The discussions reflect mild interest and engagement, highlighted by mentions like 'Wikipedia quality in #anatomy' and referencing the publication as an 'early view,' which indicates attentiveness but not strong endorsement or critique. The tone remains informational with some curiosity about the article's findings, emphasizing its relevance without suggesting it causes significant change or concern.
AgreementNeither agree nor disagree
The posts show neutrality or limited opinions about the publication, with little explicit support or disagreement.
InterestModerate interest
The discussions demonstrate some curiosity, especially about the quality and readability issues, but overall engagement remains moderate.
EngagementModerate engagement
Participants reference the article in a meaningful way and include tagging or commenting on related topics, indicating some level of thoughtful engagement.
ImpactNeutral impact
The overall discussions seem to have minimal immediate influence, focusing more on observation than calls for action.
Abstract in brief
The study analyzed 40 anatomy articles from Wikipedia, finding that they are frequently updated with an average of 8.3 times per month and contain numerous references and media, but generally have low readability, making them more suitable for college students and above.
Qualitative evaluation by experts using the modified DISCERN survey showed that most articles ranged from good to poor quality, with factors like completeness, accuracy, and visual content influencing their quality; positive correlations were observed between article quality and factors such as edit frequency, number of editors, and length.
The findings suggest that Wikipedia anatomy articles can be challenging to read and their quality varies based on editing activity and content richness, so students and learners should be cautious about relying solely on them for educational purposes.]
EARLY VIEW: Wikipedia quality in #anatomy.
@AnatSciEduc #ASE
'The Quality and Readability of English Wikipedia Anatomy Articles.'
https://t.co/nPf2XTVX3f https://t.co/yYThG5GjXo
Aug 23, 2019 · 1 like · 2,676 followersView post →
SH
Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg
@StabiHH · X
RT @WikiResearch: "The Quality and Readability of English Wikipedia Anatomy Articles" https://t.co/n7e4yGU8KH #paywalled
The study analyzed 40 Wikipedia anatomy articles, revealing frequent updates, numerous references, but generally low readability, suitable mainly for college-level learners. Quality varied based on editing activity and…
Wikipedia anatomy articles are frequently updated with numerous references and media, but have low readability, making them suitable mainly for college students and above. The study highlights variability in quality…
EARLY VIEW: Wikipedia quality in #anatomy.
@AnatSciEduc #ASE
'The Quality and Readability of English Wikipedia Anatomy Articles.'
https://t.co/nPf2XTVX3f https://t.co/yYThG5GjXo
Aug 23, 2019 · 1 like · 2,676 followersView post →
SH
Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg
@StabiHH · X
RT @WikiResearch: "The Quality and Readability of English Wikipedia Anatomy Articles" https://t.co/n7e4yGU8KH #paywalled
doi:10.1002/ase.1373 Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., &. Sweller, J. (2010) ... Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad. Med. 2010;85(2): ...
Medical Education in the United States and Canada | Science
News
Medical Education in the United States and Canada. Abraham FlexnerAuthors Info & Affiliations. Science. 8 Jul 1910 ... https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70130.
Yeah nah, this “there is no evidence” rant is not skepticism, it is lazy ...
Facebook
... 10.1002/ajpa.24903 Xavier Roca-Rada et al., “Ancient DNA Studies in ... " - The Old North Trail by Walter McClintock [1910]: Blackfeet folklore ...
According to Egypt vision 2030. The principle of caring about ...
Facebook
... 10.1002/rrq. 411](https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/10.1002 ... An analysis of politeness strategies in gikuyu: a case of thika sub-county, ...
AE
SH
NP