Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall tone demonstrates strong skepticism about the effectiveness of nonverbal cues for detecting lies, supported by references to scientific reviews and critiques, such as 'non-verbal cues are faint and unreliable' and 'people are mediocre lie catchers.' This language, combining phrases like 'don't work' and 'you can't reliably identify lies,' underscores a consensus against overestimating behavioral cues, shaping the perception that scientific evidence dismisses popular misconceptions.
Most discussions reject claims that nonverbal cues reliably indicate deception, emphasizing scientific evidence that contradicts such beliefs.
Many posts highlight the enduring fascination and debate around lie detection and deception, reflecting high curiosity.
Some discussions reference scientific reviews and specific studies, showing moderate engagement with the research details.
Posts collectively suggest that despite widespread misinformation, the article reinforces the limited practical use of nonverbal cues in lie detection, which could influence public and professional perceptions negatively.
“Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.co/Yqag3HKK0S
Sí, de Google Académico https://t.co/F2qov2RdOE https://t.co/49DvMMerr1
In fact, even professionals can't really tell who is lying from nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues work & they aren't that useful (see my annotations). The second table shows that even these haven't been studied in real settings! https://t.co/HnZUEskZnX https://t.co/ddOjVMgk27
And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues work & they aren't that useful. The second table shows that even these haven't been studied in real settings! https://t.co/HnZUEskZnX https://t.co/TsvTGnXpDI
And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don't work. The table (with my annotations) shows only a couple cues have any use. But even these haven’t been tested outside of a lab! https://t.co/HnZUEs3owp https://t.co/N2h4BT0hi1
Here ya go - link for anyone who fancies a read https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
Mal ehrlich In which situations do you lie and have you ever regretted it? This scientific exploration examines the reliability of lie detection techniques, including nonverbal cues, polygraphs, and behavioral…
Can people really tell if somebody is lying by looking at their body language? This video explores the research on deception, highlighting that nonverbal cues are subtle and often unreliable for lie detection…
People can roughly identify lies from truths about 54% of the time, with slightly better accuracy in recognizing truths than lies. The average ability to distinguish lies from truths is statistically significant but not…
The topic of facial microexpressions is far more complex than some YouTubers suggest. This video aims to provide a comprehensive academic perspective on these expressions, emphasizing the need for thorough research to…
The article explores the link between nonverbal communication and deception, emphasizing the subtlety and unreliability of behavioral cues, and highlights the need for improved methods in lie detection research.
@flem2019 @freitashebert_ A boa prática só se manifesta nasce a partir da boa teoria (ciência). E o tirocínio policial não tem esse elemento pelo simples fato de que é constituido por achismos de expressões faciais e corporais. Sobre o tema: https://t.co/0ed3pxFV5E
RT @mariahartwig:
RT @mariahartwig:
RT @mariahartwig:
RT @mariahartwig:
RT @mariahartwig:
RT @mariahartwig:
RT @mariahartwig:
RT @mariahartwig: Another case of the troubling appeal of demeanor, which is so often causes misjudgments in the the legal system Here is…
Another case of the troubling appeal of demeanor, which is so often causes misjudgments in the the legal system Here is a #literaryreview with @AldertVrij and Professor Granhag in @AnnualReviews (psychology) Full article here⬇️: https://t.co/bOLoMvoMZJ https://t.co/XDI6nTQKDv
RT @DaniMet1: Sources: https://t.co/z9ZrbB29ic; https://t.co/r0GNegQsav; https://t.co/I2KI5EI3UE; https://t.co/7zj1NVcMwn 16/ End. #IStan…
@TellyTubbo That has been proven to be false. Look at all the NLP studies. :-) https://t.co/Qe3lGM6tx8 https://t.co/tLDKIrum70
Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception https://t.co/JNhv4YDiL1
@WillToLiveUS @TIME Here is a literature overview in @AnnualReviews, co-authored with @AldertVrij and Pär Anders Granhag: https://t.co/pwU2IAY3nk
RT @LaInca_: @martintetaz No, no hay evidencia científica del significado fiable del lenguaje no verbal. https://t.co/F2qov2RdOE https://t.…
Sí, de Google Académico https://t.co/F2qov2RdOE https://t.co/49DvMMerr1
@martintetaz No, no hay evidencia científica del significado fiable del lenguaje no verbal. https://t.co/F2qov2RdOE https://t.co/dmVT74jLDg
body language "interpretation" is notoriously unreliable. the article tom links to should really do better than just credulously repeating one guys claims https://t.co/tn9r5lFNO7 https://t.co/IWz8UV0zRr
RT @mariahartwig: Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception https://t.co/ccHAvlJvjI
RT @mariahartwig: Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception https://t.co/ccHAvlJvjI
RT @mariahartwig: Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception https://t.co/ccHAvlJvjI
Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception https://t.co/ccHAvlJvjI
