Synopsis of Social media discussions
The social discussions display a general agreement on the importance of using optimal database combinations, with posts sharing examples like searching Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science, emphasizing the article's findings. The tone varies from enthusiastic to reflective, with words like 'valuable' and 'must read,' illustrating genuine interest and recognition of the study's relevance to improving systematic review quality.
Agreement
Moderate agreementMost discussions acknowledge the importance of selecting the right databases, aligning with the article's emphasis on optimized combinations for literature searches.
Interest
High level of interestPosts show a high level of curiosity and enthusiasm about the practical implications of the research, especially in relation to improving systematic reviews.
Engagement
High engagementSeveral comments reference the methodology, suggest best practices, or share personal experiences, demonstrating active engagement.
Impact
Moderate level of impactWhile the discussions highlight the value of the study, they mainly serve to reinforce existing practices or encourage better research methods, indicating moderate impact.
Social Mentions
YouTube
7 Videos
30 Posts
Blogs
3 Articles
News
2 Articles
Metrics
Video Views
98
Total Likes
68
Extended Reach
438,921
Social Features
42
Timeline: Posts about article
Top Social Media Posts
Writing For Research
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systematic Reviews | Full Text https://t.co/oU5agQDHiH
view full post
Dr. Laura M. König
The joy when finding a paper that exactly answers your question!
Which databases should I search for a systematic literature review in psychology? ➡️EMBASE, MEDLINE/ Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycInfo. Source: https://t.co/Ws9ZXsdFtq found via https://t.co/NJ8Ej2kn11
view full post
Daniel Gould, MD, PhD
https://t.co/bX03MlEzls
If I ever emotionally recover from my first systematic review, for my next one I'll search Embase, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science.
Read on to find out more!
@wichor @OscarH_Franco @JosKleijnen @mlrethlefsen
#SystematicReviews #researchpaper
view full post
Wichor Bramer, PhD
@NydahlPeter Not a only source but it definitely adds value to your searches:
https://t.co/XcBvJpstaM
view full post
Hector Meza Comparan, MD
Always ask yourself which are the relevant databases for your research question! #systematicreviews ✅
https://t.co/t3oMGSrDXu
view full post
Posts referencing the article
Effective Database Combinations for Systematic Literature Reviews
This study identifies efficient database combinations for systematic reviews, revealing that using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieves about 98.3% of relevant articles, enhancing search completeness and review quality.
August 6, 2023
45 views
Optimal Database Strategies for Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
This study identifies effective database combinations for comprehensive literature retrieval in systematic reviews, highlighting that using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together captures 98.3% of relevant articles.
June 12, 2023
20 views
Optimal Database Combinations for Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
This study identifies effective database combinations for systematic review searches. Using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieves over 98% of relevant articles, improving review quality by ensuring comprehensive literature retrieval.
April 16, 2024
11 views
Optimal Database Combinations for Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
This study identifies the most efficient database combinations for systematic review literature searches, showing that using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieves over 98% of relevant articles, improving review completeness.
February 4, 2023
9 views
Optimizing Database Selection for Comprehensive Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
The study aims to identify the most efficient database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews, analyzing actual search results from published reviews. Using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieves about 98.3% of relevant articles, highlighting the importance of multiple dat
November 25, 2023
8 views
Optimal Database Combinations for Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
This study identifies the most efficient database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews, highlighting that using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieves over 98% of relevant articles.
February 1, 2023
5 views
Optimal Database Combinations for Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
This video discusses the most efficient database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews, highlighting that using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieves about 98.3% of relevant articles, improving review comprehensiveness.
August 15, 2024
2 views
-
RT @PreClic: Empezar la clase de hoy en @GVAlaRibera con @biblioenlace descubriendo está maravilla es una joya, que solo nos hemos encontra…
view full postJune 19, 2024
2
-
Fran
@Franjacega (Twitter)RT @PreClic: Empezar la clase de hoy en @GVAlaRibera con @biblioenlace descubriendo está maravilla es una joya, que solo nos hemos encontra…
view full postJune 18, 2024
2
-
PreClic
@PreClic (Twitter)Empezar la clase de hoy en @GVAlaRibera con @biblioenlace descubriendo está maravilla es una joya, que solo nos hemos encontrado en #Alzira https://t.co/6X2sHMiD3C
view full postJune 18, 2024
2
2
-
うーまく13歳
@pingue7 (Twitter)SRの検索は手間がかかり time-consumingかもしれませんが、 Bramer, W.M., Rethlefsen, M.L., Kleijnen, J. et al. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev 6, 245 (2017). https://t.co/SWLpOd2D6G
view full postJanuary 25, 2024
1
-
Rishab Gupta, MD
@RishabGupta_84 (Twitter)Something that researchers conducting inadequate "systematic" reviews should read: https://t.co/TMeBfdIoOo
view full postSeptember 24, 2023
-
Wichor Bramer, PhD
@wichor (Twitter)@NydahlPeter Not a only source but it definitely adds value to your searches: https://t.co/XcBvJpstaM
view full postFebruary 26, 2023
5
-
Dr. Laura M. König
@LauraMKoenig (Twitter)@helenahhartmann @MarkusRuetgen Depends on the topic of course, but I usually search PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycInfo. This paper is a useful resource, too: https://t.co/bKPu5B6tN0
view full postNovember 23, 2022
3
-
Javier Mancilla Galindo
@Javimangal (Twitter)RT @HectorMezaMD: Always ask yourself which are the relevant databases for your research question! #systematicreviews ✅ https://t.co/t3oMG…
view full postMay 14, 2022
2
-
Hector Meza Comparan, MD
@HectorMezaMD (Twitter)Always ask yourself which are the relevant databases for your research question! #systematicreviews ✅ https://t.co/t3oMGSrDXu
view full postMay 13, 2022
4
2
-
Daniel Gould, MD, PhD
@DJGould94 (Twitter)https://t.co/bX03MlEzls If I ever emotionally recover from my first systematic review, for my next one I'll search Embase, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Read on to find out more! @wichor @OscarH_Franco @JosKleijnen @mlrethlefsen #SystematicReviews #researchpaper
view full postMay 13, 2022
9
1
-
Tom Roper
@tomroper (Twitter)@AcademySurgical At least a second database, I’d suggest. See Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 6;6(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y.
