Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Overall, the discussions reveal a consensus that Littman's 2018 study on ROGD is fundamentally flawed and unreliable, exemplified by references to poor research practices, such as reliance on internet surveys with selection bias, and claims that the concept itself is discredited. The tone is confrontational and skeptical, with posters sharing videos and articles that disassemble the flawed science, which underscores both active engagement and the dismissal of ROGD's validity as a legitimate phenomenon.
The majority of discussions strongly discredit the study and concept of ROGD, labeling it as pseudoscience or junk science.
Despite the strong disagreement, many posters engage actively with critiques and videos, showing moderate curiosity.
Users deeply analyze methodological flaws, share videos, and debate scientific integrity, indicating high engagement.
Most posts aim to dismiss ROGD as invalid, reducing its perceived scientific impact, but some call for awareness and critical examination.
Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexual Behavior, Restar, A. J. (2020). https://t.co/hlWqxd6DeP 50/
For the sake of posterity. ROGD IS FAKE There is no evidence it ever existed and the studies done on it disprove it's existence and cite tweets. Im not joking. For the full picture: https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO https://t.co/BREzXVowSR https://t.co/rL6oaHq5uc
These two publications followed a methodological critique of it by Arjee Restar in 2018… 3… https://t.co/pKZoFqecrl
The gender industry seeks to normalize pathology part 01929581: https://t.co/4QjNIbwsN0. If it's not a pathology, why does it predict negative outcomes including self-harm so strongly that treatment for it is a medically-necessary health benefit?
Restar, A (2018) Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Ashley, F (2020) A critical commentary on ‘rapid-onset gender dysphoria’. Sociological Review Monographs
or this one!! https://t.co/z5Bh162Ags https://t.co/LAT8NcdTj6 https://t.co/w2rJPy4dQX
This video examines the methodological flaws and biases in Littman's 2018 study on parents' reports of Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria, emphasizing the importance of rigorous research in understanding gender dysphoria in…
This video critically examines Littmans’ 2018 study on parents' reports of Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria, highlighting potential biases and methodological flaws. It emphasizes the need for more rigorous research to…
This video discusses the question 'what is a woman' and critiques the use of womanhood to justify transphobia. It highlights debates involving Matt Walsh's documentary and examines how some seek to rationalize bigotry…
This interview between Gender Mentor Jess Romeo and Gender Specialist Rebecca Minor explores effective ways to support parents and caregivers of gender-expansive youth, discussing barriers to care and how grief can…
Hosts discuss the factors behind the rise in transmasculine youth and analyze the influence of anti-trans activism and junk science, including criticisms of recent research methods on gender dysphoria and rapid-onset…
Restar, A (2018) Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Ashley, F (2020) A critical commentary on ‘rapid-onset gender dysphoria’. Sociological Review Monographs
RT @natachakennedy: These two publications followed a methodological critique of it by Arjee Restar in 2018… 3… https://t.co/pKZoFqecrl
