@rdpeng Leaving this here... (from: https://t.co/VhLGuArrE4) https://t.co/uWy9z0Fuiw
Psychology's Renaissance.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Oct 2017 – Apr 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter91 posts
-
News26 articles
-
Blogs8 articles
-
Bluesky3 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Facebook2 posts
-
Reddit2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Several conversations highlight critical ideas from the article, such as the critique of traditional statistical methods and the call for increased transparency in research practices. For instance, one participant emphasized the need for sharing data and skepticism towards statistical solutions, while another referenced the 'file-drawer problem' to illustrate challenges in publishing failure. The tone of these discussions is predominantly professional and constructive, underscoring a collective move toward reform and acknowledgment of the issues faced within the discipline.
Many discussions reflect a consensus around the need for methodological reforms in psychology, particularly regarding publication bias and replication issues.
The variety of perspectives indicates high curiosity about the article, highlighting its relevance to ongoing conversations in the field.
Discussions often reference specific concepts such as p-hacking and the importance of sharing data, indicating a moderate level of engagement with the material.
Participants largely perceive the publication as having a significant impact on the field, suggesting it may contribute to a shift in how research is conducted and reported.
Abstract in brief
- The period from 2010 to 2012 marked a "Renaissance" in psychology, stemming from a realization that traditional methods of data collection and analysis made it too easy to publish misleading findings.
- Researchers shifted their focus from publication bias caused by unpublished studies to concerns about flawed analyses, prompting a reevaluation of their methodologies.
- Key recommended changes include increased transparency through disclosure and preregistration, skepticism towards statistical fixes for publication bias, and a belief that embracing meta-analytical approaches can reduce the likelihood of false positives in psychological research.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyA huge honor! Professor Lindsay giving a talk on Psychology’s Renaissance! @dstephenlindsay https://t.co/1yIXYqPBEi
“File-drawer problem” is misleading. It obscures the deep problems of p-hacking and HARKing: "Whereas our file drawers are sprinkled with failed studies that we did not publish, they are overflowing with failed analyses of the studies that we did publish." https://t.co/ETCFBMoEwJ https://t.co/oJ6dpPDBb0
@michael_nielsen I would point people towards this paper ( https://t.co/DnQRFTpC6q) and this paper (https://t.co/tjpObigE2P), but that's just limiting it to psychology, and not as detailed as a book. Really glad to hear you liked the book BTW!
@dstephenlindsay talking about Psychology’s Renaissance at @erasmusuni. https://t.co/l4Jljwhgd9
@danwilliamsphil @giladfeldman I’ve assigned this to undergrads on this topic: https://t.co/9hr1PB32JT
All mentions
Exploring the Integrity of Scientific Research in Psychology
The science is wonderful, but those who conduct it may not always be. This episode features psychologist Alejandro Posadas, who discusses the necessary criteria for quality research and addresses significant challenges…
Understanding the Replicability Crisis and Open Science Initiatives
You will be introduced to the replicability crisis. The video discusses the Open Science Movement, its objectives, and the importance of transparent research practices. It also reviews key articles analyzing…
Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, e1. https://t.co/UMv4z9ux7r Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J., & Simonsohn, U. (2018). Psychology’s renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 511–534. https://t.co/DQwF7HEhaD
RT @DegenRolf: In a lucid paper on "Psychology’s Renaissance", Uri Simonsohn et al nail down the root of all evil in their field. https://t…
@minzlicht @paulrconnor https://t.co/VhnYaXM8Bk
@ChMark161 @DanielHadas2 @soncharm Sharing data and code -- neither useless nor unrelated to replication. If you haven't ever thought about these issues before, a good article that provides an overview of reforms in psychology is here: https://t.co/DnX0pJ9bZN
https://t.co/CWAryWHNg1
@danwilliamsphil for a thoughtful overview of the replication crisis in psych https://t.co/zwq9NYRwu2 I like that it critically interrogates pseudosolutions, e.g., bayesian stats, meta-analysis. And that it has good discussions on topics such as publication bias, interpreting replications...
