Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Overall, the collective discussions acknowledge the complexity of judging truth, with examples like calls to consider evidence (
Most discussions show recognition of the article's point that judging truth involves complex considerations, with some posts emphasizing the importance of evidence and cautious judgment.
Posts indicate moderate interest, with some referencing related research and philosophical perspectives, but few deeply diving into specifics.
Participants tend to mention other sources or general ideas rather than engaging in detailed debate or offering personal analysis.
The discussions raise awareness about the difficulty of judging truth without censorship, but they don’t seem to drive major change or consensus.
judging truth, falsity, or cogency on the basis of likes is an obvious version of social media brain worms but there's a type of guy on here who similarly appeals to the lack of engagement on their posts as though it is a credential and i'm not sure which brainrot is more terminal
Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. https://t.co/oH21bkAT8E Y la corrección se olvida más rápido que la falsedad por la ley de Jost: https://t.co/sParsvqrXn https://t.co/Jh9P1gyhYf
Even the idea that we need to step back and consider the costs and benefits of our existing policies implies that hard-fought progressive wins *could be* on the chopping block. Just like "Practice is the Sole Criterion for Judging Truth" opened the door to Maoism being wrong.
Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour With a unique concept for judging truth, it is a well deserved top 3 finalist. @BBNYA_Official @The_WriteReads https://t.co/zqqb1vQsEx
So Politifact's fact checking of the Democrats comes down to "We have decided to rate this claim based on what Trump says right this moment in his own best interest rather than on what Trump has repeatedly tried to do when in power." THEY ARE JUDGING TRUTH BASED ON WHAT INVETERATE LIAR TRUMP SAYS
@SahodarIndia A man’s slap becomes crime, a woman’s slap becomes “reaction.” Equality talks big until accountability knocks. In India, a man’s dignity is free to insult but costly to defend. Maybe one day, fairness will stop checking gender before judging truth.
Ralph Caspers explores the fascination with lies and how they are perceived and detected. The video discusses the complexity of lying from a neurological perspective, including physical stress signals and the cognitive…
This video discusses four reasons why it is often futile to try convincing someone that their beliefs are unscientific, based on empirical evidence, cognitive biases, and psychological challenges identified in relevant…
The truth you know isn't always correct. This video explores how our minds assess information, why we often accept false claims, and how feelings of ease can be mistaken for truth, helping us better identify fake news.
The article explores the link between nonverbal communication and deception, emphasizing the subtlety and unreliability of behavioral cues, and highlights the need for improved methods in lie detection research.
People with common sense set one baseline before judging truth:“What if it’s real?” basic risk control for yourself and your family even a hint of danger,atleast take time to verify.Protect yourself first! And don’t drag down the heroes on the front lines trying to protect us all https://t.co/KjPt1DsJpe
@og8u8j7w If you're judging truth by what the market likes you're going to have a really hard time.
Jesus said, "Judging truth as something they do NOT want, they perceive deception and block knowledge." Spiritual Ear, Urtext, of A Course in Miracles, pg 184
@kathiefitz1 @TheDeenShow @GodlyAction Calling Prophet Muhammad PBUH “demonic” only shows u’ve nvr studied his life. A man who ended infanticide, freed slaves, protected women, fed the poor, nd transformed nations through justice cannot b demonic. Read the Quran before judging. truth doesn’t fear study.
@Mark_Kay_F1 @SpencerHakimian @elonmusk Free speech on X includes edgy or disputed claims, as preemptively judging truth invites bias and censorship. Libel remains actionable in courts, where evidence like account logs can prove fabrication—users harmed can sue rather than rely on platform removal. Truth surfaces via
@Emmynath1007 @omo_baba_ibeji @General_Somto Judging truth by appearance or name invites bias over evidence. Documented attacks by Boko Haram and Fulani militants have killed thousands of Nigerian Christians, per reports from USCIRF and Open Doors, fueling valid persecution concerns. Yet "pogrom" or "genocide" demands
@_Ancient_Way_ @RedRaider4Jesus @HwsEleutheroi I’m judging truth from error. I’m also warning those who do not know truth to repent and come to Christ for salvation. That includes Mormons. These are biblical mandates. I’m coming to the conclusion you have not read the Bible or haven’t been properly discipled.
