Trials June 2017 PMID 28681707

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.

Paula R Williamson, Douglas G Altman, Heather Bagley, Karen L Barnes, Jane M Blazeby, Sara T Brookes, Mike Clarke, Elizabeth Gargon, Sarah Gorst, Nicola Harman, Jamie J Kirkham, Angus McNair, Cecilia A C Prinsen, Jochen Schmitt, Caroline B Terwee

Mentions

18
Peak: 2 in Feb 2022
across 3 sources since Nov 2017

Extended reach

11,993
potential audience

Total likes

26

Video views

2,729

Mentions per month

Nov 2017 – Nov 2024

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter9 posts
  • YouTube5 videos
  • News4 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions consistently praise the COMET initiative for its detailed methodology and practical applications, as seen in remarks about systematic reviews, collaborations, and the potential to reduce research waste, which reflect a shared enthusiasm and recognition of its transformative role in standardizing outcomes in clinical research.

AgreementStrong agreement

Most posts clearly support the importance of the COMET initiative and its methodology, indicating strong agreement.

InterestHigh interest

Posts demonstrate high interest, highlighting detailed strategies, systematic reviews, and enthusiasm about core outcome set development.

EngagementHigh engagement

Posts actively discuss specific projects, methodologies, and tools like the COMET handbook, showing deep engagement.

ImpactHigh impact

Discussions emphasize the significance of these standards for reducing research heterogeneity and improving clinical trial outcomes, indicating a high impact.

Abstract in brief

  • Selecting relevant outcomes is essential in clinical trials to effectively compare interventions and influence health policy and practice.
  • Researchers recognize the need for standardized outcomes, leading to the development of core outcome sets that must be measured in all trials for specific areas.
  • The COMET Initiative's Handbook provides guidelines for creating, implementing, evaluating, and updating these core outcome sets, promoting ongoing research in this field.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Masayuki Saka
@SakamasPT · X

引用論文より、COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) のハンドブックを発見。オープンアクセス。こちらは40-50ページあるので今後必要な時が来たら。。 https://t.co/sbFU9ky8Tn https://t.co/07eoQLKRao

Mar 11, 2024 · 6 likes · 2,738 followers View post →
CROSSSD study
@CROSSSD_ · X

The CROSSSD study method was informed by a growing body of existing work by a community of core outcome set developers; the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials @COMETinitiative. Handbook supporting development of consensus-based recommendations https://t.co/G7gQNyinu7 https://t.co/z0qIawrItz

Feb 25, 2022 · 4 likes · 2 shares · 608 followers View post →
@gwshorter
@GWShorter · X

@DrSherryPagoto This thread is superb! Thank you. I always recommend @COMETinitiative to determine if there is a Core Outcome Set for your research area and to reduce research waste/improve relevance and evidence (if not you might want to create one... https://t.co/z9nhIQOhXh)

Sep 27, 2021 · 2 likes · 2,647 followers View post →
CROSSSD study
@CROSSSD_ · X

Qn: How can you develop a core outcome set (COS)? See @COMET initiative handbook https://t.co/VmTiGYNK1A & other COS developers' ways in a series of systematic reviews https://t.co/kOPYJgbIse @EvidenceRobot Qn: How did we develop a COS? See https://t.co/4IRRtbCiiE @UoNHearSci https://t.co/NMDpLkdWTo

Apr 11, 2022 · 2 likes · 608 followers View post →
CROSSSD study
@CROSSSD_ · X

@RouKat @Maryam_UoN @COMITIDStudy @hearingnihr @UoNHearSci @MedicineUoN #CROSSSD is currently undertaking Part 1 of #COS development for #SSD interventions as per Williamson's et al (2017) @COMETinitiative handbook https://t.co/D1NyqSo8Mc, here's our progress to date: https://t.co/TJay01x3kX

Jul 27, 2019 · 2 likes · 608 followers View post →
Raza S
@RazaSN · X

We also found substantial heterogeneity in outcomes reported across trials, which hinders evidence synthesis (eg meta-analysis) A potential solution is the Core Outcome Set methodology developed by @COMETinitiative for designing and interpreting trials https://t.co/zbKDl2gxj6 https://t.co/S0uYjoXliu

Apr 16, 2024 · 2 likes · 422 followers View post →

All mentions

John Houghton
@jsmhoughton · X

@sciqst @aoashwan There’s a very detailed methodology on how to develop a core outcome set from the COMET initiative: https://t.co/ikq3hn2KTl We’ll be considering all outcomes. We have completed systematic reviews for both claudication and CLTI. The focus groups are the next stage!

