Recently published research with @aksaeri and @BraggePeter where we reviewed the prior literature, key approaches and major barriers in health-related research co-design. You can find our open-access paper here: https://t.co/Ai40RmDHwu
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Feb 2020 – Jul 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter37 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Overall, the digital discussions demonstrate a high level of interest and engagement, with posters citing specific reviews and papers like Slattery and Saeri (2020) to underline the importance of research co-design. Words such as 'useful,' 'helpful,' and phrases like 'may help address research waste' illustrate their support and recognition of the publication’s relevance, while references to methodology and practical applications show active participation in the conversation.
Most discussions agree on the potential benefits of research co-design in health, with several referencing the importance of involving end-users to reduce waste and improve outcomes.
Discussion participants show strong interest in the topic, highlighting that the subject is relevant for current health research practices and personal academic work.
Many posts delve into details about methodologies, implications, and sharing related papers, indicating a high level of nuanced engagement.
The discussions emphasize the significance of the research and its potential to influence research practices, though some comments note the need for more empirical evidence, slightly tempering the perceived immediate impact.
Abstract in brief
- Engaging end-users through research codesign in health research aims to reduce waste and create more meaningful benefits for patients by involving them in activities like focus groups, interviews, and surveys during the study planning phase.
- The overview identified 23 reviews with varied approaches to codesign, but there is limited empirical evidence on its effectiveness, though qualitative reports suggest both positive and negative outcomes.
- Despite the potential benefits, more rigorous evaluation is needed to understand how different codesign activities impact research quality and patient outcomes in health settings.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyDon't want to miss this keeper #PatientPartners Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co/sRALFYocCp "health research frequently addresses questions and outcomes of limited relevance to clinicians, patients and other end-users" #ResearchCoDesign
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. New paper in Health Research Policy & Systems. https://t.co/izcHCmMhzz open access!!
@BonzFurzerPhD @kemiwright27 @mckeon_grace @OscarLederman @AmandaRebar @RobStanton2 @simon_rosenbaum @lin_ashleigh @ash_l_thornton @dr_o_girard @ivan_jeftic @BrendanMouatt ...and I know you’ll have lots on this anyway, but here’s a cool 2020 overview of the state of & methods used in co-design in health research / interventions too, which they might get some good messages from... https://t.co/WEdkKmzd5d
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co/P8vODr57ro
@CoffeeBlackMD @JessLAndersen @DGlaucomflecken @FrailSkeleton “Billions of dollars are lost annually in health research that fails to create meaningful benefits for patients. Engaging in research co-design – the meaningful involvement of end-users in research – may help address this research waste.” https://t.co/lFm4YcXPRE
All mentions
Enhancing Health Research Effectiveness Through End-User Co-Design
This article addresses a significant challenge in the health sector the avoidable waste of billions of dollars annually in health research. It explores how research co-design involving end-users can potentially reduce…
Research Co-Design in Health: Review of Approaches and Outcomes
Engaging end-users through research codesign in health research aims to reduce waste and create more meaningful benefits for patients by involving them in activities like focus groups, interviews, and surveys during the…
@CoffeeBlackMD @JessLAndersen @DGlaucomflecken @FrailSkeleton “Billions of dollars are lost annually in health research that fails to create meaningful benefits for patients. Engaging in research co-design – the meaningful involvement of end-users in research – may help address this research waste.” https://t.co/lFm4YcXPRE
"Billions of dollars are lost annually in health research that fails to create meaningful benefits for patients. Engaging in research co-design – the meaningful involvement of end-users in research – may help address research waste." https://t.co/bFNJPnBnEn #methodologymonday
@BenJaneFitness @JNHealth @OliWilliamsPhD @WoodallDr Vargas looks useful, thanks @dr_know et al. (2021) more than a method paper https://t.co/ntTS6fhxJs Slattery, Saeri, @BraggePeter (2020) Research co-design in health: A rapid overview of reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. 18(1):17 Williams et al.(2020) Lost in the shadows paper
