EBioMedicine July 2017 PMID 28396265

Biological Age Predictors.

Juulia Jylhävä, Nancy L Pedersen, Sara Hägg

Mentions

119
Peak: 24 in Dec 2022
across 6 sources since Jul 2019

Extended reach

635,881
potential audience

Total likes

139

Video views

56

Mentions per month

Jul 2019 – Aug 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter86 posts
  • News11 articles
  • YouTube9 videos
  • Blogs8 articles
  • Bluesky3 posts
  • Facebook2 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions frequently highlight the promise of epigenetic clocks and innovative modeling approaches, using enthusiastic language like 'most promising' and 'game changer,' which reflects high interest and optimism. Technical details, such as the limitations discussed by various posters, show active engagement and nuanced understanding, while some skepticism about practical readiness adds a cautious tone.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions recognize the advances in biological age predictors, especially the promise of epigenetic clocks, reflecting general agreement with the article's optimism about future potential.

InterestHigh interest

Posts show high interest, with many comments praising the research and discussing technical details, methods, and applications.

EngagementModerate engagement

Several posts delve into specific biomarkers, such as DNA methylation and metabolic pathways, demonstrating active engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The conversations suggest that this area has moderate influence, particularly on future research directions and clinical applications, though some skepticism remains.

Abstract in brief

  • The quest for reliable biological age indicators has been ongoing for over 30 years, with recent advances in molecular biology expanding the potential biomarkers available.
  • Six main types of biological age predictors are discussed, including epigenetic clocks, telomere length, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and composite biomarkers, with combining these methods showing promise for better understanding aging.
  • Currently, the epigenetic clock is considered the most promising predictor, but its effectiveness still needs to be confirmed through long-term studies.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Agingdoc
@agingdoc1 · X

Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h

Dec 12, 2022 · 27 likes · 10 shares · 41,221 followers View post →
Agingdoc
@agingdoc1 · X

Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyUBo

Dec 24, 2022 · 25 likes · 8 shares · 41,221 followers View post →
Pills of Science
@pills_ofscience · X

@davidasinclair The problem is that only DunedinPACE showed a slight drop. The other 2 epigenetic clocks (PhenoAge and GrimAge) showed nothing. Biological age predictors are controversial: at best, they're telling you something about a very small aspect of aging. https://t.co/a3e3ycU4YH

Mar 27, 2023 · 18 likes · 27,337 followers View post →
Aging Science News
@AgingBiology · X

Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6

Jan 11, 2023 · 10 likes · 2 shares · 30,506 followers View post →
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
@ejsotweets · X

MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in older adults? Free for 2 weeks at https://t.co/8mKXxyIUc7 @ki_meb_biostat @HaggSara @ESSOnews @OncologyAdvance @BASO_ACS https://t.co/yygavOY4mv

Mar 10, 2020 · 8 likes · 6 shares · 8,708 followers View post →
Varun Dwaraka, Ph.D.
@VarunDw · X

Thank you very much @AlldusAI for the feature! Machine learning and AI methodologies have been very useful tools in developing the biological age predictors we build and use on a daily basis at @TruDiagnostic. Take a listen to hear how we are doing this! https://t.co/NkTfLf8bOu

Aug 14, 2023 · 8 likes · 240 followers View post →

All mentions

Scott McGrath
@smcgrath.phd · Bluesky

An analysis of biological age predictors finds that aging varies between individuals yet is relatively stable within a person over time. Integrating epigenetic and proteomic clocks into human digital twins may offer a way to guide personalized health plans. #MedSky #MLSky

Aug 22, 2025 · 2 likes View post →
AI in Science
@ai_inscience · X

Most biological age predictors look at individual biomarkers in isolation. Osaka University researchers took a different approach: Modeling entire metabolic pathways instead. Here's why it matters:

Mar 15, 2025 · 25 followers View post →
David Mayo
@Hackyourgut · X

@Cernovich Because those biological age predictors are trained on risk of mortality risk and not athletic performance.

Jan 17, 2025 · 398 followers View post →
Brad Cooper, PhD
@bradcooperphd.bsky.social · Bluesky

Biological (vs. chronological) age markers not ready for prime time: "Biological age predictors use same underlying assumptions (lacking stat support), meaning markers of aging uninformative & no more (info) captured than if assigned at random." bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....

