایشگاه هرکار کنی تهش به درد سگ نمیخوره چون «برا فهمیدن اینکه پرنده چجوری پرواز میکنه دارین پر رو زیر میکروسکوپ چک میکنین» ما اونجوری نیستیم دیگه ولی از اونا میخوای تو =))
RT @shnakazawa: An important perspective to ask "how does the brain generate behavior" or "what is a mechanism for the behavior." | Neurosc…
An important perspective to ask "how does the brain generate behavior" or "what is a mechanism for the behavior." | Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/xqBBR0zYVF
RT @TerryERobinson1: @SergeAhmed @yael_niv Related to this, one of a series of slides I often use. Quote at bottom from Krakauer et al., Ne…
RT @TerryERobinson1: @SergeAhmed @yael_niv Related to this, one of a series of slides I often use. Quote at bottom from Krakauer et al., Ne…
@SergeAhmed @yael_niv Related to this, one of a series of slides I often use. Quote at bottom from Krakauer et al., Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias, Neuron, 2017. https://t.co/htr8mam3ET
RT @CarlosEAlvare17: This was addressed nicely for neuroscience (cited >500 times, so far 110 times in 2020): Neuroscience Needs Behavior:…
@rhurtubia https://t.co/EEfE9BFNQ2
@blamlab @criticalneuro @JCSkewesDK @bradpwyble @shengokai @IrisVanRooij @neuro_data @tyrell_turing @BernhardHommel @FelixHill84 @santoroAI Incidentally, cites @blamlab paper https://t.co/HA3i9C8vPY . So let's not dismiss the sensorimotorists because they deprioritize representation. Instead, we should acknowledge they were right all this time in their emphasis on process.
@bradpwyble @IceVisLab @neuromatch @TimKietzmann Classic plug time: Neuroscience needs behavior https://t.co/VgR9DUWlsZ
This was addressed nicely (cited >500 times, so far 110 times in 2020): Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias; 2017; Krakauer JW, Ghazanfar AA, Gomez-Marin A, MacIver MA, Poeppel D. Neuron 93:480-490. https://t.co/FomRKZwKux https://t.co/Xr53EaI519
Just discovered this old paper on reductionism in neuroscience. There is a huge bias towards trying to break down scientific problems into units, rather than trying to understand them holistically. Really an incredible paper, even for non-neuroscientists. https://t.co/8llf0xqM5K
Great article Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/RZEUJrpKtK
RT @CarlosEAlvare17: This was addressed nicely for neuroscience (cited >500 times, so far 110 times in 2020): Neuroscience Needs Behavior:…
This was addressed nicely for neuroscience (cited >500 times, so far 110 times in 2020): Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias; 2017; Krakauer JW, Ghazanfar AA, Gomez-Marin A, MacIver MA, Poeppel D. Neuron 93:480-490. https://t.co/3pd3H1NG7r https://t.co/BWQJBxeh6p https://t.co/d0kBwklvH5
RT @jmmgazquez: @george_owens @IreneFPinto @lidacboom @edgar8_24 @Neurathena Como dirían Bunge y Ardila 'definamos aprendizaje'. Otro debat…
@george_owens @IreneFPinto @lidacboom @edgar8_24 @Neurathena Como dirían Bunge y Ardila 'definamos aprendizaje'. Otro debate es posible también y agradezco el hilo, muy interesante todo lo que habéis puesto. Que tengáis un buen fin de semana. https://t.co/OeFzlHXlyI
@PessoaBrain The state of the Art reviews for me about how neuroscience has been just neglecting behavior are https://t.co/yckBiYV6xt And https://t.co/wxlxhHVPQo
RT @pooneil: もうひとつのネタ元はKrakauer et al Neuron 2017 "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" https://t.co/piVnqkH9P9 なんだ…
もうひとつのネタ元はKrakauer et al Neuron 2017 "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" https://t.co/piVnqkH9P9 なんだけど、つい先日@shokou5 さんが言及してたここで、神経科学者が使う脳の操作で行動への介入ができることは、マーの意味ではhttps://t.co/Oz51MHwiIg
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
RT @shokou5: Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ"…
Krakauer et al. (2017) Neuron https://t.co/TdmTXEcBb7 "ニューロンからの記録によって脳を理解しようとすることに対する Marr の主な異議は，それが説明ではなく記述にしかつながらないということだ" "埋め草用語［…］は，回路と行動の間のマッピングのための明示的な概念枠組みがないことを示す" https://t.co/Z1UYNoWFr0
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
RT @fMRI_today: What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neu…