These two publications followed a methodological critique of it by Arjee Restar in 2018… 3… https://t.co/pKZoFqecrl
@GolfeurDuLundi @Nez_Buleuse https://t.co/xKmwm6HXdD
@lecanardnoir @MechaniVal Lack of a control group in the 2018 Littman study, for one. In addition to her misapplications of the DSM, where she oversimplified the criteria for gender dysphoria so that parents could easily use that criteria. https://t.co/TKnsOdNpYr
@LanarkLanark https://t.co/ZUizstJDQD Selection and Samplingと Measurementsを参照してくださいね
@4zoP8 @kongyouguai ＞そのバイアスを踏まえた上で シュライア含めROGD支持者はそれが出来てないから問題なんですよ https://t.co/ZUizstJDQD
@LanarkLanark https://t.co/6sHbMbG6Js https://t.co/ZUizstJDQD
@Ca_Tire_Fort @stephane_gillot @libe Balayer d'un revers de main, OK. Quelles sont tes sources maintenant, si jamais tu as lu ne serait-ce que l'étude de littman. https://t.co/9uTl8YzoUD https://t.co/9h5lgqvrcZ https://t.co/VibLrN4ulh
@streamkamala @takec_takeshi https://t.co/ZUizstJ615 「また、この論文で懸念されるのは、保護者回答者の人口統計学的プロフィールである。 特筆すべきは、76.5％が自分の子供のトランス識別は正しくないと考えており、特に "ROGD "の概念を声高に宣伝する親が
@MagdalenaLewa19 @RafalPiton @Herzyk1 Jeżeli NAPRAWDĘ nie rozumiesz metodologii, to tutaj masz przykład, dlaczego gadasz głupoty. https://t.co/2ArV0kH0Qn
@Kovichium This one’s accessible https://t.co/oN96CGktcn
リサ・リットマンの調査手法そのものが批判されている典型的な論文 https://t.co/2qvGNwNujs 概要のGoogle翻訳 https://t.co/58jkh6Cl9u 調査手法の問題点が概要でも事細かに読める。 https://t.co/YjOMdwOebW
@KR500_Kai 反証を挙げるならこちらでしたね。 https://t.co/2qvGNwNujs 概要のGoogle翻訳 https://t.co/58jkh6Cl9u
RT @licsak25: @KR500_Kai @takec_takeshi 元の記事を読めなかった場合に備え、Splinger Natureが指摘したLittman's(2018)研究標本の不備についてリンクを貼る。 https://t.co/2qvGNwNujs 翻訳 h…
まともに読んでないでしょ。 日本語の読解に問題ありとしか言いようがない。 https://t.co/byCX3AX2sb https://t.co/r97gmAH3JQ
@KR500_Kai @takec_takeshi 元の記事を読めなかった場合に備え、Splinger Natureが指摘したLittman's(2018)研究標本の不備についてリンクを貼る。 https://t.co/2qvGNwNujs 翻訳 https://t.co/byCX3AX2sb 明らかにリットマンの手法の不備だ。
The good thing is that it separates the wheat from the chaff, if you though that Ray Blanchard was a serious researcher and not a dotard, he embraces ROGD despite the terrible scholarship. Something an undergraduate could dispute https://t.co/BNg6rvYpZc
@SjaakUit @wierdduk @telegraaf Voorspelbaar dat je met Littman komt aanzetten. Dat onderzoek is zachtjes gezegd behoorlijk afgekraakt. Littmann interviewde ouders, die zichzelf ook konden melden voor dit onderzoek, niet de kinderen zelf. Zie ook https://t.co/exeUu9Wx9t
@kittypurrzog Hey cool way to completely ignore the actual, substantive criticisms of the concept itself.
vgl. https://t.co/gVBHZ8yXZq vgl. https://t.co/3h69NePFhx ausführliche Videoreihe zum Buch und 'ROGD' vgl. https://t.co/u6igLHpSax
@michaelshermer @HJoyceGender @RichardDawkins @sapinker @GadSaad @peterboghossian … Except when you interviewed Abigail Shrier, you never once challenged her about the fact that her entire book was based on one discredited study. Exposing junk science, it seems, takes a back seat in your mind whenever trans people are concerned. https://t.co/Or4xtAs8aO
@MarsAttacs @FanyaMagendo @womansecondsex https://t.co/brsNojIHdc
@DrDebraSoh Also rogd doesnt exist: https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@Shadesurfer123 @AnaKasparian @OwenRBroadhurst @LeftwardBound @jessesingal Fun fact, the study Shrier based her book on was so bad, she had to pay to have it published in a non psychology journal! In fact, I made a whole video about the problems. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
Ever hear about ROGD? Well it's a massive crock of shit and it's own paper proves it https://youtu.be/9BZvAeOwAvU
