Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The digital discussions emphasize the value of short refutational posts in combating misinformation, with phrases like 'most effective,' 'helpful publication,' and mentions of reducing false beliefs. The tone combines professional praise and recognition of the method’s potential, reflecting both interest and perceived impact.
Most discussions acknowledge the findings that short refutations and simple retractions effectively reduce false beliefs, indicating general agreement.
The variety of comments, including those praising the publication's importance and effectiveness, show high curiosity and value placed on the research.
Comments range from brief mentions to more detailed discussions about the method and significance, showing moderate but meaningful engagement.
References to the importance of fact-checking and the mention of the publication's high download rates imply recognition of its influence in the broader media and misinformation landscape.
Yet more delightful & helpful publication impact news from Wiley's #TopDownloadedArticle feed - congrats to Assoc. Prof @UlliEcker, Dr @EePinChang1 & team, top 10% most downloaded in 2018 & 2019 in the British Journal of Psychology
The effectiveness of short-format refutational fact-checks https://t.co/CtMNGYvOJI
Fact checking has become an important feature of the modern media landscape. However, it is unclear what the most effective format of fact checks is. This study explores the effectiveness of short format refutational fact checks. @UlliEcker https://t.co/fLiaVk5CQ0
Belief in false claims was reduced by simple retractions and 140-character refutations in two experiments of over 1000 people. https://t.co/jz5D88zVCK
https://t.co/aWoJMJomet Study finds that simple retractions can reduce belief in false claims, as can short-format refutations (consisting of fewer than 140 characters), which suggests that both of these tools can be useful when it comes to dealing with widespread misinformatio… https://t.co/5lmGdUgzF0
Źródła: ℹ️ Wpis powstał głównie na bazie oficjalnego oświadczenia @eurofactcheck. ℹ️ https://t.co/B69RrhEHN7 ℹ️ https://t.co/cfSq53c7NY ℹ️ https://t.co/9m5M0GZWy4 ℹ️ https://t.co/vvh7FTveds ℹ️ https://t.co/yKfL0BvJgE ℹ️ https://t.co/6Rz7W4Pcu1 ℹ️ https://t.co/c9Q9puGdz2
No BlaBlaNews this Tuesday 1605 13h Emilio Garcia discusses whether debates are effective tools for presenting and discussing opposing ideas. The study examines three vaccine misinformation correction strategies…
Esse corte parte das lives que rolam teras e quintas s 13h. Misinformation is a significant public issue, leading to health risks and increased costs. This video discusses the channels of misinformation and the…
Źródła: ℹ️ Wpis powstał głównie na bazie oficjalnego oświadczenia @eurofactcheck. ℹ️ https://t.co/B69RrhEHN7 ℹ️ https://t.co/cfSq53c7NY ℹ️ https://t.co/9m5M0GZWy4 ℹ️ https://t.co/vvh7FTveds ℹ️ https://t.co/yKfL0BvJgE ℹ️ https://t.co/6Rz7W4Pcu1 ℹ️ https://t.co/c9Q9puGdz2
The effectiveness of short-format refutational fact-checks https://t.co/CtMNGYvOJI
RT @UWApsych: Yet more delightful & helpful publication impact news from Wiley's #TopDownloadedArticle feed - congrats to Assoc. Prof @Ulli…
RT @UWApsych: Yet more delightful & helpful publication impact news from Wiley's #TopDownloadedArticle feed - congrats to Assoc. Prof @Ulli…
Yet more delightful & helpful publication impact news from Wiley's #TopDownloadedArticle feed - congrats to Assoc. Prof @UlliEcker, Dr @EePinChang1 & team, top 10% most downloaded in 2018 & 2019 in the British Journal of Psychology
RT @candyapple980z: 最も効果的なファクトチェックの形式がどんなものか実験的に検証。単純に誤りと指摘する反論も有効だし，140字の限られた範囲でがんばった反論は一週間の遅延後も有効。https://t.co/VtirsmvzaD
最も効果的なファクトチェックの形式がどんなものか実験的に検証。単純に誤りと指摘する反論も有効だし，140字の限られた範囲でがんばった反論は一週間の遅延後も有効。https://t.co/VtirsmvzaD
Fact checking has become an important feature of the modern media landscape. However, it is unclear what the most effective format of fact checks is. This study explores the effectiveness of short format refutational fact checks. @UlliEcker https://t.co/fLiaVk5CQ0
Belief in false claims was reduced by simple retractions and 140-character refutations in two experiments of over 1000 people. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bjop.12383
Belief in false claims was reduced by simple retractions and 140-character refutations in two experiments of over 1000 people. https://t.co/jz5D88zVCK
https://t.co/aWoJMJomet Study finds that simple retractions can reduce belief in false claims, as can short-format refutations (consisting of fewer than 140 characters), which suggests that both of these tools can be useful when it comes to dealing with widespread misinformatio… https://t.co/5lmGdUgzF0
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12383. Kofler, M. J., Irwin, L. N., Soto, E. F. ... https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.3. Jang, D.-P., Namkoong, K., Kim, J.-J ...
https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12383. 28. Tohen M, McIntyre RS, Kanba S ... 1192/bjp.bp.107.040485. tional claims in published maps and institutional ...
10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01657.x. Carr, E. G. (1977). The motivation of ... 12383. Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., & Cox, W. T. (2012) ...
... 10.1111/jopy.12588. Bowles, J., Croke, K., Larreguy, H., Marshall, J., & Liu ... bjop.12383. Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved ...
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12159. Hess, W., Burgi, S., & Bucher, V. (1946) ... Journal of Neuroscience, 29(40), 12374–12383. Bridgeman, B., Hendry, D ...
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12383. References. All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I ...
com/doi/full/10.1111/bjop.12383 I'll See It When I Believe It: Motivated Numeracy in Perceptions of Climate Change Risk https://www.tandfonline.
US
青
KK
ND
SN
M
EC
JC
A
R