Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions demonstrate high interest and engagement through references to specific evidence quality statistics, such as 'only 18% of recommendations supported by high-quality data,' and debates about navigating patient care amid limited evidence. The tone varies from analytical to concern-driven, underscoring the importance of improving evidence in primary care for meaningful impact.
Most discussions recognize the issue raised in the publication, with some agreeing that the quality of evidence in primary care is limited.
Posts show high interest by mentioning statistics like '18% of recommendations based on high-quality evidence' and debating how to proceed with limited data.
Participants engage deeply, referencing specific studies, data points, and practical challenges faced in primary care, indicating thoughtful analysis.
The discussions highlight the significance of the issue, emphasizing the need for better evidence to inform practice, which could influence clinical approaches.
Of course, this isn't all because docs don't know or don't apply evidence - often there is simply a dearth of data. For example, one study suggests just 18% of primary care recommendations have high quality evidence generated to support them! 10/14 https://t.co/aPFTkiHtHF
References: 1. Ebell MH, Sokol R, Lee A, Simons C, Early J. How good is the evidence to support primary care practice? Evid Based Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):88-92. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110704. Epub 2017 May 29. PMID: 28554944. 2. Del Grande, Filippo MD, MBA, MHEM*†; Aro, Michael
@SIGSYS @safetycloset @Jangofett5556 @SigittaNew Ebell MH, Sokol R, Lee A, et al How good is the evidence to support primary care practice? BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 2017;22:88-92. https://t.co/f6dnKWbwX7
@Noahpinion "In primary care oriented medical reference, 18% were based on consistent high quality patient oriented evidence" https://t.co/UCIFrqdYIR How does one move forward in a world with infinite facts and finite evidence for success? Clinical experience can be a guide.
This video provides an overview of ineffective practices in healthcare and their prevalence. It delves into psychological phenomena behind perceived treatment effectiveness and highlights research methods to discern…
Action bias in healthcare can lead to unnecessary medical interventions. This video discusses how cognitive biases influence decisions, spotlighting the significant issue of medical overuse and its implications for…
References: 1. Ebell MH, Sokol R, Lee A, Simons C, Early J. How good is the evidence to support primary care practice? Evid Based Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):88-92. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110704. Epub 2017 May 29. PMID: 28554944. 2. Del Grande, Filippo MD, MBA, MHEM*†; Aro, Michael
@Noahpinion "In primary care oriented medical reference, 18% were based on consistent high quality patient oriented evidence" https://t.co/UCIFrqdYIR How does one move forward in a world with infinite facts and finite evidence for success? Clinical experience can be a guide.
@SIGSYS @safetycloset @Jangofett5556 @SigittaNew Ebell MH, Sokol R, Lee A, et al How good is the evidence to support primary care practice? BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 2017;22:88-92. https://t.co/f6dnKWbwX7
Of course, this isn't all because docs don't know or don't apply evidence - often there is simply a dearth of data. For example, one study suggests just 18% of primary care recommendations have high quality evidence generated to support them! 10/14 https://t.co/aPFTkiHtHF
AC
DH
D
PB