Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions center around the findings that sub-Saharan Africans inherit 2% to 19% of their genetic material from an archaic lineage, igniting conversations about ancestry and identity. For instance, phrases like 'substantial contribution of archaic ancestry' and rebuttals to misunderstandings reflected in the term 'non-human' illustrate the intensity of reactions. The tone ranges from serious to sarcastic, showcasing a blend of genuine curiosity and conflict over interpretations, which directly relates to differing perceptions of racial and ethnic identities.
Discussions show mixed, often contentious views regarding the implications of the publication, indicating a lack of consensus.
Many participants display a high level of curiosity about the findings and their implications for understanding human ancestry.
Conversations include references to the study's methodology and its place within broader discussions of genetics, although some responses are dismissive.
Users recognize the study's significance in redefining perceptions of human ancestry and genetics in African populations.
OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to ruffle the feathers of some snowflakes! I'll be in the chat, come yell at me! https://t.co/qljZ8BmcmU https://t.co/vzDl9k08Tc
@beyoncegarden You clearly do not understand genetics. DNA influences behavior, intelligence, and impulse control. Not only does race exist, humanity is comprised of admixture from different hominin species millions of years removed from each other. Published DNA study: https://t.co/jyuUIwXFhM https://t.co/pcPuKzERMT
@roguedunadan @TheOnlyDSC It’s crazy how a huge segment of the human population shares DNA with extinct monkeys but we’re not allowed to talk about it. https://t.co/2o2cyHUZK2 Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations | Science Advances
@E430Merc @robertsepehr @ImMeme0 Literally Science. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "populations derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals... substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African pops"
@GulaJaani4 @malen_manya @TheGriftReport No. Pre-Neanderthal. https://t.co/PJEnI2THFh "2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African[s]"
@HelCol2025 @Anc_Aesthetics You may b right, these aren't human. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals... substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African
This video delves into how climate change affects marine ecosystems and biodiversity. It examines the results of rising temperatures, ocean acidification, and changing habitats on fish and other marine organisms…
Researchers examined the genetic impact of ancient hominins on modern African populations, focusing on West Africans. They discovered significant contributions of archaic ancestry that may influence adaptation traits.
This video delves into the complexities of quantum computing techniques. It explores the foundational principles and recent advancements, illustrating how these technologies are set to transform various fields…
This video explores a significant finding of a Denisovan mandible from Pleistocene Taiwan, expanding the understanding of Denisovan distribution in ancient Asia. The mandible, dating between 10,000 to 190,000 years ago…
Researchers examined the genetic impact of ancient hominins on modern African populations, particularly in West Africa. Findings reveal that these populations have inherited significant genetic material from an archaic…
@jdawg_264 @BlackZoro95 @kzshabazz https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@DrDabbington @erwanweb @TheGriftReport Not. Human. https://t.co/PJEnI2THFh "2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations."
@GulaJaani4 @malen_manya @TheGriftReport No. Pre-Neanderthal. https://t.co/PJEnI2THFh "2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African[s]"
@glistnsincerity @spdrv6 @Mexican_Duchess @WilliamA_33 @DHSgov You literally have admixture from an EARLIER hominid lol. Neanderthals had art 65,000 y ago, and were likely just as intelligent as their homo sapien contemporaries. Going to go on a limb and say whoever you guys mixd with likely were not, hence the IQ gap https://t.co/RYhxDzHk4d
@GEstrella55555 @RickyDoggin Actually... https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African pops."
@NotSure09013362 @DiogenesTheDog0 @leonardaisfunE There u go projecting AGAIN like the fucking Retard that u are! I looked up on credible scientific websites just by googling “are there different races within the human race?” https://t.co/Bl5nTWtTdf https://t.co/jLZZYVGolr https://t.co/DEMANOerUj https://t.co/DBc6KSLDRp
@theonlystonez @Hap6306 @TooWhiteToTweet Absolutely. https://t.co/G6eWlM602r https://t.co/Qf9cL5WF3n https://t.co/6CJyC5P5pR These should get everyone who is interested started on their journey.