RT @stephen_want: @danwilliamsphil @giladfeldman I’ve assigned this to undergrads on this topic: https://t.co/9hr1PB32JT
RT @stephen_want: @danwilliamsphil @giladfeldman I’ve assigned this to undergrads on this topic: https://t.co/9hr1PB32JT
@danwilliamsphil @giladfeldman I’ve assigned this to undergrads on this topic: https://t.co/9hr1PB32JT
@michael_nielsen If there's a Nobel for program officers, I'll be so bold as to claim one for funding (and often helping craft the proposals for) the activities that you describe as creating a Renaissance* in psychology. :) *I assume in homage to this? https://t.co/QZAToxoHQM
RT @jrgptrs: “File-drawer problem” is misleading. It obscures the deep problems of p-hacking and HARKing: "Whereas our file drawers are spr…
RT @jrgptrs: “File-drawer problem” is misleading. It obscures the deep problems of p-hacking and HARKing: "Whereas our file drawers are spr…
RT @jrgptrs: “File-drawer problem” is misleading. It obscures the deep problems of p-hacking and HARKing: "Whereas our file drawers are spr…
“File-drawer problem” is misleading. It obscures the deep problems of p-hacking and HARKing: "Whereas our file drawers are sprinkled with failed studies that we did not publish, they are overflowing with failed analyses of the studies that we did publish." https://t.co/ETCFBMoEwJ https://t.co/oJ6dpPDBb0
@rdpeng Leaving this here... (from: https://t.co/VhLGuArrE4) https://t.co/uWy9z0Fuiw
@michael_nielsen I would point people towards this paper ( https://t.co/DnQRFTpC6q) and this paper (https://t.co/tjpObigE2P), but that's just limiting it to psychology, and not as detailed as a book. Really glad to hear you liked the book BTW!
@mongreloutsider There is an article by Leif Nelson, Joe Simmons and Uri Simonsohn that says it better than me. It's called "Psychology's Renaissance" or something like that.
RT @crodriguezprada: "Experiments that work are sent to a journal, whereas experiments that fail are sent to the file drawer. (...) This "f…
"Experiments that work are sent to a journal, whereas experiments that fail are sent to the file drawer. (...) This "file-drawer explanation" is incorrect. Most failed studies are not missing. They are published in our journals, masquerading as a success".https://t.co/aQbgJhut9X
@VsemHren @Bobbyberu2 This is the tenor of a broad debate that has taken place in psychology after the recognition of the "debacle". Here, I can only recommend you one important milestone article in this context: https://t.co/Os6TXLTbkK
"Credibility revolution" and "psychology's Renaissance" in practice... https://t.co/sVdfdyavIW
@BenBurke_REACH @CJFerguson1111 I think this paper is also a good summary of many of the issues: https://t.co/zGJsL2DH7G
@PaoloAPalma @alexluger Yes, that's it. For a nice background article, see https://t.co/mfoSFERvy6 For a comprehensive, really good length summary see @StuartJRitchie "Science Fictions"
We will discuss how fields like psychology have dealt with reproducibility issues, starting from the papers "Psychology's renaissance" (Nelson et al., 2018) and "A manifesto for reproducible science" (Munafo et al., 2017). Find the papers here: https://t.co/mPyoc8RGvL
We will discuss how fields like psychology have dealt with reproducibility issues, starting from the papers "Psychology's renaissance" (Nelson et al., 2018) and "A manifesto for reproducible science" (Munafo et al., 2017)
RT @Rpt_MX: Happy to start the term with our first online session to comment the paper Psychology's Renaissance
Happy to start the term with our first online session to comment the paper Psychology's Renaissance
@PEEP_lab Here are some really thoughtful and cautiously optimistic articles addressing some of the crises in psychology and social science: https://t.co/pXAHWlUoBZ https://t.co/kp55RFZm5g https://t.co/b7d0N8hOq2
Puts my hurriedly-put-together-for-sudden-switch-to-online-semester screencast introducing undergrads to "psychology's renaissance" to shame.
