Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many discussions highlight criticisms of the original study by Stoet and Geary, with users mentioning issues like methodological flaws and the incorrect use of indices to measure gender equality. Phrases such as 'data manipulation' and 'debunked' express skepticism about the study’s conclusions, while references to further publications reinforce the discourse, indicating that the choice of words and critical tone contribute to an overall challenging stance towards the original findings.
The discussions show a mix of skepticism and criticism regarding the original study, indicating a general disagreement with its findings.
There is a strong interest in the topic, as many posts reference various perspectives and critiques related to the gender-equality paradox.
Comments reflect some depth, as participants discuss methodologies and findings, though not all engage in a detailed manner.
While some see value in the article's critique of the original study, many perceive its impact as limited regarding broader societal change.
15| Quellen: Q1: https://t.co/2pRTBO9nyK Q2: https://t.co/Jnc1c6k5bb Q3: https://t.co/GcC8p5SEgx Q4: https://t.co/UXT9DIfLMP Q5: https://t.co/ySISJ4f86o Q6: https://t.co/Hk2t80m7x3 Q7: https://t.co/gHwZf6wzVG Q8: https://t.co/GfpNvslrOH Q9: https://t.co/f11Uzdbjsi
This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian countries) is not convincing https://t.co/w1w6vNEHdG
The journal has now published a corrigendum, as well as a piece by the Harvard scholars explaining why the study's conclusions are likely spurious. https://t.co/HzxV1feD7Y https://t.co/VG1YLqtWFH
#NuevoVideo | ¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela?
Alguien que le avise a la
Unutmadan ekleyeyim. Stoet ve Geary'nin çalışmasına şu eleştiri gelmiş: https://t.co/n3cOKS9dt5 Bu eleştiriye karşı da orijinal çalışmanın yazarları şu cevabı vermiş: https://t.co/X1EUH7LcFB Fakat, eleştirinin sonuca pek bir etkisi olduğunu düşünmediğim için yazıya eklemedim.
What challenges do girls and boys face in the educational system? Our examination draws on extensive research, highlighting that the only significant differences in brains between genders pertain to size, with most…
Structural MRIs revealed that London taxi drivers have larger posterior hippocampi, indicating brain adaptation to navigational experience, with variations in anterior hippocampus suggesting different functional roles.
@Seda33554179 @zdch @mattyglesias Cross-sectional country data like this would be laughed out of economics, but its psychology so alas. The original study also failed replication: https://t.co/wIZO6PHklY
@DKeithClimate Note that there has been criticism about the the gender gap in STEM (e.g. https://t.co/6kMXxyk2o3, don't forget the reply) and debate about whether it is real or not is ongoing (see discussion of recent publications such as https://t.co/4km44EqjoL and https://t.co/eU1cxPsGO0)
@vxel Tutaj polemika z badaniem Stoet i Geary (2018), że korelacja między patriarchalnymi społ. i udziałem kobiet w STEM wynikać może z użycia GGGI jako błędnego miernika nierówności. Jeśli zastąpić go BIGI – wówczas zależność znika. https://t.co/MweZDaekpE https://t.co/D4UemdzJU0
RT @titiatscriptor: 15| Quellen: Q1: https://t.co/2pRTBO9nyK Q2: https://t.co/Jnc1c6k5bb Q3: https://t.co/GcC8p5SEgx Q4: https://t.co/UXT9D…
@ZeitgeistCritic @GrueneCH Wenn andere Authoren den von Stoet und Geary benutzten index gegen den tatsächlichen anteil von Frauen in STEM korrelierten verschwand das paradox.
« Gender equality is a multidimensional construct. A low score does not predict gender inequality or gender- unequal outcomes in all domains. Algeria, 128th on the has the world’s second-highest rate of STEM tertiary degrees for women”. 13/n https://t.co/MGuKdwex7P
@NewAle73 @SerotoninPsy https://t.co/7SJ3muUMwn; https://t.co/FM1jegKiKm
@PHChess @AndersYo Why are you quoting a study known to have data manipulation and whose paradox can be explained by the strength of gender stereotypes? https://t.co/uW8KakMSlc https://t.co/Dtv0aDnGZV
@lucho_lucho10 @cancerbero099 @PatoBMo @ChrisRegulus1 @Personaje_Secun @grima019 @1_minazuki Cuando esta va mas relacionada con la orientacion sexual https://t.co/IPHU3mzrfX Luego veo que comentas abajo el tema de la paradoja de la igualdad , te dejo estos articulos sobre eso: https://t.co/PGxjtfsk8y; https://t.co/FM1jegs9we https://t.co/CHwBzTV48C
@mart1oeil @Enroweb @JeremieNaudeFR Y a aussi ça https://t.co/EfMcnXGjXm Effectivement la Pologne je me disais bien qu'il y avait un blême.
