Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions reflect a balanced interest in scientific details, with users referencing various studies on food risks and benefits, such as the relationship between red meat and heart disease, and debating the strength of evidence presented in meta-analyses. The tone combines curiosity with skepticism, highlighting ongoing debates about dietary guidelines and the interpretation of epidemiological data.
Most discussion points align with the article's findings, emphasizing that processed red meats and sugary drinks are associated with higher cardiovascular risks, while foods like dairy and eggs show no significant effects.
Posts show moderate interest, with users referencing specific studies, discussing dietary impacts, and questioning mechanisms, indicating engagement beyond surface-level reactions.
Several posts cite detailed research, mention meta-analyses, and debate scientific validity, reflecting deep engagement with the topic and the data behind these conclusions.
The sharing of multiple studies and methodological critiques suggests the discussions could influence personal dietary choices and perceptions of nutrition science, indicating a moderate impact.
@metamitya https://t.co/l7nq1BmvbD https://t.co/UIewNP0brx https://t.co/tZYzah7G6z https://t.co/GPUFYTroEV https://t.co/CEcEa7LfVh https://t.co/FrUcBjNmsm https://t.co/BhLi1z329P https://t.co/FrUcBjNmsm https://t.co/BhLi1z329P
https://t.co/XMEtN2p9xe
Is visceral fat caused by too much carbohydrate? Sugar? Insulin? Do seed oils cause disease or help prevent it? Are only small LDLs harmful or all LDL? Is fruit causing metabolic disease? I discussed all of this with Cardiologist Dr Pradid Jamnadas. Full video
"Comparing the highest to the lowest categories of egg intake, no association between egg intake and risk of CHD or risk of stroke was observed . . . In the dose-response meta-analysis, there was no association" - https://t.co/4rarcCfMfE https://t.co/RXs9Pipfma
@_life_imperfect @Veganella_ @AtheistDamned @rocaverde3 @Philodices @JustinTemplerSr @andyswarbs @sean_Stilson @BurntOutUtopian @BornVegan1 1 cigarette/day, CHD RR 1.48 (1.30 to 1.69). https://t.co/NNgsHRSTqz ~3oz red meat/day, CHD RR 1.51 (1.11 to 2.06). https://t.co/UFVOHAJZmy Meta-analysis of red meat and CHD: https://t.co/UIewNP0brx
@FusionProgGuy https://t.co/HXsIrF0Uu0 https://t.co/975vilvjhU. https://t.co/ehxs1x1082 https://t.co/EZ7pIvuw0Q
This video discusses the top five foods that can help prevent arterial plaque buildup and reduce heart attack risk, highlighting dietary choices that promote cardiovascular health based on recent research insights.
Is fruit just sugar? This video explores the science behind fruit intake and its actual health benefits. Are the well-known advantages of eating fruit real or merely myths? Join us as we delve into the impacts of fruit…
This video addresses misconceptions about sugar and carbohydrates, clarifies terminology, and provides useful recommendations based on current research and guidelines.
