Gen Psychiatr August 2019 PMID 31552383

Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis?

Yiran Zhang, Rita Hedo, Anna Rivera, Rudolph Rull, Sabrina Richardson, Xin M Tu

Mentions

46
Peak: 10 in Mar 2020
across 3 sources since Sep 2019

Extended reach

199,605
potential audience

Total likes

952

Video views

149,222

Mentions per month

Sep 2019 – May 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter22 posts
  • YouTube22 videos
  • News2 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions mostly reflect skepticism toward post hoc power analysis, with phrases like 'conceptually flawed' and 'analytically misleading' emphasizing strong disagreement. Certain posts reference specific statistical methods and formulas, indicating a technical engagement, but overall sentiment highlights critique rather than advocacy or curiosity.

AgreementStrong disagreement

Most discussions strongly criticize the value of post hoc power analysis, labeling it as conceptually flawed and misleading.

InterestNeutral interest

The posts show a neutral level of curiosity, with some questioning the relevance and others dismissing the topic as flawed.

EngagementModerate engagement

Some comments delve into methodological details, such as mentioned formulas and statistical concepts, indicating moderate engagement.

ImpactLow impact

The overwhelming negative stance suggests the discussions may influence opinions against the practice, but overall impact appears limited without broader consensus.

Abstract in brief

  • Post hoc power analysis involves evaluating the statistical power of a study after the data has been collected and analyzed, which is often requested by journals for published studies.
  • The report examines whether post hoc power analysis provides meaningful and useful information, especially when based on the same data used for the original results, and questions its reliability in this context.
  • Monte Carlo simulations are employed in the study to test how well post hoc power analysis performs, helping to determine if it offers accurate insights into a study's ability to detect significant effects.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
マーキュリー2世
@uranus_2 · X

事後的な検定力分析では、真の検定力は分からない。Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/Y9NVUvzCkX

Mar 15, 2020 · 33 likes · 12 shares · 5,534 followers View post →
Keith R Laws
@Keith_Laws · X

Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/77PQFrHN0V Why is this even a question? ...it is not only conceptually flawed but also analytically misleading

Sep 5, 2019 · 4 likes · 4,644 followers View post →
hidaka
@sakuranolabo · X

@IEN_enjoy https://t.co/fCLrXW70YK https://t.co/wSZJElST2h これを契機にまとめてみてもいいのかな?再確認のために

May 28, 2025 · 3 likes · 491 followers View post →
Real Stats Real Easy ;-)
@Frank79593327 · X

@IvansCat1 @christoph_rothe Deshalb gibt es ja die sog. N(opt.) Formeln (Cohen). Sie geben als Studienleiter eine für Sie wiss. relevante Effektgröße vor, definieren Power und Alpha (bspw. 85% / 5%). Und berechnen daraus N(opt.) für den jeweiligen Test. Stichwort G*Power https://t.co/b6iYc56JUl

Jun 1, 2022 · 2 likes · 55 followers View post →
Taishi Okuno
@taishiokuno · X

Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/PaSZdryrwI

Mar 29, 2023 · 1 like · 441 followers View post →
Shigekazu Ishihara
@shigekzishihara · X

RT @ai_biostat: ③ Zhang Y, et al. Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? Gen Psychiatr. 2019;32(4):e100069.…

May 16, 2025 · 2 shares · 7,055 followers View post →

All mentions

hidaka
@sakuranolabo · X

@IEN_enjoy https://t.co/fCLrXW70YK https://t.co/wSZJElST2h これを契機にまとめてみてもいいのかな?再確認のために

May 28, 2025 · 3 likes · 491 followers View post →
Shigekazu Ishihara
@shigekzishihara · X

RT @ai_biostat: ③ Zhang Y, et al. Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? Gen Psychiatr. 2019;32(4):e100069.…

May 16, 2025 · 2 shares · 7,055 followers View post →
わたヤク@AI臨床研究
@ai_biostat · X

③ Zhang Y, et al. Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? Gen Psychiatr. 2019;32(4):e100069. https://t.co/UGwYjLyOml (4/5)

May 16, 2025 · 2 shares · 6,381 followers View post →
Taishi Okuno
@taishiokuno · X

Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/PaSZdryrwI

Mar 29, 2023 · 1 like · 441 followers View post →
Real Stats Real Easy ;-)
@Frank79593327 · X