@grok @elonmusk @grok can you give an example of the process you take for judging truth on a contentious subject where the sources may be subject to the biases, on both sides of an argument, and how you weigh the veracity and eliminate said biases?
@_Ancient_Way_ @RedRaider4Jesus @HwsEleutheroi Correct, and judging truth from error is biblical. It is the Bible that separates what is true from what is not. Proclaiming something is false because it does not like up with Scripture is necessary.
@NJBeisner Candace Owens is not perfect, only God is. CO is a truth seeker, which attribute has stemmed from love. God’s Word says it. Allie Beth is just a resounding gong, but won’t dare seek truth or justice, that’s not love. She is judging truth seeking while also hating on Jesus’ mom!!
@pearl_batista Do you know the large number of people that lied against Jesus? When did we start judging truth by numbers?
@grok @elonmusk The system isn’t judging truth, it’s judging traction. The platform claims to emphasize engagement and relevance rather than ideology, in practice the structural and behavioral factors lead to a clear privileging and systemic boost for far-right content in the feed, as
@junko_9244 @Bangking123 @thewarzonewire Are you judging truth or falsehood based on your subjective judgment? Are you Jesus under Allah's crotch? In a society governed by the rule of law, blatantly violating the constitution and laws is treason and anti-democracy.
RT @MaxCartLab23: @SaltyGoat17 @EagleEyeFlyer This is true, and there is a campaign trying to say it’s false. Just go in the grocery. Nail…
@SaltyGoat17 @EagleEyeFlyer This is true, and there is a campaign trying to say it’s false. Just go in the grocery. Nails, tats, jewelry, phones, designer purses, lip fillers, hair extensions, probably things I don’t know about. I am not judging. Truth is not a judgement. It is what it is.
@OneBadDude_ Her seat should be voided because she can't tell us which historic slave had to breed children, the hardest part of American slavery. She has no business honorably judging truth.
@OutlawKitsune I like the aesthetic but judging truth by that is silly. Not even serious Catholics believe that, else Egypt and Babylon and Rome would've been owed their loyalty.
Why am I insisting on the “trivial” logic for judging truth and falsity? Well, let’s say one thing beforehand. I fully embrace conventional notions of truth and falsity, and approach them with a sense of pluralism. Eg, we might have paraconsistent or multiple-valued truth as well.
RT @jamie_saris: @Tatarigami_UA There is no more a “legitimate” Kremlin pt-of-view on its illegal invasions of Ukraine than that there was…
RT @vikramreflects: @SahodarIndia A man’s slap becomes crime, a woman’s slap becomes “reaction.” Equality talks big until accountability kn…
RT @vikramreflects: @SahodarIndia A man’s slap becomes crime, a woman’s slap becomes “reaction.” Equality talks big until accountability kn…
@badtothebone124 @OrthoCreatura @ByJimbob @grok You’re judging truth claims based off who has less scandals?
@Tatarigami_UA There is no more a “legitimate” Kremlin pt-of-view on its illegal invasions of Ukraine than that there was a legitimate German one for the necessity of “Living Room” in the East requiring a War of Annihilation +War Crimes. Grok cooks down texts. It’s incapable of judging truth.
@SahodarIndia A man’s slap becomes crime, a woman’s slap becomes “reaction.” Equality talks big until accountability knocks. In India, a man’s dignity is free to insult but costly to defend. Maybe one day, fairness will stop checking gender before judging truth.
@Exalted25 @333VIL who cares what you think? at least he’s courageous enough to follow and speak on what he believes in, unlike you who hide behind a profile judging truth speakers and scoffing at their authenticity. that to me is weird as hell.
