The social discussions are largely characterized by skepticism and criticism of the article, with many posters quoting the same review to argue that vaccines have minimal effectiveness—phrases like 'low effectiveness,' 'no significant reduction,' and 'fraud' highlight this tone. Words such as 'damning' and 'no value' reflect a dismissive attitude, which combined with dismissive tones and references to perceived conflicts of interest, results in an overall low agreement and impact.
AgreementStrong disagreement
Most discussions strongly question or outright reject the effectiveness of influenza vaccines based on the cochrane review, indicating a high level of disagreement with the publication’s positive framing.
InterestNeutral interest
Many discussions express skepticism or disinterest, focusing instead on highlighting flaws in the research or preferring alternative health measures.
EngagementLow engagement
The engagement level is relatively low or dismissive, with some posts citing studies and data but others dismissing findings as biased or flawed.
ImpactLow impact
The overall impact seems limited, as the dominant tone pierces skepticism rather than advocating for vaccination, and some posts challenge or undermine the article’s significance.
Abstract in brief
The review focuses on the effectiveness, safety, and impact of influenza vaccines in healthy adults, including pregnant women, primarily aiming to reduce time off work caused by influenza.
It updates previous research by analyzing data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs conducted up to 2017, emphasizing the importance of high-quality evidence over observational studies.
A total of 52 clinical trials involving over 80,000 participants were included, with findings presented from 25 studies on inactivated influenza vaccines, and future updates will depend on new trials or vaccine developments.]
Dec 1, 2020 · 181 likes · 52 shares · 141,879 followersView post →
PW
Piotr Witczak
@PiotrWitczak_ · X
Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie mają niewielki efekt ochronny przed grypą i ILI oraz zwiększają ryzyko wystąpienia szeregu działań niepożądanych
https://t.co/lmi0VjuNmc
O rzetelnych danych
Oct 14, 2025 · 115 likes · 16 shares · 68,571 followersView post →
FR
Filipe Rafaeli
@filipe_rafaeli · X
Aqui, Cochrane. Padrão ouro. Resultados históricos. Nada de nada! Pífio.
Vamos estudar e parar de repetir slogans, Melzinha?
Repetí-los ininterruptamente não tornam seu desejo em verdade, valeu? Racionalidade, querida! Bora?
https://t.co/S5rgnGtpEh
Nov 25, 2022 · 40 likes · 8 shares · 30,577 followersView post →
GN
Gaute Adler Nilsen
@GauteNilsen · X
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults
- "The results of this review provide no evidence for the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure"
https://t.co/sfuYoEjedd
The review focuses on the effectiveness, safety, and impact of influenza vaccines in healthy adults, including pregnant women, primarily aiming to reduce time off work caused by influenza. It analyzes data from over…
The flu vaccine is our best defense against influenza, reducing hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and deaths. It is recommended yearly for everyone 6 months and older to protect vulnerable populations and prevent…
RT @Xochipelli1953: L'arnaque des “vaccins” contre la “Grippe” selon les études Cochrane.
https://t.co/lV3dzEt5nR
https://t.co/lV3dzEt5nR…
Dec 19, 2025 · 2 shares · 143 followersView post →
RS
River Song
@GriotMarianne · X
RT @Xochipelli1953: L'arnaque des “vaccins” contre la “Grippe” selon les études Cochrane.
https://t.co/lV3dzEt5nR
https://t.co/lV3dzEt5nR…
Dec 19, 2025 · 2 shares · 316 followersView post →
XG
Xochi/Dominique Guillet
@Xochipelli1953 · X
@emma_ducros L'arnaque des “vaccins” contre la “Grippe” selon les études Cochrane. https://t.co/lV3dzEt5nR https://t.co/lV3dzEt5nR https://t.co/LtC77e7vAM
@GeWoessner L'arnaque des “vaccins” contre la “Grippe” selon les études Cochrane.
https://t.co/lV3dzEt5nR
https://t.co/lV3dzEt5nR
https://t.co/LtC77e7vAM
L'arnaque des “vaccins” contre la “Grippe” selon les études Cochrane.
https://t.co/lV3dzEt5nR
https://t.co/lV3dzEt5nR
https://t.co/LtC77e7vAM
Dec 19, 2025 · 5 likes · 2 shares · 2,327 followersView post →
SP
Steven M. Belknap, MD PGY43
@StevenMBelknap · X
Influenza vaccine doesn’t have much benefit in healthy adults: it doesn’t reduce hospitalizations nor does it prevent lost work days. There is a tiny reduction in likelihood of getting the flu.
DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub6 https://t.co/u7AVV3ngN9
Dec 15, 2025 · 7 likes · 2,342 followersView post →
D
DrJ
@DrJ_surgeon · X
@voteconsequence @joannalamblooby @IntegralAnswers @Rn_Psi @Kevin_McKernan Not according to the latest Cochrane review. Shows poor evidence for a reduction in hospitalizations and no significant benefit on deaths. https://t.co/yLmq4XRJwR
@JHorrn @jakescottMD The bar is set low: benefit of standard influenza vaccine in healthy patients is nil.
DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub6
Patients care about these metrics:
mortality, hospitalization, workdays lost, long-term functional decline.
New vaccine is no better on these metrics.
@BBCBreakfast It's not what Cochrane says. 52 clinical trials of over 80,000 people. Need to inject 71 people to stop 1 person getting flu. Not good odds to me. Ill stick with looking after my immune system thanks https://t.co/bX4jb0jMY1
@republicat18 @Belonnais1 @3CatInfo Sí, nombrosos estudis científics indiquen que la vacuna de la grip és eficaç per reduir el risc d'infecció i complicacions. Per exemple, la revisió Cochrane "Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults" (Demicheli et al., 2018) mostra una reducció del risc d'influenza
@ClareCraigPath "71 healthy adults need to be vaccinated to prevent one of them experiencing influenza" . I'll stick with the vitamin D thanks https://t.co/bX4jb0jMY1
Nov 14, 2025 · 4 likes · 1,261 followersView post →
MI
Miss inform
@Behaveyersell · X
@lizsteelpt2 @LizKershawDJ You have a 2% chance of getting flu, the jab reduces that to 1%. Reduces hospitalisations by 0.6%. May increase fever and other side effects. The jab can also cause influenza like illness. Don’t take my word for it. It’s all in the Cochrane review.
https://t.co/01k8tYnN2J
@barriere_dr D’après 25 études comprenant 60 000 adultes, Cochrane a estimé que la vaccination réduisait le risque de grippe d’à peine 6 %, pour les personnes en bonne santé. (cf. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, "Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults" - 1-2006).
@DrNeilStone Your body your choice. Me, I prefer to optimise my immune system and check our the research on flu jabs ......"71 healthy adults need to be vaccinated to prevent one of them experiencing influenza" https://t.co/bX4jb0jMY1
@BogochIsaac Actually there is poor evidence that it has any effect on hospitalization and deaths from flu. Maybe a small reduction in influenza infections but the efficacy varies from season to season from a negative percentage to maybe 50%. https://t.co/P9B2Rp8A8L
Nov 5, 2025 · 2 likes · 5,454 followersView post →
C
Cat
@Cat202307 · X
RT @DrJ_surgeon: Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from…
Oct 31, 2025 · 11 shares · 86 followersView post →
HH
Herb Herbers
@herbersh · X
RT @DrJ_surgeon: Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from…
Oct 28, 2025 · 11 shares · 1,275 followersView post →
CW
Charley Workman
@Charley2021 · X
RT @DrJ_surgeon: Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from…
Oct 28, 2025 · 11 shares · 2,805 followersView post →
C
CritterCamGorilla
@face_victory · X
RT @DrJ_surgeon: Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from…
Oct 28, 2025 · 11 shares · 3,776 followersView post →
BG
Barb Gladders
@RGBG01 · X
RT @DrJ_surgeon: Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from…
Oct 28, 2025 · 11 shares · 658 followersView post →
MJ
Matt James
@MattJames777 · X
RT @DrJ_surgeon: Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from…
Oct 28, 2025 · 11 shares · 2,069 followersView post →
N
neveronasunday
@Farlan14Mc · X
RT @DrJ_surgeon: Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from…
Oct 28, 2025 · 11 shares · 1,241 followersView post →
P
pmcd
@pmcdunnough · X
RT @DrJ_surgeon: Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from…
Oct 28, 2025 · 11 shares · 13,257 followersView post →
UC
Unacceptable Lisa ........Concerned Canadian
@LisaMar91564392 · X
RT @DrJ_surgeon: Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from…
Oct 28, 2025 · 11 shares · 6,468 followersView post →
KJ
Ken Jaques (Jakes)
@kenjaques · X
RT @DrJ_surgeon: Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from…
Oct 28, 2025 · 11 shares · 17,111 followersView post →
JL
Jane Bailey - Don’t let fear run your life.
