January 2023 PMID 30395919

Insect repellents: An updated review for the clinician.

Quoc-Bao D Nguyen, Mai-Anh N Vu, Adelaide A Hebert

Mentions

21
Peak: 1 in Nov 2019
across 4 sources since Nov 2019

Extended reach

27,293
potential audience

Total likes

1,042

Video views

26,259

Mentions per month

Nov 2019 – Oct 2023

Where it's discussed

  • News14 articles
  • Blogs3 articles
  • X / Twitter2 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The responses indicate a neutral stance, with one person expressing basic interest by asking for the article and referencing the publication, but without critical analysis or debate. The tone is casual, exemplified by phrases like 'habla al respecto,' and the comment about COFEPRIS highlights a specific regulatory detail that they are uncertain about, signaling minimal engagement overall.

AgreementNeither agree nor disagree

The discussion shows uncertainty or indifference about specific regulatory details like COFEPRIS, indicating neither strong agreement nor disagreement with the publication.

InterestModerate interest

The interest level is moderate, as one participant expresses curiosity about the article but does not delve deeply into its content.

EngagementNeutral engagement

The exchange is quite brief, with minimal elaboration or analysis, reflecting neutral engagement.

ImpactNeutral impact

This discussion appears to have little immediate impact, serving more as a preliminary inquiry rather than a decisive stance or response.

Abstract in brief

  • The article discusses the importance of insect repellents (IRs) in preventing serious vector-borne diseases like malaria, Zika, West Nile, dengue, and Lyme disease, emphasizing their role in public health and their key characteristics such as cost-effectiveness and high efficacy.
  • DEET is highlighted as the most widely used IR with a strong safety profile and effective protection, while alternative EPA-registered IR ingredients like permethrin, picaridin, IR3535, and natural oils are also discussed for their comparable efficacy and low toxicity.
  • The review provides information for clinicians on various IR options, including their origins, mechanisms, side effects, and formulations, helping them choose the best protection methods tailored to individual patient needs.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Jack's Raging Bile Duct
@smackmygrinchup · X

@andreyfp @doctormacias Si, claro Nguyen, Q.-B. D., Vu, M.-A. N., & Hebert, A. A. (2018). Insect Repellents: An Updated Review for the Clinician. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Habla al respecto, lo que no encuentro es lo de la COFEPRIS. Si necesitas el articulo, mandame tu mail

Nov 25, 2019 · 679 followers View post →
Goodhealth_._
@CroxFit · X

https://t.co/NvZQGatWvG https://t.co/ADQdqI2hpz.

Oct 22, 2023 · 356 followers View post →

All mentions

Goodhealth_._
@CroxFit · X

https://t.co/NvZQGatWvG https://t.co/ADQdqI2hpz.

Oct 22, 2023 · 356 followers View post →
Jack's Raging Bile Duct
@smackmygrinchup · X

@andreyfp @doctormacias Si, claro Nguyen, Q.-B. D., Vu, M.-A. N., & Hebert, A. A. (2018). Insect Repellents: An Updated Review for the Clinician. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Habla al respecto, lo que no encuentro es lo de la COFEPRIS. Si necesitas el articulo, mandame tu mail

Nov 25, 2019 · 679 followers View post →