¿Podría una profilaxis antibiótica más amplia (que la terapia convencional con cefazolina) ⬇️ las infecciones de dispositivos cardiacos #DECI ? #PADIT trial. https://t.co/FJiXFHr58S Nueva revisión del artículo publicado recientemente en @JACCJournals https://t.co/F4HVmBpCwW https://t.co/D1DDIQkgR1
Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial: The PADIT Trial.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2019 – Nov 2023Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter18 posts
-
News9 articles
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Facebook2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The proposed discussions reflect a balanced attitude towards the study, with participants noting the low infection rates and the absence of statistically significant differences, as seen in phrases like 'not significant' and 'quite convinced.' The tone remains analytical rather than emotional, with some users referencing specific antibiotic practices or trial methods, contributing to a moderate level of interest and engagement.
Most discussions acknowledge the findings of the PADIT trial, noting the low infection rates and the lack of significant difference between treatment groups.
Participants show moderate interest, with some expressing curiosity about specific methods and implications but largely focusing on confirming the study's outcomes.
Comments involve some technical details, referencing antibiotic protocols and infection rates, indicating an average level of engagement.
The discussions suggest limited immediate practical impact since the study findings show minimal difference in outcomes, although they highlight ongoing debates about antibiotic strategies.
Abstract in brief
- • The results showed a slight reduction in device infections with the incremental antibiotic approach, especially in high-risk patients, but the difference was not statistically significant.
- • Overall, the study suggests that while more comprehensive antibiotic protocols might help, they did not significantly decrease infection rates, and infection rates remained low across both treatment groups.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyMore antibiotics, not always a better outcome. NS difference in infection rates in this large, multisite trial of SOC vs. SOC+irrigation with antibiotcs+post-op abx Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial: The PADIT Trial https://t.co/A6iK0nnP1N
Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial. The PADIT Trial Device infection rates were low. The observed difference in infection rates was not statistically significant. https://t.co/Oo8bBXwo1d https://t.co/EvjtmOzvto
@haripj152 @rdschaller @narrowQRS @drrakeshg1 @Hisdoc1 As a group we use saline wash in pocket, and not ABX wash or post procedure ABX course. https://t.co/gvvtaV5nlO
@doc_ccc @cellisvandyep In our PADIT study, in high-risk patients, hospitalization for infection occurred 1.23% receiving conventional antibiotics and 1.01% receiving incremental antibiotics ( p = 0.26). We did not use any antibiotic envelope. https://t.co/lhO2WJ151c @EPeeps_Bot
@malagu_m @EHRAPresident @Dominik_Linz @GuerraCardio @escardio @RodrigueGarcia4 @KommataVarvara @HaranBurri Not sure. But quite convinced. https://t.co/PBRr7TuGJx
All mentions
Preventing Infections in Cardiac Implantable Devices
An unfortunate complication after CIED implantation is infection. This video explores prevention and management strategies based on the 2023 ESC Guidelines for Infective Endocarditis and discusses the effectiveness of…
Preventing Infections in Cardiac Implantable Devices
This video discusses the prevention and management of infective endocarditis following cardiac implantable electronic device surgeries. It highlights recent clinical trials, including the effectiveness of absorbable…
@doc_ccc @cellisvandyep In our PADIT study, in high-risk patients, hospitalization for infection occurred 1.23% receiving conventional antibiotics and 1.01% receiving incremental antibiotics ( p = 0.26). We did not use any antibiotic envelope. https://t.co/lhO2WJ151c @EPeeps_Bot
@haripj152 @rdschaller @narrowQRS @drrakeshg1 @Hisdoc1 As a group we use saline wash in pocket, and not ABX wash or post procedure ABX course. https://t.co/gvvtaV5nlO
@malagu_m @EHRAPresident @Dominik_Linz @GuerraCardio @escardio @RodrigueGarcia4 @KommataVarvara @HaranBurri Not sure. But quite convinced. https://t.co/PBRr7TuGJx
@SMParrishRPh @IdVilchez @IDstewardship Single dose cefazolin pre-procedure and done. https://t.co/bG3AvPBacl
More antibiotics, not always a better outcome. NS difference in infection rates in this large, multisite trial of SOC vs. SOC+irrigation with antibiotcs+post-op abx Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial: The PADIT Trial https://t.co/A6iK0nnP1N
RT @estimcardiaca: ¿Podría una profilaxis antibiótica más amplia (que la terapia convencional con cefazolina) ⬇️ las infecciones de disposi…
RT @estimcardiaca: ¿Podría una profilaxis antibiótica más amplia (que la terapia convencional con cefazolina) ⬇️ las infecciones de disposi…
RT @estimcardiaca: ¿Podría una profilaxis antibiótica más amplia (que la terapia convencional con cefazolina) ⬇️ las infecciones de disposi…
RT @estimcardiaca: ¿Podría una profilaxis antibiótica más amplia (que la terapia convencional con cefazolina) ⬇️ las infecciones de disposi…
RT @estimcardiaca: ¿Podría una profilaxis antibiótica más amplia (que la terapia convencional con cefazolina) ⬇️ las infecciones de disposi…
RT @estimcardiaca: ¿Podría una profilaxis antibiótica más amplia (que la terapia convencional con cefazolina) ⬇️ las infecciones de disposi…
RT @estimcardiaca: ¿Podría una profilaxis antibiótica más amplia (que la terapia convencional con cefazolina) ⬇️ las infecciones de disposi…
¿Podría una profilaxis antibiótica más amplia (que la terapia convencional con cefazolina) ⬇️ las infecciones de dispositivos cardiacos #DECI ? #PADIT trial. https://t.co/FJiXFHr58S Nueva revisión del artículo publicado recientemente en @JACCJournals https://t.co/F4HVmBpCwW https://t.co/D1DDIQkgR1
RT @jvillacastin: Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial. The PADIT Trial Device infection rates were low. The observed difference…
RT @jvillacastin: Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial. The PADIT Trial Device infection rates were low. The observed difference…
RT @jvillacastin: Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial. The PADIT Trial Device infection rates were low. The observed difference…
RT @jvillacastin: Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial. The PADIT Trial Device infection rates were low. The observed difference…
Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial. The PADIT Trial Device infection rates were low. The observed difference in infection rates was not statistically significant. https://t.co/Oo8bBXwo1d https://t.co/EvjtmOzvto
AC
MD
JV
PD
SC
DD
JM
MO
IB
ÓC
IL
ML
JC
L
JB
PC
D