Nat Hum Behav March 2019 PMID 30953022

The importance of no evidence.

Mentions

34
Peak: 14 in Mar 2021
across 5 sources since Mar 2019

Extended reach

444,024
potential audience

Total likes

21,297

Video views

296,532

Mentions per month

Mar 2019 – Jun 2021

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter26 posts
  • YouTube2 videos
  • Facebook2 posts
  • News2 articles
  • Blogs2 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone is positive and reflective, with discussions emphasizing that null or negative results are crucial to scientific integrity. Phrases like 'null results are still valuable' and 'being wrong is learning' exemplify appreciation for the message. Many posts express support by sharing personal reactions or related insights, highlighting a collective recognition of the article's importance in fostering honest scientific discourse.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the value of null or negative results, emphasizing that they are still meaningful for scientific progress.

InterestHigh interest

Posts show high curiosity, with many highlighting the importance of understanding what *not* to find, and expressing enthusiasm for the video's message.

EngagementModerate engagement

Some comments reflect thoughtful reflection on the topic, discussing how null results challenge traditional publication norms and nurture learning.

ImpactModerate impact

Users perceive the article's message as moderately influential, as it encourages reconsideration of how scientific success and failure are viewed.

Abstract in brief

  • The text likely emphasizes the significance of not having evidence in certain situations, possibly to prevent false accusations or assumptions.
  • It may discuss how the absence of evidence is sometimes necessary to protect individual rights or ensure fairness.
  • The overall message could stress that lack of evidence should be carefully considered before drawing conclusions or taking action.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Nicole Barbaro
@NicoleBarbaro · X

The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years after 1999 & peaking at 88.6% in 2005 [..] if only positive findings are published, the risk of these ‘facts’ being false is substantial." https://t.co/FLotOzllAX https://t.co/zoSu112EJy

Mar 14, 2019 · 30 likes · 13 shares · 16,643 followers View post →
MinuteEarth (also on BlueSky)
@MinuteEarth · X

NEW VIDEO: Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/umVGLEnMg8 https://t.co/xQElFu15pP

Mar 19, 2021 · 16 likes · 55,394 followers View post →
Julián Gustavo Gómez
@TheJulianGomez · X

I'm really happy with this video I made at @MinuteEarth about the importance of null results :) https://t.co/L8lur1M5Bi

Mar 19, 2021 · 8 likes · 1 share · 1,716 followers View post →
mountdiscovery
@mountdiscovery · X

Null Results // Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/9QAGFyi6s0

Mar 20, 2021 · 1 like · 414 followers View post →
Amy Alkon
@amyalkon · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 14, 2019 · 13 shares · 30,144 followers View post →
Dan Quintana
@dsquintana · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 14, 2019 · 13 shares · 20,565 followers View post →

All mentions

God's Child
@peterjohnklyde · X

Failing or achieving nothing is still something. It's ok to result in nothing as long as you make that nothing into something. Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/KeSyECj1vd via @YouTube

Apr 28, 2021 · 221 followers View post →
Xohnathon +18
@JTAC005 · X

https://t.co/QYseM15dM4

Apr 21, 2021 · 289 followers View post →
Justin Kiness
@JustinKiness · X

Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/2bvQgNJcO0 via @YouTube

Mar 27, 2021 · 2,958 followers View post →
JArt2Ro
@HippyJoe0707 · X

Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/Bxiwf7DG03 via @YouTube

Mar 21, 2021 · 1,229 followers View post →
Pratap Kumar
@PratapKumar4351 · X

Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/zpIpD6FQI0 via @YouTube

Mar 20, 2021 · 22 followers View post →
charith gangoda
@charith414 · X

Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/D45oNJsA7L via @YouTube

Mar 20, 2021 · 36 followers View post →
mountdiscovery
@mountdiscovery · X

Null Results // Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/9QAGFyi6s0

Mar 20, 2021 · 1 like · 414 followers View post →
toss ★緊急事態条項はトロイの木馬、憲法停止ウイルス!
@tossact · X

Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/w5j0rhvNIa @YouTubeより

Mar 19, 2021 · 2,777 followers View post →
Grizzly's Lab
@uibbs2 · X

I liked a YouTube video https://t.co/xS3MVXOv9n Why "Nothing" Matters in Science

Mar 19, 2021 · 128 followers View post →
Julián Gustavo Gómez
@TheJulianGomez · X

I'm really happy with this video I made at @MinuteEarth about the importance of null results :) https://t.co/L8lur1M5Bi

Mar 19, 2021 · 8 likes · 1 share · 1,716 followers View post →
Leonardo Lessa
@Exaleo · X

Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/LZUAGQgHX4 via @YouTube

Mar 19, 2021 · 29 followers View post →
MinuteEarth (also on BlueSky)
@MinuteEarth · X

NEW VIDEO: Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/umVGLEnMg8 https://t.co/xQElFu15pP

Mar 19, 2021 · 16 likes · 55,394 followers View post →
Cecile Braconnier
@braco001 · X

Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/IKmkcbqBgb via @YouTube

Mar 19, 2021 · 742 followers View post →
~Gabo
@GaboMcGamer · X

Mar 19, 2021 · 65 followers View post →
Albert Zweistein
@al_zweistein · X

Why "Nothing" Matters in Science https://t.co/kqhSOnAvF5 via @YouTube "null result" "being wrong is far from failing—after all, you're still learning something new"

Mar 19, 2021 · 206 followers View post →
Hans-Christoph Nuerk
@tuebang · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 15, 2019 · 13 shares · 840 followers View post →
Aaron Lukaszewski
@SpeciesTypical · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 14, 2019 · 13 shares · 3,151 followers View post →
Johannes Lohse
@JoLohse · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 14, 2019 · 13 shares · 314 followers View post →
Dan Quintana
@dsquintana · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 14, 2019 · 13 shares · 20,565 followers View post →
Elisabeth Gsottbauer
@LisiCheesy · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 14, 2019 · 13 shares · 618 followers View post →
Sylvain Chabé-Ferret
@SylvainCF · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 14, 2019 · 13 shares · 4,093 followers View post →
Amy Alkon
@amyalkon · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 14, 2019 · 13 shares · 30,144 followers View post →
Dr. Max
@wtf_is_life_pod · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 14, 2019 · 13 shares · 1,562 followers View post →
Evander
@Hereditarian98 · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 14, 2019 · 13 shares · 2,276 followers View post →
John-Peter G. Mall, PhD
@Jay3point14 · X

RT @NicoleBarbaro: The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years af…

Mar 14, 2019 · 13 shares · 772 followers View post →
Nicole Barbaro
@NicoleBarbaro · X

The proportion of papers reporting positive results [...] "increased over 22% [btw 1990-2007] exceeding 80% all years after 1999 & peaking at 88.6% in 2005 [..] if only positive findings are published, the risk of these ‘facts’ being false is substantial." https://t.co/FLotOzllAX https://t.co/zoSu112EJy

Mar 14, 2019 · 30 likes · 13 shares · 16,643 followers View post →