PubHawk
Biology (Basel) July 2019 PMID 31336976

Chronotype and Social Jetlag: A (Self-) Critical Review.

Till Roenneberg, Luísa K Pilz, Giulia Zerbini, Eva C Winnebeck

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

76
Peak: 4 in Sep 2019
across 5 sources since Jul 2019

Extended reach

32,145
potential audience

Total likes

1,078

Video views

12,275

Mentions per month

Jul 2019 – Feb 2025

Where it's discussed

  • News54 articles
  • X / Twitter13 posts
  • Blogs5 articles
  • YouTube2 videos
  • Facebook2 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The group generally shows positive agreement with the publication, referencing Roenneberg’s work and emphasizing the relevance of social jetlag in daily life, with some posts urging further exploration of related studies. Their tone indicates curiosity and respect for the research, reflected in phrases like 'recommend reading' and 'should explore further,' which demonstrates both interest and engagement without claiming transformative impact.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the value and insights of the reviewed publication, especially highlighting the importance of the concepts like social jetlag and chronotype.

InterestHigh interest

Participants are quite interested, as indicated by their attempts to deepen understanding through references to additional works, and they engage actively with the material.

EngagementModerate engagement

The responses go beyond superficial comments, with some sharing specific references and discussing implications, showing moderate but meaningful engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

While not revolutionary, the discussions suggest the article has a moderate influence on people's understanding and interest in chronotypes and sleep research.

Abstract in brief

  • The Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ) has been widely used and validated for over 15 years, providing valuable data on human circadian timing and spawning new concepts like social jetlag.
  • Despite its popularity and simplicity, the MCTQ has faced some criticisms and misunderstandings, prompting a need for a self-critical review to clarify its definitions and limitations.
  • This review aims to address these issues, redefine concepts like chronotype and social jetlag, and reflect critically on the MCTQ's role and interpretation in sleep and circadian research.]
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
YU TAHARA
@YUTAHARA6 · X

世界３０万人の朝型、夜型スコア調査結果。 それぞれの比率は、 超朝型 7.2% 少し朝型 22.3% 中間型 29.8% 少し夜型 21% 夜型 19.9% 平日と休日の生活リズムの差、つまり社会的時差ボケ 1時間以内の差は53.9% 1−2時間の差は29.1% 2-3時間の差は11.7% 3時間以上の差は5.3% https://t.co/MCGCVUvRZu

Jul 30, 2019 · 5 likes · 5 shares · 313 followers View post →
Céline Vetter
@DrCelineVetter · X

@RosieGibsMoul There are some reviews that might help you with this, too. Check out https://t.co/AnkJrDTIWq and https://t.co/AGx56gmeSn

May 6, 2020 · 2 likes · 1,268 followers View post →
Jan Kirschnick
@JanKirschnick · X

@juniiregen @9Lukas5 @Bartelhei Müsste die Studie hier sein: https://t.co/SFwomiAwu7

Oct 20, 2021 · 2 likes · 311 followers View post →
Gil-Martin
@RobertWringhim · X

@unengagedperson Chronotype and Social Jetlag: A (Self-) Critical Review (Roenneberg et al., 2019)

Aug 18, 2020 · 1 like · 2,189 followers View post →
Peter Spork
@SporkPeter · X

Chronotype and Social Jetlag: A (Self-) Critical Review https://t.co/TUku4CQJZy

Jul 17, 2019 · 1 like · 1,931 followers View post →
Jan Kirschnick
@JanKirschnick · X

@Svenfpunkt @davidbest95 Länger schlafen zu können, ist für die Seele besser. Ich empfehle ein paar Arbeiten von Roenneberg zu lesen, der das Thema sehr gut aufarbeitet. Für den Einstieg: https://t.co/SFwomiAwu7 Oder konkret zum Thema Seele: https://t.co/thSTulkFKN

Oct 30, 2021 · 1 like · 311 followers View post →

All mentions

BioClocksUK
@BioClocksUK · X

Want to dig deeper? The references we used were: https://t.co/ybHorjAltR https://t.co/3n0uzqURgX https://t.co/qM9JwvdA32 https://t.co/wrH2mWy4Te