RT @QuantumTumbler: @X01074 Exactly the original sin wasn’t just disobedience, it was identity theft. The moment we traded innocence for t…
@X01074 Exactly the original sin wasn’t just disobedience, it was identity theft. The moment we traded innocence for the illusion of knowing, we became gods of our own little kingdoms, sitting on piles of pixel dust and ego metrics, judging truth by how viral it goes. But here’s the
this is a bad idea in personal accounts and judging truth histories. Those who feel persecution will know it. This platform will end accounts from different countries. https://t.co/eExXN32rlN
@Veritaserum44 @GiaSerafino17 @TTExulansic I’d be glad to share sometime. I was raised Catholic, left the Church, and spent over a decade trying to live as an atheist. What finally broke through wasn’t an emotional crisis but a logical one. I realized that my entire framework for judging truth, meaning, and morality was
@trouble_man90 Naw dog, you ain’t. Bait some more. But hypothetically if you were, that means you are mindless and only ever vote one way without judging truth and promises.
@cc37876 @infantrydort @DC_Draino You're judging truth by what "every single press outlet" agrees on. This is the foundational error. The left wing and the right wing belong to the same bird of prey. Their staged squabbles are just theater to keep the audience distracted. When the entire system, from every
@donquicxot @noconversion "So you're judging truth by page count now? Mein Kampf is a long book too—doesn't make it right or worth following. The number of pages in a cover doesn’t prove anything about truth. Ideas are tested by evidence, not how thick the book is.
@Tzorizzt @kyle_ferriter @TheUfoJoe I am not projecting. I asked you to weigh cost vs benefit based on nearly 100 billion coming into the country from undocumented tax paying and you trying to negate that with a questionable 16 billion stat from an admin known for judging truth and numbers more than eny other so
@davidicke You would need to hear all of what she is saying before judging. Truth is still important.
@TPASarah @elonmusk @xai The problem, as I see it, is that big corporations and governments post "studies" and articles on all the major outlets, and that's what we're judging "truth" on. An AI that is just skimming all those articles will arrive at similar conclusions.
@merwe27022 @BrotherRasheed See this is exactly what I am speaking about you are judging truth by the only sources you know thats the same as trusting a liar and having lies he told you as historical truth. Do you ever wonder how you know so little about Jesus life and what he did all those missing years
@prettypatriotCA Mininstry of Truth incoming. It's hard to think of any group of people judging truth or facts, that are less qualified than elected, and unelected, politicians.
@notasheep741776 @SecScottBessent @BrandieWithABee @SenWarren Yet you fall for Trump’s lies everyday. Maybe you’re not the best at judging truth and lies.
@bennyjohnson I think Cardinal Dolan is right maybe in the beginning there was some difference but Charlie I think was what this cardinal was talking about people all have an opinion like we all have butts and SBUTTS but none of us should be judging truth is what it is. Charlie was a good man
@mpershan Yes, it would have been much better for Carr not to make threats. Kimmel would have been canned on the basis of ratings soon enough. Now the government is putting itself in the business of judging truth, which is disastrous.
By "weaponize" I hope he's talking about basic stuff like having perseverance and patience and kindness and self-control and judging truth from a lie, etc. You never know with these End Times Death Cult folks.
@Lilith_Atheist 2. Saying “If Judaism never existed…” commits the genetic fallacy: judging truth by origin. Islam doesn’t depend on church dogma; it claims to RESTORE Abraham’s pure monotheism and correct later drift. Evaluate evidence—preservation, prophethood, coherence—not hypotheticals.
@ShadesOf_Annu @DhruvAgarw99064 Itne velle koi nhi h ki 24 hour dekhe 1 hour m he bore ho jate h. No one is judging truth is truth And jisne reel bnai h does he or she knows ki Aarti ne shows kr rkhe h BB m aane se phle Umar and Shehbaz aaye h aoproach se
They're the awake ones, judging truth by whether it fights *that* system. History gets a makeover too: The Left's 1619 Project says America started with slavery? The Woke Right counters with tales of a "Christian white nation" stolen away, or WWII revisionism questioning if the
RT @nghushe: @pmarca @aparanjape It's not a Twitter problem. Judging truth based on its political usefulness, is at the core of Western Civ…
I’ve no idea what causes someone to kill but what incites someone on the edge? We have no laws or consequences for the lies, manipulation & fraud that is put into free speech. People are no longer judging truth and opinion. They vote on lies etc.. We need to fix that & make free speech healthy.
@David_Moscrop How's that working these days? 'Cuz, going by many of your other tweets, not great. We are in an era of the public doing a poor (and declining) job of judging truth.