@peakpilot · X
RT @DrJ_surgeon: Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from…
Oct 28, 2025 · 11 shares · 1,559 followersView post →
D
DrJ
@DrJ_surgeon · X
Sigh. There is no good quality evidence that shows the influenza or Covid vaccines prevent hospitalization or deaths from these illnesses. https://t.co/P9B2Rp8A8L https://t.co/8PNg6vkcWU
Oct 28, 2025 · 20 likes · 11 shares · 16,449 followersView post →
FF
Frederik Feys
@FFeys · X
Voorkomt een griepprik bij gezonde mensen werk-afwezigheid ? Onderzoek vindt niets wezenlijks. Toch denken vele mensen dat dit wel zo is. Zelfs werkgevers bieden soms 'gratis griepprik' aan. Laten we a.u.b. bescheiden blijven in onze claims.
bron: https://t.co/lAE1iYwdfj https://t.co/7C3g48E6g5 https://t.co/iDvKJm7znH
Oct 25, 2025 · 1 like · 1,698 followersView post →
NT
Niko Thomas
@RobotMaxMe · X
@AaronSiriSG “The results of this review provide no evidence for the utilisation of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.”
Demicheli et al, “Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults,” Cochrane
https://t.co/Up6RfXUsjX
Chez les 55 – 75 ans, millions de données sur 14 ans « aucune preuve n’indique que la vaccination réduit les hospitalisations ou la mortalité»
https://t.co/JJoRer89Kp
Résultats non significatifs:
https://t.co/NivVUU4W48
https://t.co/VYLKppuv9G
https://t.co/v3rCt4wB7a
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 15, 2025 · 16 shares · 812 followersView post →
K
Krzysztof
@Wariatex2 · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 414 followersView post →
JK
Jerzy Kowalski
@jkowalski777 · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 449 followersView post →
P
Paweł
@Pawe93701590 · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 310 followersView post →
Ł
Łukasz
@Lukasz_RP · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 93 followersView post →
K
Kakooshka
@Kakooshka_ · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 1,832 followersView post →
M
magda
@magdaamali · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 729 followersView post →
JW
JACEK MARIA Wojciechowicz
@JACEKMARIAWojc4 · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 282 followersView post →
M
Marian
@Marian57183019 · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 21 followersView post →
RŚ
Roman Andrzej Śniady
@Templariusz6 · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 2,795 followersView post →
DR
Dusza Rozumna ✝
@DuszaRozumna · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 105 followersView post →
Ł
Łukasz
@ukasz23875291 · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 218 followersView post →
AS
Anna ze Szczecina
@SzczecinaZe · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 11,319 followersView post →
T
Tomasz
@TomaszDani · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 31 followersView post →
K
Km
@darrside · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 81 followersView post →
NL
N2L2L - Never 2 Late 2 Learn
@g0liath_N2L2L · X
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie…
Oct 14, 2025 · 16 shares · 1,359 followersView post →
PW
Piotr Witczak
@PiotrWitczak_ · X
Pewnie uczniowie nie dowiedzą się o wysokiej jakości metaanalizie Cochrane, która wskazuje że szczepionki przeciw grypie mają niewielki efekt ochronny przed grypą i ILI oraz zwiększają ryzyko wystąpienia szeregu działań niepożądanych
https://t.co/lmi0VjuNmc
O rzetelnych danych
Oct 14, 2025 · 115 likes · 16 shares · 68,571 followersView post →
GN
Gaute Adler Nilsen
@GauteNilsen · X
RT @GauteNilsen: Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults
- "The results of this review provide no evidence for the utilizatio…
Oct 10, 2025 · 16 shares · 14,271 followersView post →
J
Joyce
@jctaylor52 · X
RT @BewdyRipper: @wideawake_media Flu shots don't work.