@michaelshermer @billprady Hey @michaelshermer, If you are ‘not anti-trans’ - may I ask why, in your interview with Abigail Shrier, you didn’t ask her why she relied so heavily on a discredited study for her entire thesis? Isn’t exposing junk science a part of being a ‘Skeptic’? https://t.co/k9inRvQxqF
@DenyMilkshakes Ay yo, I've got a video explainer of you want https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
RT @SocialismPsycho: For the sake of posterity. ROGD IS FAKE There is no evidence it ever existed and the studies done on it disprove it's…
RT @SocialismPsycho: For the sake of posterity. ROGD IS FAKE There is no evidence it ever existed and the studies done on it disprove it's…
RT @SocialismPsycho: For the sake of posterity. ROGD IS FAKE There is no evidence it ever existed and the studies done on it disprove it's…
For the sake of posterity. ROGD IS FAKE There is no evidence it ever existed and the studies done on it disprove it's existence and cite tweets. Im not joking. For the full picture: https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO https://t.co/BREzXVowSR https://t.co/rL6oaHq5uc
@AbigailShrier Hey Abi! Your book was based on a study that debunks itself! I got 2 youtube videos out of it! Thanks! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO https://t.co/BREzXVowSR
@profjmb I'm a psych grad who made 2 youtube videos debunking the ROGD research from Lisa Littman. ROGD is a fake concept based on the worst research I've ever read. Think you're brave enough to have your views challenged? Come at me. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO https://t.co/BREzXVowSR
@wesyang Why do you propagate the ROGD myth? People who actually know what they're talking about have looked at it and said "Uh, yeah, that's not scientific." One might almost think that you're a shameless grifter. https://t.co/VdUpi3TKOp
@KLongthorp @JenniferAnne_s @Wommando Social Contagion Hypothesis: https://t.co/DfFmVrHPpH https://t.co/qsdZKxCQj9 https://t.co/eU5szjZgzP https://t.co/lgvSJw3urJ
@Naglfar94Games @KHAOSANIMA418 @00DaniPonie I'd say one paper that everyone has poked holes in for selection bias worse than Andrew Wakefield's. https://t.co/jXLWa98tt2
@alfa_bette https://t.co/eD7qG7ZemN
@JoeyMannarinoUS https://t.co/eD7qG7ZemN just dropping this here
@Back_0n_Twatter @JoeyMannarinoUS Simply information showing the flaws in drawing these conclusions from the original study. Here, this might be more of what you’re looking for. https://t.co/28wXnQNhGt
@PunishedAG If you want some additional arguments or want to wreck this guys day, i made this video on the topic https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@IsaChildProtect @Canada_Flag_Guy @TRHLofficial Futr rebuttal and critique https://t.co/PNEpklWCYa
@RationalStoic @RodFlemingWorld @SaraJane101 @TRHLofficial And there's also the cretique on it by Springer link. See https://t.co/PNEpklWCYa https://t.co/Nqg7LOIs3Z
@Dade24Kdz @utahthemiller @MisterSandmanAU @unknowgenius10 @alphapj52 @Oseguera2020 @benshapiro @MattWalshBlog https://t.co/Fnjw1BTrlJ
1. https://t.co/uRUzTW8USi 2. https://t.co/eolOKRMQ2w 3. https://t.co/5y2ptd2e1d
@conlock_r https://t.co/jZRuByKwx4
RT @SocialismPsycho: @AGAndrewBailey Here's me, reporting on your studies. Spoilers: They're both garbage. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO https…
@AGAndrewBailey Here's me, reporting on your studies. Spoilers: They're both garbage. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO https://t.co/BREzXVowSR