RT @LinkopingTea: What is the "open science" movement anyway and how did it all begin? Today we're reading a review of what can be called p…
What is the "open science" movement anyway and how did it all begin? Today we're reading a review of what can be called psychology's renaissance https://t.co/z9qItSxUtg
Review (2019). “Reproducible research into human semiochemical cues and pheromones: learning from psychology’s renaissance.“ https://t.co/AT6boNbQbY
Psychology's Renaissance by Nelson et al. (Why? Psychology is undergoing a replication crisis because of a focus on statistical significance as the key metric. User researchers could learn something from this) https://t.co/RQi3l4ilMX (9/9)
@MelissaGWolf For a positive take: https://t.co/J5cUUluq3S For history: https://t.co/1fWj9TyK8U
My mistake. We're reading Pelosi (2019) next week. Today's reading is @uri_sohn's "Psychology's Renaissance" article. https://t.co/s2Yc9H95sz
@DenOlmo @improvingpsych i also enjoyed these two resources (paper and blog post), at least for the psychology crisis: https://t.co/Ou4qqWub32 https://t.co/b8W5GrPGsi
@SolomonKurz I find this one really nice: https://t.co/SoEWsNn8R2
"... it is clear that the [methodological] Middle Ages are behind us, and the Enlightenment is just around the corner" - Nelson, Simmons, & Simonsohn, 2018, "Psychology’s Renaissance" https://t.co/pWSvmUrYbc
RT @FBpsy: @Joaquin_Sevilla @HelenaMatute @emulenews Le llaman "el renacimiento de la psicología" porque según algunos estamos saliendo de…
RT @FBpsy: @Joaquin_Sevilla @HelenaMatute @emulenews Le llaman "el renacimiento de la psicología" porque según algunos estamos saliendo de…
@Joaquin_Sevilla @HelenaMatute @emulenews Le llaman "el renacimiento de la psicología" porque según algunos estamos saliendo de la crisis más fuertes de lo que entramos. https://t.co/tcEaGeNycP
@LangelohMiriam @mariella_n_paul I still don't have the ultimate reference for this handy, but here are some suggestions: 1) Nelson et al.'s 'Psychology's Renaissance' might be most comprehensive https://t.co/PdSTZM7jGN 2) @BobbiePoPS's Revolution 2.0 https://t.co/QMlMqka0A4 1/
RT @rolandimhoff: @matkau I like "Psychology's Rennaisance" as a mild introduction that does not completely undermine their trust in the sc…
@matkau I like "Psychology's Rennaisance" as a mild introduction that does not completely undermine their trust in the scientific method https://t.co/0jzO72LIip
Reproducible research into human semiochemical cues and pheromones: learning from psychology’s renaissance https://t.co/Upo78fGycL
Reproducible research into human semiochemical cues and pheromones: learning from psychology’s renaissance https://t.co/HA4c3BhNaC https://t.co/hc2kohh3Uy
RT @TristramWyatt: Reproducible research into human semiochemical cues + #pheromones: learning from psychology’s renaissance #RegisteredRep…
RT @TristramWyatt: Reproducible research into human semiochemical cues + #pheromones: learning from psychology’s renaissance #RegisteredRep…
Reproducible research into human semiochemical cues + #pheromones: learning from psychology’s renaissance #RegisteredReports preprint @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/m4c7cyL1lj @BrianNosek @OSFramework @FifthSenseUK @MarcusMunafo @stevenmunger @deevybee @ukrepro
RT @pheromoneEvo: Reproducible research into human semiochemical cues + #pheromones: learning from psychology’s renaissance #RegisteredRepo…
RT @pheromoneEvo: Reproducible research into human semiochemical cues + #pheromones: learning from psychology’s renaissance #RegisteredRepo…
Reproducible research into human semiochemical cues + #pheromones: learning from psychology’s renaissance #RegisteredReports preprint @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/VmVJ06xb7E #olfaction #reproducibility @chrisdc77 @pollyp1 @Neuro_Skeptic @UFCST @darrenlogan
This last part of the story is nicely summarized here, in one of the most inspiring scientific articles I have read in the past years, by Nelson, @jpsimmon, @uri_sohn https://t.co/mfoSFERvy6
Psychology’s Renaissance: https://t.co/EzBeBH264g #OpenScience #Psychology
@ianagutierrez "Psychology's renaissance" by Nelson, Simmons, & Simonsohn (2018) is p great
That's from the "Psychology's Renaissance" paper btw.
Psychologists, how has psychology’s renaissance impacted your field? Has it impacted your teaching?
They posit that this is psychology’s “renaissance” rather than “replication crisis” (p. 512).
Nelson, Simmons & Simonsohn (2018) reflect on “Psychology’s Renaissance”, incl. the #filedrawer effect to #p-hacking. They critique approaches to the problem incl statistical solutions, prereg & disclosure, and meta-analyses. What were your impressions? #Psychpaperclub
AND WE’RE LIVE! Welcome to this week’s #PsychPaperClub. We’ll be live for the next hour, discussing “Psychology’s Renaissance” (Nelson, Simmons & Simonsohn,2018). Feel free to comment, share and contribute! -Chair #Psychpaperclub
RT @psychpaperclub: Join us tomorrow at 3pm GMT to discuss Psychology's Renaissance! Paper available here: https://t.co/f2sKA4UIPk Tune in…
RT @PsyPAGAlumni: Interested in replicability and the open science movement? Join the online paper club tomorrow at 3pm discussing Psycholo…
RT @psychpaperclub: Join us tomorrow at 3pm GMT to discuss Psychology's Renaissance! Paper available here: https://t.co/f2sKA4UIPk Tune in…
RT @psychpaperclub: Join us tomorrow at 3pm GMT to discuss Psychology's Renaissance! Paper available here: https://t.co/f2sKA4UIPk Tune in…
Psychology’s Renaissance? 7 years ago we realized that our credibility hinged on changing how we collect & analyze data We responded e.g.replications disclosure & preregistration are much more common than they were Enlightenment is just around the corner? https://t.co/RfRPCx7rpX
RT @psychpaperclub: Join us tomorrow at 3pm GMT to discuss Psychology's Renaissance! Paper available here: https://t.co/f2sKA4UIPk Tune in…
Join in the discussion about "Psychology's Renaissance" at our next online #PsychPaperClub tomorrow at 3pm GMT via the hashtag. See you there! @BPSOfficial @PsyPAG https://t.co/iBy6CdqNSI
Interested in replicability and the open science movement? Join the online paper club tomorrow at 3pm discussing Psychology's Renaissance https://t.co/SlMB4TX2T1
Join us tomorrow at 3pm GMT to discuss Psychology's Renaissance! Paper available here: https://t.co/f2sKA4UIPk Tune in LIVE via #PsychPaperClub Can't wait! @theroseturner @BPS_LHC @PsyPAG
@Ben_C_J https://t.co/JDt7fGqvJQ
RT @sTeamTraen: @timothycbates I was amazed by the concluding paragraphs and title of the "Psychology's Renaissance" paper, concluding that…
@timothycbates I was amazed by the concluding paragraphs and title of the "Psychology's Renaissance" paper, concluding that a corner had been turned. We're still at the Battle of Britain stage, a long way from El Alamein.