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults - Demicheli, V - 2018 | Cochra…
@3DancingMaidens @luckytran Influenza vaccines are not particularly effective at preventing illness or death in any cohort of patients. https://t.co/qhI0Kavkt5 https://t.co/8RkN4Mz71t
@jondoe__69 Seufz … und schon wieder.
https://t.co/WOEXYxLflL
https://t.co/AEhMJ5Q12i
https://t.co/ejP16NdMvv
https://t.co/z29cjhUqem
https://t.co/wA1O6Iq5KK
https://t.co/jz2uqwesO3
Und nun?
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 20, 2025 · 44 shares · 3,508 followersView post →
NP
Natita_MG 2o perfil
@Tataia36207649 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 500 followersView post →
AA
Admilson Quintino Sales Junior/AQSJR68
@asales7 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 2,490 followersView post →
ER
Eduardo Raffaells
@ERaffaells · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 39 followersView post →
M
Mallow
@Mallowbr7 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 552 followersView post →
X
Xurah
@allkar · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 3,387 followersView post →
E
egty
@egty · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 3,269 followersView post →
JC
Jose Teles Carvalho
@JoseTelesCarva3 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 5,488 followersView post →
EP
Eliseu Polvora
@PolvoraEli50959 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 285 followersView post →
NV
Nikita Voadora
@NikitaVoadora · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 475 followersView post →
AS
Adão Santos
@adaosantos · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 434 followersView post →
ML
Marcio Lemos
@LemosL87547869 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 1,547 followersView post →
LT
LIBERDADE CADÊ TU ?
@Emanuel86626393 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 3,297 followersView post →
RA
Roseana Munhoz Maximo Anjos
@MaximoAnjo61058 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 85 followersView post →
MN
Marcos.Nynro
@MarcosSpinosa · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 152 followersView post →
AC
Allysôn Cavalcânte
@AlysonCava57582 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 64 followersView post →
J
Jluizc
@Jluizc1 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 2,339 followersView post →
A
AlexEngCivil1
@AlexEngCivil1 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 4,977 followersView post →
P
pripri10000
@pripri10000 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 251 followersView post →
ML
Maria de Fátima Litaiff
@DeLitaiff · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 3,835 followersView post →
AO
Anderson José de Oliveira
@AndersonJosdeO1 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 647 followersView post →
G
Gerson
@GSilva18783 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 51 followersView post →
CC
Claudia Costa
@ClaudiaCLiberty · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 14,979 followersView post →
B
Belisario
@VANESSABELISARI · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 761 followersView post →
S
Silvia
@SilviaR1961 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 200 followersView post →
AS
Ari Souza
@AriSSouza22 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 984 followersView post →
LC
Leandro Comyn
@terra_comyn · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 2,065 followersView post →
MM
Márcio Eduardo Muzy
@marcioeduluz · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 2,027 followersView post →
G
Geovani
@GeovaniLB23 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 2,027 followersView post →
C
Cidiav
@cidiavas · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 2,507 followersView post →
C
CidaDuarte
@cidaduarte74 · X
RT @filipe_rafaeli: 7. A Cochrane é referência. É o mais alto grau de evidência científica.
Nesta revisão sistemática eles incluíram 52 en…
Jun 19, 2025 · 44 shares · 1,494 followersView post →
PL
Pierre L.