@M_Wingels @div12_ @afrojudaic @HPhobiaWatch @Hirohito_1491 dude you're just rehashing shit you haven't studied very well that 19% figure you keep quoting (inaccurately btw) came from this paper: https://t.co/rMD36V6wl3 which was contradicted by follow up studies with more realistic model assumptions https://t.co/pfIvhuKOz8
@black_power814 @Joe__Bassey @grok https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@Spatialbluprint @R3dJ0k3r
@RAISRAEL2
RT @robertsepehr: Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (DNA) to an extinct archaic hominin species (H…
@thurhyde https://t.co/2wCC1N9LGR
RT @robertsepehr: @beyoncegarden You clearly do not understand genetics. DNA influences behavior, intelligence, and impulse control. Not on…
RT @robertsepehr: @beyoncegarden You clearly do not understand genetics. DNA influences behavior, intelligence, and impulse control. Not on…
@Lorenooj @Gersonrato64611 @mombaque Os africanos subsaarianos atuais têm até 19% de DNA de uma espécie extinta de hominídeo arcaico (homo erectus ou homo habilis) que NÃO é encontrada no DNA dos atuais asiáticos ou caucasianos. https://t.co/ttu3SN0F38
@SisterBeech @kjosmitty @Crime_In_NYC They're not though. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals... substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations."
RT @robertsepehr: @beyoncegarden You clearly do not understand genetics. DNA influences behavior, intelligence, and impulse control. Not on…
RT @robertsepehr: @beyoncegarden You clearly do not understand genetics. DNA influences behavior, intelligence, and impulse control. Not on…
RT @robertsepehr: @beyoncegarden You clearly do not understand genetics. DNA influences behavior, intelligence, and impulse control. Not on…
RT @robertsepehr: @beyoncegarden You clearly do not understand genetics. DNA influences behavior, intelligence, and impulse control. Not on…
RT @robertsepehr: @beyoncegarden You clearly do not understand genetics. DNA influences behavior, intelligence, and impulse control. Not on…
RT @robertsepehr: @beyoncegarden You clearly do not understand genetics. DNA influences behavior, intelligence, and impulse control. Not on…
RT @robertsepehr: @beyoncegarden You clearly do not understand genetics. DNA influences behavior, intelligence, and impulse control. Not on…
@beyoncegarden You clearly do not understand genetics. DNA influences behavior, intelligence, and impulse control. Not only does race exist, humanity is comprised of admixture from different hominin species millions of years removed from each other. Published DNA study: https://t.co/jyuUIwXFhM https://t.co/pcPuKzERMT
@richlead6 @Jigsaw1066 @JonesBarron @rightresponsem Africans have neanderthal too btw. Africans also have a signifcant portion (up to 19%) of DNA from a mysterious archaic hominin species that no other race mixed with. https://t.co/QXcYAyEers
@wei2high @Tuttlewind33 @Duane139233 @darvidosiris https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@Tuttlewind33 @Duane139233 @darvidosiris Here's an actual link to a reputable site science . Org got no laughably fake easily disprovable memes https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@Tuttlewind33 @Duane139233 @darvidosiris https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@KirksJuicy_Neck @dawn55533 Here’s one of the many studies https://t.co/kx700wYa5t
@TomiLahren Sub-hominid genes https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations."
@AnthropoTube @GeologicalSETI @itsluluthebaby You’re just flat out wrong, sorry. https://t.co/VN1C12lUpR.
@not_rekt_11 They're not human. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals... substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations."
@YOFAVORITE_DAE @relationshpdumb @Sadmethod https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@j_Mullins68 @iAnonPatriot https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@retvrntogala @sttrscgg @raphousetv2 https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@JimiJames003 @adam1trent @Nmkcomps_2 @avidseries @glenn_tunes https://t.co/WGtCd1L8i9
RT @hallermunt: https://t.co/mJRsLEFnuM
https://t.co/mJRsLEFnuM https://t.co/cnJ0jwxPTh
@Remiyyah @Sadmethod You're also 19% super archaic hominid https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@TAWolf79 @not_rekt_11 Actually not Neanderthal at all. They were the smart ones further north. These people have something different to varying degrees. https://t.co/T47DBU8Vfg
@introducingme06 @dreste8 @warriorman7 @OnlyFightsHQ Ha! Akshually, not human... https://t.co/PJEnI2THFh "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals... substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African pops"
Surfing the net - Discovered this journal article, “Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations” https://t.co/O1rfDmblrv https://t.co/wNvuGKEWHB
@dirk_fasshauer @messberger87 @ReimondHoffmann https://t.co/lUczouI0k2 5 Sekunden auf Google und ein Klick. Du schimpfst dich Wissenschaftler, aber schaffst es nicht, eine einfache Studie per Schlagwörter zu finden???
@jackmcnewt16 @not_rekt_11 Yup. https://t.co/PJEnI2THFh "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations."