Nov 28, 2024 · 1 like · 517 followers View post →
Raza S
@RazaSN · X

We also found substantial heterogeneity in outcomes reported across trials, which hinders evidence synthesis (eg meta-analysis) A potential solution is the Core Outcome Set methodology developed by @COMETinitiative for designing and interpreting trials https://t.co/zbKDl2gxj6 https://t.co/S0uYjoXliu

Apr 16, 2024 · 2 likes · 422 followers View post →
Masayuki Saka
@SakamasPT · X

引用論文より、COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) のハンドブックを発見。オープンアクセス。こちらは40-50ページあるので今後必要な時が来たら。。 https://t.co/sbFU9ky8Tn https://t.co/07eoQLKRao

Mar 11, 2024 · 6 likes · 2,738 followers View post →
CROSSSD study
@CROSSSD_ · X

Qn: How can you develop a core outcome set (COS)? See @COMET initiative handbook https://t.co/VmTiGYNK1A & other COS developers' ways in a series of systematic reviews https://t.co/kOPYJgbIse @EvidenceRobot Qn: How did we develop a COS? See https://t.co/4IRRtbCiiE @UoNHearSci https://t.co/NMDpLkdWTo

Apr 11, 2022 · 2 likes · 608 followers View post →
Mild-Moderate Hearing Loss PSP
@JLAhearing · X

RT @CROSSSD_: The CROSSSD study method was informed by a growing body of existing work by a community of core outcome set developers; the C…

Feb 25, 2022 · 2 shares · 854 followers View post →
CROSSSD study
@CROSSSD_ · X

The CROSSSD study method was informed by a growing body of existing work by a community of core outcome set developers; the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials @COMETinitiative. Handbook supporting development of consensus-based recommendations https://t.co/G7gQNyinu7 https://t.co/z0qIawrItz

Feb 25, 2022 · 4 likes · 2 shares · 608 followers View post →
@gwshorter
@GWShorter · X

@DrSherryPagoto This thread is superb! Thank you. I always recommend @COMETinitiative to determine if there is a Core Outcome Set for your research area and to reduce research waste/improve relevance and evidence (if not you might want to create one... https://t.co/z9nhIQOhXh)

Sep 27, 2021 · 2 likes · 2,647 followers View post →
CROSSSD study
@CROSSSD_ · X

@RouKat @Maryam_UoN @COMITIDStudy @hearingnihr @UoNHearSci @MedicineUoN #CROSSSD is currently undertaking Part 1 of #COS development for #SSD interventions as per Williamson's et al (2017) @COMETinitiative handbook https://t.co/D1NyqSo8Mc, here's our progress to date: https://t.co/TJay01x3kX

Jul 27, 2019 · 2 likes · 608 followers View post →
LogicalOutcomes
@logical_info · X

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 https://t.co/g8pcpBwH31 #indicators

Apr 26, 2019 · 217 followers View post →
A minimum data set—Core outcome set, core data elements, and ...
News

doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4. pmid:28681707. 31. Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, et al. Core Outcome Set ...

Aug 22, 2024 View →
An open science pathway for drug marketing authorization ...
News

doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5499094. pmid:28681707. 10. Teixeira T, Kweder SL, Saint-Raymond A. Are the European ...

Aug 9, 2021 View →
Proposed Framework for Patient-Centered Outcomes-Based ...
News

doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4. 26. Kirkham JJ, Davis K, Altman DG, et al. Core Outcome Set – STAndards for Development: the COS-STAD ...

Feb 11, 2021 View →
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD ...
News

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4 PMID: 28681707. 7. Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, et al. Core ...

Nov 16, 2017 View →