@maingraph · X
@jmyremets Je t'ai mis un peu de tout :
https://t.co/TeOBX6FuUs
https://t.co/0Oo0LO1tsn
https://t.co/dQANhD11P2
https://t.co/hWZ1x0uEEV
https://t.co/ehidjjyWyp
https://t.co/SdrXyhkGsb
https://t.co/sdPUAuzIEN
https://t.co/JINb9OU56V
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults
"Inactivated vaccines can reduce the proportion who have influenza & ILI; impact is modest. We are uncertain about effects on working days lost or serious complications of influenza during flu season."
https://t.co/qzMC3mj6fo https://t.co/WkH4rEcN7E
Mar 10, 2025 · 1 like · 14,869 followersView post →
T
Trinity
@alphakuo3 · X
@SharylAttkisson 3. approximately 72 people, meaning that 72 individuals need to be vaccinated to reduce one case of influenza."
Bottom line: An ARR (absolute risk reduction) measure of only 1.4% means the influenza vaccines never worked.
https://t.co/SGbRAQJ27S
Feb 13, 2025 · 1 like · 1,730 followersView post →
AG
Ashish Gwasikoti
@ashish4082 · X
RT @CartlandDavid: The old 100 percent relative risk reduction
RT @CartlandDavid: The old 100 percent relative risk reduction
Dec 3, 2024 · 9 shares · 1,627 followersView post →
VR
Victoria Rixon
@Victoria_Rixon · X
RT @CartlandDavid: The old 100 percent relative risk reduction
Dec 3, 2024 · 9 shares · 38,097 followersView post →
DM
Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP
@CartlandDavid · X
The old 100 percent relative risk reduction
Dec 3, 2024 · 22 likes · 9 shares · 309,029 followersView post →
CL
creon levit
@creon · X
@jason_metcalfe @PeterHotez Cochrane Library Systematic Reviews: Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults (Review) Demicheli V, et al.
"[Flu] vaccination may have little or no appreciable effect on hospitalisations (low-certainty evidence) or number of working days lost
https://t.co/IHoQCsV0VP
Cochrane Library Systematic Reviews:
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults (Review) Demicheli V, et al.
"[Flu] vaccination may have little or no appreciable effect on hospitalisations (low-certainty evidence) or number of working days lost
https://t.co/iTNWrQreap https://t.co/CXJAGBpHLg
Dec 2, 2024 · 3 likes · 6,045 followersView post →
CL
Chiara Lestuzzi
@CLestuzzi · X
@Majorana91 @BadMedic @danilomik1 La Cochrane NON è di Gates; fa solo rigorosissime metanalisi della letteratura.
Se un vaccino ha scarso effetto, e se buona parte degli studi esaminati è finanziato dall'industria lo dice https://t.co/fthiGRrNsD
@c_plushie "Vaccines for Preventing Influenza in Healthy Adults"
https://t.co/eLOr1lWodY
Wow! it says that the efficacy of inactivated vaccines to prevent influenza is 59% (Relative Risk Reduction), and that this would be like vaccinating 71 healthy adults to prevent ONE CASE of influenza. https://t.co/yzgYdsQcsI
@dockyyyyyyyyy Die meisten Wirksamkeitstudien kommen offiziell um 40-60% raus. Was das bedeutet, dürfte ja mittlerweile zumindest hier in der Bubble bekannt sein.
@docdu16 Sur la transmission, ces méta-analyses de RCT :
- https://t.co/u7LwX3KHuy
- https://t.co/ZWFuZaQysF
Sur les formes graves, difficile de faire une RCT mais ça :
- https://t.co/QygVs3RZE9
Pour soignants/soignés :
- https://t.co/Fi5Ar49WO0
- https://t.co/RPXgV04CRR
Dec 21, 2023 · 3 likes · 17,505 followersView post →
M
Marcel
@DerExpertise · X
@DrCain0 @RainerReelfs @blafasel42 @Nuklearia "Climate Change Still Seen as the Top Global Threat, but Cyberattacks a Rising Concern" - Pew Research Center. (PRC)
"Public and Scientists' Views on Science and Society" - PRC
"Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults" - Cochrane Collaboration.
Alle unabhängig.