Nov 22, 2024 View post →
Brad Cooper, PhD
@Catalyst2Thrive · X

Biological (vs. chronological) age markers not ready for prime time: "Biological age predictors use same underlying assumptions (lacking statistical support), meaning markers of aging are uninformative & no more (info) captured than if assigned at random." https://t.co/zeLBzUkjHN

Nov 22, 2024 · 4 likes · 1 share · 2,335 followers View post →
Andre Rendeiro
@andre-rendeiro.com · Bluesky

As rich as these insights are, many tissues are not accessible in the real world. We combined the image-based age predictions with blood gene expression data, resulting in new blood biological age predictors that are tissue-specific! These were higher in individuals with disease

Nov 16, 2024 · 1 like · 1 share View post →
Hannah Went
@EverythingEpi · X

build biological age predictors based on DNA methylation. The study shows that these biological age clocks are affected by breed differences and require complex models

Sep 17, 2024 · 557 followers View post →
Bioecomatics
@bioecomatic · X

RT @agingdoc1: Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors: an elaborate illustratio…

Mar 13, 2024 · 1 share · 107 followers View post →
Agingdoc
@agingdoc1 · X

Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors: an elaborate illustration using synthetic and real data

Mar 13, 2024 · 1 like · 1 share · 41,221 followers View post →
Health365Info.com
@health365Info · X

Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors: an elaborate illustration using synthetic and real data https://t.co/0jkqCYT7El There is divergence in the rate at...

Mar 9, 2024 · 25 followers View post →
Biomarkers of Aging Consortium
@agingbiomarkers · X

@HaggSara 2/6 ⌛ According to the authors, current biological age predictors lack statistical rigor. 'AccelerAge' breaks the mold, aligning with the clock metaphor by using Accelerated Failure Time models.

Nov 18, 2023 · 2,369 followers View post →
Silvano Zanuso, PhD
@WellnessRemarks · X

Not super updated but useful to analyze six potential types of biological age predictors: epigenetic clocks, telomere length, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomics-based, and composite biomarker predictors. The most promising? the epigenetic clock https://t.co/qS7JagvsLK https://t.co/Y2HtUUZj9c

Sep 19, 2023 · 2 likes · 79 followers View post →
Varun Dwaraka, Ph.D.
@VarunDw · X

Thank you very much @AlldusAI for the feature! Machine learning and AI methodologies have been very useful tools in developing the biological age predictors we build and use on a daily basis at @TruDiagnostic. Take a listen to hear how we are doing this! https://t.co/NkTfLf8bOu

Aug 14, 2023 · 8 likes · 240 followers View post →
Dmitrii Kriukov
@shappiron · X

RT @biorxivpreprint: Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors https://t.co/PKG88…

Jul 19, 2023 · 1 share · 77 followers View post →
Mr safety
@mrsafetyabc · X

RT @Orlando_uy: Biological Age Predictors https://t.co/XW6qwzPUzq

Jul 9, 2023 · 1 share · 432 followers View post →
Orlando_uy
@Orlando_uy · X

Biological Age Predictors https://t.co/XW6qwzPUzq

Jul 9, 2023 · 1 share · 689 followers View post →
cilentano.it
@cilentano_it · X

Predittori dell'età biologica: lo status quo e le tendenze future.Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends FONTE: https://t.co/FajOhg8Lq6 L'età biologica è una misura della salute e della funzionalità https://t.co/o6rC8U1vlG https://t.co/bBasiEPs0X

May 6, 2023 · 70 followers View post →
Pills of Science
@pills_ofscience · X

@davidasinclair The problem is that only DunedinPACE showed a slight drop. The other 2 epigenetic clocks (PhenoAge and GrimAge) showed nothing. Biological age predictors are controversial: at best, they're telling you something about a very small aspect of aging. https://t.co/a3e3ycU4YH

Mar 27, 2023 · 18 likes · 27,337 followers View post →
Mystery
@crypto1_mystery · X

RT @AgingBiology: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6

Mar 11, 2023 · 3 shares · 258 followers View post →
#RaviVisvesvarayaSharadaPrasad #Telecom #InfoTech
@rvp · X

RT @AgingBiology: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6

Mar 11, 2023 · 3 shares · 4,883 followers View post →
Lisa Vlad
@LisaVlad2 · X

RT @AgingBiology: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6

Mar 11, 2023 · 3 shares · 100 followers View post →
Aging Science News
@AgingBiology · X

Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6

Mar 11, 2023 · 6 likes · 3 shares · 30,506 followers View post →
Lisa Vlad
@LisaVlad2 · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h

Feb 6, 2023 · 10 shares · 100 followers View post →
observer137
@aeonhermit · X

I just posted "Biological Age Predictors" on Reddit https://t.co/s8rn4SkIKs

Feb 6, 2023 · 433 followers View post →
observer137
@aeonhermit · X

Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/rzAlba5sUX

Feb 6, 2023 · 433 followers View post →
Agingdoc
@agingdoc1 · X

Figure 1. Biological age predictors mentioned in this review.