Interesting....seems the critic of the 2018 study is a transpinay: 1.https://t.co/T27gKTzq74 2.https://t.co/wfoJmP2FZr
@RogerEA5 @againstgrmrs 1. The studies make bad assumptions, such as assuming that one who stop going to get treatment desisted, ignoring factors like cost, social pressure, etc. Also just counting people who weren’t trans as desisting. 2. https://t.co/mspX7LCNK1 ROGD is a myth
@LeorSapir @jack_turban My guy, the CREATOR of ROGD debunked it in her second paper on the subject. Its got more holes than blackburn lancashire. If you dont believe me... i made two videos to explain it https://t.co/BREzXVowSR https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@f_frieza @salanaland @SunnyMarmalaid @theserfstv You need peer review to tell you why formulating a theory based on the parents of trans kids who browse anti-trans websites isn't scientifically rigorous? Okay, here you go then: https://t.co/JtT4IHPm4E https://t.co/sK7fzuB2rE https://t.co/ihuIVIPbnK https://t.co/2VvrpFdKu6
@BrianINVAAT En l'occurrence, c'est notamment le fait que l'étude interrogeait des parents qui était pointait du doigt, alors même que ceux-ci ont de bonnes chances de ne pas avoir une bonne idée de ce qu'il se passe dans la tête des jeunes. https://t.co/roIr3pdqjY
@meganphelps Hi @meganphelps, May I ask - did the question ‘why did you use discredited research from a deeply flawed study in order to make false claims about transgenderism?’ come up? https://t.co/k9inRvQxqF
@LeorSapir @trepetlikaA I've acknowledged the valid criticisms in Turban's study. However, I hope you're not presenting a view that ROGD is settled science. In my view, Dr. Littman provides a weak defense to Restar: https://t.co/1VLSZvFIOy
@polphiloecon @WhatTheTrans also it relies on the littman study, which again, is bullshit https://t.co/DD6ZNv5Vnh
@Amanda_DGIR @jalopezpsi @feministes_cat https://t.co/Z9JhACqHQf
@ConnieMarkie @Dauntus @ChtyCommission Other resources -https://t.co/riPB2mA64h -https://t.co/ohpb22Z8Wh -https://t.co/AIPp8gnein -https://t.co/LscxQxIcn4
@jk_rowling The problem is, @jk_rowling, even when we refute your concerns with evidence, you still make the same old unsupported claims. You keep citing Littman’s 2018 study, for example, despite the fact that it has been unambiguously discredited: https://t.co/jx3XfOtACu
@jordanbpeterson Why don’t you ever respond to substantive criticism? Here’s one: You often cite Littman’s research on RO Gender Dysphoria, despite its truly glaring flaws (see below). There. No ad hominem. No insults. Just critique. Why do you keep running away? https://t.co/jx3XfOtACu
@StijnOerde @LGBwiththeT That "study" is done by a single person who is infamous for poor study practices, such as basing perceptions of "Rapid Onset Gender Dysmorphia" by surveying only parents on websites who already believed such a thing occurred, creating confirmation bias https://t.co/E3czxo7q4M
RT @TTExulansic: The gender industry seeks to normalize pathology part 01929581: https://t.co/4QjNIbwsN0. If it's not a pathology, why doe…
The gender industry seeks to normalize pathology part 01929581: https://t.co/4QjNIbwsN0. If it's not a pathology, why does it predict negative outcomes including self-harm so strongly that treatment for it is a medically-necessary health benefit?
@Gold_Dragon4 @jordanbpeterson @elonmusk Happy to @Gold_Dragon4
@lizmo777 @jordanbpeterson @elonmusk Yes, he does. Proof below
@ZaiStoic @jordanbpeterson @elonmusk Hi @ZaiStoic. Happy to.
