Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The group shows strong interest in the article’s insights, as evidenced by mentions of specific data points like 85% of populations remaining stable, and discussions about the ecological implications, using words like 'surprising' and 'important.' The tone is largely respectful and analytical, reflecting engagement with complex ecological concepts and emphasizing the article's significance in understanding biodiversity dynamics in the Anthropocene.
Most discussions reflect agreement with the article's findings that biodiversity changes are complex and balanced, highlighting that around 85% of populations show no significant change, which aligns with the original publication.
The discussions demonstrate high interest, with multiple social discussions emphasizing the importance of the topic and referencing specific data such as the 23,241 populations studied.
Posts engage deeply by referencing detailed statistics, implications for ecological understanding, and acknowledging different data sources, indicating thoughtful processing of the research.
The discourse appears to influence perspectives on biodiversity, emphasizing the nuanced balance between extinctions, colonizations, and species turnover, which could shape future ecological research and policy debates.
winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinctions and colonisations also balanced, but both are increasing and higher than null model predictions: biodiversity change accelerating https://t.co/qawCkGJ8CH
Very interesting paper in @Ecology_Letters by @maadornelas & al on winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/k0HvLB5KZI 85% of > 23000 populations evaluated did not show significant trends in abundance, and those that did were balanced between winners & losers
A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/W5bUzxTEUp
Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations showed no change in abundance, with the rest balanced between thrivers (8%) & decliners (7%). New in @Ecology_Letters: https://t.co/Jjif1yQHfG https://t.co/uauPyqOEt2
Important paper: A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - "Most populations (85%) did not show significant trends in abundance, and those that did were balanced between winners (8%) and losers (7%)." https://t.co/YwhXy1T74g
New study using me out in Ecology Letters - A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - Dornelas - - Ecology Letters - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/r27aA8Z1cg
Contrary to popular belief, the earth is not experiencing a mass extinction crisis. A comprehensive analysis shows that 85% of species populations do not exhibit significant abundance trends, with a balanced mix of…
The British Ecological Society presents a talk by Maria Dornelas discussing biodiversity trends as revealed by global data compilations. This talk explores the complex patterns of biodiversity change, highlighting both…
Med de fleste arter går det ganske bra. Ifølge denne analysen er 85 prosent av artene om lag uendret i den perioden de er studert, 8 prosent opplever signifikant nedgang og 7 opplever fremgang. https://t.co/kCwdPEPwn8 10/
Analýza trendu s využitím dat ze sledování společenstev ukazuje, že poměr „vítězů a poražených“ mezi organizmy je v zásadě vyrovnaný. Lokální i globální změny prostředí logicky mají na různé druhy a skupiny rozdílné dopady vyplývající z ekologie druhů. https://t.co/yX8m3FTzMX
Does this research suggest that #speciation rates are going up in response to #climatechange stress? No, because it's based on recognized #species, so new species as yet unrecognized by #taxonomy don't appear as a signal in the data. @maadornelas's paper: https://t.co/WiH9YEzRKu https://t.co/LZWeTTDTe3
A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - Dornelas - 2019 - Ecology Letters - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/GPyQ4YJ1IU
A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene Scientists disagree about the nature of biodiversity change. While there is evidence for widespread declines from population surveys, assemblage surveys reveal a mix of... https://t.co/pk0KW5k77F
A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - Dornelas - - Ecology Letters - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/UEyMsNQqMg
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @bioTIMEdb: New study using me out in Ecology Letters - A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - Dornelas - - Ecology Lett…
RT @BESMacroecol: Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations…
RT @FValenteNeto: Important paper: A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - "Most populations (85%) did not show significant t…
The conclusions of this paper are surprising: - declining and increasing populations are roughly equally balanced - most populations show little/no change Still, extinction & colonisation rates (i.e. turnover) are accelerating https://t.co/GfPUn5j6cY
RT @BESMacroecol: Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations…
RT @BESMacroecol: Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations…
RT @BESMacroecol: Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations…
RT @BESMacroecol: Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations…
RT @BESMacroecol: Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations…
A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene For a set of 23 241 populations, 16 009 species, in 158 assemblages, we detected significantly accelerating extinction and colonisation rates, with both rates being... https://t.co/pk0KW5k77F
