経口避妊薬と乳がんの関係性。 ざっくり言うと7500人が経口避妊薬を飲むと、1人が経口避妊薬が影響し乳がんになる計算。5年以内の内服期間なら、ほぼ影響なし。薬の種類の差もほぼなし。 経口避妊薬も必要だから飲むわけで、これによる乳がんを過度に心配する必要はなさそう。 https://t.co/0sVLmInpNv
Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Dec 2017 – Nov 2025Where it's discussed
-
News252 articles
-
X / Twitter50 posts
-
Facebook47 posts
-
Blogs21 articles
-
Bluesky2 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Reddit2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Analysis reveals that many discussants reference the article's findings, such as increased risk with long-term use, often emphasizing the importance of more research; their tone varies from cautious agreement to critical scrutiny, demonstrating both awareness and concern about the implications of hormonal contraception on breast cancer risk.
Most discussions reflect acknowledgment of the research's findings, with many agreeing that hormonal contraception slightly raises breast cancer risk.
People show high curiosity and concern, actively discussing various studies and implications.
Comments range from brief acknowledgments to detailed requests for evidence and debate, indicating moderate to high engagement.
The collective discussions highlight awareness of the potential health risks, suggesting a moderate impact on public perception and decision-making.
Abstract in brief
- This study found that the use of contemporary hormonal contraception is associated with a slightly increased risk of invasive breast cancer, especially with long-term use of more than 10 years.
- The risk remains elevated even after stopping contraception, particularly for women who used it for 5 years or more, with current or recent users experiencing a 20-38% higher risk compared to non-users.
- Although there is an increased relative risk, the overall absolute increase in breast cancer cases among users is small, roughly 1 extra case per 7,690 women, indicating that while there's a potential risk, it is limited in scale.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky[ 低用量ピルと乳がんリスク] 低用量ピルを1年間使った女性が7690人のうち、 1人乳がんが増える →1年間で10万人あたり 13人の増加リスク 低用量ピルでの乳がんリスク増加はわずか absolute increases in risk were small https://t.co/6P28GtbAFq https://t.co/qZxS1PBAgc
دراسة علمية ترجحّ ارتفاع خطر الإصابة بسرطان الثدي للسيدات اللاتي تناولنَّ حبوب منع الحمل الهرمونية: https://t.co/RVWXn9Yksz
Hormonal contraception is very dangerous! Risks include: ☑️ Breast & Cervical cancer https://t.co/C9S6soKVSp https://t.co/SWu5KeJ0fU ☑️ Blood clots https://t.co/7u3RIil8tK ☑️ Heart attack & Stroke https://t.co/7SUaKKG2YW
@dangersofdepo @HormoneMatters Like breast cancer. https://t.co/Bze3WV9FnP
@matteolambe @Dr_RShatsky @drdonsdizon @AnnPartridgeMD @hoperugo @ErikaHamilton9 @DrLaurenNye @naborala @stolaney1 @DrLisaCarey The best evidence I have: hormonal IUDs increase the risk of breast cancer just like oral contraceptives, so why would their effect on actual breast cancer be different? As such, I encourage non-hormonal IUD or other non-hormonal options. #bcsm https://t.co/okgO39nOG7
All mentions
Hormonal Contraceptives and Breast Cancer Risk Explained
The study investigates the link between hormonal contraceptives and breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. Recent analyses show that nearly half of breast cancer cases involved hormonal contraceptive users…
Hormonal Contraception and Breast Cancer Risk Overview
This video discusses the association between contemporary hormonal contraception and a slightly increased risk of invasive breast cancer, particularly with long-term use over 10 years. The overall absolute risk increase…
@JohnyLony1337 @jklunaire @JAREKH12 @sensualitymalik Ale ty wiesz, że to nie jest jedyne badanie na ten temat, prawda? Proszę bardzo, skoro świeże nie pasuje, tutaj jest z 2017 roku; https://t.co/hWH8lzPXyS ryzyko wzrasta tylko trochę, ale jednak wzrasta i powinno się o tym mówić
@soanelia2 https://t.co/X6XaY3sUa5 Tutaj są różne wnioski - przyznaje, że tego artykułu już nie studiowałem dogłębnie.