RT @emollick: Links, in case you don't believe me: Non-verbal cues: https://t.co/HnZUEs3owp Faces of strangers: https://t.co/adoB20MW5v Fai…
Links, in case you don't believe me: Non-verbal cues: https://t.co/HnZUEs3owp Faces of strangers: https://t.co/adoB20MW5v Failure of the cognitive "interrogation" approach: https://t.co/sSmh36EHqk Delays and lying: https://t.co/PBrdR12a2x https://t.co/lVmn97UCAv
RT @FaisalBenMenaia: "Reading others' minds is central to social interactions, but we vastly overestimate our ability. Contextual cues and…
"Reading others' minds is central to social interactions, but we vastly overestimate our ability. Contextual cues and knowledge of personality can help improve accuracy”. https://t.co/N1GlSyFLRE #ForensicPsychology #investigativeinterviewing #DeceptionDetection
@PedrinhoFields @Priscil04608081 Existem muitas referências, mas esse é um dos artigos mais interessantes: https://t.co/OyRgWSQkhH
RT @emollick: Links, in case you don't believe me: Non-verbal cues: https://t.co/HnZUEs3WlX Faces of strangers: https://t.co/adoB20NtV3 Fai…
RT @emollick: Links, in case you don't believe me: Non-verbal cues: https://t.co/HnZUEs3WlX Faces of strangers: https://t.co/adoB20NtV3 Fai…
RT @emollick: Links, in case you don't believe me: Non-verbal cues: https://t.co/HnZUEs3WlX Faces of strangers: https://t.co/adoB20NtV3 Fai…
Links, in case you don't believe me: Non-verbal cues: https://t.co/HnZUEs3WlX Faces of strangers: https://t.co/adoB20NtV3 Failure of the cognitive "interrogation" approach: https://t.co/sSmh36FffS Delays and lying: https://t.co/PBrdR12HS5 https://t.co/LVL7WgwgjR
@LumberLaw @SpideyHypnosis so great! i'm glad no one pays attention to this "science" with all those "scientists" who have been "studying" and "researching" it for decades, spreading lies w/ their awfully long "peer-reviewed" articles like the one below. ugh! who wants to read that? https://t.co/wzg6fdFl0j
RT @emollick: And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that…
RT @emollick: And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that…
RT @emollick: And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that…
RT @emollick: And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that…
RT @emollick: And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that…
RT @emollick: And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that…
RT @emollick: And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that…
RT @emollick: And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that…
RT @emollick: And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that…
RT @emollick: And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that…
And, contrary to what most people believe, you can’t reliably identify lies from any nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues work & they aren't that useful. The second table shows that even these haven't been studied in real settings! https://t.co/HnZUEskZnX https://t.co/TsvTGnXpDI
@pabloribeiro373 @Daniel_CSS98 @saemiart https://t.co/JdrnvqkXsJ
@tchetchelan https://t.co/RP5fzOzXBx https://t.co/M3QJopjbzY https://t.co/HBNZ0ElbUZ
Oh ffs. Several decades of research conclusively demonstrates that people are unable to accurately assess veracity through body language. https://t.co/2uPYrFvmm1 https://t.co/cLBGMEYSPk Hutchinson's testimony is corroborated by loads of other proof. No BS needed. https://t.co/b4YWQuwrAP
RT @DaniMet1: Sources: https://t.co/z9ZrbB29ic; https://t.co/r0GNegQsav; https://t.co/I2KI5EI3UE; https://t.co/7zj1NVcMwn 16/ End. #IStan…
RT @DaniMet1: Sources: https://t.co/z9ZrbB29ic; https://t.co/r0GNegQsav; https://t.co/I2KI5EI3UE; https://t.co/7zj1NVcMwn 16/ End. #IStan…
Sources: https://t.co/z9ZrbB29ic; https://t.co/r0GNegQsav; https://t.co/I2KI5EI3UE; https://t.co/7zj1NVcMwn 16/ End. #IStandWithAmberHeard #IBelieveAmberHeard #ISupportAmberHeard #SpeakTruth2Power #JusticeForAmberHeard #HumanizeHer #AmberHearIsInnocent #DeppvHeard #DeppvsHeard
@MoiraDonegan @HayesBrown It's annoying that the jury system asks jurors to assess witness credibility based (in part) on demeanor because people are terrible at identifying deception and they greatly overestimate their ability to accurately detect deception. https://t.co/rEf16nFSkQ
RT @DrJessTaylor: Here ya go - link for anyone who fancies a read https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
@TheRewiredSoul @jessesingal @StuartJRitchie @CT_Bergstrom @LFeldmanBarrett @michaelshermer So, small Ns. Something this field, and others, have bemoaned for forever. Here's a good review of what we (still) know or don't know. https://t.co/dYE20ip4jh
RT @emollick: In fact, even professionals can't really tell who is lying from nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues wo…
RT @emollick: In fact, even professionals can't really tell who is lying from nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues wo…
@DrJessTaylor @sophiegarner1 Here’s the article in full, don’t worry, it’s free https://t.co/RrN7NPltYb
@DrJessTaylor @sophiegarner1 Hey sis? This website is a collection of journals and articles. They’re a publishing website, that publishes what they believe to be informational. This is a writers opinionated summary, though it could be swayed by facts, it’s still opinionated. https://t.co/QUzXtkh6En
RT @DrJessTaylor: Here ya go - link for anyone who fancies a read https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