RT @psychpaperclub: *Ding ding ding!* For this month's #PsychPaperClub we'll be discussing "Psychology's Renaissance" (Nelson et al., 2018,…
RT @psychpaperclub: *Ding ding ding!* For this month's #PsychPaperClub we'll be discussing "Psychology's Renaissance" (Nelson et al., 2018,…
*Ding ding ding!* For this month's #PsychPaperClub we'll be discussing "Psychology's Renaissance" (Nelson et al., 2018, in Annual Review of Psychology) on Thur 28 March 3-4pm GMT. See you then for publication bias, p-hacking & prereg! @BPS_LHC @PsyPAG https://t.co/ykSN137xch
RT @HenryOtgaar: A huge honor! Professor Lindsay giving a talk on Psychology’s Renaissance! @dstephenlindsay https://t.co/1yIXYqPBEi
RT @HenryOtgaar: A huge honor! Professor Lindsay giving a talk on Psychology’s Renaissance! @dstephenlindsay https://t.co/1yIXYqPBEi
A huge honor! Professor Lindsay giving a talk on Psychology’s Renaissance! @dstephenlindsay https://t.co/1yIXYqPBEi
Until about 7 years ago, psychologists relied "on methods of data collection and analysis that make it too easy to publish false-positive, nonreplicable results ... That period ... constituted the real replication crisis" (Nelson, @jpsimmon, @uri_sohn). https://t.co/sBM2SZJ8Sq
RT @IrisVanRooij: Delighted to be hosting @dstephenlindsay for his talk @DondersInst: “Psychology's Renaissance: Progress toward Transparen…
RT @IrisVanRooij: Delighted to be hosting @dstephenlindsay for his talk @DondersInst: “Psychology's Renaissance: Progress toward Transparen…
RT @IrisVanRooij: Delighted to be hosting @dstephenlindsay for his talk @DondersInst: “Psychology's Renaissance: Progress toward Transparen…
RT @IrisVanRooij: Delighted to be hosting @dstephenlindsay for his talk @DondersInst: “Psychology's Renaissance: Progress toward Transparen…
RT @IrisVanRooij: Delighted to be hosting @dstephenlindsay for his talk @DondersInst: “Psychology's Renaissance: Progress toward Transparen…
RT @IrisVanRooij: Delighted to be hosting @dstephenlindsay for his talk @DondersInst: “Psychology's Renaissance: Progress toward Transparen…
RT @IrisVanRooij: Delighted to be hosting @dstephenlindsay for his talk @DondersInst: “Psychology's Renaissance: Progress toward Transparen…
"Most failed studies are not [in the file-drawer]. They are published in our journals, masquerading as successes." (Nelson, @jpsimmon, @uri_sohn, 2018, p. 514) https://t.co/sBM2SZJ8Sq
RT @Inframethod: Also this: https://t.co/sBM2SZJ8Sq (I don't have access so I have to order it, but if it uses the phrase "replication cri…
RT @RolfZwaan: @dstephenlindsay talking about Psychology’s Renaissance at @erasmusuni. https://t.co/l4Jljwhgd9
@dstephenlindsay talking about Psychology’s Renaissance at @erasmusuni. https://t.co/l4Jljwhgd9
If you have to stay up late reading for class: 1) Make it “Psychology’s Renaissance” (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3064811) 2) Get help from cat
"Psychology's Renaissance" ($) by Leif Nelson, @jpsimmon & @uri_sohn http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836