Front Physiol December 2018 PMID 30568598

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Sprint Interval Training on Anthropometric Measures and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Healthy Young Women.

João Pedro A Naves, Ricardo B Viana, Ana Cristina S Rebelo, Claudio Andre B de Lira, Gustavo D Pimentel, Patrícia Cristina B Lobo, Jordana C de Oliveira, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Paulo Gentil

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 2 in Mar 2024

across 5 sources since Oct 2020

Extended reach

198,312

potential audience

Total likes

17,099

Video views

194,183

Mentions per month

Oct 2020 – Jan 2025

Where it's discussed

YouTube3 videos
Facebook2 posts
News2 articles
Blogs2 articles
X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

These discussions emphasize the efficiency of both sprint interval and high-intensity interval training, using words like 'time efficiency' and hashtags related to cycling and fitness, which reflect interest but without deep technical analysis, leading to moderate agreement and impact scores.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the positive effects of both training methods, aligning with the study's findings.

InterestModerate interest

The social discussions demonstrate moderate interest, focusing on time efficiency and practical applications rather than deep scientific analysis.

EngagementNeutral engagement

While some posts mention specific training strategies and fitness context, overall engagement is relatively surface-level.

ImpactModerate impact

The conversations highlight practical implications for athletes and fitness enthusiasts, suggesting some influence on training choices.

Abstract in brief

The study compared the effects of 8 weeks of Sprint Interval Training (SIT) and High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) on body measurements and fitness in healthy young women, finding both methods improved fitness and reduced skinfolds and waist size, but only SIT significantly reduced body weight and BMI.
Both groups saw increases in their peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), indicating improved cardiorespiratory fitness, with no significant difference between them.
While both training types led to positive changes without needing dietary modifications, SIT was more effective at reducing overall body fat as shown by skinfold decreases, but both methods helped in lowering waist size.

Read the full abstract