RT @DrJessTaylor: Here ya go - link for anyone who fancies a read https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
@sunstroke_house Yes they are to accurate
RT @DrJessTaylor: Here ya go - link for anyone who fancies a read https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
RT @DrJessTaylor: Here ya go - link for anyone who fancies a read https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
RT @DrJessTaylor: Here ya go - link for anyone who fancies a read https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
RT @DrJessTaylor: @brian_davis5 https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
RT @DrJessTaylor: Here ya go - link for anyone who fancies a read https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
RT @DrJessTaylor: Here ya go - link for anyone who fancies a read https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
Here ya go - link for anyone who fancies a read https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
@brian_davis5 https://t.co/YeT2YtNHFp
RT @emollick: You may have heard about the startup that says it can detect fraud & lies from faces. NOBODY can actually do this. The table…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
RT @Dr_Inna: “Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.…
“Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception” — a review, published in Annual Review of Psychology in 2019 https://t.co/Yqag3HKK0S
RT @emollick: In fact, even professionals can't really tell who is lying from nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues wo…
RT @emollick: In fact, even professionals can't really tell who is lying from nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues wo…
RT @emollick: In fact, even professionals can't really tell who is lying from nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues wo…
RT @emollick: In fact, even professionals can't really tell who is lying from nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues wo…
RT @emollick: In fact, even professionals can't really tell who is lying from nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues wo…
RT @emollick: In fact, even professionals can't really tell who is lying from nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues wo…
In fact, even professionals can't really tell who is lying from nonverbal clues. This review shows that only a couple cues work & they aren't that useful (see my annotations). The second table shows that even these haven't been studied in real settings! https://t.co/HnZUEskZnX https://t.co/ddOjVMgk27
Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception Aldert Vrij 1 , Maria Hartwig 2 , Pär Anders Granhag 3 Affiliations expand PMID: 30609913 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103135
Annu Rev Psychol . 2019 Jan 4;70:295-317. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103135.
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don't work. The table (with my annotations) shows only a couple cues have any use. But even these haven’t been tested outside of a lab! https://t.co/HnZUEs3owp https://t.co/N2h4BT0hi1
RT @emollick: You may have heard about the startup that says it can detect fraud & lies from faces. NOBODY can actually do this. The table…
RT @emollick: You may have heard about the startup that says it can detect fraud & lies from faces. NOBODY can actually do this. The table…
RT @emollick: You may have heard about the startup that says it can detect fraud & lies from faces. NOBODY can actually do this. The table…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
RT @emollick: And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don'…
And don't believe anyone who tells you that they can just see if you are lying. Non-verbal approaches to detecting liars don't work. The table (with my annotations) shows only a couple cues have any use. But even these haven’t been tested outside of a lab! https://t.co/HnZUEs3owp https://t.co/UwmhtLJY1R
⚠️ https://t.co/NckxajBZcI
Interesants @BBC_Future raksts par meļu ķermeņa valodu,vēl interesantāks zinātniskais raksts pielikumā https://t.co/TynZrsxSwJ https://t.co/ziXYo1NzHa To read truth and deception results in very poor accuracy rates, most likely because the behavioral traces of deception are faint
RT @mariahartwig: Full Ann Rev of Psych paper here: https://t.co/motJmtiFY1
Full Ann Rev of Psych paper here: https://t.co/motJmtiFY1 https://t.co/fBjZspL3pb
RT @mariahartwig: For the Annual Review of Psychology article on which the below is based see https://t.co/motJmtAhmB
@Aliceincaos @Stfko_memero @AlcatruzDaniel @fsbelmar Sobre averiguar más del tema, un solo ejemplo: "We show that the nonverbal cues to deceit discovered to date are faint and unreliable and that people are mediocre lie catchers when they pay attention to behavior." https://t.co/jlQfE4IizQ
RT briandavidearp: Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception https://t.co/jHsCPkX5OD https://t.co/YzkwHZCEbJ
RT @briandavidearp: Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception https://t.co/6vLHVxyULv https://t.co/QaG5s7DZE3
Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception https://t.co/6vLHVxyULv https://t.co/QaG5s7DZE3
"Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception", Vrij et al 2019 https://t.co/SH7xcmwIwh #psychology
Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception. - PubMed - NCBI #debates https://t.co/IKYOoC9NJJ
Article 2: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103135?intcmp=trendmd
TE