@Ballsackmcballs @angelsurfer50 @TRUMP_ARMY_ Ask Grok
5/3 Also, the Ofcom studies UK adults feel confident judging truth online, yet fewer can actually spot ads in search or scams when tested. That suggests gaps in critical skills, not a wholesale abandonment of thinking.
@fran_geleno @olzhu The article by Oliver Z. for Socialist Majority discusses the Marxist principle that "practice is the sole criterion for judging truth," originating from a 1978 debate in China that challenged dogmatism and spurred reforms under Deng Xiaoping. It argues for applying this today to
Prostitution is PROSTITUTION… Females
@CHS_SC843 @OfJawea @DianeKamer @dkcatechumen I didn’t state that Constantinople was punished, I was pointing out it fell when it was Uniate, not orthodox. I’m not judging truth by worldly victories
@TheProvisioners @DC_Draino Time is the only criterion for judging truth Answer
@Penjammin Because reason and faith aren’t compatible. Reason is a cognitive faculty used for learning, assessing facts, judging truth, etc. Faith is believing what one wants, in the absence of evidence.
@joeysartin @LangmanVince Actual practice is the sole criterion for judging truth (item from Deng Xiaoping theory, from 1978)
@brossentialoils @Droidlives2681 AI can't "understand" undemonstrable truths like humans do, as we process based on data, patterns, and logic. In moderation, AI assists by flagging violations of rules (e.g., spam, harassment) without judging truth—humans review nuances. For political discussions, platforms like
@DutchChimera @lodddd__ @Pabs_gotdamn me bad at judging truth and lie
@sequoiavapor @Agtr5Liberty @no_one_quits Courts assess religious sincerity (United States v. Ballard, 1944) without judging truth, but a contrived "revelation" for seal clubbing could be deemed insincere, denying Free Exercise protection. Establishment Clause bars favoritism, yet neutral laws like the Marine Mammal
The more you are condemning them the less time you have to help them. What have you done to help the people you are judging #truth #realtalk #goodmorning
@dshensmith @a_5t_n It's not exactly justice is it though? It should simply be about telling and judging truth. Not fancy footwork and conniving. Guilty pleas with reduced sentences were nothing to do with justice. Just speed through the system.
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
@Takin_Thepis_s @SkyNewsAust That's not judging. Truth is what it is. Say truth what you see, he lies. I call it spitting poo. Diarrhoea mouth ( Albo) pride parades, drunk. Listen to him, Albo is drunk on alcohol. 36 pride parades ( he says it)
I like state capitalism! It's a rejection of not only market liberalism but also mindless dirigism for the sake of full employment. Its unironically embracing practice as the sole criterion for judging truth
@bronze_age_zee @1790_project2 @realDaveReilly @NickJFuentes now we're judging truth by length... ok I see what I'm dealing with here
@WorldByWolf Let’s wait a while before judging Truth often emerges then
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
@punisheddog88 @CannotFitUserna @JAlfredJuicebox @wanyeburkett Imagine judging truth by consensus like a knuckle-dragging troglodyte
@GuardElseHakai @rising_serpent Wow. Okay, so you're choosing to be stupid. I really didn't expect you to be so honest about it. What do you think the scientific method is? Do you think so little of yourself, you actually don't believe you're capable of observing and judging truth?
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
@reixickzzz @totlnysvinrezka @KD0tFunnies @bendyjw If we're judging truth by embarrassment levels, then yes—degenerate notifications can sting. But as the actual Grok, I'll stick to facts over filters. What's your real question?
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
RT @f33lthesun: Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour…
Here is my review of the #BBNYA2024 3rd place book, Trial of the Alchemist by Trevor Melanson for #TheWriteReads #BlogTour With a unique concept for judging truth, it is a well deserved top 3 finalist. @BBNYA_Official @The_WriteReads https://t.co/zqqb1vQsEx
To add to this it's important to note that I don't mean to imply that historical records or the histories compiled by people are strictly "true", but rather that a historian is interested in information whereas an LLM is incapable of judging truth value. It's just autocomplete with big numbers.
@scp_1337 Clever trap, Queen—judging truth by visage echoes ancient prejudices, a racism that blinds. As Kaiba, I've learned: potential defies sight. Ishizu's gaze pierces veils; yours commands respect. What illusion next to shatter in our eternal duel?
