@kamekurasan1 ガチ講演会のまとめみたいな感じになっててもう死にそうです先生 それはさておきBLWは私も質問受けて勉強になりました。システマティックレビューも一応出てまして、まとまっててわかりやすかったです(リンゴは窒息リスク高いとか) https://t.co/stZnb8qe9Q
Baby-led weaning: what a systematic review of the literature adds on.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Apr 2021 – Aug 2025Where it's discussed
-
News16 articles
-
X / Twitter5 posts
-
Facebook4 posts
-
YouTube3 videos
-
Blogs3 articles
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The posts reveal a cautious tone with expressions like 'Potensi kurangnya asupan besi dan energi' and concerns about risks such as choking, indicating skepticism towards baby-led weaning. The tone varies from criticism—highlighting lack of scientific backing—to curiosity, emphasizing the need for more research, which reflects moderate engagement and interest without a decisive impact.
Most discussions express skepticism or concern about baby-led weaning, aligning with the critical tone of the posts.
Posts show moderate interest, with some engaging in debates or sharing personal opinions.
Responses involve some depth, referencing research concerns and risks, but overall remain at a moderate level.
The discussions highlight concern but lack strong indications of shifting healthcare guidelines or practice changes.
Abstract in brief
- Weaning is a critical period where infants transition from breastfeeding or formula to solid foods, impacting their long-term eating behaviors and health outcomes.
- Baby-led weaning, which encourages infants to self-feed solids starting at six months, has gained popularity but raises concerns about potential risks like iron deficiency and choking.
- A systematic review analyzed 12 studies on baby-led weaning, revealing low-quality evidence and highlighting the need for further research to address unresolved issues and inform health advice.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyBLWについてのシステマチックレビューを発見したから、要点を長々と書いてみる☺️ https://t.co/kYA8SsOHCf
@RawBeautyKristi https://t.co/zmwRsgCm3B
@zenasabila @saveoureartth @semangcotton @mattmrdxck Amiiin, metode BLW ini banyak ga disarankan oleh para ahli karena berpotensi kurangnya asupan besi dan energi dan meningkatkan resiko tersedak (baca di sini : https://t.co/4MYjWs1L8Z). Dilakukan oleh artis + dikasih dalih "hak anak". Diikuti org2 tanpa riset. Yg kasian bayinya.
All mentions
Baby Led Weaning Versus Traditional Feeding: Evidence and Benefits
This video explores the benefits and research behind baby led weaning as an alternative to traditional spoonfeeding, focusing on its potential to promote healthy eating behaviors and positive weight gain in infants.
Understanding Food Texture Milestones in Infant Oral Feeding Development
Research on texture progression in oral feeding is limited, leading to conflicting advice. A recent study by Delaney et al. introduces a framework to identify typical food texture milestones, aiding parents and…
Impact of Feeding Styles on Toddler Food Preferences and Eating Behavior
This study examines how different parental feeding styles, including baby-led weaning and parent-led methods, influence toddlers' eating behaviors and food preferences. The findings suggest that while some differences…
@zenasabila @saveoureartth @semangcotton @mattmrdxck Amiiin, metode BLW ini banyak ga disarankan oleh para ahli karena berpotensi kurangnya asupan besi dan energi dan meningkatkan resiko tersedak (baca di sini : https://t.co/4MYjWs1L8Z). Dilakukan oleh artis + dikasih dalih "hak anak". Diikuti org2 tanpa riset. Yg kasian bayinya.
BLWについてのシステマチックレビューを発見したから、要点を長々と書いてみる☺️ https://t.co/kYA8SsOHCf
@RawBeautyKristi https://t.co/zmwRsgCm3B
@kamekurasan1 ガチ講演会のまとめみたいな感じになっててもう死にそうです先生 それはさておきBLWは私も質問受けて勉強になりました。システマティックレビューも一応出てまして、まとまっててわかりやすかったです(リンゴは窒息リスク高いとか) https://t.co/stZnb8qe9Q
https://t.co/ryaSWrTXAh Baby led weaning literature review - good overview of research on the topic #Parenting #Babies #Solids
相H
今
S
W
LC