@reFleXiveLogiK @ScottAppliedSci @Blackswanson @gunsnrosesgirl3 Evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) & Meta-analyses of RCTs https://t.co/oybE31Xz4S https://t.co/3TIZYDgUbh https://t.co/Yw99QB2HqV https://t.co/a0hIK5UL2N https://t.co/lIudH7GAQU
view full post

@lporiginalg https://t.co/wxKxngdVCs
view full post

@TuckerGoodrich @JesperLundbom @garytaubes @KingManninen @PeterFaberSP @BiggestComeback @mikeoniron @exfatloss Here's the Hamley SRMA: DOI 10.1186/s12937-017-0254-5 The code is a complete transcript of the Survival Function calculations using Mathematica. It's not published anywhere. I can send you the Mathematica file if you like.
view full post

@StevenMBelknap @hufcm @dylanarmbruste3 @GardnerPhD @American_Heart Thanks for this. Here is the link to the Hamley paper….. https://t.co/rub9orSy0e https://t.co/C2eQFnuu2E
view full post

@hufcm @dylanarmbruste3 @GardnerPhD @American_Heart 1. The best SRMA of SatFat→ω6:PUFA is by Hamley. DOI 10.1186/s12937-017-0254-5 2. Present the research result(s) that you believe that I ignore. 3. Explain the flaw in my application of Taleb's method to meta-analysis of the high-quality RCTs. (Unpublished ≠ Wrong & Published https://t.co/zonC5QEqC8
view full post

Not so much. Satfat does not increase total mortality compared to ω6 PUFA, based on the best available research results: adequately-controlled randomized clinical trials that compare satfat to ω6 PUFA. DOI 10.1186/s12937-017-0254-5 https://t.co/xfFmERmP5f https://t.co/jQNkhgAOYv
view full post

@BioLayne No https://t.co/nNyXwaLb5U https://t.co/RLGJzxPDug https://t.co/DNCPsAaA5j /biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12986-017-0186-2
view full post

@NzyenR The question was: For those who disagree with this perspective regarding "seed oils" / PUFAs / linoleic acid and heart disease, what's the most convincing human evidence of harm? Ref 1.) https://t.co/BB0lP3eMle The meta-analysis you just cited does not make any such conclusion,
view full post

@triagemethod That's easy bro https://t.co/OKhZPXu2di https://t.co/LJStgsQQTO https://t.co/RLGJzxPDug
view full post

@AsarCadyn This isn’t just Alice’s opinion. https://t.co/shSMgmqYOg https://t.co/BhhOykfXRf https://t.co/Wsmte4QbJn
view full post

@LucianTritt @lincolixavier @ngtv_bg I don't care that much about that. The fact is that there is evidence that saturated fats are not harmful. https://t.co/LugQuVZtt2
view full post

@bminn7660 @_sugaree_ @VPrasadMDMPH So this was used as a claim that saturated fat “doesn’t cause cardiovascular disease” https://t.co/tIucEuromh It was a rabbit hole from source 33 of THIS nonsense
view full post

RT @StevenMBelknap: @MohammedAlo Not so much. There’s a lot of wrong to unpack here. Hamley’s meta-analysis of RCTs found no effect of rep…
view full post

RT @StevenMBelknap: @MohammedAlo Not so much. There’s a lot of wrong to unpack here. Hamley’s meta-analysis of RCTs found no effect of rep…
view full post

@JesperLundbom @KingManninen @TuckerGoodrich @garytaubes @PeterFaberSP @BiggestComeback @mikeoniron @exfatloss You are correct that an analysis published in a meta-analysis of well-controlled RCTs showed that swapping SFA → ω6 PUFA does not increase cardiovascular mortality or total mortality. DOI 10.1186/s12937-017-0254-5 However, the analytic method used in this meta-analysis (and
view full post

RT @HalukVAHABOLU: 8/ ortada dönen dolabı anlamak için şunu oku https://t.co/6CNPt7M3es şu makaleleri de incelemeni isterim https://t.co/g…
view full post

