Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The social discussions display a general agreement on the importance of using optimal database combinations, with posts sharing examples like searching Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science, emphasizing the article's findings. The tone varies from enthusiastic to reflective, with words like 'valuable' and 'must read,' illustrating genuine interest and recognition of the study's relevance to improving systematic review quality.
Most discussions acknowledge the importance of selecting the right databases, aligning with the article's emphasis on optimized combinations for literature searches.
Posts show a high level of curiosity and enthusiasm about the practical implications of the research, especially in relation to improving systematic reviews.
Several comments reference the methodology, suggest best practices, or share personal experiences, demonstrating active engagement.
While the discussions highlight the value of the study, they mainly serve to reinforce existing practices or encourage better research methods, indicating moderate impact.
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systematic Reviews | Full Text https://t.co/oU5agQDHiH
The joy when finding a paper that exactly answers your question! Which databases should I search for a systematic literature review in psychology? ➡️EMBASE, MEDLINE/ Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycInfo. Source: https://t.co/Ws9ZXsdFtq found via https://t.co/NJ8Ej2kn11
https://t.co/bX03MlEzls If I ever emotionally recover from my first systematic review, for my next one I'll search Embase, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Read on to find out more! @wichor @OscarH_Franco @JosKleijnen @mlrethlefsen #SystematicReviews #researchpaper
@NydahlPeter Not a only source but it definitely adds value to your searches: https://t.co/XcBvJpstaM
Always ask yourself which are the relevant databases for your research question! #systematicreviews ✅ https://t.co/t3oMGSrDXu
Getting a preview of the upcoming of the new web of science interface. Wondering if how much it affect results? Probably not due to the data staying the same, but how it searches is different. Will we need update to very helpful pub https://t.co/BwGkosK6zt @wichor @mlrethlefsen
This study identifies efficient database combinations for systematic reviews, revealing that using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieves about 98.3% of relevant articles, enhancing…
This study identifies effective database combinations for comprehensive literature retrieval in systematic reviews, highlighting that using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together captures 98.3% of…
This study identifies effective database combinations for systematic review searches. Using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieves over 98% of relevant articles, improving review quality…
This study identifies the most efficient database combinations for systematic review literature searches, showing that using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieves over 98% of relevant…
The study aims to identify the most efficient database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews, analyzing actual search results from published reviews. Using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and…
This study identifies the most efficient database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews, highlighting that using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieves over 98% of…
This video discusses the most efficient database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews, highlighting that using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar together retrieves about 98.3% of…
RT @PreClic: Empezar la clase de hoy en @GVAlaRibera con @biblioenlace descubriendo está maravilla es una joya, que solo nos hemos encontra…
RT @PreClic: Empezar la clase de hoy en @GVAlaRibera con @biblioenlace descubriendo está maravilla es una joya, que solo nos hemos encontra…
Empezar la clase de hoy en @GVAlaRibera con @biblioenlace descubriendo está maravilla es una joya, que solo nos hemos encontrado en #Alzira https://t.co/6X2sHMiD3C
SRの検索は手間がかかり time-consumingかもしれませんが、 Bramer, W.M., Rethlefsen, M.L., Kleijnen, J. et al. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev 6, 245 (2017). https://t.co/SWLpOd2D6G
Something that researchers conducting inadequate "systematic" reviews should read: https://t.co/TMeBfdIoOo
@NydahlPeter Not a only source but it definitely adds value to your searches: https://t.co/XcBvJpstaM
@helenahhartmann @MarkusRuetgen Depends on the topic of course, but I usually search PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycInfo. This paper is a useful resource, too: https://t.co/bKPu5B6tN0
RT @HectorMezaMD: Always ask yourself which are the relevant databases for your research question! #systematicreviews ✅ https://t.co/t3oMG…
Always ask yourself which are the relevant databases for your research question! #systematicreviews ✅ https://t.co/t3oMGSrDXu
https://t.co/bX03MlEzls If I ever emotionally recover from my first systematic review, for my next one I'll search Embase, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Read on to find out more! @wichor @OscarH_Franco @JosKleijnen @mlrethlefsen #SystematicReviews #researchpaper
@AcademySurgical At least a second database, I’d suggest. See Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 6;6(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y.
RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
RT @Write4Research: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systemat…
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study | Systematic Reviews | Full Text https://t.co/oU5agQDHiH
@AbbeyDiaz_says Thought this may be of interest Abbey: https://t.co/E8GBY8Kd59
@PWGTennant @Garnet_Smuczer @meansell @MaartenvSmeden That is true. With gs you can find articles that other database might have missed. However, if that is the case you should check whether these articles are in those database and find them there as well. https://t.co/XcBvJpstaM
Getting a preview of the upcoming of the new web of science interface. Wondering if how much it affect results? Probably not due to the data staying the same, but how it searches is different. Will we need update to very helpful pub https://t.co/BwGkosK6zt @wichor @mlrethlefsen
RT @LauraMKoenig: The joy when finding a paper that exactly answers your question! Which databases should I search for a systematic literat…
RT @LauraMKoenig: The joy when finding a paper that exactly answers your question! Which databases should I search for a systematic literat…
The joy when finding a paper that exactly answers your question! Which databases should I search for a systematic literature review in psychology? ➡️EMBASE, MEDLINE/ Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycInfo. Source: https://t.co/Ws9ZXsdFtq found via https://t.co/NJ8Ej2kn11
@bergney @wichor Eat your breakfast!
RT @MaryEShelton: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study https://t.co…
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study https://t.co/VcC8JfFYBe #sysrevsj
RT @Researcher_Kate: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study https://t…
RT @Researcher_Kate: Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study https://t…
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study https://t.co/eV4giLsdLI #highered #phdchat #ecrchat