@ewyler @Tim_Roehn @torsten_harmsen … Sie denn Daten präsentieren zur Wirksamkeit der Grippe-Impfung? Wie steht es um die Numbers needed to vaccinate, um bei einem gesunden Erwachsenen eine Grippe-Erkrankung zu verhindern? Jefferson et al. kamen in 2018 zum Ergebnis, …
https://t.co/qLc27K6Zl4
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults
- "The results of this review provide no evidence for the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure"
https://t.co/sfuYoEjedd
RT @Calcijp: 例の医療ジャーナリスト様が有難がってるコクランのインフルエンザワクチンの効果を評価したレポートを読んでみた。http://t.co/f43QH6LeOA Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adul…
Mar 22, 2023 · 23 shares · 1,360 followersView post →
LA
LEON_ALBA
@INT_LEONALBA · X
@GYamey Are you blaming Dr. Tom Jefferson (Senior Associate Tutor at the University of Oxford, member of EMA’s Clinical Trials Advisory Group 2, member of editorial board BMJ EBM) as anti-vaxx, right wing person?
SHAME ON YOU, LIAR!
https://t.co/bzMwh5PMt4
https://t.co/HVidveLiUf https://t.co/DFeT7uz2A9
RT @Calcijp: 例の医療ジャーナリスト様が有難がってるコクランのインフルエンザワクチンの効果を評価したレポートを読んでみた。http://t.co/f43QH6LeOA Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adul…
Mar 10, 2023 · 23 shares · 1,360 followersView post →
JR
Joe Robinson
@JoeRobi95379877 · X
@goddeketal @j_g_allen @HarvardChanSPH Here are titles of 2 Cochrane Review articles that show evidence for the lack of efficacy for vaccines and masks.
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults (Review)
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of
respiratory viruses (Review)
Feb 25, 2023 · 1 like · 5,160 followersView post →
LR
Lib Refuter
@AynRandFollower · X
@ProfGThurston 71 healthy adults need to be vaccinated to prevent one of them from getting influenza
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults
https://t.co/pNP5eK6ELh
Flu vaccines "probably reduce influenza in healthy adults from 2.3% w/o vaccination to 0.9% [moderate-certainty evidence]."
"Vaccination may have little or no appreciable effect on hospitalisations (low-certainty evidence) or number of working days lost."
https://t.co/bwD5MTpXIG
Nov 25, 2022 · 40 likes · 8 shares · 30,577 followersView post →
R
ratiowizard
@ratiowizard · X
@crohlfsen @CDCFlu @CDCgov Glad you asked [https://t.co/tkp8Hu9J2e, https://t.co/eI712DF44J, https://t.co/rSPe3Wc3Pi, https://t.co/zI2gbd34W9, https://t.co/sH3t0dCzuo, https://t.co/zI2gbd34W9, https://t.co/IOCSeHMLDh]! I'd say there's enough peer reviewed evidence to make that judgement.
This 2018 Cochrane review also found flu vax to be marginally effective.
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults - PubMed https://t.co/Q62bmRs6hM
This Cochrane Report is about flu, not COVID:
"Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults"
https://t.co/ddhVo8R3ew
This report doesn't apply to people my age:
I'm 74.
I'm concerned with death, not time off work!
FDA, bu arada,. Modern tıp dünyası, aslında, onları alan hastaların %95'inde işe yaramayan ilaçlarla doludur.
Cochrane özetini kendiniz okuyun:
It's entitled, "Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults"
"Sağlıklı yetişkinlerde influenzayı önlemek için aşılar" başlıklı
De door het #RIVM gepresenteerde cijfers met betrekking tot de effectiviteit van de griepvaccinatie in het griepseizoen 20217-2018 (https://t.co/FWG1kpr9mB) lijken #schromelijk #overdreven wanneer je ze vergelijkt met serieuze wetenschappelijk data: https://t.co/BPcF1oGb6O
@fjmostert @mijntwiets Zoek een op een echte medische database, niet met dit soort onwetenschappelijke nonsens komen, alsjeblieft zeg! https://t.co/BPcF1oGb6O succes ermee!
RT @Calcijp: 例の医療ジャーナリスト様が有難がってるコクランのインフルエンザワクチンの効果を評価したレポートを読んでみた。http://t.co/f43QH6LeOA Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adul…
Dec 26, 2021 · 23 shares · 1,360 followersView post →
D
Duskulder
@duskyldermig100 · X
@R4nd4hl Nogle gange, har en effektiv vaccine, bare ikke nogen effekt. Som f.eks. Influenza vaccinen når den gives til raske voksne. Se her: https://t.co/tmgLnzBma8
Vi må til at tale om, at risikoen for Corona er stærkt aldersbestemt.
