Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h
Biological Age Predictors.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jul 2019 – Aug 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter86 posts
-
News11 articles
-
YouTube9 videos
-
Blogs8 articles
-
Bluesky3 posts
-
Facebook2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions frequently highlight the promise of epigenetic clocks and innovative modeling approaches, using enthusiastic language like 'most promising' and 'game changer,' which reflects high interest and optimism. Technical details, such as the limitations discussed by various posters, show active engagement and nuanced understanding, while some skepticism about practical readiness adds a cautious tone.
Most discussions recognize the advances in biological age predictors, especially the promise of epigenetic clocks, reflecting general agreement with the article's optimism about future potential.
Posts show high interest, with many comments praising the research and discussing technical details, methods, and applications.
Several posts delve into specific biomarkers, such as DNA methylation and metabolic pathways, demonstrating active engagement.
The conversations suggest that this area has moderate influence, particularly on future research directions and clinical applications, though some skepticism remains.
Abstract in brief
- The quest for reliable biological age indicators has been ongoing for over 30 years, with recent advances in molecular biology expanding the potential biomarkers available.
- Six main types of biological age predictors are discussed, including epigenetic clocks, telomere length, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and composite biomarkers, with combining these methods showing promise for better understanding aging.
- Currently, the epigenetic clock is considered the most promising predictor, but its effectiveness still needs to be confirmed through long-term studies.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyBiological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyUBo
@davidasinclair The problem is that only DunedinPACE showed a slight drop. The other 2 epigenetic clocks (PhenoAge and GrimAge) showed nothing. Biological age predictors are controversial: at best, they're telling you something about a very small aspect of aging. https://t.co/a3e3ycU4YH
Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6
MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in older adults? Free for 2 weeks at https://t.co/8mKXxyIUc7 @ki_meb_biostat @HaggSara @ESSOnews @OncologyAdvance @BASO_ACS https://t.co/yygavOY4mv
Thank you very much @AlldusAI for the feature! Machine learning and AI methodologies have been very useful tools in developing the biological age predictors we build and use on a daily basis at @TruDiagnostic. Take a listen to hear how we are doing this! https://t.co/NkTfLf8bOu
All mentions
Biological Age Predictors: Epigenetic Clocks and Biomarkers Explained
The quest for reliable biological age indicators has been ongoing for over 30 years, with recent advances in molecular biology expanding the potential biomarkers available. This video discusses six main types of…
Biological Age Predictors: Advances in Molecular Biomarkers
The quest for reliable biological age indicators has been ongoing for over 30 years, with recent advances in molecular biology expanding the potential biomarkers available. This video discusses six main types of…
Biological Age Prediction Methods and Biomarkers Overview
This video explores the quest for reliable biological age indicators, discussing six main predictor types including epigenetic clocks, telomere length, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and composite…
Advances in Biological Age Prediction Using Molecular Biomarkers
The quest for reliable biological age indicators has been ongoing for over 30 years, with recent advances in molecular biology expanding the potential biomarkers available. This video discusses six main types of…
Biological Age Predictors and Advances in Aging Biomarkers
The quest for reliable biological age indicators has been ongoing for over 30 years, with recent advances in molecular biology expanding the potential biomarkers available. Current focus is on epigenetic clocks and…
Biological Age Prediction Methods and Biomarkers Overview
The quest for reliable biological age indicators has been ongoing for over 30 years, with recent advances in molecular biology expanding the potential biomarkers available. This video discusses six main types of…
Advances in Biological Age Prediction Methods and Biomarkers
The quest for reliable biological age indicators has been ongoing for over 30 years, with recent advances in molecular biology expanding the potential biomarkers available. The epigenetic clock is currently the most…
Biological Age Predictors: Advances and Biomarkers in Aging Research
The quest for reliable biological age indicators has been ongoing for over 30 years, with recent advances in molecular biology expanding the potential biomarkers available. The video discusses six main types of…
Biological Age Prediction Methods and Recent Advances
Over 30 years, researchers have sought reliable biological age indicators. Recent advances include epigenetic clocks, telomere length, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and composite biomarkers, with…
An analysis of biological age predictors finds that aging varies between individuals yet is relatively stable within a person over time. Integrating epigenetic and proteomic clocks into human digital twins may offer a way to guide personalized health plans. #MedSky #MLSky
Most biological age predictors look at individual biomarkers in isolation. Osaka University researchers took a different approach: Modeling entire metabolic pathways instead. Here's why it matters:
@Cernovich Because those biological age predictors are trained on risk of mortality risk and not athletic performance.