@ChristisKing123 @reneeclaireb @SlapMyHams @_astrostrashcan @bothcoasts The theory also doesn’t take into consideration social factors during young childhood https://t.co/pspRigECuv
RT @GillesDeleuze17: Unutmadan ekleyeyim. Stoet ve Geary'nin çalışmasına şu eleştiri gelmiş: https://t.co/n3cOKS9dt5 Bu eleştiriye karşı da…
Unutmadan ekleyeyim. Stoet ve Geary'nin çalışmasına şu eleştiri gelmiş: https://t.co/n3cOKS9dt5 Bu eleştiriye karşı da orijinal çalışmanın yazarları şu cevabı vermiş: https://t.co/X1EUH7LcFB Fakat, eleştirinin sonuca pek bir etkisi olduğunu düşünmediğim için yazıya eklemedim.
¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela? Curiosamente: https://t.co/LqvNffsvj9
¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela? https://t.co/EuZhtlI8mF a través de @YouTube
"...cuestionar y eliminar nuestros estereotipos y roles de género" Por eso las gender reveals solo perpetúan una idea obsoleta sobre cómo debe de comportarse una persona https://t.co/GuPQ6PH6SX
RT @curiosamente: En nuestro vídeo tenemos más datos y estadísticas que ejemplifican la #desigualdad en las aulas. https://t.co/J1gY8qvlw0
En nuestro vídeo tenemos más datos y estadísticas que ejemplifican la #desigualdad en las aulas. https://t.co/J1gY8qvlw0
Que ⚡ ginoarcado ⚡ más raro https://t.co/LweH3CoXq0
RT @curiosamente: #NuevoVideo | ¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela?
¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela? https://t.co/McLw5GixnK
¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela? https://t.co/cort0w25K0
¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela? https://t.co/9Oev7TkyLi a través de @YouTube
RT @curiosamente: #NuevoVideo | ¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela?
RT @curiosamente: #NuevoVideo | ¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela?
¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela? https://t.co/SzrYLS03hw a través de @YouTube Para que el fachimachismo aprenda la lección y estudien. @curiosamente
Me gustó un video de YouTube: ¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela? https://t.co/vr7aY8VbH3
Desigualdad de género en las escuelas #educaciónsexual #psicología #psicoterapia #psicóloga #saludmental #AsisteAPsicoterapia https://t.co/fZ8y2HZuOh
RT @curiosamente: #NuevoVideo | ¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela?
RT @curiosamente: #NuevoVideo | ¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela?
#NuevoVideo | ¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela?
¡Cuánto por hacer! ¿Hay desigualdad de género en la escuela? https://t.co/yHBmNJh1bI a través de @YouTube #desigualdaddegenero.
@MarjoOllikainen @EerolaSami @ARautiainen Hyvä teksti! Vaikka eihän konservatiivien väitteet mihinkään hyviin argumentteihin ole kaatuneet ennenkään... Tuosta Stoet & Gearystä olen jaksanut bookmarkata mutten lukea myös tällaisen kritiikin: https://t.co/SbJfqLMPyY
@Kunkakom Stoet and Geary vs. Richardson et al. on the gender equality paradox: Original article: https://t.co/FHXUt5mu5t Correction after critique: https://t.co/1BQQkOGFMp Critique to the correction: https://t.co/ZIbcyWCS7x Reply: https://t.co/CC8uSE1akE
@c_groetzinger Diese Resultate weisen aber darauf hin, dass die Studie, welche dieses Gender-Paradox gefunden hat methodologisch unsauber ist. Es fehlte da die Baseline Messung. Ausserdem scheint es noch weitere methodologische Schwierigkeiten mit der Studie zu geben: https://t.co/x4bqhZm3z5
15| Quellen: Q1: https://t.co/2pRTBO9nyK Q2: https://t.co/Jnc1c6k5bb Q3: https://t.co/GcC8p5SEgx Q4: https://t.co/UXT9DIfLMP Q5: https://t.co/ySISJ4f86o Q6: https://t.co/Hk2t80m7x3 Q7: https://t.co/gHwZf6wzVG Q8: https://t.co/GfpNvslrOH Q9: https://t.co/f11Uzdbjsi
Is There a Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)? Commentary on the Study by Stoet and Geary (2018) - Sarah S. Richardson, Meredith W. Reiches, Joe Bruch, Marion Boulicault, Nicole E. Noll, Heather Shattuck-Heidorn https://t.co/V2HIznMCRM https://t.co/LZgnFkw2Ko
@campeters4 @rasmansa There's a good breakdown of why nobody could replicate the "gender paradox" findings here: https://t.co/mRvoc967YI and there's an interesting discussion on the issue of differing gender norms between countries here: https://t.co/C3UmLgqiqr
@kevinburch @ItsGoneAwry @Harrys_Garage @Judith_Char I’m aware of the original study on this paradox, *and* aware that a) its measures of women’s participation in STEM and of gender equality have been criticised, and that b) other examinations find no such paradox. See e.g. this critique and re-analysis: https://t.co/11L8cGOw6V