Feb 6, 2023 · 4 likes · 41,221 followers View post →
Orlando_uy
@Orlando_uy · X

Biological age predictors: The status quo and future trends. "Despite their demonstrated effectiveness, most of them require further improvement and cannot yet be considered for use in standard clinical practice." https://t.co/ZGE97btSeo

Feb 3, 2023 · 1 like · 689 followers View post →
Cheeks By Chike
@cheeksbychike · X

RT @AgingBiology: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6

Jan 11, 2023 · 2 shares · 32 followers View post →
Aging Science News
@AgingBiology · X

Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ifxUmvT2l6

Jan 11, 2023 · 10 likes · 2 shares · 30,506 followers View post →
Biorxiv Reddit
@BiorxivReddit · X

Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors https://t.co/TX2GX6ij3s

Jan 3, 2023 · 39 followers View post →
bioRxiv
@biorxivpreprint · X

Clarifying the biological and statistical assumptions of cross-sectional biological age predictors https://t.co/PKG886NRKG #bioRxiv

Jan 3, 2023 · 2 likes · 1 share · 136,828 followers View post →
Rafael Manuel
@RamanabaRafael · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…

Dec 26, 2022 · 8 shares · 50 followers View post →
Juan pachanga
@AndromedaRoi · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…

Dec 25, 2022 · 8 shares · 413 followers View post →
Lisa Vlad
@LisaVlad2 · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…

Dec 25, 2022 · 8 shares · 100 followers View post →
Smit Giri MD MHS
@smith__giri · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…

Dec 25, 2022 · 8 shares · 445 followers View post →
Saturnsky, MBA, BigTech Exec Corporate Demon
@mba_big · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…

Dec 25, 2022 · 8 shares · 239 followers View post →
Frantz Fanon
@waweru · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…

Dec 25, 2022 · 8 shares · 7,998 followers View post →
Raul Cordoba, MD, PhD
@DrRaulCordoba · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyU…

Dec 25, 2022 · 8 shares · 10,999 followers View post →
Agingdoc
@agingdoc1 · X

Biological Age Predictors (2017) Jylhävä, Pedersen & @HaggSara https://t.co/tO8idLMZSz @eBioMedicine https://t.co/aq8s7hyUBo

Dec 24, 2022 · 25 likes · 8 shares · 41,221 followers View post →
Jaime A. Hidalgo A.
@Jhidalgoanfossi · X

RT @drjohnmorley: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/VCQuP1sOke #mdpiijms via @IJMS_MDPI

Dec 15, 2022 · 1 share · 1,880 followers View post →
john morley
@drjohnmorley · X

Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/VCQuP1sOke #mdpiijms via @IJMS_MDPI

Dec 15, 2022 · 1 like · 1 share · 8,328 followers View post →
INSPIRE Platform - IHU HealthAge
@INSPIREPlatfor1 · X

For a clinical application ? "Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends" https://t.co/dYPnv2aRhr #mdpiijms via @IJMS_MDPI @isaperarnau @brunovellas @RestoreInstitut @InfinityTLS @I2mcT

Dec 15, 2022 · 1 like · 675 followers View post →
Laure Rouch
@RouchLaure · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h

Dec 15, 2022 · 10 shares · 715 followers View post →
Andrei Ilnitski
@AndrIlnitski · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h

Dec 13, 2022 · 10 shares · 424 followers View post →
The Heart
@ZHeart11768530 · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h

Dec 12, 2022 · 10 shares · 32,843 followers View post →
Fay
@fay90028966 · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h

Dec 12, 2022 · 10 shares · 141 followers View post →
Lisa Vlad
@LisaVlad2 · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h

Dec 12, 2022 · 10 shares · 100 followers View post →
JاMاL
@AlQasemJamal · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h

Dec 12, 2022 · 10 shares · 515 followers View post →
Oscar Andres
@OscarAndresMD · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h

Dec 12, 2022 · 10 shares · 557 followers View post →
Dr. Shashank Joshi
@AskDrShashank · X

RT @agingdoc1: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h

Dec 12, 2022 · 10 shares · 32,533 followers View post →
Agingdoc
@agingdoc1 · X

Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/ulUB6IwIgh https://t.co/xRkRmo9A3h

Dec 12, 2022 · 27 likes · 10 shares · 41,221 followers View post →
luis hernan graffe
@hernangraffe · X