#Santé #Médecine ©️ @lel-media.bsky.social
@Vaskatta @kitten_beloved It doesn’t https://t.co/jQjYZquvhW https://t.co/xevKmrY7u4
@BilltheCatGuy1 @mtylermsn @yoalexrapz Honestly the research is mixed and they need to do more studies. The studies that DO suggest an increased risk of breast cancer found only small increases: https://t.co/xfOaqzibze https://t.co/yjjJtPgxYt I absolutely agree with you about the benefits outweighing the risks in https://t.co/9lO90xHVkt
Hormonal contraception is very dangerous! Risks include: ☑️ Breast & Cervical cancer https://t.co/C9S6soKVSp https://t.co/SWu5KeJ0fU ☑️ Blood clots https://t.co/7u3RIil8tK ☑️ Heart attack & Stroke https://t.co/7SUaKKG2YW
@insidemoussa Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer | New England Journal of Medicine (https://t.co/8dDN8PwEXZ) Grand, voici l'étude en question qui sert de référence à ta video, autant le libellé de la dame est erroné autant l'est ton tweet. Il serait plus
@_marvie___ https://t.co/DlXoDh7LbU
@tom_small68 @KingKaiserX @RAZ0RFIST Let me know if the New England Journal of Medicine is an adequate source, clown. https://t.co/3ISbi38Bur
RT @drpoppyBHRT: @dangersofdepo @HormoneMatters Like breast cancer. https://t.co/Bze3WV9FnP
@dangersofdepo @HormoneMatters Like breast cancer. https://t.co/Bze3WV9FnP
Su uso irracional se asocia a cancer mamario ⚠️ seamos cuidadosos https://t.co/ZP4hl0CIFj https://t.co/WPlz0b6xzp
@RearAdBsBlog Higher risk of breast cancer among oral contraceptive users https://t.co/RcnLXI4ieO
Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer | NEJM https://t.co/5K8LeSLFSy
@DrPaulaGordon @NightShiftMD @Yahoo The longer you take the pill, the higher the risk. It’s not uncommon for women in the US to be on OCs for decades. https://t.co/m9xZblsqIP
@jagged589 @BrianFragaNCR @BishopBarron @USCCB @US_FDA Show me data that says that it's 100% safe for anyone -- minor girls, for example -- to purchase a carcinogen that is linked to an increase in breast cancer and blood clots, over the counter. Without so much as a routine exam. https://t.co/fn3msabVI4
@dhconway1 @ThomasPolega @Jolz_Aust @Chris_SmithsJ @rightscholar The World Health Organization labels it a Class 1 carcinogen. Are there are multiple studies, peer reviewed, along with longitudinal studies that show an increased risk of breast, ovarian, endometrial, cervical and colorectal cancer with use of the Pill. https://t.co/helSbYe6Up
@WallstreetRambo @krassenstein @DakotaSidwell @elonmusk @ZubyMusic Hormonal birth control is a class 1 carcinogen, per the American Cancer Society. Here is probably the best study on HBC: https://t.co/nWiTlEEPcY
@matteolambe @Dr_RShatsky @drdonsdizon @AnnPartridgeMD @hoperugo @ErikaHamilton9 @DrLaurenNye @naborala @stolaney1 @DrLisaCarey The best evidence I have: hormonal IUDs increase the risk of breast cancer just like oral contraceptives, so why would their effect on actual breast cancer be different? As such, I encourage non-hormonal IUD or other non-hormonal options. #bcsm https://t.co/okgO39nOG7
ミレーナは子宮だけだから乳房は関係ないと言う先生も多いけど実際は痛みが出る人も多いし乳がんリスクが1.2倍になるとの報告も
@TammyTowney @LilaGraceRose That’s outdated information. https://t.co/nWiTlEFn2w
@Julia20526177 @LilaGraceRose https://t.co/nWiTlEndOo