@Westegnen @jonasholmdk Influenza vaccinen har nærmest ingen effekt hos raske mennesker: https://t.co/tmgLnzBma8
Det er kun de svækkede immun systemer der har effekt, nok også derfor mange ikke vælger at få vaccinen.
RT @creon: @FD2403 From: Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults (Cochrane Review)
https://t.co/PA2NKavuUP
Oct 16, 2021 · 1 share · 2,798 followersView post →
CL
creon levit
@creon · X
@FD2403 From: Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults (Cochrane Review)
https://t.co/PA2NKavuUP
Oct 16, 2021 · 1 like · 1 share · 6,045 followersView post →
RT
Rae Trinity
@RaeTrinity2 · X
@DavidKSmith2022 @RWMaloneMD 3/n A 2018 review of 52 randomized trials for influenza vaccines that studied over 80,000 healthy adults reported an overall ARR of only 1.4%. So the flu vaccines don't work any better than the Covid19 vaccines. https://t.co/aAH9z6bZpC
@matthew133132 @mlke27048 @JC3322 @IvWoodsy and has never worked to reduce transmission or hospitalisations,
https://t.co/mmxL2zIHt7
https://t.co/gGS2jR4A5b
https://t.co/7r3nUnGawW
but itself increases risk from pathogenic priming when encountering a coronavirus which makes it circular
ie avoid being shot for better health
@ArelysShaw La vacuna contra la influenza nunca ha demostrado reducir significativamente mortalidad ni complicaciones severas (las que llevan a hospitalización) en adultos sanos.
Reduce incidencia de cuadros leves.
Aquí revisión de la Cochrane en 2016.
https://t.co/VlkcqcWLjj https://t.co/YzoyXjNNWk
@noorchashm @eileeniorio @JJ93622848 @lifebiomedguru @NotreDame 4/4
b) done the calculation yourself and seen that these vaccines are being misrepresented.
NNTV for flu from Cochrane:
https://t.co/Xd8k16CZsi
微妙な例を出すと、インフルエンザのワクチンって効いてそうな気がするけどよく分かんないところありますよね。それでNNTが71とかそんな感じです。
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults https://t.co/HxrErysWkq
Apr 11, 2021 · 1 like · 2 shares · 8,798 followersView post →
CD
Chris Darnielle
@chris_darnielle · X
@arkmedic @PamLongCO Cochrane: Absolute risk reduction for the influenza vaccine was "modest" (2.3% to .9%), with 71 vaccinations required to prevent a single case flu case.
https://t.co/sVbeSreXxo
If the public knew how to read clinical trials... the narrative would be much, much different.
Das sind beeindruckende Zahlen. Zum Vergleich: Bei der saisonalen Influenza-Impfung beträgt die NNV, um einen Fall zu verhindern, 71. Jene, um einen Tod bei Personen über 65 Jahre zu verhindern, 4.000! (Quelle: https://t.co/sIeCSG8Yms bzw. https://t.co/sKUZfdbEwu) 3/5
RT @uTobian: @SandraWors3 This is the reference:
Demicheli, V., et al. (2014). Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults. https…
Oct 25, 2020 · 2 shares · 282 followersView post →
MC
m t cartier
@marciatcarter · X
RT @uTobian: @SandraWors3 This is the reference:
Demicheli, V., et al. (2014). Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults. https…
Oct 25, 2020 · 2 shares · 827 followersView post →
TR
Toby Rogers
@uTobian · X
@SandraWors3 This is the reference:
Demicheli, V., et al. (2014). Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults. https://t.co/RQclrlirQV
But in 2016, Cochrane took money from Bill Gates. So the new 2018 study (linked above) says MAYBE SOMETIMES flu shot makes TINY difference?
Oct 25, 2020 · 6 likes · 2 shares · 102,691 followersView post →
TS
the shit sheriff.