@SlenderSkeptic @delflickmaestro @MavenOfMayhem The "kids being tricked" social contagion based ROGD theory is another piece of GC ideology posing as science. https://t.co/3wBluDJgEj
@devonlass @ZJemptv That’s your prerogative. But her peers don’t share your faith: https://t.co/FqnYWkdOki
@tpwk47 @longue_carabine @Approximation_1 @JeremyTate41 That the data used to create the concept was highly flawed. https://t.co/ck0RbXBgdj
@JoeTraherne1 @PomeranianGod ROGD does not exist. Real life data does not match https://t.co/8mnxQ83fFS what Littman's internet poll (that explicitly allowed people to resubmit as many times as they wanted & have it count as new & different answers) https://t.co/Qykni6GXQO
@ButNotTheCity An amazing piece, especially in adding nuance to the poor research design behind the 2019 Littman paper that attempted to put ROGD on the map. I can always support academic freedom, but rigor in clinical research design and implementation is so important. https://t.co/6VrNslJZtd
@urisan_san @Ferpdelrio @Amanda_DGIR @LaEtxebarria @Agenda2030_ @dra_manar https://t.co/Z9JhACqHQf
@urisan_san @Ferpdelrio @Amanda_DGIR @LaEtxebarria @Agenda2030_ @dra_manar Pero no hay problema. En Google Scholar es fácil de encontrar artículos científicos como estos ⤵️ https://t.co/s2uGrV75Yr https://t.co/Z9JhACqHQf
@conureCC For the record: All anti trans "research" is utter garbage. I reviewed the ROGD research and its so bad you will literally piss yourself https://t.co/Ouj1rkEnum https://t.co/BREzXVp4Ip
@epa_nit @MayaMitKind @matahari_etc @yannickshetty @el_nagashi https://t.co/gVBHZ8zvOY Kritik an der Studie kann man mitnichten als "TRA-Aufschrei" abtun.
@SaigeAlexis10 @BeyondSafewords You might enjoy my series debunking ROGD research :) https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO https://t.co/BREzXVowSR
@lostfem80 @125dew @Jac061272 @JaneCaro @danfromsydney @trophywife43 @salltweets @leoniebc @RhettsRevival Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria” https://t.co/IeBkFjOSF3
@Gathersources https://t.co/TvFj8zKhpA
RT @SocialismPsycho: @ContraPoints Fun Fact: The studies about ROGD that JK cites in her essay, are all complete bollocks. Ya know, in case…
@ContraPoints Fun Fact: The studies about ROGD that JK cites in her essay, are all complete bollocks. Ya know, in case you didn't already know... https://t.co/Ouj1rkmege https://t.co/BREzXVG7Kp
@alles_sophie https://t.co/gVBHZ8yXZq Jupp. Wichtige kritik
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
@trollqueen19 @fubuker @BadMedicalTakes I'm afraid it's nonsense. He's discussing Litmann's paper on social contagion. https://t.co/P9bh0Fbafs Which has been comprehensively debunked as that link describes (Popular science websites are NOT authoritative sources)
@JanglesLad No need buddy, I got ya ;) https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@jk_rowling @guerrero_ramey @SpitfireAudio Fun Fact for you JK: The 'Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria' hypothesis you mention in this essay was based on a pseudoscience paper by a non-psychologist. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO Who then disproved her own idea in her next paper by accident... no kidding. https://t.co/BREzXVowSR
@BretteDutton https://t.co/T3DLbqG3BI Your social contagion bullshit is wrong and based on a false study with bad research. You are a failure of a parent and what every person wishes they don’t end up as.