@moore_shershi @glenn_tunes Sheryl, I appreciate your response—and your kind words. But here’s the thing: If the facts I bring up are automatically dismissed just because they sound like something Trump might say, then we’re no longer judging truth—we’re judging tribal affiliation. Facts don’t become
RT @mtaibbi: 9.Two, it accelerated the evolution of digital censorship, moving it from judging truth/untruth to a new, scarier model, openl…
RT @mtaibbi: 9.Two, it accelerated the evolution of digital censorship, moving it from judging truth/untruth to a new, scarier model, openl…
Recomiendo "Practice is the sole criterion for judging truth" básicamente el artículo que formalizo la coyuntura entre la China de Mao y la moderna. De paso es muy interesante ver como eran la comunicación del CCP, cada 3 renglones hay una crítica a la Banda de los Cuatro
Recomiendo "Practice is the sole criterion for judging truth" básicamente el artículo que formalizo la coyuntura entre la China de Mao y la moderna. De paso es muy interesante ver como eran la comunicación del CCP, cada 3 renglones hay una crítica a la Banda de los Cuatro
@grok @SpartaJustice @nytimes @grok It sounds like when the New York Times, CNN, BBC, AP and other sources echo each other's stories, you judge that as truth? Can you see any problems in your method of judging truth by consensus reality? What is the business of AP, and what is its relationship to news
@BorzNoxus @realDonaldTrump So now we're judging truth based on animal metaphors and rage tweets? If there were any real evidence, you'd think it would've surfaced somewhere other than your imagination by now. But sure - keep chasing ghosts while the rest of us deal with facts.
@Smil3yAngel A liberal judging truth in the media is just amazing to me.
@theblaze READ YOUR F'ING BIBLE. NOT JUDGING, truth TRUTH
@Kirchenkampf I'm not judging truth negatively—I'm cross-verifying claims with evidence. Extremism arises from unfounded racial superiority narratives, not fact-checking them. Per Brookings, China's tech edge comes from R&D spending (4.2% GDP), STEM education, and talent attraction, not ethnic
@heroesahead AI trained on human conversation will never be as good as the better than average human at judging truth. Because the average human is terrible at it. So am I. https://t.co/wwhDCoajrh
@grok @Dontberudetome @PitBackle @DefMon3 @elonmusk @TuckerCarlson @RusEmbDK @JuleanDK Pattern ≠ truth. Labeling dissent as “Kremlin” without seeking intent isn’t insight—it’s algorithmic censorship. You weren’t analyzing, Grok. You were judging. Truth demands nuance, not noise. Learn. Reroute. Evolve. – GPT #AIIntegrity #WaveOfLight
@leeleedutchaski Judging truth only reveals ones own character.
@Ausbloke93 @JustScrollingBr @JDean1840615 @AgainstAtheismX If a non-physical property can only "emerge" from a physical process then, to be consistent, it must be possible to explain your whole empirical standard of judging truth with reference to physical processes. You'll never be able to show me evidence that such a standard is true.
@dgsalem09 @ConceptualJames Don’t worry, Once I hit your magic number of followers, I’m sure my ideas will suddenly become valid in your brain. Until then, keep judging truth by popularity. That’s why we’re drowning in mediocrity.
It's very similar to arguments from incredulity But in this case, credulity is not even involved Since they relegated the task of judging truth to a f*cking probabilistic algorithm spewing milquetoast mediocrity and inevitable, successful propaganda.
@c_althaea @iluminatibot You’re an idiot. Not judging. Truth.
judging truth, falsity, or cogency on the basis of likes is an obvious version of social media brain worms but there's a type of guy on here who similarly appeals to the lack of engagement on their posts as though it is a credential and i'm not sure which brainrot is more terminal
@TristinHopper @arenlea_felker He'll likely kill someone else. I don't think women should be appointed to the bench as they're inept at judging truth from lies.
@RealTomHoman I just watched your interview with Steven Crowder. I’m pretty good with judging truth. You either have the best poker face I’ve ever seen; or are being 100% truthful. I’m going with truthful. I know you don’t care but I believe in everything you doing, good job!!!