What does it mean to understand the brain? "...a more pluralistic conception of mechanistic understanding can only help neuroscience" Great paper by Krakauer and Poeppel: Neuroscience needs behavior: Correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron 93, 2016. https://t.co/dBnQOr4q6g
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
RT @tsonj: Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a…
Rereading @blamlab 's "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" today and decided that everyone could use a reminder that you can't escape philosophy
@JulioMTNeuro @bradpwyble @dileeplearning @TvanKerkoerle It sounds like you both agree- I think Brad is getting at the point that to better understand neural activity we need to better understand the behaviour it (maybe) produces. A la https://t.co/ypOMl6aP7O
Even in the age dataism and gazillion teslas MRI's, neuroscience still needs behavior https://t.co/5na1Q23MeO and of course https://t.co/Bw7tyMstzf
Then Krakauer et al, 'Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias' (a very true paper that I think creates space an ecological neuroscience should fill) https://t.co/WcT5PNVtMo
“Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias” https://t.co/rBcePOLMUQ
@artoo_arturo Creo que mejor deberías leer este artículo (con cara de desaprobación): https://t.co/p20SaWX5co
RT @WiringTheBrain: Pair that with: Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias. https://t.co/jLgmDC5ysE
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias https://t.co/aeucFVYmHR #science #research #neuroscience
RT @davidpoeppel: "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" by Krakauer Ghazanfar Gomez-Marin MacIver Poeppel https://…
@neuroecology Awesome, thank you! I would add two Neuron's papers: "Toward a Science of Computational Ethology" (2014) and "Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias" (2017). Both are open access.
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias - ScienceDirect https://t.co/bKdk6N5hdn
@JhendersonIMB Once done with Marr, the neuroscience-interested reader will enjoy Krakauer, J. W., Ghazanfar, A. A., Gomez-Marin, A., MacIver, M. A., & Poeppel, D. (2017). Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron, 93(3), 480-490.
RT @martisamuser: @davidpoeppel argued for a push towards thinking about hypotheses that would link representational/conceptual details of…
@davidpoeppel argued for a push towards thinking about hypotheses that would link representational/conceptual details of a mechanism to the implementational details by specifying algorithmic details. (see: the cool example of sound localization; https://t.co/UoREh1xPTT) https://t.co/J1Q2hx6zkR
(...) another equally important approach seeks an alternative form of understanding through careful theoretical and experimental decomposition of behavior (...) behavioral work provides understanding, whereas neural interventions test causality. https://t.co/pWIx3BbCKe
... neuron number, synapse number, and size of ... neuron number, synapse number, and size ... 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.041 - DOI - PMC ...
Neuron, 93, pp. 480–490. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041. Schwarz, D. A., et al. (2014) Chronic, wireless recordings of large-scale ...
Neuron 93, 480–490 (2017). 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041. Crossref · PubMed · Web of Science · Google Scholar. a [...] neural mechanisms causal ...
Neuron 93, 480–490 (2017). 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041. Crossref · PubMed · Web of Science · Google Scholar. 23. E. A. Brenowitz, H. H. Zakon ...
... 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041. Máte pripomienku alebo ste našli chybu? Prosíme, napíšte na pripomienky@dennikn.sk. Čítať neskôr. Zdieľať.
JT
S
N
PB
DM
TR
AD
EM
CL
BP
NR
CA
HS
FS
SK
N
NI
E
س
UD
AC
B
YA
DW
CM
O
JL
AL
BS
JF
MK
OΓ
MH
DR
PR
CL
AO
YJ
RS
CR
WC
NR
PZ
E
SD
GG
YŞ
L
J
SN
SF
S
YK
MB
CP
E
MH
AJ
JK
DA
JG
CC
ご
吉正
H根
A
K子
I田
藤
HK
KH
YN
RS
ﾄ
住朋
KK
JM
DP
XT
RN
P
あ
IL
JA
SS
GH
GM
G
CS
VS
JD
SW
NT
I
AS
KS
AA
IR
KL
SP
IM
SA
YS
JB
HH
A
RD
YO
AP
AS
S
ST
CS