Biological (vs. chronological) age markers not ready for prime time: "Biological age predictors use same underlying assumptions (lacking stat support), meaning markers of aging uninformative & no more (info) captured than if assigned at random." bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
Biological (vs. chronological) age markers not ready for prime time: "Biological age predictors use same underlying assumptions (lacking statistical support), meaning markers of aging are uninformative & no more (info) captured than if assigned at random." https://t.co/zeLBzUkjHN
As rich as these insights are, many tissues are not accessible in the real world. We combined the image-based age predictions with blood gene expression data, resulting in new blood biological age predictors that are tissue-specific! These were higher in individuals with disease
build biological age predictors based on DNA methylation. The study shows that these biological age clocks are affected by breed differences and require complex models
RT @agingdoc1: Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors: an elaborate illustratio…
Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors: an elaborate illustration using synthetic and real data
Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors: an elaborate illustration using synthetic and real data https://t.co/0jkqCYT7El There is divergence in the rate at...
@HaggSara 2/6 ⌛ According to the authors, current biological age predictors lack statistical rigor. 'AccelerAge' breaks the mold, aligning with the clock metaphor by using Accelerated Failure Time models.
Not super updated but useful to analyze six potential types of biological age predictors: epigenetic clocks, telomere length, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomics-based, and composite biomarker predictors. The most promising? the epigenetic clock https://t.co/qS7JagvsLK https://t.co/Y2HtUUZj9c
Thank you very much @AlldusAI for the feature! Machine learning and AI methodologies have been very useful tools in developing the biological age predictors we build and use on a daily basis at @TruDiagnostic. Take a listen to hear how we are doing this! https://t.co/NkTfLf8bOu
RT @biorxivpreprint: Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors https://t.co/PKG88…
RT @Orlando_uy: Biological Age Predictors https://t.co/XW6qwzPUzq
Biological Age Predictors https://t.co/XW6qwzPUzq
Predittori dell'età biologica: lo status quo e le tendenze future.Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends FONTE: https://t.co/FajOhg8Lq6 L'età biologica è una misura della salute e della funzionalità https://t.co/o6rC8U1vlG https://t.co/bBasiEPs0X
@davidasinclair The problem is that only DunedinPACE showed a slight drop. The other 2 epigenetic clocks (PhenoAge and GrimAge) showed nothing. Biological age predictors are controversial: at best, they're telling you something about a very small aspect of aging. https://t.co/a3e3ycU4YH
RT @AgingBiology: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6
RT @AgingBiology: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6
RT @AgingBiology: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6
Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h
I just posted "Biological Age Predictors" on Reddit https://t.co/s8rn4SkIKs
Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/rzAlba5sUX
Figure 1. Biological age predictors mentioned in this review.