RT @PMunozIturrieta: @AndresRamirezII ¿A qué crees que se deben los juicios por cáncer de mama en USA? https://t.co/K1IQve1tvP
@AndresRamirezII ¿A qué crees que se deben los juicios por cáncer de mama en USA? https://t.co/K1IQve1tvP
Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer https://t.co/WNsTC0HjO7
продолжая про консенсусы - с удивлением недавно выяснила что не то что бы все очень плохо.жпг но все не очень-то хорошо: https://t.co/zrVoOPt4zY
RT @ayako700: [ 低用量ピルと乳がんリスク] 低用量ピルを1年間使った女性が7690人のうち、 1人乳がんが増える →1年間で10万人あたり 13人の増加リスク 低用量ピルでの乳がんリスク増加はわずか absolute increases in risk…
2017, Diciembre 7 - https://t.co/Rz7n6Kk7Mj - Estudios recientes en la relación cáncer de mama - consumo ACO. 2003 Apr 5 - https://t.co/qcmG4FpKtn - Revisión del cáncer cervical y su relación con ACO
RT @ayako700: [ 低用量ピルと乳がんリスク] 低用量ピルを1年間使った女性が7690人のうち、 1人乳がんが増える →1年間で10万人あたり 13人の増加リスク 低用量ピルでの乳がんリスク増加はわずか absolute increases in risk…
[ 低用量ピルと乳がんリスク] 低用量ピルを1年間使った女性が7690人のうち、 1人乳がんが増える →1年間で10万人あたり 13人の増加リスク 低用量ピルでの乳がんリスク増加はわずか absolute increases in risk were small https://t.co/6P28GtbAFq https://t.co/qZxS1PBAgc
@laura_jackson79 @robert8841 @MeHitchc0ck 50% is not typical for everyone. Relative risk depends on a ton of factors -- age, weight, types of estrogen receptors, activity levels, etc. The article I linked to is based on this paper, & their study found "1 extra breast cancer for every 7690 women". https://t.co/TYchZFgnDK
RT @DrGottfried: Does the birth control pill increase breast cancer? Yes, increased relative risk of 20% (95% CI: 1.14-1.26) as published i…
Does the birth control pill increase breast cancer? Yes, increased relative risk of 20% (95% CI: 1.14-1.26) as published in @nejm #namsmtg https://t.co/us7CpAiASz
RT @sifa_fauzia: @FloNadayang Kak, ini aku pilih jurnal 5 tahun terakhir & bisa didownload pdf nya :D https://t.co/znIKPqXJwm https://t.co/…
@FloNadayang Kak, ini aku pilih jurnal 5 tahun terakhir & bisa didownload pdf nya :D https://t.co/znIKPqXJwm https://t.co/O0BcMrXMwP https://t.co/8Rhp8zwMmH https://t.co/TKhBxADikN
Contemporary hormonal contraception and the risk of breast cancer. https://t.co/e8HzvNIyqR #m3india
@martinvars Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast CancerLina S. Mørch, Ph.D., Charlotte W. Skovlund, https://t.co/qUhlHnPyzm., Philip C. Hannaford, M.D., Lisa Iversen, Ph.D., et al.December 7, 2017N Engl J Med 2017; 377:2228-2239 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700732
@Astordna https://t.co/NfWSF6dATA Conclusiones
@TheWatchBegins @medusadollmaker @Mylestring Depende del tipo de cáncer. En algunos casos los estudios apuntan a que se reducen, en otros se incrementa. En su día me lo miré bastante. Búsqueda rápida ahora: https://t.co/HQBiSPxDSa
@cbpolis Our goal is to share evidence for #fertilityawareness based methods. We agree women need accurate info about ALL methods including side effects from peer-reviewed journals like @jama @NEJM etc. @AlanLevinovitz #WomenDeserveBetter https://t.co/9jQErYUe5U https://t.co/qlh5bFtZXj
@AOC Each year, 56,000 people are hospitalized due to acetaminophen and you want to put a drug that increases your risk of cancer and lupus on the shelves too? See studies -> https://t.co/bavxuw7ip3 & https://t.co/RmYl7np4AV. Have you seen cancer & autoimmune statistics in the US?