@DanMir24432407 @FNiazi31 @MaddieWali @Kalakha96452183 @laaleen @amnaappi 3. Here is where the authors provided details. They didn't revise the study. The study was never rescinded or pulled. Merely clarifications were offered. Sorry you stand incorrect https://t.co/Id5iXy17Se
@utagro @robkhenderson There is no "paradox" when sociocultural factors are included. Conservatives values are still promoted in egalitarian countries, the same way delinquency still happens in countries with laws against crimes. https://t.co/6rhP4e03tI
@entropiadevalen @JNominas no se quien seas @JNominas, pero no veas esa madre. Ten fuentes de gente que realmente se dedica a la divulgación: https://t.co/FLMsSIcf0l https://t.co/sONy0wSgbe https://t.co/T5Ahllrluk https://t.co/laQlRqb41b
Is There a Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering,and Math (STEM)?っていう「男女平等な国であるほど女性の方がSTEMの進学率は低い」っていう論文に対する反論の論文読んでんだけど，元の論文の計算がガバガバすぎてPISAのデータと矛盾しまくってんの草なんだが
@Salad98173600 @RoxanaKreimer @feminisciencia @nataliavolosin Yo tambien tengo mi cherrypicking a mano https://t.co/74V43A2um3
@VannesaCo Y revisando citas, me encontré ésta refutación: https://t.co/xSFoWiegjR
RT @minipetite: Y más adelante publicó también la extensa revisión del equipo de Harvard sobre esa hipótesis, que pone en crisis su metodol…
Y más adelante publicó también la extensa revisión del equipo de Harvard sobre esa hipótesis, que pone en crisis su metodología y ofrece conclusiones diferentes cuando se establecen otras métricas la igualdad de género. https://t.co/rQhGkBOAo0
@PqGregor @ElisandeWalters @Anousch @Joern_Mueller Und recht umfassend zu den Schwächen: https://t.co/EaSx1NLD6Q
@yeetismo @snazzylesbiab @XessArt @MidgeGaunt @elonmusk Read this https://t.co/WtvNSz6zT7 It shows that the negative association between gender equality and women’s STEM achievement does not persist when the measures of gender equality and achievement change
@AhmadrSadi Here’s a paper by Harvard researchers that pokes holes in that study we can take a look at as well. https://t.co/iS5LeKX9hu
@CathrynTownsend @RichardDawkins @HeatherSH22 https://t.co/GIY6VvLM1J
@iggiohm Har ikke kompetanse til å lese sånt, men fant originalstudien her: https://t.co/ow9ftYleyf Og "BIGI" ("GGGI..... is too biased to one specific gender to consider it a true measure of gender equality) ? her: https://t.co/Yq6PMq8PAe
@ilyasil2surgut @sansara_bones @artyomiscool Объясняется тем, что опыт исследования воссоздать так и не удалось. Поищите что-нибудь более научное https://t.co/U61QAFWAnR
"Is there a gender-equality paradox in STEM?" New from the Harvard GenderSciLab, a paper by Sarah Richardson of @HarvardHistSci, M. Reiches, et al. https://t.co/sPnkzgl7L0
Is There a Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)? Commentary on the Study by Stoet and Geary... Richardson SS, Reiches MW, Bruch J, Boulicault M, Noll NE, Shattuck-Heidorn H.Psychol Sci. 2020 Feb 11:956797619872762. https://t.co/xJjJxmZPZk
(And here is the #SciHub @Sci_Hub link for those who don't have the means to access the document in the SAGE site: https://t.co/NfKUeEFfoW )
RT @marionb_8: Today, on #womeninscience day, check out a new piece from the GenderSci Lab on the so-called "Gender Equality Paradox"! http…
RT @Choosy_Female: Is There a Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)? Commentary on the Study by Stoe…
Is There a Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)? Commentary on the Study by Stoet and Geary (2018) - Sarah S. Richardson, Meredith W. Reiches, Joe Bruch, Marion Boulicault, Nicole E. Noll, Heather Shattuck-Heidorn, https://t.co/kxhKJSGJZO https://t.co/j8oaB1Xk5u
RT @marionb_8: Today, on #womeninscience day, check out a new piece from the GenderSci Lab on the so-called "Gender Equality Paradox"! http…
RT @marionb_8: Today, on #womeninscience day, check out a new piece from the GenderSci Lab on the so-called "Gender Equality Paradox"! http…
RT @marionb_8: Today, on #womeninscience day, check out a new piece from the GenderSci Lab on the so-called "Gender Equality Paradox"! http…
RT @marionb_8: Today, on #womeninscience day, check out a new piece from the GenderSci Lab on the so-called "Gender Equality Paradox"! http…
RT @marionb_8: Today, on #womeninscience day, check out a new piece from the GenderSci Lab on the so-called "Gender Equality Paradox"! http…
RT @marionb_8: Today, on #womeninscience day, check out a new piece from the GenderSci Lab on the so-called "Gender Equality Paradox"! http…
