Synopsis of Social media discussions
The discussions reflect a strong agreement with the article's conclusion, citing specific aspects such as Turner’s findings on the poor replicability of BOLD responses with small samples—especially at N > 100—demonstrating technical engagement. The tone emphasizes the importance of larger samples for more reliable neuroimaging results, indicating both curiosity and recognition of broad implications.
Agreement
Strong agreementMost discussions acknowledge that small sample sizes negatively affect the reliability of neuroimaging results, aligning with the publication's findings.
Interest
Moderate level of interestParticipants show a moderate level of interest, since MRI research and methodological issues are somewhat specialized but still relevant to scientific progress.
Engagement
High engagementDiscussions include references to specific studies and technical metrics, indicating deep engagement with the research implications.
Impact
High level of impactThe collective tone stresses that improving sample sizes could significantly enhance research replicability, underscoring high impact on future study designs.
Social Mentions
YouTube
3 Videos
3 Posts
5 Posts
Blogs
2 Articles
News
4 Articles
2 Posts
Metrics
Video Views
4,680
Total Likes
393
Extended Reach
10,719
Social Features
19
Timeline: Posts about article
Top Social Media Posts
Posts referencing the article
Addressing the Crisis of Reproducibility in Scientific Research
This video explores the ongoing crisis of reproducibility in science, emphasizing how studies, even from reputable journals, can present unreliable findings. Join us as we discuss the implications of this issue for scientific integrity and advancement.
The Impact of Sample Sizes on Neuroimaging Study Reliability
Small sample sizes in task-based fMRI studies lead to lower chances of producing consistent and replicable results, making it hard to confirm findings across different studies. Larger samples are essential for more reliable neuroimaging research.
Improving Reproducibility in Scientific Research Practices
This video discusses the ongoing issue of reproducibility in scientific research, highlighting concerns about the reliability of published studies. A collective of 1,500 scientists emphasizes the need for transparency and better methodologies to enhance reproducibility within the scientific community.
-
Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies https://t.co/X8Rdjt20k2
view full postApril 5, 2022
2
-
nicola sambuco
@NicolaSambuco (Twitter)With little amount of data per subject (~ 5 min), Turner (https://t.co/ae0ucWdzn6) have showed that replicability of BOLD amplitude of peak activity (calculated as a hit rate) and cluster activation (Jaccard index) is very poor, even at samples N>100. 3/n
view full postJanuary 10, 2022
4
-
bioRxiv Published
@biorxiv_pubd (Twitter)How Sample Size Influences The Replicability Of Task-Based fMRI published as: https://t.co/eJpn57xBJ0 #Communications_Biology #biorxiv
view full postAugust 20, 2020
-
Ali Khatibi @alikhatibi.bsky.social
@AliiKhatibi (Twitter)RT @martaceko: Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies https://t.co/e3pA4n4lXJ
view full postApril 26, 2019
1
-
Marta Čeko
@martaceko (Twitter)Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies https://t.co/e3pA4n4lXJ
view full postApril 26, 2019
2
1
Abstract Synopsis
- Small sample sizes in task-based fMRI studies lead to lower chances of producing consistent and replicable results, making it hard to confirm findings across different studies.
- The study shows that even sample sizes around 100 participants, which are common in many studies, only yield modest replicability, and much larger samples are needed for more reliable results.
- The findings emphasize the importance of using larger samples in neuroimaging research to improve the reliability of conclusions, aiming to make the case clearer for researchers who might find previous technical discussions about sample sizes confusing.]
Takahikoike
@takahikoike (Twitter)