The group's tone varies from analytical to assertive, with posts like '@TuckerGoodrich' debating the effects of omega-3 and omega-6 and advocating for the Omega-3 Index, showing deeper engagement. Others critique the traditional ratio with phrases like 'ratio needs to get ratio’d,' reflecting skepticism and a call for change, which points to a recognition of the article's potential for significant influence on how omega fatty acids are assessed and understood.
AgreementModerate agreement
Most discussions recognize the limitations of the traditional omega-6:omega-3 ratio and favor newer metrics like the Omega-3 Index, showing general support for the article's critiques.
InterestHigh interest
Posts delve into nuanced debates about the measurement methods and diet impacts, indicating high engagement with the subject matter.
EngagementModerate engagement
Participants discuss mechanisms, such as EPA and DHA levels, and challenge the validity of the ratio approach, demonstrating moderate to deep engagement.
ImpactModerate impact
The discussions highlight a shift towards more accurate biomarkers, with some anticipating changes in dietary recommendations, suggesting moderate perceived impact.
Abstract in brief
The text discusses the importance of long-chain marine omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA) for health, especially in relation to cardiovascular and neurocognitive diseases, and highlights the challenges in accurately measuring and interpreting omega-3 levels.
The commonly used n6:n3 ratio has limitations and can lead to misunderstandings, suggesting that it may not be the best metric for assessing omega-3 status.
The authors propose replacing the n6:n3 ratio with the Omega-3 Index, which measures EPA and DHA levels in red blood cells, as a more effective way to assess omega-3 deficiency in Western diets.]
El omega 3 índex es el % de EPA + DHA respecto al total de AG contenidos en las membranas de los eritrocitos en una muestra de sangre. Se considera saludable si es más del 8%. Se considera insuficiente si es menos de 4%. Es mejor marcador q el ratio W3/W6
https://t.co/Y7infoz0VX
Dec 28, 2021 · 10 likes · 1 share · 21,737 followersView post →
AA
Alan Aragon
@TheAlanAragon · X
@ollieD68 @zbitter @jeep7575 @Garybrecka1 @BioLayne The ratio stuff needs to get ratio’d. Attaching what won’t fit in my tweet (sorry, don’t have the character capacity). https://t.co/Fy8Nktsq8d https://t.co/jVP9EJ2GL3
Nov 17, 2023 · 4 likes · 42,094 followersView post →
A
Agingdoc
@agingdoc1 · X
Footnote: Linoleic acid from highly processed foods is overabundant in the West and problematic (understatements). The matter here is omega-6 in the context of whole foods such as nuts/seeds.
More background: https://t.co/LmpplCysAM
Jun 23, 2021 · 3 likes · 42,588 followersView post →
TB
Tom Babington
@Tom_Babington1 · X
@Josh52182894 @The_Nutrivore Even your mechanistic rationale doesn't hold up. I suggest reading this paper discussing the issues with the n-6:3 ratio
https://t.co/NV6R1rDJ42
and the discussion from this paper
https://t.co/Tg1TKfdeIb
But anyway, who cares if it doesn't pan out in human outcome data? https://t.co/a9ZlTGJ6BU
Feb 11, 2022 · 3 likes · 1,206 followersView post →
JH
Jacob M. Hands
@jacobmhands · X
@TuckerGoodrich @exfatloss It’s likely that lowering o6 can raise o3 but as Bill Harris argues, effect of o3 index and benefit conferred is attributable to o3 not o6… complex feelings about this but increasing o3 generally is more beneficial (@PhD_Leigh and I have a paper coming) https://t.co/Q2N9sUw4ul
@MJPadula @CaloriesProper @MarkBski The old push for a more balanced ratio of omega-3:6 is evidence-challenged, unlike getting sufficient omega-3. The "ratio" reasoning fails to acknowledge that several omega-6-rich foods (nuts are a good example) have well-established health benefits. https://t.co/Fy8Nktsq8d