@chensonmusic @jk_rowling Ok, I want to believe you're not completely stupid. Please for the love of god listen to actual psychologists. Being trans is pretty normal actually and transphobes like JKR have to lie a LOT to make their points seem valid https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO https://t.co/BREzXVowSR
@OldManLondre @DemonMamaReal Also check this one: https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO cos it's even worse
@conureCC Ey yo conure, if you ever want to debunk some anti trans science, ive got some vids for ya! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO https://t.co/BREzXVowSR
RT @SocialismPsycho: @francesweetman Actually I already did a deep dive into why J.K Rowling is deranged, turns out she bought into some fa…
@francesweetman Actually I already did a deep dive into why J.K Rowling is deranged, turns out she bought into some fake science https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@zwitterio @francesweetman Nah I read Terf Wars, it cites pseudoscience and then wildly speculates around a wrong argument, sadly JKR got fooled by a bogus study https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
RT @SocialismPsycho:
@HollyGrayle @oh_hey_its_m @semiliterate Actually you're making an assertion, aaserting that the commonly known scientific consensus, accepted by the medical and psychological community around the world is wrong. Care to prove that? Cos, ill tell you what, ROGD "research" tried and failed https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@TheAKSdog You might enjoy this article: https://t.co/lFlDof5X8e
y otro criticando el estudio de Littman L., 2018 por tener una metodología deficiente (plantea la hipótesis de la existencia del ROGD como fenómeno clinico) de Restar AJ., 2020. https://t.co/yVfUOF2pBD https://t.co/4RADSpgsBb
@awesomely_mike @BostonChildrens Good Video Examining the ROGD Study https://t.co/kuvo4FiajY Critique of Study: https://t.co/mspX7LCNK1 Critique of Detrans Studies (the study it links isn’t adress, because it’s an analysis of the individual studies used within that study): 9:10-16:30 https://t.co/2G9ZrrIwAo
@electedbread @BostonChildrens The sources they cite are bullcrap. Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria is a myth and the study it originated from is junk science https://t.co/mspX7LCNK1 Also the study regarding surgery leading to higher suicide is miscited because the study compares trans people to the general pop.
@B_for_backup @FuxxFell https://t.co/UtE92bA03u Bad Science
RT @caitlinmoriah: or this one!! https://t.co/z5Bh162Ags https://t.co/LAT8NcdTj6
or this one!! https://t.co/z5Bh162Ags https://t.co/LAT8NcdTj6 https://t.co/w2rJPy4dQX
@BenemyoftheP @protransfemnst Done. https://t.co/hbaBlgZMY2
@little_hart @ohnoesaxel @TokenBird @oliverburkeman @andizeisler https://t.co/hbaBlgZMY2
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
@SarahLudford They promote ROGD, provably false science, specifically to the end goal of classifying trans people as mentally ill and preventing them from taking certain jobs because their identity is "socially contagious" That is transphobia https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@TwisterFilm @ALLIANCELGB For those curious about how bad the ROGD research is, I debunked it here: https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@TheVikingDane Oh honey I can and I do. But they're too cowardly to respond to evidence against them. Just like you're too cowardly to tell me what you actually believe. I'll leave you with this, you wanna know how bad thier science is? Check this out https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@ZJemptv The ROGD study was so bad I had to make a whole half hour video laughing at it https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
RT @MaskHate: @herong @Valkskorn I am also surprised that she is seemingly unaware of this study: https://t.co/8mnxQ8kR4s It found no supp…
@herong @Valkskorn I am also surprised that she is seemingly unaware of this study: https://t.co/8mnxQ8kR4s It found no support for ROGD when looking at actual patient data (as opposed to an anonymous priming self-selecting internet survey that explicitly allowed retakes https://t.co/Qykni6Yzfo)
@anodynedreams @Valkskorn @jasonintrator @everydayangst1 It's unsurprising that Littman's internet survey did not match real world data since it was severely flawed (selection bias, priming ahead of start etc) She explicitly allowed 1 person to retake it several times & have it count as separate instances. https://t.co/Qykni6Yzfo
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
@kr_samaja Shame your facts are always bollocks like the ROGD "Paper" https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
RT @DadTrans: Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexu…
Methodological Critique of Littman’s (2018) Parental-Respondents Accounts of “Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria”. Archives of Sexual Behavior, Restar, A. J. (2020). https://t.co/hlWqxd6DeP 50/