RT @iSciencesi: دراسة علمية ترجحّ ارتفاع خطر الإصابة بسرطان الثدي للسيدات اللاتي تناولنَّ حبوب منع الحمل الهرمونية: https://t.co/RVWXn9Yksz
RT @iSciencesi: دراسة علمية ترجحّ ارتفاع خطر الإصابة بسرطان الثدي للسيدات اللاتي تناولنَّ حبوب منع الحمل الهرمونية: https://t.co/RVWXn9Yksz
دراسة علمية ترجحّ ارتفاع خطر الإصابة بسرطان الثدي للسيدات اللاتي تناولنَّ حبوب منع الحمل الهرمونية: https://t.co/RVWXn9Yksz
https://t.co/x9GwogSmhD https://t.co/qeOFj442RE https://t.co/p3KNYY7O7Z https://t.co/9cegoM4yiw
RT @MamMa_mimumemo: 経口避妊薬と乳がんの関係性。 ざっくり言うと7500人が経口避妊薬を飲むと、1人が経口避妊薬が影響し乳がんになる計算。5年以内の内服期間なら、ほぼ影響なし。薬の種類の差もほぼなし。 経口避妊薬も必要だから飲むわけで、これによる乳がんを過度…
RT @MamMa_mimumemo: 経口避妊薬と乳がんの関係性。 ざっくり言うと7500人が経口避妊薬を飲むと、1人が経口避妊薬が影響し乳がんになる計算。5年以内の内服期間なら、ほぼ影響なし。薬の種類の差もほぼなし。 経口避妊薬も必要だから飲むわけで、これによる乳がんを過度…
RT @MamMa_mimumemo: 経口避妊薬と乳がんの関係性。 ざっくり言うと7500人が経口避妊薬を飲むと、1人が経口避妊薬が影響し乳がんになる計算。5年以内の内服期間なら、ほぼ影響なし。薬の種類の差もほぼなし。 経口避妊薬も必要だから飲むわけで、これによる乳がんを過度…
RT @MamMa_mimumemo: 経口避妊薬と乳がんの関係性。 ざっくり言うと7500人が経口避妊薬を飲むと、1人が経口避妊薬が影響し乳がんになる計算。5年以内の内服期間なら、ほぼ影響なし。薬の種類の差もほぼなし。 経口避妊薬も必要だから飲むわけで、これによる乳がんを過度…
RT @MamMa_mimumemo: 経口避妊薬と乳がんの関係性。 ざっくり言うと7500人が経口避妊薬を飲むと、1人が経口避妊薬が影響し乳がんになる計算。5年以内の内服期間なら、ほぼ影響なし。薬の種類の差もほぼなし。 経口避妊薬も必要だから飲むわけで、これによる乳がんを過度…
経口避妊薬と乳がんの関係性。 ざっくり言うと7500人が経口避妊薬を飲むと、1人が経口避妊薬が影響し乳がんになる計算。5年以内の内服期間なら、ほぼ影響なし。薬の種類の差もほぼなし。 経口避妊薬も必要だから飲むわけで、これによる乳がんを過度に心配する必要はなさそう。 https://t.co/0sVLmInpNv
Danish data: Hormonal contraception increases the risk of breast cancer — NEJM http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1700732?query=TOC#.Wimf0d_FrY8.twitter -
M乳
Aウ
ما
MD
DD
SF
M
RR
V
K
LS
IÒ
W
T
ر
V
LS
SS
MF
T
D女
MR
PI
に
ла
ま
TM
KI
P
M
D
TY
S
DM
AP
GT
SC
F
DA
?
F
ぴ
K
E
L
た