Rapeseed oil is often claimed to be harmful due to its omega-6 content, believed to promote inflammation. This video explores these myths and discusses the relevance of omega fatty acids, metabolic health, and the…
Seed oils, including canola oil, have sparked debate regarding their health effects. This video delves into research suggesting that canola oil may improve cardiometabolic risk factors like cholesterol levels and…
@TuckerGoodrich @exfatloss It’s likely that lowering o6 can raise o3 but as Bill Harris argues, effect of o3 index and benefit conferred is attributable to o3 not o6… complex feelings about this but increasing o3 generally is more beneficial (@PhD_Leigh and I have a paper coming) https://t.co/Q2N9sUw4ul
@ollieD68 @zbitter @jeep7575 @Garybrecka1 @BioLayne The ratio stuff needs to get ratio’d. Attaching what won’t fit in my tweet (sorry, don’t have the character capacity). https://t.co/Fy8Nktsq8d https://t.co/jVP9EJ2GL3
Nov 17, 2023 · 4 likes · 42,094 followersView post →
AA
Alan Aragon
@TheAlanAragon · X
@MJPadula @CaloriesProper @MarkBski The old push for a more balanced ratio of omega-3:6 is evidence-challenged, unlike getting sufficient omega-3. The "ratio" reasoning fails to acknowledge that several omega-6-rich foods (nuts are a good example) have well-established health benefits. https://t.co/Fy8Nktsq8d
@JTayScience @AndyJScott @dranthonygustin @ketocoachmary @TheNutrivore These are pretty decent explanations as to why this notion is overly simplistic. With regard to the omega 3:6 ratio and its association with health outcomes, the issue seems to be a lack of omega 3 in the diet rather than too much omega 6.
https://t.co/NV6R1rDJ42 https://t.co/OhKZoWaBVV
@Josh52182894 @The_Nutrivore Even your mechanistic rationale doesn't hold up. I suggest reading this paper discussing the issues with the n-6:3 ratio
https://t.co/NV6R1rDJ42
and the discussion from this paper
https://t.co/Tg1TKfdeIb
But anyway, who cares if it doesn't pan out in human outcome data? https://t.co/a9ZlTGJ6BU
Feb 11, 2022 · 3 likes · 1,206 followersView post →
SS
Saúl Sánchez
@SaulNutri · X
@josecarlosjimtu Importante sí. Para equilibrarlo conviene limitar la ingesta de procesados y de ciertos aceites vegetales. No es tarea fácil de todos modos.
https://t.co/Hi40k7QXWZ
Jan 13, 2022 · 1 like · 108,061 followersView post →
ML
María José López
@mj_nutricion · X
RT @pzjarana: El omega 3 índex es el % de EPA + DHA respecto al total de AG contenidos en las membranas de los eritrocitos en una muestra d…
pzjarana: El omega 3 índex es el % de EPA + DHA respecto al total de AG contenidos en las membranas de los eritrocitos en una muestra de sangre. Se considera saludable si es más del 8%. Se considera insuficiente si es menos de 4%. Es mejor marcador q el … https://t.co/OySIJyTAVZ
El omega 3 índex es el % de EPA + DHA respecto al total de AG contenidos en las membranas de los eritrocitos en una muestra de sangre. Se considera saludable si es más del 8%. Se considera insuficiente si es menos de 4%. Es mejor marcador q el ratio W3/W6
https://t.co/Y7infoz0VX
Dec 28, 2021 · 10 likes · 1 share · 21,737 followersView post →
A
Agingdoc
@agingdoc1 · X
Footnote: Linoleic acid from highly processed foods is overabundant in the West and problematic (understatements). The matter here is omega-6 in the context of whole foods such as nuts/seeds.
More background: https://t.co/LmpplCysAM
Jun 23, 2021 · 3 likes · 42,588 followersView post →
K
k
@kaspernilsen · X
@dvdmon @kevinnbass @npure3 But according to @npure3 and other experts like @OmegaQuant it is about getting in a lot of EPA/DHA (that is most important and also avoiding oxidized PUFA's/omega-6 in particular). https://t.co/vOfBNAk0LC
PJ
AA
A
TB
JH
MP
SS
ML
FT
K