@LosDragonflyos · X
@PhantomGamers @SilversTweet Here, have a review:
https://t.co/b9PwEGnyjm
@shossontwits @Bartissimus @HennaLWD @RubeyR ik heb de eerste regel gelezen , Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults
in gezonde mensen ??
heb je dit ook gelezen Conflict of interest statement
@rodoepifanio Esta revisión de Cochrane de 2018, sí analiza RCTs. Concluye: la evidencia indica que la vacuna de la influenza reduce incidencia de casos leves, pero no se aprecia un efecto significativo en hospitalizaciones, ni días de trabajo perdidos por incapacidad.
https://t.co/VlkcqcWLjj https://t.co/ZkM7G7SQ6i
@Dummokratie @SHomburg Die 10% Studie würde mich interessieren. Reichlich i.d.Fachpresse thematisiert kenn' ich das Cochrane Review, das zumindest auch mit der Idee aufräumt, eine Grippeimpfung sei ein hocheffektiver Schutz.
https://t.co/tr3ND4LdGz
Aug 10, 2020 · 1 like · 4,128 followersView post →
@doblerabodeaji @PROMEDICOS Le recomiendo, así le de perecita leer un poquito antes de.
La ignorancia es mmmuuuyyy atrevuda.
acá le ahorro tantisisisisismo esfuerzo.
https://t.co/S6lXNDAfGa
Lea que virus fue el responsable
Aquí la vacuna y su eficacia
https://t.co/KPXYrz7Z0C
@Carmen09332007 @Domenicopatell @jameswi05026180 @imeon_x @Annaelegalita @GiuseppeConteIT @WHO Certo che protegge, e al contrario se sei anziano e hai altre patologie potenzialmente ti salva anche la vita. Libera di credere a quello che vuole, questa è una review interessante https://t.co/Cn7cL1KxeL.
THE FLU SHOT IS A FRAUD
Study Verifies That There Is No Value In Any Flu Vaccine. The study, "Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults", is damning of the entire pharmaceutical industry and its minions,... https://t.co/YAW4M6Mykr
@DocSandyB @CMA_Docs @drgigiosler @NYGH_News The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published a review in 2018 titled, Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults. The results of looking at 52 clinical trials and over 80,000 people show a very low effectiveness of the flu vaccine. https://t.co/aYClGMIxlk
@celliottability @RexallDrugstore @WCHospital The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published a review in 2018 titled, Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults. The results of looking at 52 clinical trials and over 80,000 people show a very low effectiveness of the flu vaccine. https://t.co/aYClGMIxlk
@DrFrancesRyan @guardian And a second one: not working. Peer reviewed research, not anti-vaxx movement, stop feeding this movement.
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults:
https://t.co/aOHZzQHKbI
VACCINATION ET GROSSESSE | Le Quotidien du Médecin | FMC ...
News
No.: CD001269. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub6 13- Zaman K, Roy E, Arifeen SE, Rahman M, Raqib R, WilsonE, & al. Effectiveness of maternal influenza ...
LA PROMOTION DE LA PRÉVENTION EN SALLE D'ATTENTE EST ...
News
2018 Feb 1;2:CD001269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub6. Dr Santa Félibre (Généraliste Enseignant, Paris). 0 RéactionsCommenter; Partager sur Facebook.
Shocking Truth of Paracetamol by Kamalpreet Singh | PDF | Fever ...
News
... 10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub 6/full. 74. L. T. Kohn “To Err Is Human; To Fail to Improve Is Unconscionable” Institute of Medicine (1999), https://www ...
Influenza Vaccine | PDF | Influenza Vaccine | Vaccines
News
CD001269. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub6. PM C 6491184. PMID 29388196. 12. ^ Jump up to:a b c Osterholm MT, Kelley NS, Sommer A, Belongia EA (January ...
Probiotics Cut Flu Costs in USA | PDF | Clinical Medicine ...
News
(2), CD001269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub6 Li, S., and Leader, S. (2007). Economic burden and absenteeism from influenza- Draper, K., Ley, C., and ...
... 10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub6/full. "Inactivated influenza vaccines probably reduce influenza in healthy adults from 2.3% without vaccination to 0.9% (risk ...