RT @HalukVAHABOLU: 8/ ortada dönen dolabı anlamak için şunu oku https://t.co/6CNPt7M3es şu makaleleri de incelemeni isterim https://t.co/g…
view full post

8/ ortada dönen dolabı anlamak için şunu oku https://t.co/6CNPt7M3es şu makaleleri de incelemeni isterim https://t.co/gtsPpYTcRP https://t.co/rDuuIxFc1b
view full post

@Appoota @shashiiyengar @TheNutrivore https://t.co/oukjavwWgz Here this one. Effect on CHD
view full post

RT @raphaels7: https://t.co/v7gcZyOA5e “The suggestion of benefits reported [SFA => N6] in earlier meta-analyses is due to the inclusion of…
view full post

@TuckerGoodrich @foundmyfitness @AnthonyLewayne @fmfclips @WHO Well meta-analysis says you’re wrong about the CVD: https://t.co/CnnKgXIcJK ” the pooled results from all trials, including the inadequately controlled trials, suggested that replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA would significantly reduce the risk of total CHD events”
view full post

@MiocanDanijel Here’s one. 2017 meta-analysis: n-6 PUFA replacement shows no benefit to CHD events, mortality, or total mortality. Hamley, 2017 https://t.co/2xvQnOZTcg
view full post

@TarbuckSam @BHBEnjoyer @EarthlingAus This is a metanalysis of RCTs. "Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality." https://t.co/JEwpNUENiX
view full post

@BadassDalit @shashiiyengar @dlifein We don't need to check our lipids you need to check more research papers. 1.https://t.co/W8uMNf8yS3 https://t.co/Zn7Mvr0pe0 2.https://t.co/6xnNEmqw5H 3.https://t.co/RuFhMlmQUd 4.https://t.co/jdkcVoOy39 https://t.co/oWIDaWbuzM
view full post

@raphaels7 https://t.co/iGgztyMR9f https://t.co/dQ506vffyg https://t.co/ylyKiqChD5 These ones too plus mendelian randomization. Not to mention other that show a trend in crp with high intakes, blood clotting rct, the rct in China with gut bacteria and one where it increases lpa and oxldl
view full post

@SOfreeLifestyle @BioLayne https://t.co/ylyKiqChD5 https://t.co/BPzuL8IIGi https://t.co/RLGJzxPDug https://t.co/dQ506vffyg
view full post

IFNCP Functional Nutritionists are trained to tailor diet recommendations to YOU based on your lifestyle, genetics, and disease condition. https://t.co/jMkfayte5Y #IFNAcademy https://t.co/q45qJQZ7fH
view full post

RT @StevenMBelknap: @MohammedAlo Not so much. There’s a lot of wrong to unpack here. Hamley’s meta-analysis of RCTs found no effect of rep…
view full post

@MohammedAlo Not so much. There’s a lot of wrong to unpack here. Hamley’s meta-analysis of RCTs found no effect of replacing dietary satfats with ω6 PUFAs. https://t.co/0WbEpOni0l I re-analyzed the RCT data using a better statistical method, and found that ω6 PUFAs *increased* mortality. https://t.co/lZRPFPXrNb
view full post

@raphaels7 @PeterAttiaMD @ZeroAcreFarms replacing saturated fats with PUFAs resulted in a small but statistically significant reduction in body weight. https://t.co/jc4gVdSB4c
view full post

@missiletech80 Not what the science says. 2017 meta-analysis: n-6 PUFA replacement shows no benefit to CHD events, mortality, or total mortality. https://t.co/2xvQnOZTcg
view full post

@IsmaelGalancho @exfatloss @sguyenet @bigfatsurprise The facts are otherwise. Swapping out Dietary SatFats for PolyUnSatFats does not reduce total mortality. (Fig 3.) https://t.co/Y4YL7bkpZt The Minnesota Coronary Survey found a 22% *higher* risk of death for each 30 mg/dL reduction in serum cholesterol. https://t.co/szA2uVW4b4 https://t.co/Wc1TfLcCsP
view full post