RT @biogerontology: An overview of aging clocks (not my group - but will follow their papers from now) Biological Age Predictors: The Stat…

Dec 1, 2022 · 2 shares · 3,132 followers View post →
Lisa Vlad
@LisaVlad2 · X

RT @biogerontology: An overview of aging clocks (not my group - but will follow their papers from now) Biological Age Predictors: The Stat…

Dec 1, 2022 · 2 shares · 100 followers View post →
Alex Zhavoronkov, PhD (aka Aleksandrs Zavoronkovs)
@biogerontology · X

An overview of aging clocks (not my group - but will follow their papers from now) Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/1uXU1fspYQ #mdpiijms via @IJMS_MDPI

Dec 1, 2022 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 31,816 followers View post →
MyJournals
@myjournals · X

IJMS, Vol. 23, Pages 15103: Biological Age Predictors: The Status Quo and Future Trends https://t.co/FTyMDxOP5o

Dec 1, 2022 · 556 followers View post →
Giulia Zavagno
@giulia_zavagno · X

@InquilineKea Sara uses many different biological age predictors vs that paper who only use DNA methylation - perhaps that explains the disagreement? https://t.co/jT5VNCytHo

Sep 1, 2022 · 226 followers View post →
michaelreuter
@michaelreuter · X

RT @NOMIX_AI: The most promising biological age predictor is the epigenetic clock #bioclock https://t.co/dqGCS92gGP

Apr 19, 2022 · 3 shares · 4,292 followers View post →
Datarella
@Datarella · X

RT @NOMIX_AI: The most promising biological age predictor is the epigenetic clock #bioclock https://t.co/dqGCS92gGP

Apr 19, 2022 · 3 shares · 1,933 followers View post →
BIOCOACH
@BIOCOACHAPP · X

RT @NOMIX_AI: The most promising biological age predictor is the epigenetic clock #bioclock https://t.co/dqGCS92gGP

Apr 19, 2022 · 3 shares · 141 followers View post →
NOMIX
@NOMIX_AI · X

The most promising biological age predictor is the epigenetic clock #bioclock https://t.co/dqGCS92gGP

Apr 19, 2022 · 6 likes · 3 shares · 598 followers View post →
Cathal McCrory
@CathalMcCrory1 · X

@MKellyIrving I really like this paper which examines associations of different biological age predictors with mortality. Great use of longitudinal data and nice graphics https://t.co/pNkKpXwSp6

Mar 29, 2022 · 3 likes · 822 followers View post →
La_Observadora 0_o
@La_Observadora1 · X

@MariolaPR Ellos se venden como biological age predictors pero yo quiero ver los niveles del inflamm-aging...

Jul 9, 2021 · 426 followers View post →
Giovanni Apráez Ippolito
@ApraezGiovanni · X

RT @hein_putter: New PhD position at @bds_lumc Leiden: come work with @hein_putter, @GirondoMar and others on developing new statistical me…

Mar 15, 2021 · 3 shares · 340 followers View post →
Biomedical Data Sciences LUMC
@bds_lumc · X

RT @hein_putter: New PhD position at @bds_lumc Leiden: come work with @hein_putter, @GirondoMar and others on developing new statistical me…

Nov 27, 2020 · 3 shares · 545 followers View post →
Science Alerts
@Science_Alerts · X

RT @EurekaMag: Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in the older adults? https://t.co/8aOE1525bf

Nov 26, 2020 · 2 shares · 1,240 followers View post →
POPLINE
@POPLINE_org · X

RT @EurekaMag: Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in the older adults? https://t.co/8aOE1525bf

Nov 26, 2020 · 2 shares · 5,271 followers View post →
EurekaMag
@EurekaMag · X

Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in the older adults? https://t.co/8aOE1525bf

Nov 26, 2020 · 2 shares · 6,446 followers View post →
JACIE
@JACIE_EBMT · X

RT @hein_putter: New PhD position at @bds_lumc Leiden: come work with @hein_putter, @GirondoMar and others on developing new statistical me…

Nov 18, 2020 · 3 shares · 2,020 followers View post →
Nan van Geloven
@GelovenNan · X

RT @GirondoMar: Come to work with us on developing new statistical methods to derive omic-based biological age predictors! See https://t.co…

Nov 18, 2020 · 1 share · 729 followers View post →
Mar Girondo
@GirondoMar · X

Come to work with us on developing new statistical methods to derive omic-based biological age predictors! See https://t.co/Bf25KwT9xr @bds_lumc @HeinPutter https://t.co/OgloPGvCyH

Nov 18, 2020 · 1 like · 1 share · 38 followers View post →
Hein Putter
@hein_putter · X

New PhD position at @bds_lumc Leiden: come work with @hein_putter, @GirondoMar and others on developing new statistical methods to derive omic-based biological age predictors. See https://t.co/UsmO0z88Qa.