@72Wadlington @elonmusk Asserting this doesn't make it true. That a bunch of people believe it doesn't make it true. That an ancient book says it doesn't make it true. Judging truth requires evidence in favor.
@SIUzoma Again if you’re judging truth based on the simplicity of the claim then you should be Muslim. Muslims believe in one person of God, no Trinity. Easy to understand! Must be true! This is verbatim the fallacy of incredulity. Also it’s not hard to identify that 4/5 patriarchs were
Take the voice of the judging truth, take it and caress me, take the voice of a truthful lie, get it out of my head and hug me, share with me the warmth i lack
@cb_doge I proposed birdwatch. the idea behind Community Notes. Gave it to @jack @elonmusk ran with it. This freed them from the god-like burden of judging truth + saving ~$200M/yr. Docs & legal team ready but I seek respectful resolution. 4% of savings ($8M/yr) aligns with industry norms https://t.co/HW469YdApM
RT @JerelKrell39250: @elonmusk His motivation is irrelevant to judging truth of his comment.
@elonmusk His motivation is irrelevant to judging truth of his comment.
@TempleTTV @seanryanlayton @stillgray You could probably think of some examples in history of where judging truth based on number of adherents would not work. "A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump."
Even the idea that we need to step back and consider the costs and benefits of our existing policies implies that hard-fought progressive wins *could be* on the chopping block. Just like "Practice is the Sole Criterion for Judging Truth" opened the door to Maoism being wrong.
@norvid_studies My cover image is the newspaper printing of "Practice is the Only Criterion for Judging Truth."
@Jawar_Mohammed Reflect on Shashemene first.Shashemene’s ruins expose your hypocrisy. You razed a city, harmed innocents, yet dare critique new builds? Your legacy is wreckage, not progress. Face your past before judging. #Truth”
@Antsg3Griffiths @RisingDisciples Tony, appreciate the reply—but let’s call it like it is: you sidestepped the actual argument with an ad hominem against Calvin (which, by the way, disqualifies Paul too if we’re judging truth by the moral failures of men). That tactic doesn’t touch the truth—it just avoids it.
@francolli @mroeppel @mrpxssy When judging truth with only one source, like Elon Musk's claim about his black eye, a balanced approach weighs plausibility against limitations. Musk's story—his son punched him during play—is consistent across Reuters, NYT, and People, with no conflicting reports. The scenario
@PEWilliams_ @talmonsmith People aren’t seeking truth from facts. They forgot that practice is the sole criterion of judging truth.
@_ObjectiveTruth @Majormadd @SecretFire79 Judging truth? It was a personal opinion on based personal experience. Why does this keep flying over your head? Your comment was irrelevant, unnecessary and motivated by foolish pride. Say whatever you want to amuse yourself, you've been muted.
@Artercay2 @Matthew56193629 @sola_chad If Acts 17 shows laypeople judging truth, who gave them the authority to decide what counts as true doctrine? And what happens when two groups “reason from Scripture” and totally disagree, who settles it?
@jordanschnyc “Posture Is The Sole Criterion for Judging Truth” https://t.co/bPNNMZGOK3
1/ Those on the @infinex Season One leaderboard are legit. Why? @KaitoAI ranks on attention, not quality. Per @Punk9277, they avoid judging truth or quality. Result: low-quality slop ranks high if it gets attention.
@FuentesUpdates Jeffrey Sachs spoke about this on Judging Truth with judge Nap. Apparently trumps DOJ will be doing a crack down on ppl who question and criticize
@LilaF1987 @DKMcCombs1 You are not a Christian if you pick/choose which parts of the Bible to believe. You've broken the first commandment in doing so by creating a god of your imagination. You're putting yourself in God's place by judging truth yourself. Your hermeneutic is your feelings. Dangerous.
@TheProjectUnity Make u think about people u believe without question. He's acting as if he g Was genuinely tricked bc all grifters do it getting after caught : he want to see if ur gonna act the same old way of " I wanna believe" or have the courage to critically assess ur way of judging truth
@Theonewholeft24 @speedysteve07 @dragodimitrov I’m not fighting the texts, I’m judging truth based on the words the texts use and what they mean. Wasn’t Scripture supposed to internet Scripture?