Dr. Pradip Jamnadas discusses a specific fat type linked to heart disease, LDL mistakes, seed oils, and more. This video emphasizes the importance of diet in cardiovascular health, referencing recent research on food…
Is visceral fat caused by too much carbohydrate? Sugar? Insulin? Do seed oils cause disease or help prevent it? Are only small LDLs harmful or all LDL? Is fruit causing metabolic disease? I discussed all of this with Cardiologist Dr Pradid Jamnadas. Full video
https://t.co/XMEtN2p9xe
@BHBEnjoyer It doesn't matter which argument. They're both pointing at the same a priori inference. Yeah, I can provide the data. https://t.co/UIewNOJ8px https://t.co/l7nq1BEEpL
@spion @Ice_trey522 @Revival_Fitness @ZKForTre Sure. You don't really get confidence intervals that tight with high multicollinearity issues. https://t.co/UIewNOJ8px
@_eleanorina Prospective cohort studies. https://t.co/UIewNOJ8px
@IgnatiusReilly8 @eurekaskastle @robertlufkinmd Dose response of red meat and coronary heart disease compared with sugary drinks. Notice that SSB are worse on a per-calorie basis; red meat is worse on a per-serving basis. https://t.co/bK5fKLXBVg https://t.co/kOlAConfdT
@IgnatiusReilly8 @eurekaskastle @robertlufkinmd Dose response between red meat and mortality: https://t.co/bK5fKLXBVg https://t.co/G9iQnCihrM
Check out these studies: https://t.co/b4F2EUbUv9 and https://t.co/yWb7A5CpMi @CPW_Global @OldwaysPT @ICCcereals @EUFIC @GrainsLegumesNC
@FusionProgGuy https://t.co/HXsIrF0Uu0 https://t.co/975vilvjhU. https://t.co/ehxs1x1082 https://t.co/EZ7pIvuw0Q
@MartinR158 Meta-analysis: https://t.co/UIewNP0brx Cohort study with no persuasive evidence of the healthy user bias: https://t.co/UFVOHAJZmy Be warned that this is epididdlydoodlydemiology, and thus invalid in the eyes of 99% of red meat proponents.
@NutritionDanny Data for my graphs above come from these studies, showing that risk is set to 1 at zero intake. https://t.co/EPYFZTehJf https://t.co/xACCm0rfMm https://t.co/nGwcv9vtGz https://t.co/8AzERAMz3W
@LC_sailor @CarnivoreSapien Oh really? https://t.co/5IEnTo6e2l https://t.co/8XOcug9fos https://t.co/rzAPlvF9M0 https://t.co/dKc62744k1 https://t.co/IqqluEEfVA Start with these and come back when you are done reading
RT @The_Nutrivore: @_life_imperfect @Veganella_ @AtheistDamned @rocaverde3 @Philodices @JustinTemplerSr @andyswarbs @sean_Stilson @BurntOut…
@_life_imperfect @Veganella_ @AtheistDamned @rocaverde3 @Philodices @JustinTemplerSr @andyswarbs @sean_Stilson @BurntOutUtopian @BornVegan1 1 cigarette/day, CHD RR 1.48 (1.30 to 1.69). https://t.co/NNgsHRSTqz ~3oz red meat/day, CHD RR 1.51 (1.11 to 2.06). https://t.co/UFVOHAJZmy Meta-analysis of red meat and CHD: https://t.co/UIewNP0brx
@metamitya https://t.co/l7nq1BmvbD https://t.co/UIewNP0brx https://t.co/tZYzah7G6z https://t.co/GPUFYTroEV https://t.co/CEcEa7LfVh https://t.co/FrUcBjNmsm https://t.co/BhLi1z329P https://t.co/FrUcBjNmsm https://t.co/BhLi1z329P
@namtrag @tednaiman Food groups and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies https://t.co/5EAQhoIYTa https://t.co/fC68wQptP3
"Comparing the highest to the lowest categories of egg intake, no association between egg intake and risk of CHD or risk of stroke was observed . . . In the dose-response meta-analysis, there was no association" - https://t.co/4rarcCfMfE https://t.co/RXs9Pipfma
@ScepticalDoctor The change of lifestyle (might be more movement) and nutrition could have lowered BMI by means of average calorie intake, makes perfect sense. Here's another related meta-study by the way: https://t.co/O77YAnzyAZ
Food Groups and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke and Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies https://t.co/lnBaGGSS3V #PubMed @nlm_news @NCBI
"...no signifcant association was found for dairy https://t.co/r00ZUtXPQi and egg, https://t.co/4JJ1u5J9Oo while increased risk was found for meat, https://t.co/wRSupXfSGj particularly processed red meat...
N
Z
MM
AT
WI
FS
Z
V
SV
HR
NK