@ToYourHealth101 @NicolaiWorm @bigfatsurprise @drdairy50 @fleroy1974 Hamley 2017 https://t.co/LXBKJGoF1b
view full post

@skydog576 @rodney_dever @jwolnizer @forktown385 Even a metanalysis of RCT's concluded "Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality" https://t.co/PNsZfDbq3I
view full post

@LucianTritt @F_Z_F_Z_F RCT's don't show any harm from SFA's either. "Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality" https://t.co/PNsZfDbq3I
view full post

RT @StevenMBelknap: @ScepticalDoctor @susanwoledge @ButterFueled LDL-C is not a predictive biomarker for atherosclerosis or anything else.…
view full post

RT @StevenMBelknap: @ScepticalDoctor @susanwoledge @ButterFueled LDL-C is not a predictive biomarker for atherosclerosis or anything else.…
view full post

@ScepticalDoctor @susanwoledge @ButterFueled LDL-C is not a predictive biomarker for atherosclerosis or anything else. Randomized controlled trials have shown that replacing SatFats with PUFAs is not beneficial and is probably harmful. https://t.co/Y4YL7bkpZt
view full post

@Alex__Katz @simplulo @mattyglesias Here we have a meta analysis showing no benefit from replacing sat fat with n6 polyunsaturated (what is found in cooking oils): https://t.co/JvPEL88Bd4
view full post

@FearZero4 @stopYouOut @SBakerMD https://t.co/vTUMbvcMPd We can do it all day.
view full post

@GZzyzyx @LeomantVictoria @benandjerrys Cholesterol in diet doesn’t cause heart attack. Re: saturated fats, “Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality” https://t.co/0WbEpOni0l
view full post

@nntaleb @boozifer99 I admire @nntaleb’s critical thinking & clever stats. But! He has yet to get facts straight on recent tweets on SFAs. Plz review relevant tweets & revise yr error. @bigfatsurprise presented @stevenhamley’s review on SFA restriction as best, not Cochrane’s. https://t.co/Y4YL7bkXP1 https://t.co/LZ1v4apxaW
view full post

@CaloriesProper @bigfatsurprise @nntaleb @LuisCLCorreia @DrDamluji @cochranecollab @nationallipid @NutritionMadeS3 @KCKlatt Steven Hamley performed a meta-analysis of RCTs that replace saturated fatty acids (SFA) with ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). The experimental intervention was different according to the RCT. Here’s the key data from Figure 4. Here’s the link: https://t.co/Y4YL7b2OAT https://t.co/7fAWUlWSQi
view full post

@nntaleb @StevenMBelknap @LuisCLCorreia @DrDamluji @cochranecollab @nationallipid Your issue is with the paper, I guess. You should know this is one of many reviews of these data. IMHO, the clearest review of this data, and also most objective, is this one. Breaks out well-controlled trials and inadequately controlled trials. https://t.co/JROZTlbbgI
view full post

Replacing sat fat with vegetable oils vs coronary heart disease (RCT meta-analysis) —Seed oils harm/kill more in rigorous trials (not stat-sig RR): 1.06 (.86/1.31) major CHD events 1.02 (.84/1.23) total CHD 1.13 (.91/1.40) CHD deaths 1.07 (.90/1.26) deaths https://t.co/OeJ9gzSGfq
view full post