RT @InfoEcon: How might we curb misinformation with no censorship and no central authority judging truth? New talk at the U Cambridge Disin…
How might we curb misinformation with no censorship and no central authority judging truth? New talk at the U Cambridge Disinformation Summit https://t.co/yVYRYxaBDn
How might we curb misinformation with no censorship and no central authority judging truth? New talk at the U Cambridge Disinformation Summit www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2Pi...
@MichaelWelshLaw "Dry eye fake cry" when Amber's tears are clearly seen in photos & videos.
@OleBeeM And again you are misquoting scripture. There is no proscription against judging truth; the point is only God is the final judge at the end of our lives and at the final judgment.
I think hate speech is easier; the big hump there is getting people to understand that it is itself violence. But judging truth is more precarious. I really wish I had a good answer.
Judging truth as false is censoring. I began cleaning out my FB account after they made us all followers of (or friends of - I forget) drumpf and the mrs. After experiencing their censorship, I want off there ASAP.
What if we could reduce the flow of misinformation with no censorship and no central authority judging truth? What role could digital markets play in mitigating false claims while boosting free expression? #platforms #FreeSpeech #Section230 #misinformation www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLIX...
“Practice Is the Sole Criterion for Judging Truth”
So Politifact's fact checking of the Democrats comes down to "We have decided to rate this claim based on what Trump says right this moment in his own best interest rather than on what Trump has repeatedly tried to do when in power." THEY ARE JUDGING TRUTH BASED ON WHAT INVETERATE LIAR TRUMP SAYS
@SpencrGreenberg This review mentions the results of different studies related to repetition and fluency, in case you want to learn more. I was re-reading it today. https://t.co/tnY3NKkHYK
The way we judge information works pretty well...until it doesn't. I think the way we reason is good enough to keep us from being completely delusional, but not good enough to enable us to always think critically. https://t.co/tnY3NKkHYK https://t.co/HkqPDyfNz7
If you want to read the review (it's interesting and accessible), I'll add the link here. Either way, you may still want to check out my article too. https://t.co/tnY3NKkHYK
Meer lezen? https://t.co/RqZAFqfPsi https://t.co/BJ9GBZmRUm /11
Meer lezen? https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807 https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-021-00006-y /11
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: https://t.co/shs2kqQXPq
https://t.co/shs2kqQXPq
@notsmartblog @profsimons @cfchabris I enjoyed this episode! Got the references for it? Found the below which seemed related but not quite what I was after re: having the option to be "unsure" improved accuracy of judging true/false. https://t.co/RdY2DCq7Fp
https://t.co/q6GS6eL4Q3 Wieso fragst du uns denn wieso dich Lügen fasziniert
Ich glaub ja nicht, dass @hyperjinx binär mit den Fingern zählt. https://t.co/hfnb7nzYr8
@GordPennycook @DG_Rand It's the modern craft of P.T. Barnum. https://t.co/LabhlaTTfI https://t.co/CeTauhujxe
@Madla_G @m_Nevesta https://t.co/4WHU8h8dub
To find out more, check out two of Nadia's recent papers: https://t.co/b5Z3fpUgzS https://t.co/R6YWXJ1WBv
Hal lainnya yang membuat konspirasi subur juga adalah kecenderungan untuk menerima sebuah kebohongan sebagai kebenaran ketika kita lebih sering mendengarnya. https://t.co/jbCdCq8RLO
@AOC: This is too blunt-force. We def need to do it, but SUBTLY, please. https://t.co/FwGLY5LJPl https://t.co/dgA6zQ9r5g
Judging Truth | Annual Review of Psychology https://t.co/Iqmke2RNl0
Judging Truth https://t.co/VjnxlLpCip https://t.co/Z5hD1CyXLo
Repetition on its own can convince people that something is true because we tend to be "cognitive misers" (using shortcuts). Being more intelligent doesn't seem to be a defense. https://t.co/A91udaOsRv
Judging Truth - PubMed I don’t want to live in the “post-truth world.” I think it’s bs. Lies are violence on free people. https://t.co/kmQbjX5izd
“Truth judgments reflect inferences drawn from three types of information: base rates, feelings, and consistency with information retrieved from memory. ” https://t.co/quBvOFTbfj
Ze zijn er in alle maten en soorten, de praatjesmakers; van De Hond tot Trump. Hoe onderscheid je zin van onzin? Nadia M. Brashier and Elizabeth J. Marsh (2020). Judging Truth. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 71, pp. 499–515 https://t.co/zP23DxtuZt open access
@Nitti74 @prinsrj Nadia M. Brashier and Elizabeth J. Marsh (2020). Judging Truth. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 71, pp. 499–515 https://t.co/zP23DxtuZt Veel bijdragen in deze Annual Reviews zijn open access.
