July 2018 PMID 28927896

Niacin and heart disease prevention: Engraving its tombstone is a mistake.

Harold Robert Superko, Xue-Qiao Zhao, Howard N Hodis, John R Guyton

Download social card

Mentions

3
Peak: 1 in Jun 2019
across 2 sources since Jun 2019

Extended reach

905,823
potential audience

Total likes

17,383

Video views

905,771

Mentions per month

Jun 2019 – May 2024

Where it's discussed

  • YouTube2 videos
  • X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The group collectively acknowledges prior clinical trials that demonstrated benefits of niacin, such as reduced cardiovascular events, with comments like 'numerous NIH clinical trials have demonstrated a significant reduction in events.' The tone varies from supportive to cautious, reflecting the tension between historical evidence and recent critiques, and words like 'true' and references to specific studies suggest a moderate level of interest and engagement rooted in scientific discourse.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions agree with the article's critique, emphasizing that previous clinical trials showed benefits of niacin, contrary to recent findings.

InterestModerate interest

Participants demonstrate some interest, referencing specific trials and interpretations, but overall discussion remains somewhat surface level.

EngagementNeutral engagement

Posts mention studies and authors but do not deeply analyze methodologies or broader implications, indicating moderate engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions highlight the ongoing debate about niacin's role, suggesting some influence on perceptions but not widespread or transformative change.

Abstract in brief

  • Niacin (nicotinic acid) has historically been used for over 40 years to prevent coronary heart disease, showing benefits like reducing clinical events and improving lesions, including a 6% absolute reduction in mortality, but recent large trials in 2011 and 2014 found no additional benefit when added to statin therapy.
  • Differences in trial design, patient populations, niacin formulations, dosages, and timing (mealtime vs. bedtime dosing) may explain why earlier studies showed benefits while newer trials did not, with the most benefit seen in patients with high LDL cholesterol and triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol.
  • Due to these mixed results, some experts suggest stopping the use of niacin in statin-treated patients and the US FDA to halt marketing of combined statin-niacin medications, emphasizing the importance of proper formulation, dose, and timing to potentially achieve lipid improvements and cardiovascular benefits.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Robert Superko
@highhdl · X

@Lpa_Doc This is true. However, numerous NIH clinical trials have deonstrated a significan reduction in events with Niacin combination Rx (Superko HR, Zhao XQ, Hoddis HN, Guyton JR. Niacin and Heart Disease Prevention:Engraving its Tombstone is a Mistake, J Clin Lipid 2017;joi:org/10.1016

Jun 21, 2019 · 2 likes · 53 followers View post →

All mentions

Robert Superko
@highhdl · X

@Lpa_Doc This is true. However, numerous NIH clinical trials have deonstrated a significan reduction in events with Niacin combination Rx (Superko HR, Zhao XQ, Hoddis HN, Guyton JR. Niacin and Heart Disease Prevention:Engraving its Tombstone is a Mistake, J Clin Lipid 2017;joi:org/10.1016

Jun 21, 2019 · 2 likes · 53 followers View post →