@krebiozen @richykirsh @WendyOrent @mcfunny @scottstocker4 @IdunsDaughter @ConsequentialBr @pawley_robert @AndrewLazarus4 @Pouldeau61 @Monstercoyliar @SkepticalMutant @newstranslate13 @barryjohnreid21 @TonyBaduy @jarbot15 @AspAlaAsnAsnTyr @JonathanHannah @MaureenStroud @ShockTraumaRN @JimBeam102 @Thskicksarefire @JKelleyK @swedishchf @provaxtexan @reacharoundu @ogilville1 @Alex_on_A14 @doom37455413 @AngryFleas @ShadowDroid616 @doritmi @tomsirolimus @TheDrJon @jtmayes3 @nuhope2022 @Adrian7745 @statsguyuk @CurfewX @JDCBurnhil @HupperichWerner @KStateTurk @BreezerGalway @Fornowago @Conservacat2 @zeetubes @AtomsksSanakan @MattMcInnis6 @Twitter https://t.co/gY0y7OQLHF https://t.co/eACNbOLBJZ
view full post

@Tellit007 @SamaHoole Many studies to show there's little to no concern with consuming animal products (meat or fat) and LDL https://t.co/gZuj1i6TEg https://t.co/EU10ASP73H https://t.co/jOf1nJYdWu https://t.co/7JxO5vQNjx https://t.co/lbVYVog484 https://t.co/fWeyIXcd7u https://t.co/AHlnUrPfpo
view full post

@CaloriesProper Lol, actually I believe you know well it's supposed to work the other way around; if they do any claim (which I'm not), they must provide the evidence to support it. Anyway, a couple about PUFA, which I think is the usual suspect: https://t.co/XRCpCeI920 https://t.co/nQtc1BFr60
view full post

@sguyenet @theproof @sguyenet @theproof What do you think about this meta-analysis of RCTs? https://t.co/fREL2mK7IN
view full post

RT @Mangan150: Evidence suggests replacing saturated fat with n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality.…
view full post

Evidence suggests replacing saturated fat with n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality. The suggestion of benefits reported in earlier meta-analyses is due to the inclusion of inadequately controlled trials. https://t.co/LbLpngyVwf
view full post

@LesFleurs67 @kemminnick @bigfatsurprise "Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events" https://t.co/PNsZfCTgPA
view full post

@CapitalistV3GAN @OwlJoAJo "evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA w/ n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events or total mortality.The suggestion of benefits reported in earlier meta-analyses is due to inadequately controlled trials." https://t.co/PNsZfCTgPA
view full post

INTERESTING: Saturated fatty acid intake/ heart disease may not be linked
view full post

@ScepticalDoctor @ValtsuH @Max_Plaid Responding with “bro” voice is childish and shows you don’t understand the topic adequately to argue with concise points. PUFAs are not at all beneficial for improving CVD outcomes when your studies are designed properly. https://t.co/cAtqkZWWU5
view full post

@ScepticalDoctor Yes, these trials have a lot of confounding factors. https://t.co/1rPjBwHF6e
view full post

@SecoraPearlRem They are not https://t.co/54Uav4d0lc https://t.co/gEI8YV69iR https://t.co/pvU9ytSB8U https://t.co/B2qsqw3Q2x https://t.co/CaxsuRgyin
view full post

@NoNotTheDrummer @kayleighisded @philly_taco @alliemarie777 @vssapaige @colormeboldly https://t.co/QKggdY4VvZ
view full post

@TuckerGoodrich @The_Nutrivore https://t.co/OpHIQsmXdf
view full post

RT @Mangan150: Much of the evidence used by the experts to recommend use of vegetable oils in place of saturated fat is shoddy. When adequ…
view full post

RT @Mangan150: Much of the evidence used by the experts to recommend use of vegetable oils in place of saturated fat is shoddy. When adequ…
view full post

RT @Mangan150: Much of the evidence used by the experts to recommend use of vegetable oils in place of saturated fat is shoddy. When adequ…
view full post

RT @Mangan150: Much of the evidence used by the experts to recommend use of vegetable oils in place of saturated fat is shoddy. When adequ…
view full post

Much of the evidence used by the experts to recommend use of vegetable oils in place of saturated fat is shoddy. When adequately controlled trials are used, benefits disappear. https://t.co/LbLpngyVwf
view full post