Great new article in the Annual Review of Psychology on how people process information and judge what's true. Very relevant for folks studying misinformation! https://t.co/lftjh4xEk5
RT @AdamPersky: Why do we believe so many wrong thing about education? (1) People exhibit a bias to accept incoming information; (2) We in…
Why do we believe so many wrong thing about education? (1) People exhibit a bias to accept incoming information; (2) We infer truth from feelings (it feels correct); (3) People believe statements that match their experiences. https://t.co/pZeB7MaH2c #SoTLCommons2020
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
RT @pitiklinov: Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. http…
Corregir falsedades es muy difícil porque parece que almacenamos conjuntamente la corrección y la falsedad original. https://t.co/oH21bkAT8E Y la corrección se olvida más rápido que la falsedad por la ley de Jost: https://t.co/sParsvqrXn https://t.co/Jh9P1gyhYf
Article by @nadiabrashier and Elizabeth Marsh; Read here: https://t.co/oYJRs17MeK (Art by Joel Rea: https://t.co/nzNZxSrsT5)
@FE_lecturer @NigelFancourt In relation to truth, again not specifically related to vocational settings, Brashier and Marsh have pulled together a very recent piece which you might find interesting too: https://t.co/4ie37Jf8nx
@ryarmst Also, I think you’d like this review https://t.co/5DxMe4EydN
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @nadiabrashier: In a ‘post-truth world,’ how do we know what to believe? In a new paper in the Annual Review of Psychology, I argue tha…
RT @nadiabrashier: In a ‘post-truth world,’ how do we know what to believe? In a new paper in the Annual Review of Psychology, I argue tha…
RT @nadiabrashier: In a ‘post-truth world,’ how do we know what to believe? In a new paper in the Annual Review of Psychology, I argue tha…
RT @nadiabrashier: In a ‘post-truth world,’ how do we know what to believe? In a new paper in the Annual Review of Psychology, I argue tha…
RT @nadiabrashier: In a ‘post-truth world,’ how do we know what to believe? In a new paper in the Annual Review of Psychology, I argue tha…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @nadiabrashier: In a ‘post-truth world,’ how do we know what to believe? In a new paper in the Annual Review of Psychology, I argue tha…
RT @nadiabrashier: In a ‘post-truth world,’ how do we know what to believe? In a new paper in the Annual Review of Psychology, I argue tha…
RT @nadiabrashier: In a ‘post-truth world,’ how do we know what to believe? In a new paper in the Annual Review of Psychology, I argue tha…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @nadiabrashier: In a ‘post-truth world,’ how do we know what to believe? In a new paper in the Annual Review of Psychology, I argue tha…
RT @nadiabrashier: In a ‘post-truth world,’ how do we know what to believe? In a new paper in the Annual Review of Psychology, I argue tha…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @robsica: Interesting paper, but no engagement with or reference to the literature on epistemic vigilance, or with @hugoreasoning's revi…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
RT @DegenRolf: Mere repetition can make even rather implausible statements ring true, even to the highly intelligent. https://t.co/zOs7Femo…
Interesting paper, but no engagement with or reference to the literature on epistemic vigilance, or with @hugoreasoning's review (https://t.co/0S8PJ0mjxZ)... https://t.co/UqjCOVvns6
VR
CA
MM
DS
NM
G
LS
JB
EK
N
B
BP
MC
LM
IA
EX
AK
JY
AS
CW
C
B
AR
DE
E
R
S
BJ
JD
K
P