RT @SocialismPsycho: @CallMeBernita @qmnib @ItsGoneAwry @AbigailShrier @HJoyceGender Shame the book is based on fake science, so fake that…
@CallMeBernita @qmnib @ItsGoneAwry @AbigailShrier @HJoyceGender Shame the book is based on fake science, so fake that I made an entire video laughing at how fake it is. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@MomOfLesbian Hello! Just here to remind you all that rapid onset gender dysphoria is not real! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@SLP506 @miffythegamer @JamesEsses See https://t.co/1i5qYTbk1O
@Lavieenrose2121 @Womanborn1 @ShannonBDouglas Tbh you don't even need a psych degree to take apart the ROGD study, just basic common sense really. Your confirmation bias is based only in hatred and disgust for trans people, which is intellectual cowardice. Watch the video if you're so confident https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@Womanborn1 @ShannonBDouglas He's acting on false information https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@ShannonBDouglas @qirenni As a man of rationality and logic, you surely wouldn't be averse to a little science video that challenges your opinions right? Right? https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@ShannonBDouglas My brother in Christ! You may need to see this! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
Watching @VaushV's conversation with @DrDebraSoh and she brought up the ROGD paper by Lisa Littman.... So Im just gonna link my video on why that paper is completely invalid... https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO AND state that her recent paper on detransitioners is similarly biased
@CattyArt1 For those curious about ROGD, I made a video about the discovery of it! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@Owl500013 If you want to truly understand ROGD, I made a video on the science of it all! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@latimes If you want to know why NOONE, especially a newspaper should ever take Abigail Shrier's book seriously, it's cos the science its based on is bullshit, find out why here: https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
Did you know that a lot of the people saying #RespectMySex believe in #RapidOnsetGenderDysphoria? A fake condition based on fake science created by fake psychologists in a fake journal. No, really. GC sisters, they lied to YOU too! Find the truth here: https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@jk_rowling Did you care when you cited fake science made in partnership with hate groups in your essay? https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
RT @SocialismPsycho: @jk_rowling Here's a youtube video I made explaining why parents, counsellors and public figures believe fake science…
@jk_rowling Here's a youtube video I made explaining why parents, counsellors and public figures believe fake science about trans people! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria: A Miffed Response https://t.co/0FAvY230jW via @YouTube
@ROGDisreal @BPSSexualities Lol your @ is hilarious. ROGD is easily debunked fake science... in fact, I debunked it myself on my Youtube channel for funsies. You got lied to. Sorry. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@AbigailShrier For those who aren't aware, the study that @AbigailShrier built her entire career around was... wrong. Here's why. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@melissawright75 @ALLIANCELGB Also, since im planning to watch the lovely podcasts of stories and stuff you sent me. Perhaps youd like to see me discredit ROGD as a purely fake phenomenon, by a fake scientist. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@fundypost @fort_sarah @SmartAssJen I see you're retweeting debunked science. Please watch some of this. https://t.co/uzW0UMokjK
RT @SocialismPsycho: @genspect I had a lot of thoughts on this topic. So I decided to read Littman's paper myself. This is the result. http…
@PLazarinho Lol what are you "gaining" here? A following of hateful idiots? I'll pass. But if you think I'm preaching to the choir, I invite you to watch my actual content, this factual, scientific destruction of "Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria" https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@Lee2957409374 @animaginarynail @michellecyca @MargaretAtwood Have you even tried to google for cases of trans people involved in prison rape?? In like 99.9% of results, trans people are the VICTIMS, not the perpetrators. Also, watch this video before trusting a single word from Abigail Shrier. https://t.co/LeGHugXVLq
@Mariehopes4u2 @SupportCardinal @SEGMtweets I made a video about this! Concerned parents and citizens might be enlightened! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@genspect I had a lot of thoughts on this topic. So I decided to read Littman's paper myself. This is the result. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@YourRAGEz Fuck it, check my shit out and dunk on some terfs with it! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
RT @SocialismPsycho:
@prageru https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