The effect of replacing saturated fat with n-6 polyunsaturated fat on coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - the best method in nutritional science and metabolism shows no difference between Saturated fat and omega-6 fat! https://t.co/hADgdwYbrk
view full post

RT @Mangan150: @IvorGoodbody https://t.co/Awv00AOofO
view full post

@IvorGoodbody https://t.co/Awv00AOofO
view full post

RT @raphaels7: https://t.co/v7gcZyOA5e “The suggestion of benefits reported [SFA => N6] in earlier meta-analyses is due to the inclusion of…
view full post

RT @raphaels7: https://t.co/v7gcZyOA5e “The suggestion of benefits reported [SFA => N6] in earlier meta-analyses is due to the inclusion of…
view full post

https://t.co/v7gcZyOA5e “The suggestion of benefits reported [SFA => N6] in earlier meta-analyses is due to the inclusion of inadequately controlled trials” https://t.co/EPqT5mDu0I
view full post

@NutritionMadeS3 @CarolHo03279746 Are you referring to this meta-analysis?
view full post

@Veganella_ @The_Nutrivore @MrDiefenbach @LoraJR72 @kirthurgan @FusionProgGuy @waseemkiani @mosca_matthew @MistyMum2 @Parallax9999 @JoeKerr57254356 @OofT74480205 @AnimalJustice6 @cerebralsymphoy @Rev0lvingDoor @ThatTennisVegan @bongxdylan @TheTrueCompton @Grahanimal @_Aloominati_ @NutritionMadeS3 @whsource @BioLayne And this one: Conclusion: “Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality. https://t.co/x7W1qB6pgR
view full post

@ElliottWins @The_Nutrivore @Plant_proof Here ya go, Elliott: "Conclusion: “Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality." https://t.co/x7W1qB6pgR
view full post

@Tom_Babington1 @nakedathletes @kevinnbass *cough cough* https://t.co/HpC54R8Kma
view full post

@Tom_Babington1 @kevinnbass So, are we not taking into account this meta-analysis? https://t.co/HpC54R8Kma
view full post

@mosca_matthew @AmandaZZ100 And anoher one: https://t.co/USi9LWeT9y
view full post

@joemclean95 This one published in 2017 suggests otherwise. Looks like the verdict is still out? https://t.co/Wf7tmkj1yV
view full post

As evidências disponíveis de ensaios clínicos randomizados controlados adequadamente sugerem que a substituição de SFA por PUFA n-6 provavelmente não reduzirá o risco de doença cardíaca coronária (DCC), a mortalidade por DCC ou a mortalidade total. https://t.co/aVBDB7URCi
view full post

@MyNutritionSci @WiswordBrasil @Travis_Statham @ScepticalDoctor I clicked on the link to read the abstract, then saw this more recent paper from 2017 which seems to contrdict the findings. I'm on the sidelines, not advocating for one side or another https://t.co/Ktt9ZF2MSm
view full post

@bohdyone @Travis_Statham @MyNutritionSci @ScepticalDoctor Moreover …  "The effect of replacing saturated fat with mostly n-6 polyunsaturated fat on coronary heart disease" ARE NOT THE ONLY EFFECTS. Dying from something PUFA-induced, earlier, isn't a win.
view full post

RT @bohdyone: @MyNutritionSci @Travis_Statham @ScepticalDoctor Interesting, but I saw another that appears to directly contradict those fin…
view full post

@MyNutritionSci @Travis_Statham @ScepticalDoctor Interesting, but I saw another that appears to directly contradict those findings. https://t.co/YyJv40vuZG
view full post

RT @PreKureOfficial: @MyNutritionSci @simondankel @zinocker @kariannesve The only CHD events decreased in the Cochrane meta, by a tiny exte…
view full post

@MyNutritionSci @simondankel @zinocker @kariannesve The only CHD events decreased in the Cochrane meta, by a tiny extent, are unblinded ones - angina and revascularization - where LDL level is a diagnostic criteria in uncertain cases. And if you remove the confounded studies you won't even see that. https://t.co/PJI48nKIBQ
view full post