Alguien que le avise a la
RT @briandavidearp: Is There a Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)? Commentary on the Study by Sto…
RT @KhandisBlake: @dconroybeam this is the one I was reading https://t.co/2zsvvcoV0d
RT @marionb_8: Today, on #womeninscience day, check out a new piece from the GenderSci Lab on the so-called "Gender Equality Paradox"! http…
RT briandavidearp: Is There a Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)? Commentary on the Study by Stoet and Geary (2018) - Sarah S. Richardson, Meredith W. Reiches, Joe Bruch, Marion Boulicault, Nicole E. Noll, Heathe… https://t.co/p7bgS2dYGd
@dconroybeam this is the one I was reading https://t.co/2zsvvcoV0d
Is There a Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)? Commentary on the Study by Stoet and Geary (2018) - Sarah S. Richardson, Meredith W. Reiches, Joe Bruch, Marion Boulicault, Nicole E. Noll, Heather Shattuck-Heidorn, https://t.co/Ma7ObHSVrE
All this freedom I have makes me want to quit my science career and go home.... JUST KIDDING! If Stoet & Geary did better math & science they wouldn't be so threatened by #WomenInStem https://t.co/Qb4P0r9nUo
RT @marionb_8: Today, on #womeninscience day, check out a new piece from the GenderSci Lab on the so-called "Gender Equality Paradox"! http…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
Is There a Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)? Commentary on the Study by Stoet and Geary (2018) https://t.co/FYki1HD8rL #psychology
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
https://t.co/HVN3PdLIno
RT @JeffreyASachs: The journal has now published a corrigendum, as well as a piece by the Harvard scholars explaining why the study's concl…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @SteveStuWill: Critique of the above paper: https://t.co/gwAy5p0q6c Response to the critique by the original authors: https://t.co/PQ1v…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @FeliciaJaremus: @DrAndrewV2 @ManelWatchAU @ManelWatchUS Now officially debunked, thank goodness. https://t.co/jJJznchb2R
RT @FeliciaJaremus: @DrAndrewV2 @ManelWatchAU @ManelWatchUS Now officially debunked, thank goodness. https://t.co/jJJznchb2R
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @JeffreyASachs: The journal has now published a corrigendum, as well as a piece by the Harvard scholars explaining why the study's concl…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @SteveStuWill: Critique of the above paper: https://t.co/gwAy5p0q6c Response to the critique by the original authors: https://t.co/PQ1v…
@DrAndrewV2 @ManelWatchAU @ManelWatchUS Now officially debunked, thank goodness. https://t.co/jJJznchb2R
RT @JeffreyASachs: The journal has now published a corrigendum, as well as a piece by the Harvard scholars explaining why the study's concl…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @JeffreyASachs: The journal has now published a corrigendum, as well as a piece by the Harvard scholars explaining why the study's concl…
RT @JeffreyASachs: The journal has now published a corrigendum, as well as a piece by the Harvard scholars explaining why the study's concl…
RT @JeffreyASachs: The journal has now published a corrigendum, as well as a piece by the Harvard scholars explaining why the study's concl…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
RT @JeffreyASachs: The journal has now published a corrigendum, as well as a piece by the Harvard scholars explaining why the study's concl…
RT @JeffreyASachs: The journal has now published a corrigendum, as well as a piece by the Harvard scholars explaining why the study's concl…
RT @JeffreyASachs: The journal has now published a corrigendum, as well as a piece by the Harvard scholars explaining why the study's concl…
The journal has now published a corrigendum, as well as a piece by the Harvard scholars explaining why the study's conclusions are likely spurious. https://t.co/HzxV1feD7Y https://t.co/VG1YLqtWFH
RT @AcadFreedom: This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian co…
This supposed 'debunking' of the 'gender equality paradox' (fewer women choose to study STEM in more gender-egalitarian countries) is not convincing https://t.co/w1w6vNEHdG
RT @SteveStuWill: Critique of the above paper: https://t.co/gwAy5p0q6c Response to the critique by the original authors: https://t.co/PQ1v…
RT @SteveStuWill: Critique of the above paper: https://t.co/gwAy5p0q6c Response to the critique by the original authors: https://t.co/PQ1v…