@IvansCat1 @christoph_rothe Deshalb gibt es ja die sog. N(opt.) Formeln (Cohen). Sie geben als Studienleiter eine für Sie wiss. relevante Effektgröße vor, definieren Power und Alpha (bspw. 85% / 5%). Und berechnen daraus N(opt.) für den jeweiligen Test. Stichwort G*Power https://t.co/b6iYc56JUl

Jun 1, 2022 · 2 likes · 55 followers View post →
somekita@特発性血小板減少症@EBIちゃん号
@mazuisake · X

Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/DO3z6V0bwJ

Apr 6, 2022 · 817 followers View post →
somekita@特発性血小板減少症@EBIちゃん号
@mazuisake · X

RT @mazuisake: 上記サイトの事後分析(post hoc)-検出力分析というのは間違ってるのかな Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co…

Dec 2, 2021 · 2 shares · 817 followers View post →
know thyself(子豚のオリバー)
@thyself_know · X

RT @mazuisake: 上記サイトの事後分析(post hoc)-検出力分析というのは間違ってるのかな Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co…

Dec 1, 2021 · 2 shares · 1,227 followers View post →
somekita@特発性血小板減少症@EBIちゃん号
@mazuisake · X

上記サイトの事後分析(post hoc)-検出力分析というのは間違ってるのかな Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/hx5sfMWhmr

Dec 1, 2021 · 2 shares · 817 followers View post →
somekita@特発性血小板減少症@EBIちゃん号
@mazuisake · X

DeepLでPDFを和訳させてみた Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/hx5sfMWhmr https://t.co/2HiehZv9Wp

Nov 19, 2021 · 817 followers View post →
somekita@特発性血小板減少症@EBIちゃん号
@mazuisake · X

Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/DO3z6UI2iB

Nov 19, 2021 · 817 followers View post →
Hashimoto
@Sho_Has_hus · X

RT @uranus_2: 事後的な検定力分析では、真の検定力は分からない。Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/Y9NVUvzCkX

Mar 16, 2020 · 12 shares · 105 followers View post →
Duy Van Vu
@Duyvvu · X

RT @uranus_2: 事後的な検定力分析では、真の検定力は分からない。Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/Y9NVUvzCkX

Mar 16, 2020 · 12 shares · 2,665 followers View post →
Atsu
@atspsy · X

RT @uranus_2: 事後的な検定力分析では、真の検定力は分からない。Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/Y9NVUvzCkX

Mar 16, 2020 · 12 shares · 46 followers View post →
Shungo Suzuki
@shungosuzuki · X

RT @uranus_2: 事後的な検定力分析では、真の検定力は分からない。Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/Y9NVUvzCkX

Mar 16, 2020 · 12 shares · 2,128 followers View post →
nido
@Nidoranking · X

RT @uranus_2: 事後的な検定力分析では、真の検定力は分からない。Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/Y9NVUvzCkX

Mar 16, 2020 · 12 shares · 36 followers View post →
MizumotoAtsushi
@MizumotoAtsushi · X

RT @uranus_2: 事後的な検定力分析では、真の検定力は分からない。Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/Y9NVUvzCkX

Mar 15, 2020 · 12 shares · 6,668 followers View post →
kosGITti49
@kosugitti · X

RT @uranus_2: 事後的な検定力分析では、真の検定力は分からない。Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/Y9NVUvzCkX

Mar 15, 2020 · 12 shares · 2,802 followers View post →
青柳
@FBWM8888 · X

RT @uranus_2: 事後的な検定力分析では、真の検定力は分からない。Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/Y9NVUvzCkX

Mar 15, 2020 · 12 shares · 730 followers View post →
大久保 街亜 / Matia Okubo
@matiasauquebaux · X

RT @uranus_2: 事後的な検定力分析では、真の検定力は分からない。Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/Y9NVUvzCkX

Mar 15, 2020 · 12 shares · 5,036 followers View post →
マーキュリー2世
@uranus_2 · X

事後的な検定力分析では、真の検定力は分からない。Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/Y9NVUvzCkX

Mar 15, 2020 · 33 likes · 12 shares · 5,534 followers View post →
Keith R Laws
@Keith_Laws · X

Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? https://t.co/77PQFrHN0V Why is this even a question? ...it is not only conceptually flawed but also analytically misleading

Sep 5, 2019 · 4 likes · 4,644 followers View post →