view full postMarch 13, 2022
1
-
BUCantabria
@BUCantabria (Twitter)RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
view full postSeptember 19, 2021
6
-
Marketing Theory
@MktgTheory_news (Twitter)RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
view full postSeptember 19, 2021
6
-
Jose King
@Zzay (Twitter)RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
view full postSeptember 19, 2021
6
-
Writing For Research
@Write4Research (Twitter)RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
view full postSeptember 19, 2021
6
-
Jennifer Wyatt Bourgeois
@JennWBourgeois (Twitter)RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
view full postSeptember 18, 2021
6
-
Debi
@debi_howarth (Twitter)RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
view full postSeptember 18, 2021
6
-
Writing For Research
@Write4Research (Twitter)Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systematic Reviews | Full Text https://t.co/oU5agQDHiH
view full postSeptember 18, 2021
15
6
-
Alanna Sincovich, PhD
@AlannaSincovich (Twitter)@AbbeyDiaz_says Thought this may be of interest Abbey: https://t.co/E8GBY8Kd59
view full postNovember 25, 2020
3
-
Wichor Bramer, PhD
@wichor (Twitter)@PWGTennant @Garnet_Smuczer @meansell @MaartenvSmeden That is true. With gs you can find articles that other database might have missed. However, if that is the case you should check whether these articles are in those database and find them there as well. https://t.co/XcBvJpstaM
view full postNovember 13, 2020
-
TBrigham
@TBrigham (Twitter)Getting a preview of the upcoming of the new web of science interface. Wondering if how much it affect results? Probably not due to the data staying the same, but how it searches is different. Will we need update to very helpful pub https://t.co/BwGkosK6zt @wichor @mlrethlefsen
view full postNovember 5, 2020
4
-
CREATE
@EHPSCreaters (Twitter)RT @LauraMKoenig: The joy when finding a paper that exactly answers your question! Which databases should I search for a systematic literat…
view full postSeptember 4, 2020
3
-
Dr. Steph Archer
@Stephthepsych (Twitter)RT @LauraMKoenig: The joy when finding a paper that exactly answers your question! Which databases should I search for a systematic literat…
view full postSeptember 4, 2020
3
-
Dr. Laura M. König
@LauraMKoenig (Twitter)The joy when finding a paper that exactly answers your question! Which databases should I search for a systematic literature review in psychology? ➡️EMBASE, MEDLINE/ Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycInfo. Source: https://t.co/Ws9ZXsdFtq found via https://t.co/NJ8Ej2kn11
view full postSeptember 4, 2020
15
3
-
Elisabeth (Mueller) Nylander
@nylaelis (Twitter)@bergney @wichor Eat your breakfast!
view full postAugust 20, 2020
1
-
Glynnis Johnson
@GlynnisSL (Twitter)RT @MaryEShelton: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study https://t.co…
view full postMarch 13, 2019
2
-
Mary Shelton
@MaryEShelton (Twitter)Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study https://t.co/VcC8JfFYBe #sysrevsj
view full postMarch 12, 2019
2
2
-
Dr Mel Bond MCCT
@misc_nerd (Twitter)RT @Researcher_Kate: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study https://t…
view full postMarch 10, 2019
3
-
Academic Chatter™
@AcademicChatter (Twitter)RT @Researcher_Kate: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study https://t…
view full postMarch 10, 2019
3
-
Kate Young
@Researcher_Kate (Twitter)Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study https://t.co/eV4giLsdLI #highered #phdchat #ecrchat
view full postMarch 10, 2019
3
3
Abstract Synopsis
- The study aimed to identify the most efficient combination of databases for literature searches in systematic reviews, analyzing actual search results from published reviews rather than just coverage.
- The findings showed that using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieved the majority of relevant articles (about 98.3%), with 72% of reviews reaching full 100% recall.
- The research emphasizes that searching multiple, carefully chosen databases improves the completeness of literature retrieval, but many reviews still don't use enough databases to achieve high recall, impacting the quality of systematic reviews.]
Biblioteca Ribera
@biblioenlace (Twitter)