@Alecsplaining @MarieSpreckley @jaapseidell I was talking about the red meat/white meat/ pp study you posted. As for SFA vs. PUFA, I have no big dog in the fight, data is messy, in this meta - in adequately controlled trials comparing SFA vs n-6, there is no difference in CVD events or mortality https://t.co/9eQlOxoTe6
view full post

@Plant_proof @OhhiyoGarmen Also from 2017. So much for an echo chamber, "Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality. " https://t.co/Nh1yzWyiUy
view full post

@FoodFirst_Ty @CarnivoreAntMan https://t.co/UMhFxeSPOY https://t.co/ZKkBntwOMF https://t.co/sS40p2WNOn https://t.co/c5sTcM00ro https://t.co/QgAo5JaDRY https://t.co/wLREegMaKm https://t.co/TY096o1CWZ
view full post

@The_Nutrivore @TheAlanAragon @StolteThiago "Robust" may be overstating the evidence. https://t.co/ejaRgk5qcU https://t.co/7dYDOXlgWy https://t.co/d8gOfPRo6C https://t.co/M6523GE5dg Silverman (2016) also cites the same studies as the AHA meta-analysis that has been criticized: https://t.co/SbP22Iwhuo
view full post

RT @DiscoStew66: https://t.co/yV10JFpo6q
view full post

RT @tjavanainen2018: ”Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA…
view full post

”Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality” #rasva #SFA #PUFA #CHD https://t.co/WFzxo7OSSv
view full post

”Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality” #rasva #SFA #PUFA #CHD https://t.co/5cwsRmXNVl
view full post

@GovCanHealth These findings have implications for current dietary recommendations https://t.co/IxUo187Cwf
view full post

RT @DiscoStew66: https://t.co/yV10JFpo6q
view full post

The Effect of Replacing Saturated Fat With Mostly n-6 Polyunsaturated Fat on Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. https://t.co/6QdhueARAm
view full post

https://t.co/yV10JFpo6q
view full post

“Available evidence from adequately controlled randomised controlled trials suggest replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality.” https://t.co/3VZQOzY3jp
view full post

@The_Nutrivore Hmmm.. https://t.co/ndbZhXjQbu https://t.co/tJQ6OQijTb https://t.co/4Q4t1nB8bU https://t.co/vxbR0zNHeB https://t.co/IZSQvehGRC https://t.co/SZTcifSP0V Which studies to believe..
view full post

@lowcarbGP When it comes to fats, it's worth keeping this meta-analysis in mind https://t.co/fREL2mK7IN
view full post

@IngersolRobert @craigthomler @JorgeLarangeir1 @ClimateOfGavin Does an association of 0.97 across half-a-million people really support that claim? https://t.co/hjm46MMkW9 Does the RCT evidence for SFA replacement really support that claim? https://t.co/H80sxBNYqL This is not contradictory evidence. It's confirmation of a null hypothesis.
view full post

@jheilesonRD @TheAlanAragon @KrisSkeggs @EndGame_HS You're got that backwards, for Hamley, at least. "...replacing SFA with mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality." https://t.co/PgRQm3mQri
view full post

@POhukainen @FatEmperor @TomPMarshall Really? This is a non-statin intervention. https://t.co/H80sxBNYqL
view full post

RT @puddleg: @JimJohnsonSci The @stevenhamley meta-analysis, which tries to account for confounding by the mixed interventions included in…
view full post

RT @puddleg: @JimJohnsonSci The @stevenhamley meta-analysis, which tries to account for confounding by the mixed interventions included in…
view full post

@JimJohnsonSci The @stevenhamley meta-analysis, which tries to account for confounding by the mixed interventions included in the diet-heart metas, should also be considered: https://t.co/H80sxBNYqL
view full post