RT @BESMacroecol: Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations…
RT @BESMacroecol: Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations…
RT @BESMacroecol: Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations…
RT @BESMacroecol: Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations…
Across 23,241 populations comprising 16,009 species in 158 assemblages, @maadornelas et al. found that 85% of populations showed no change in abundance, with the rest balanced between thrivers (8%) & decliners (7%). New in @Ecology_Letters: https://t.co/Jjif1yQHfG https://t.co/uauPyqOEt2
RT @ftmaestre: Very interesting paper in @Ecology_Letters by @maadornelas & al on winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/k0H…
A new paper is out! @lbororesearch @LboroScience @LboroCDS A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - Dornelas - - Ecology Letters - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/zbcjU2sr0y
RT @ftmaestre: Very interesting paper in @Ecology_Letters by @maadornelas & al on winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/k0H…
One to read: A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/WJDsvUXqMN
RT @FValenteNeto: Important paper: A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - "Most populations (85%) did not show significant t…
RT @bioTIMEdb: New study using me out in Ecology Letters - A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - Dornelas - - Ecology Lett…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - Dornelas - - Ecology Letters - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/49eaogeqQy
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @FValenteNeto: Important paper: A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - "Most populations (85%) did not show significant t…
RT @ftmaestre: Very interesting paper in @Ecology_Letters by @maadornelas & al on winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/k0H…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
New study using me out in Ecology Letters - A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - Dornelas - - Ecology Letters - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/r27aA8Z1cg
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @ftmaestre: Very interesting paper in @Ecology_Letters by @maadornelas & al on winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/k0H…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene by @maadornelas et al 2019 in @Ecology_Letters Cool paper--by looking at assemblage data, they showed that 85% of populations showed no abundance trends, 8% were "winners", 7% were "losers" #365papers https://t.co/lh6tNNL7YP https://t.co/11dcU8rRjJ
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @FValenteNeto: Important paper: A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - "Most populations (85%) did not show significant t…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @ftmaestre: Very interesting paper in @Ecology_Letters by @maadornelas & al on winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/k0H…
RT @ftmaestre: Very interesting paper in @Ecology_Letters by @maadornelas & al on winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/k0H…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @ftmaestre: Very interesting paper in @Ecology_Letters by @maadornelas & al on winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/k0H…
Very interesting paper in @Ecology_Letters by @maadornelas & al on winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/k0HvLB5KZI 85% of > 23000 populations evaluated did not show significant trends in abundance, and those that did were balanced between winners & losers
RT @FValenteNeto: Important paper: A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - "Most populations (85%) did not show significant t…
Important paper: A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene - "Most populations (85%) did not show significant trends in abundance, and those that did were balanced between winners (8%) and losers (7%)." https://t.co/YwhXy1T74g
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene: "For set of 23,241 populations, 16,009 species, in 158 assemblages - most populations (85%) did not show significant trends in abundance & those that did were balanced between winners (8%) & losers (7%)" https://t.co/JWhMRxG6ax
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @ibartomeus: A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/W5bUzxTEUp
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @ibartomeus: A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/W5bUzxTEUp
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene https://t.co/W5bUzxTEUp
Lovely new paper by @maadornelas et al. 85% sampled did not show significant trends in abundance. Those that did were balanced: winners (8%) and losers (7%). Metrics reveal sustained and increasing species turnover. https://t.co/VL9ngFNeep
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
RT @javi_igea: winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinct…
winners & losers in the Anthropocene are balanced https://t.co/BICmt1DABf by @maadornelas et al in @Ecology_Letters; extinctions and colonisations also balanced, but both are increasing and higher than null model predictions: biodiversity change accelerating https://t.co/qawCkGJ8CH
JI
FM
I
BM
FV
B
ØS
JG
SI
EF
G
AB
I
CG
CP
BC
TF
MS
FQ
PB
BM
R王
PM
DG
EL
AG
HS
SS
AL
KF
BB
JP
IP
CE
MS
AL
DG
DS
JR
DB
MS
NG
JL
KJ
SQ
JS
JB
CN
MD
MW
EE
GF
BL
RR
OG
RS
LR
MV
DB
FS
RM
PS
FL
MU
CR
KD
IM
FR
FL
AN
MM
ME
PV