@laqwalsh @laqwalsh thanks for sharing! I'm currently writing about co-design in my thesis. This may also be helpful https://t.co/zR7atsgckP
@BonzFurzerPhD @kemiwright27 @mckeon_grace @OscarLederman @AmandaRebar @RobStanton2 @simon_rosenbaum @lin_ashleigh @ash_l_thornton @dr_o_girard @ivan_jeftic @BrendanMouatt ...and I know you’ll have lots on this anyway, but here’s a cool 2020 overview of the state of & methods used in co-design in health research / interventions too, which they might get some good messages from... https://t.co/WEdkKmzd5d
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews | SpringerLink https://t.co/QNFOPxY4pF
RT @jonathanboote: Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. New paper in Health Research Policy & Systems. https://t.co/i…
Research co-#design in #health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co/gpqXSzumdA
[Rapid Review] Research co-design in Health https://t.co/odoEy3ISkx by @PeterSlattery1 @aksaeri @BraggePeter #HowToDoPtEngagement
RT @jonathanboote: Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. New paper in Health Research Policy & Systems. https://t.co/i…
RT @ErimConsulting: Several research projects are wasted, "because researchers have not consulted with patients, clinicians and other end-u…
Several research projects are wasted, "because researchers have not consulted with patients, clinicians and other end-users when prioritising an area of research". Make sure that isn't yours if you aim for impact! Here is more on #research co-design: https://t.co/s2tThBfnd1
RT @PatientAdvisors: Don't want to miss this keeper #PatientPartners Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co…
RT @PatientAdvisors: Don't want to miss this keeper #PatientPartners Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co…
RT @PatientAdvisors: Don't want to miss this keeper #PatientPartners Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co…
RT @PatientAdvisors: Don't want to miss this keeper #PatientPartners Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co…
Don't want to miss this keeper #PatientPartners Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co/sRALFYocCp "health research frequently addresses questions and outcomes of limited relevance to clinicians, patients and other end-users" #ResearchCoDesign
RT @PeterSlattery1: Recently published research with @aksaeri and @BraggePeter where we reviewed the prior literature, key approaches and m…
RT @PeterSlattery1: Recently published research with @aksaeri and @BraggePeter where we reviewed the prior literature, key approaches and m…
RT @PeterSlattery1: Recently published research with @aksaeri and @BraggePeter where we reviewed the prior literature, key approaches and m…
RT @PeterSlattery1: Recently published research with @aksaeri and @BraggePeter where we reviewed the prior literature, key approaches and m…
RT @PeterSlattery1: Recently published research with @aksaeri and @BraggePeter where we reviewed the prior literature, key approaches and m…
RT @PeterSlattery1: Recently published research with @aksaeri and @BraggePeter where we reviewed the prior literature, key approaches and m…
RT @PeterSlattery1: Recently published research with @aksaeri and @BraggePeter where we reviewed the prior literature, key approaches and m…
RT @PeterSlattery1: Recently published research with @aksaeri and @BraggePeter where we reviewed the prior literature, key approaches and m…
Recently published research with @aksaeri and @BraggePeter where we reviewed the prior literature, key approaches and major barriers in health-related research co-design. You can find our open-access paper here: https://t.co/Ai40RmDHwu
RT @jonathanboote: Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. New paper in Health Research Policy & Systems. https://t.co/i…
RT @jonathanboote: Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. New paper in Health Research Policy & Systems. https://t.co/i…
RT @jonathanboote: Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. New paper in Health Research Policy & Systems. https://t.co/i…
RT @jonathanboote: Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. New paper in Health Research Policy & Systems. https://t.co/i…
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. New paper in Health Research Policy & Systems. https://t.co/izcHCmMhzz open access!!
RT @HarpsJournal: Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co/P8vODr57ro
RT @HarpsJournal: Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co/P8vODr57ro
RT @HarpsJournal: Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co/P8vODr57ro
RT @HarpsJournal: Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co/P8vODr57ro
RT @HarpsJournal: Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co/P8vODr57ro
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews https://t.co/P8vODr57ro
DS
PA
JB
PG
HJ
LC
CR
DM
DW
DS
SS
GS
C
OP
GG
EC
AL
SF
CN
DB
LB
RP
DH
JD
AL
SE
EM
NP
GL
WC
VM
AD
JZ