RT @DiegoNSalman: Meta análisis de estudios aleatorios sobre reemplazo de grasas saturadas por ácidos grasos omega 6: No hay beneficio algu…
view full post

RT @DiegoNSalman: Meta análisis de estudios aleatorios sobre reemplazo de grasas saturadas por ácidos grasos omega 6: No hay beneficio algu…
view full post

RT @DiegoNSalman: Meta análisis de estudios aleatorios sobre reemplazo de grasas saturadas por ácidos grasos omega 6: No hay beneficio algu…
view full post

Meta análisis de estudios aleatorios sobre reemplazo de grasas saturadas por ácidos grasos omega 6: No hay beneficio alguno en mortalidad o infartos al disminuir o reemplazar el consumo grasa saturada #LowCarbChile https://t.co/4zaJTYFeuB
view full post

Cahque jour on dit a mes patients de ne surtout pas manger de gras saturés et de manger des huiles végétales chimiques a la place pour santé cardiovasculaire. Logic much. https://t.co/yYRlxPz6lV
view full post

@RChrisCC @kevinnbass And more recent 2017 review questions whether replacing SFs with n-6 PUFA would be of benefit: "Available evidence from adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA with...n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality." https://t.co/f2Xpuya0OH
view full post

@Sadrien_GW2 @Smark_phd @ProfTimNoakes @FatEmperor @grantsnz @CarynZinn That's why we included a reference to the Steve Hamley meta-analysis, which does that (as far as it is possible;). https://t.co/H80sxBNYqL
view full post

RT @DrSaripanidis: Μεγάλες αναλυτικές μελέτες δημοσιευμένων τυχαιοποιημένων κλινικών εργασιών απέδειξαν πως η κατανάλωση κορεσμένων λιπών σ…
view full post

Μεγάλες αναλυτικές μελέτες δημοσιευμένων τυχαιοποιημένων κλινικών εργασιών απέδειξαν πως η κατανάλωση κορεσμένων λιπών στη διατροφή δεν αυξάνει τη θνησιμότητα! https://t.co/3tRjh7JBBP https://t.co/Jw5AU5vprz https://t.co/YSkKw5LaCp https://t.co/mIdA8E8qQG
view full post

Available evidence from adequately controlled randomized controlled trials suggest replacing saturated fatty acids (SFA) with mostly n-6 polyunsaturated fat is UNLIKELY to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality. https://t.co/B1LCrnQYHp
view full post

Interesting!
view full post

RT @Khalzur: Niektóre metaanalizy pokazują, że zastąpienie nasyconych kwasów tłuszczowych kwasami omega 6 nie zmniejsza ryzyka choroby nied…
view full post

Niektóre metaanalizy pokazują, że zastąpienie nasyconych kwasów tłuszczowych kwasami omega 6 nie zmniejsza ryzyka choroby niedokrwiennej serca ani nie zmniejsza śmiertelności z tego powodu i całkowitej. #zdrowie #dieta #fitluty #nutrition #dietetyka https://t.co/uAzAZMdkkO
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

RT @KurtLass1: @MMindrumMD @DiscoStew66 Open access location: https://t.co/82LzXPrcCo
view full post

https://t.co/7pMTsxz8UR https://t.co/PIZGN3HSJw
view full post

@MMindrumMD @DiscoStew66 Open access location: https://t.co/82LzXPrcCo
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

RT @MMindrumMD: “adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or tot…
view full post

“adequately controlled RCTs suggest replacing SFA w/ mostly n-6 PUFA is unlikely to reduce CHD events, CHD mortality or total mortality. The suggestion of benefits reported in earlier meta-analyses is due to inclusion of inadequately controlled trials.” https://t.co/pv4KUChttp
view full post

@PeterAttiaMD The RCTs and the meta-analyses of the RCTs are nicely summarized here https://t.co/LYHTstcGWk. Current "expert" wisdom still maintains that replacing saturated fat with omega-6 PUFAs reducies CV risk but the data is very weak and depends on which RCTs are included.
view full post