https://t.co/DivYR0cYAW
@BendersShadow1 @LilyLilyMaynard @Mum3Sun @genspect @LisaMarchiano Why, of course :) https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@LisaMarchiano @LilyLilyMaynard @genspect And both of you were wrong! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@ALLIANCELGB If any of these "specialists" had actually read the paper. Theyd be laughing at it not agreeing with it.https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@ALLIANCELGB ROGD doesnt exist. It was made up by a woman who is not a psychologist using the most pathetic methodology ive ever seen. Think im wrong? https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
RT @MrCrystalMighty: @QuizzicalGoat Here's a good video for those who want to be aware of the reality of Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria this…
RT @MrCrystalMighty: @QuizzicalGoat Here's a good video for those who want to be aware of the reality of Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria this…
RT @MrCrystalMighty: @QuizzicalGoat Here's a good video for those who want to be aware of the reality of Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria this…
@QuizzicalGoat Here's a good video for those who want to be aware of the reality of Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria this #RogdAwarenessDay https://t.co/oIgRcRZBaW
@FrancisAaronUK Tell me about it mate. I made a whole video exposing some of the fake science. These lies need to be stopped. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria: A Miffed Response https://t.co/sSlsPXxvWh via @YouTube
https://t.co/Y7D9XDfVpK
@BoxLoner Guarantee that they will mention the Lisa Littman paper to justify it too, despite it being as flimsy at the napkins it was written on. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
Anyone interested can view it here! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@Quibilah1 @natachakennedy Literally one of the most insane websites ive ever visited. And yet Lisa Littman used its members as a sample for her paper! More about that here https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@KatyMontgomerie @TGirlTherapist I made a vid about this! Check it out and get anti terf arguments for free,! : https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@KatyMontgomerie @TGirlTherapist Its because their scared. Scared that they might have been shit parents this whole time for not noticing something about thier kid. I made a video about it and ROGD on general, enjoy! https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@CaelanConrad All this based on a paper so full of holes you couldnt call it a net. Smh. https://t.co/Ouj1rkDPEO
@TheOnlySprout 3. @Dr_ArjeeRestar's thorough methodological critique (2020) https://t.co/Lc65fCOO31
@ArielleScarcell If you want to gesture at rapid onset gender dysphoria, discuss criticisms of it, too. Particularly Littman's selection bias. Wouldn't want to "deny science" would we? https://t.co/BrxLRIdf1Q
Link to paper: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-019-1453-2
Retrieved from https://link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s10508-019-1453-2. 4) Australian and New Zealand Professional Association for Transgender Health ...
doi:10.1007/s10508-019-1453-2 27. Littman L. Correction: parent reports of adolescents and young adults perceived to show signs of a rapid onset of gender ...
of 'rapid‑onset gender dysphoria'. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 61–66. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10508-019-1453-2. Richards, ...
doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02163-w. Lu, D., & Hong, D. (2022). Emotional ... 019-1453-2. Review of The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison. (2022, September) ...
... 10.1007/s10508-019-1453-2?fbclid=IwAR0ACahczM1HhUxFNT8K2qybsS62yFpRIIgdDvbdtkbNOQZKB9POONm6FMw (4) https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki ...
Sex Behav., 49, 61–66, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1453-2. Kennedy, N., 2020: Deferral: the sociology of young trans people's ...
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-019-1453-2 Restar, A. J. (2020). Methodological critique of Littman's (2018) parental ...
sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0038026120934693?journalCode=sora · https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-019-1453-2 · MathyChem.
com/article/10.1007/s10508-019-1453- 2 5. "I want to be very clear here: I know transition will be a solution for some gender dysphoric ...
... 10.1007/s10508-019-1453-2. 4) Australian and New Zealand Professional Association for Transgender Health (2018). Australian Standards of ...
... Arch Sex Behav (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1453-2. Community Info Section. r/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns. Join. If youre memes and im ...
T
DK
Σ
DA
TR
MB
Z
西
W
PW
D
なL
T
M
DB
VS
A
B
JS
S
TH
Z
JL
S
I
P
C
BD
TB
SW
AF
R
L
PJ
Α
A
OW
B
Q
EM
M
PS
H
R
LT
FE
?
?
AF
LR
HE
C
DN
AR
AT
K
C
AA
LK
M
L
ST
FS
DG
AM
T
MH
SJ
TT