PubHawk
November 2019 PMID 30444533

A review of inorganic UV filters zinc oxide and titanium dioxide.

Samantha L Schneider, Henry W Lim

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

29
Peak: 1 in May 2022
across 4 sources since May 2022

Extended reach

670,549
potential audience

Total likes

33,241

Video views

644,522

Mentions per month

May 2022 – May 2025

Where it's discussed

  • News24 articles
  • YouTube2 videos
  • Facebook2 posts
  • X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The analysis reflects a neutral stance, emphasizing that physical sunscreens are not entirely reflected but also absorbed similarly to chemical types, as evidenced by terms like 'ngga sepenuhnya di pantulkan' and 'serap oleh kulit.' The tone is factual and appreciative, with positive mentions like 'Thankyou so much' showing respect for helpful input, which promotes a thoughtful and informative exchange.

AgreementNeither agree nor disagree

There is limited explicit support or disagreement; the discussion mostly shares a fact about physical sunscreens absorbing some UV rays, indicating neutrality.

InterestModerate interest

The discussion shows modest interest by highlighting recent research findings, which may be relevant for users concerned about sunscreen safety.

EngagementModerate engagement

The conversation involves sharing new information and appreciating contributions, demonstrating some level of deeper engagement.

ImpactNeutral impact

The discussion adds to awareness about sunscreen effectiveness but does not seem to significantly influence wider opinions or behaviors.

Abstract in brief

  • Inorganic UV filters like zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) are important for sun protection because they block ultraviolet (UV) rays effectively, with ZnO covering a broad spectrum including UVA and UVB, and TiO2 mainly protecting against UVB.
  • These mineral filters are used in nanoparticle form (around 100nm), which makes sunscreens more cosmetically appealing because they are less visible on the skin, and current evidence suggests they pose minimal risks to human health through skin absorption.
  • Although human health risks are low, inhalation risks from spray sunscreens with nanoparticles exist, leading to recommendations against these products; environmentally, the risks are currently considered low but could change with increased usage, so ongoing caution and protective practices like seeking shade and wearing protective clothing remain essential.
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
chan
@skinsofun · X

TAPII.. ada penelitian terkini kalau physical sunscreen itu ngga sepenuhnya di pantulkan, tp sebagian besar masih di serap oleh kulit kamu (sama seperti cheical sunscreen) (Source: https://t.co/txhjTGtYnx) Thankyou so much @twitnyapimma yg udah nambahin! https://t.co/f5GkeymDxz

May 23, 2022 · 3 likes · 26,028 followers View post →

All mentions

chan
@skinsofun · X

TAPII.. ada penelitian terkini kalau physical sunscreen itu ngga sepenuhnya di pantulkan, tp sebagian besar masih di serap oleh kulit kamu (sama seperti cheical sunscreen) (Source: https://t.co/txhjTGtYnx) Thankyou so much @twitnyapimma yg udah nambahin! https://t.co/f5GkeymDxz

May 23, 2022 · 3 likes · 26,028 followers View post →