Synopsis of Social media discussions

Discussions reflect an overall acceptance of the research, with users referencing the publication directly, such as links to the study or citing the framework. Expressions like 'it's definitely A Thing' and mentions of names and conferences show engagement, while some posts, like those tagging others or mentioning related topics, indicate a moderate level of interest and understanding without deep debate or widespread influence.

A
Agreement
Moderate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the article and recognize the concept of cognitive dissonance as a valid explanation for meat-eating behaviors.

I
Interest
Moderate level of interest

Participants show moderate interest, with many referencing the research's relevance and sharing their own experiences or curiosity.

E
Engagement
Moderate level of engagement

Comments include tagging others, quoting the article, and mentioning related concepts, indicating some depth of interaction.

I
Impact
Neutral impact

While some find the research important, there’s limited evidence of discussions prompting significant behavioral change or controversy, leading to a neutral impact score.

Social Mentions

YouTube

4 Videos

Facebook

2 Posts

Twitter

18 Posts

Blogs

2 Articles

News

22 Articles

Reddit

3 Posts

Metrics

Video Views

5,006

Total Likes

391

Extended Reach

32,637

Social Features

51

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Cognitive Dissonance in Relation to Meat Consumption

Cognitive Dissonance in Relation to Meat Consumption

This video explores the concept of cognitive dissonance and its connection to meat consumption. It discusses various strategies that individuals employ to alleviate the discomfort associated with consuming animals. Sources from notable psychological studies illustrate these concepts.

January 19, 2024

2,597 views


Cognitive Dissonance Related to Meat Consumption Conference 2023

Cognitive Dissonance Related to Meat Consumption Conference 2023

This video features a conference on cognitive dissonance related to meat, presented at the Vegan Place in Nantes. It discusses theories and tools for understanding cognitive dissonance, as well as strategies for reducing it in the context of meat consumption.

October 25, 2024

810 views


Understanding Negative Perceptions of Vegans and Vegetarians

Understanding Negative Perceptions of Vegans and Vegetarians

Why are people so irritated when they think about vegans? Research shows that negativity toward vegans and vegetarians is common and accepted, often not seen as a societal problem. This video explores the reasons behind this bias and its impact.

March 3, 2025

267 views


  • Eva Martes
    @EvMartes (Twitter)

    RT @YohannHoarau: Rediffusion de la conférence sur la dissonance cognitive relative à la viande que j'avais faite à la Vegan Place de Nante…
    view full post

    November 3, 2024

    9

  • Projet Méduses (compte inactif)
    @PMeduses (Twitter)

    RT @YohannHoarau: Rediffusion de la conférence sur la dissonance cognitive relative à la viande que j'avais faite à la Vegan Place de Nante…
    view full post

    October 28, 2024

    9

  • manhTecH
    @ManhTech (Twitter)

    RT @YohannHoarau: Rediffusion de la conférence sur la dissonance cognitive relative à la viande que j'avais faite à la Vegan Place de Nante…
    view full post

    October 25, 2024

    9

  • Réplique Éthique
    @RepliqueEthique (Twitter)

    RT @YohannHoarau: Rediffusion de la conférence sur la dissonance cognitive relative à la viande que j'avais faite à la Vegan Place de Nante…
    view full post

    October 25, 2024

    9

  • ֎ ߷ ۝ @abraxas0anansi.bsky.social ۝ ߷ ֍
    @Abraxas0Anansi (Twitter)

    RT @YohannHoarau: Rediffusion de la conférence sur la dissonance cognitive relative à la viande que j'avais faite à la Vegan Place de Nante…
    view full post

    October 25, 2024

    9

  • Nicolas C.
    @Nicolas02677384 (Twitter)

    RT @YohannHoarau: Rediffusion de la conférence sur la dissonance cognitive relative à la viande que j'avais faite à la Vegan Place de Nante…
    view full post

    October 25, 2024

    9

  • Marie-Hélène
    @luffy_mh (Twitter)

    RT @YohannHoarau: Rediffusion de la conférence sur la dissonance cognitive relative à la viande que j'avais faite à la Vegan Place de Nante…
    view full post

    October 25, 2024

    9

  • Skorly
    @Skorly03 (Twitter)

    RT @YohannHoarau: Rediffusion de la conférence sur la dissonance cognitive relative à la viande que j'avais faite à la Vegan Place de Nante…
    view full post

    October 25, 2024

    9

  • Yohann Hoarau - Éthique et Psycho (Rdv sur Bsky)
    @YohannHoarau (Twitter)

    Rediffusion de la conférence sur la dissonance cognitive relative à la viande que j'avais faite à la Vegan Place de Nantes en 2023 ! https://t.co/CDhe4hJcv8
    view full post

    October 25, 2024

    22

    9

  • Tuomas Salonen
    @tuomasolavi (Twitter)

    @tereensio Okei. Toi Rothberger on tehny nimenomaan tosta: rothgerber 2020 Meat-related cognitive dissonance- A conceptual framework for understanding how meat eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals https://t.co/lpqOC6Ap8h
    view full post

    January 9, 2024

  • ItsNotGiving ⓧ
    @ItsNotGivingX (Twitter)

    RT @frogluvr91: @itsisaacsworld https://t.co/4riyf3zaHA it’s definitely A Thing
    view full post

    March 29, 2023

    1

  • Yom of Yinland
    @frogluvr91 (Twitter)

    @itsisaacsworld https://t.co/4riyf3zaHA it’s definitely A Thing
    view full post

    March 28, 2023

    7

    1

  • Alan Watson
    @Alan_Watson_ (Twitter)

    @JohnG_UK @NutritionMadeS3 And this research is linked in the article (Doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104511): https://t.co/jJ7hfndMMd
    view full post

    July 15, 2021

    2

  • Ellen H Ullman Ⓥ
    @CureT1Diabetes (Twitter)

    Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals https://t.co/nKTv5GfEjf
    view full post

    April 25, 2021

  • Joachim K. Rennstich
    @digprof (Twitter)

    @olewin Re food behav https://t.co/UUhBP6GKxo & meat paradox https://t.co/f3TLwLzdR9. Gd expl for underlying processes https://t.co/W6QJCd5dfV or https://t.co/lHeVMAdD2L (why nobody wants to see bones).
    view full post

    July 27, 2020

  • Dr. Clare Conry-Murray @cconrymurray@fediscience.o
    @cconrymurray (Twitter)

    RT @patilindrajeets: Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat-eaters reduce negative arousal fr…
    view full post

    November 12, 2019

    3

  • Lewend Mayiwar
    @LewendM (Twitter)

    RT @patilindrajeets: Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat-eaters reduce negative arousal fr…
    view full post

    November 12, 2019

    3

  • Indrajeet Patil (इंद्रजीत पाटील)
    @patilindrajeets (Twitter)

    Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat-eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals (or prevent and reduce the moral guilt associated with eating meat) https://t.co/1pVSwU15B3 https://t.co/oKThNATHYB
    view full post

    November 12, 2019

    7

    3

Abstract Synopsis

  • The text discusses "Meat-related cognitive dissonance" (MRCD), which is the mental discomfort meat eaters experience when their behavior (eating animals) conflicts with their beliefs or feelings about animals.
  • The framework explains how people try to avoid or reduce this discomfort through strategies like ignoring facts, justifying their behavior, or degrading animals, influenced by factors such as individual differences and cultural context.
  • Understanding these mechanisms can help develop ways to encourage reducing meat consumption and raises questions for further research on how people manage this moral conflict.]