Biological age predictors: The status quo and future trends. "Despite their demonstrated effectiveness, most of them require further improvement and cannot yet be considered for use in standard clinical practice." https://t.co/ZGE97btSeo
RT @AgingBiology: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6
Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6
Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors https://t.co/TX2GX6ij3s
Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors https://t.co/PKG886NRKG #bioRxiv
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…
Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyUBo
RT @drjohnmorley: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/VCQuP1sOke #mdpiijms via @IJMS_MDPI
Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/VCQuP1sOke #mdpiijms via @IJMS_MDPI
For a clinical application ? "Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends" https://t.co/dYPnv2aRhr #mdpiijms via @IJMS_MDPI @isaperarnau @brunovellas @RestoreInstitut @InfinityTLS @I2mcT
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h
RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h
Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h
RT @biogerontology: An overview of aging clocks (not my group - but will follow their papers from now) Biological Age Predictors: The Stat…
RT @biogerontology: An overview of aging clocks (not my group - but will follow their papers from now) Biological Age Predictors: The Stat…
An overview of aging clocks (not my group - but will follow their papers from now) Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/1uXU1fspYQ #mdpiijms via @IJMS_MDPI
IJMS, Vol. 23, Pages 15103: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/FTyMDxOP5o
@InquilineKea Sara uses many different biological age predictors vs that paper who only use DNA methylation - perhaps that explains the disagreement? https://t.co/jT5VNCytHo
RT @NOMIX_AI: The most promising biological age predictor is the epigenetic clock #bioclock https://t.co/dqGCS92gGP
RT @NOMIX_AI: The most promising biological age predictor is the epigenetic clock #bioclock https://t.co/dqGCS92gGP
RT @NOMIX_AI: The most promising biological age predictor is the epigenetic clock #bioclock https://t.co/dqGCS92gGP
The most promising biological age predictor is the epigenetic clock #bioclock https://t.co/dqGCS92gGP
@MKellyIrving I really like this paper which examines associations of different biological age predictors with mortality. Great use of longitudinal data and nice graphics https://t.co/pNkKpXwSp6
@MariolaPR Ellos se venden como biological age predictors pero yo quiero ver los niveles del inflamm-aging...
RT @hein_putter: New PhD position at @bds_lumc Leiden: come work with @hein_putter, @GirondoMar and others on developing new statistical me…
RT @hein_putter: New PhD position at @bds_lumc Leiden: come work with @hein_putter, @GirondoMar and others on developing new statistical me…
RT @EurekaMag: Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in the older adults? https://t.co/8aOE1525bf
RT @EurekaMag: Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in the older adults? https://t.co/8aOE1525bf
Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in the older adults? https://t.co/8aOE1525bf
RT @hein_putter: New PhD position at @bds_lumc Leiden: come work with @hein_putter, @GirondoMar and others on developing new statistical me…
RT @GirondoMar: Come to work with us on developing new statistical methods to derive omic-based biological age predictors! See https://t.co…
Come to work with us on developing new statistical methods to derive omic-based biological age predictors! See https://t.co/Bf25KwT9xr @bds_lumc @HeinPutter https://t.co/OgloPGvCyH
New PhD position at @bds_lumc Leiden: come work with @hein_putter, @GirondoMar and others on developing new statistical methods to derive omic-based biological age predictors. See https://t.co/UsmO0z88Qa.
Nathan Price, PhD, on Predictive Biomarkers and Biological Aging The metabolite-microbiome interaction and chronological vs. biological age predictors in aging. Fascinating! https://t.co/hbmy4cRnvB
RT @attilacsordas: honest question related to default epigenetic #aging clock: how can 353 CpG methylation patterns be used as biological a…
RT @brookebio: @mike_lustgarten Fyi - There are large meta-analyses that disagree with this study (Chen 2016 - https://t.co/6dcVpzzOwD) and…
@mike_lustgarten Fyi - There are large meta-analyses that disagree with this study (Chen 2016 - https://t.co/6dcVpzzOwD) and there are also related reviews of biological age predictors that are helpful (Jylhava - https://t.co/zkELp8Lb3r).
RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…
RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…
RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…
RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…
RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…
RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…
MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in older adults? Free for 2 weeks at https://t.co/8mKXxyIUc7 @ki_meb_biostat @HaggSara @ESSOnews @OncologyAdvance @BASO_ACS https://t.co/yygavOY4mv
Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in older adults? https://t.co/F3QNcEjFTA
@RiganoESQ I haven't used them. Lol, almost everything changes with age. I'm sticking to the biological age predictors, for now
honest question related to default epigenetic #aging clock: how can 353 CpG methylation patterns be used as biological age predictors indicating accelerated/decelerated aging when these were specifically selected to be best predictors of chronological age in the first place!
@Thomas_Wilckens I obviously see your point, but that doesn't change the fact the biological age predictors have been indeed been published, which contradicts the premise of the article.
@Thomas_Wilckens Ha, I don't make any $ from any biological age predictors!
RT @venture_health: One promising development that considers multiple combinations of chronological and biological age predictors could she…
One promising development that considers multiple combinations of chronological and biological age predictors could shed light on the aging process and provide a further understanding of what contributes to healthy aging. https://t.co/in4T1WwDxz #medtech #biotech #AI