Feb 17, 2025 · 212 followers View post →
Jan Kirschnick
@JanKirschnick · X

@Svenfpunkt @davidbest95 Länger schlafen zu können, ist für die Seele besser. Ich empfehle ein paar Arbeiten von Roenneberg zu lesen, der das Thema sehr gut aufarbeitet. Für den Einstieg: https://t.co/SFwomiAwu7 Oder konkret zum Thema Seele: https://t.co/thSTulkFKN

Oct 30, 2021 · 1 like · 311 followers View post →
Jan Kirschnick
@JanKirschnick · X

@juniiregen @9Lukas5 @Bartelhei Müsste die Studie hier sein: https://t.co/SFwomiAwu7

Oct 20, 2021 · 2 likes · 311 followers View post →
Biology MDPI
@Biology_MDPI · X

#Daily_Share 2019 Highly Cited Articles in @Biology_MDPI

Aug 18, 2021 · 2,245 followers View post →
Gil-Martin
@RobertWringhim · X

@unengagedperson Chronotype and Social Jetlag: A (Self-) Critical Review (Roenneberg et al., 2019)

Aug 18, 2020 · 1 like · 2,189 followers View post →
Céline Vetter
@DrCelineVetter · X

@RosieGibsMoul There are some reviews that might help you with this, too. Check out https://t.co/AnkJrDTIWq and https://t.co/AGx56gmeSn

May 6, 2020 · 2 likes · 1,268 followers View post →
GEN@いのりまち大阪
@_GENTZ · X

RT @YUTAHARA6: 世界３０万人の朝型、夜型スコア調査結果。 それぞれの比率は、 超朝型 7.2% 少し朝型 22.3% 中間型 29.8% 少し夜型 21% 夜型 19.9% 平日と休日の生活リズムの差、つまり社会的時差ボケ 1時間以内の差は53.9% 1−2時…

Sep 12, 2019 · 5 shares · 2,042 followers View post →
陽ノ下まひる＠１８禁メーカー/作品/声優/歌手 とその他雑談垢
@hinomahi · X

RT @YUTAHARA6: 世界３０万人の朝型、夜型スコア調査結果。 それぞれの比率は、 超朝型 7.2% 少し朝型 22.3% 中間型 29.8% 少し夜型 21% 夜型 19.9% 平日と休日の生活リズムの差、つまり社会的時差ボケ 1時間以内の差は53.9% 1−2時…

Sep 12, 2019 · 5 shares · 1,218 followers View post →
石狩鍋
@isikarinabe1 · X

RT @YUTAHARA6: 世界３０万人の朝型、夜型スコア調査結果。 それぞれの比率は、 超朝型 7.2% 少し朝型 22.3% 中間型 29.8% 少し夜型 21% 夜型 19.9% 平日と休日の生活リズムの差、つまり社会的時差ボケ 1時間以内の差は53.9% 1−2時…

Sep 12, 2019 · 5 shares · 950 followers View post →
睡眠リズム障害患者会 Rhythm & Sleep 旧公式アカウント
@RhythmAndSleepT · X

RT @YUTAHARA6: 世界３０万人の朝型、夜型スコア調査結果。 それぞれの比率は、 超朝型 7.2% 少し朝型 22.3% 中間型 29.8% 少し夜型 21% 夜型 19.9% 平日と休日の生活リズムの差、つまり社会的時差ボケ 1時間以内の差は53.9% 1−2時…

Sep 12, 2019 · 5 shares · 881 followers View post →
YU TAHARA
@YUTAHARA6 · X

世界３０万人の朝型、夜型スコア調査結果。 それぞれの比率は、 超朝型 7.2% 少し朝型 22.3% 中間型 29.8% 少し夜型 21% 夜型 19.9% 平日と休日の生活リズムの差、つまり社会的時差ボケ 1時間以内の差は53.9% 1−2時間の差は29.1% 2-3時間の差は11.7% 3時間以上の差は5.3% https://t.co/MCGCVUvRZu

Jul 30, 2019 · 5 likes · 5 shares · 313 followers View post →
Peter Spork
@SporkPeter · X

Chronotype and Social Jetlag: A (Self-) Critical Review https://t.co/TUku4CQJZy

Jul 17, 2019 · 1 like · 1,931 followers View post →
con H de heterótrofo
@NutriRebel · X

Chronotype and Social Jetlag: A (Self-) Critical Review https://t.co/44jSqCpHpl

Jul 13, 2019 · 5,950 followers View post →