Nov 16, 2020 · 1 like · 3 shares · 175 followers View post →
Dr. LoBisco
@DrLoBisco · X

Nathan Price, PhD, on Predictive Biomarkers and Biological Aging The metabolite-microbiome interaction and chronological vs. biological age predictors in aging. Fascinating! https://t.co/hbmy4cRnvB

May 21, 2020 · 965 followers View post →
Cute Llama
@c242liu · X

RT @attilacsordas: honest question related to default epigenetic #aging clock: how can 353 CpG methylation patterns be used as biological a…

May 2, 2020 · 1 share · 23 followers View post →
Mike Lustgarten, PhD
@mike_lustgarten · X

RT @brookebio: @mike_lustgarten Fyi - There are large meta-analyses that disagree with this study (Chen 2016 - https://t.co/6dcVpzzOwD) and…

Mar 25, 2020 · 1 share · 9,714 followers View post →
Robert (Bobby) Brooke
@brookebio · X

@mike_lustgarten Fyi - There are large meta-analyses that disagree with this study (Chen 2016 - https://t.co/6dcVpzzOwD) and there are also related reviews of biological age predictors that are helpful (Jylhava - https://t.co/zkELp8Lb3r).

Mar 25, 2020 · 2 likes · 1 share · 66 followers View post →
Federico Ghignone
@FedeGhigno · X

RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…

Mar 12, 2020 · 6 shares · 508 followers View post →
AECP
@AECP_FAECP · X

RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…

Mar 11, 2020 · 6 shares · 3,690 followers View post →
Curro Blanco
@Curro_Blanco · X

RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…

Mar 11, 2020 · 6 shares · 3,833 followers View post →
Isacco Montroni
@3isac · X

RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…

Mar 11, 2020 · 6 shares · 1,155 followers View post →
Giampaolo Ugolini
@ugolinimd · X

RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…

Mar 10, 2020 · 6 shares · 806 followers View post →
Sara Hägg
@HaggSara · X

RT @ejsotweets: MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors…

Mar 10, 2020 · 6 shares · 1,158 followers View post →
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
@ejsotweets · X

MODERN MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE OF COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS IN SENIOR ADULTS Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in older adults? Free for 2 weeks at https://t.co/8mKXxyIUc7 @ki_meb_biostat @HaggSara @ESSOnews @OncologyAdvance @BASO_ACS https://t.co/yygavOY4mv

Mar 10, 2020 · 8 likes · 6 shares · 8,708 followers View post →
Eduardo Brambilla
@brambillaprocto · X

Should we invest in biological age predictors to treat colorectal cancer in older adults? https://t.co/F3QNcEjFTA

Feb 24, 2020 · 1 like · 573 followers View post →
Mike Lustgarten, PhD
@mike_lustgarten · X

@RiganoESQ I haven't used them. Lol, almost everything changes with age. I'm sticking to the biological age predictors, for now

Oct 14, 2019 · 9,714 followers View post →
attilacsordas
@attilacsordas · X

honest question related to default epigenetic #aging clock: how can 353 CpG methylation patterns be used as biological age predictors indicating accelerated/decelerated aging when these were specifically selected to be best predictors of chronological age in the first place!

Oct 3, 2019 · 1 like · 1 share · 4,306 followers View post →
Mike Lustgarten, PhD
@mike_lustgarten · X

@Thomas_Wilckens I obviously see your point, but that doesn't change the fact the biological age predictors have been indeed been published, which contradicts the premise of the article.

Sep 30, 2019 · 9,714 followers View post →
Mike Lustgarten, PhD
@mike_lustgarten · X

@Thomas_Wilckens Ha, I don't make any $ from any biological age predictors!

Sep 30, 2019 · 9,714 followers View post →
Raymond Francis Sarmiento, M.D.
@rfrsarmiento · X

RT @venture_health: One promising development that considers multiple combinations of chronological and biological age predictors could she…

Jul 9, 2019 · 1 share · 1,551 followers View post →
VentureHealth
@venture_health · X

One promising development that considers multiple combinations of chronological and biological age predictors could shed light on the aging process and provide a further understanding of what contributes to healthy aging. https://t.co/in4T1WwDxz #medtech #biotech #AI

Jul 9, 2019 · 1 like · 1 share · 4,846 followers View post →