@llanham69 @not_rekt_11 They're NOT people. https://t.co/PJEnI2THFh "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations."
• Source : Durvasula, A., & Sankararaman, S. (2020). Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations. Science advances, 6(7), eaax5097. https://t.co/NgiKQEYa8H
RT @LowStudies: @GarbageHuman24 https://t.co/qy1FYOZBaz
@GarbageHuman24 https://t.co/qy1FYOZBaz
@HuWhiteDeath @Anubis8750 @B1TuckerCarlson The burden of evidence is on the one making the argument, but seeing as you're white meaning your nature is disingenuous, I'll present evidence. https://t.co/vzfGydBk1n You're referencing a study that only uses 4 west African population samples.
@Zululam150045 @NoBrotherWars94 @Blackkout__ Technically your 19% super archaic hominid which means you're 19% less human. Which makes sense because if you're left to your own in Africa the best you can come up with is mud huts and sticks. https://t.co/uAKbsGdIDC
@goatstatus2312 @racistnature Still aren't https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African pops."
@eumesmin @not_rekt_11 Correct. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "...derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African[s]"
@Evil_Maxxer @alfa3141592653 @beenfakee @kaido5556 @Narmer_X @nianello6 @ManciSiya @KeMeT_roots @jamessh00293570 @m_fma @MrMisr1 @MelaninExtracts @Void_pilled @AskPerplexity @iyamyesyouareno @Belrock01 @Vic18246223 @Treday_90 @T_A_Activist @ProudlyHotep @IRLEgyptologis7 @Tonycmyk @Jerome_bagz @irregularcurve @WellnessCheck12 @PedosYt @BlackPa10086717 @ka64502876 @hhhhhhbbhhbbbb @grok @aigov_agent @Benny6696029227 @qyld1234 @grounded_in @kaido544 @graytown68100 @KingEzana77 @KushnerAvi @Fv07wX9IdQEjEwU @Woosey7945 @U740_2 @Tasdghj1 @kemetnubiakamp @AdherbalduRif @Mikey234 @JBCrpted @U780_2 @kaido "Confirmed to be very very archaic" the same original study estimates its age at 625,000 years, which would make it contemporary with the Neanderthal (whose estimates give it a similar age). You made up that "very, very archaic" thing. https://t.co/cqVSsDFvPR https://t.co/5DUuHocCeC
@skyzie101 @qsfkbwIhuWLhnjI They're not human. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "...derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations."
RT @gurujay12: @drkimthemm Also the content in the Data irrefutably disputes the notion that the ghost hominid was Homoerectus due to the…
@Sandstorm_XL @BlkVoltronRlded I'd rather be up to 2% Neanderthal then 19% Homo habilis. https://t.co/uAKbsGegta https://t.co/VefUxwPc1K
@Sandstorm_XL @BlkVoltronRlded Using a word that whites invented that perfectly describes you is not the AHA gotcha moment you think you have you guys have always been called that and will always be called that it is literally what you are. https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@Sandstorm_XL @BlkVoltronRlded Source: National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov) https://t.co/JbJb31E3RP
@Sandstorm_XL @BlkVoltronRlded https://t.co/WLoRrqFlRr
@Sandstorm_XL @BlkVoltronRlded Here you should read this https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@Albert_Baba @corruptkip @grok A modicum of intelligence or research from a kindergarten kid could of saved gou looking stupid again cuckbot https://t.co/k4T4SGPY1l
@Albert_Baba @corruptkip The weight of science The paper is on literally on science . Org That's a far right racist website now is it you lose again cuckbot https://t.co/k4T4SGPY1l Your the complete time wasting cuckbot coward street shitter
@Stephen56731790 @Albert_Baba @corruptkip The 2019 study "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" analyzes genetic data from West African groups (Yoruba, Mende, etc.). It finds 2-19% of their ancestry comes from an unknown archaic hominin that diverged before Neanderthals and modern
@WriterRomana @BabaMal2 @DOGE__news https://t.co/mFdEgADvO0
@KIMMYKREAMZ @a_a_narumi @qsfkbwIhuWLhnjI It doesn’t change the facts. Im European. English is one of few languages I can speak. I hope you know at least one… suahili? Yes, reading is fundamental but fantasy is not a history. You are not Alpha. Read then…https://t.co/oSX0OR4LeG We are not the same.
@HelCol2025 @Anc_Aesthetics You may b right, these aren't human. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals... substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African
Liberals don't take very kindly to the truth/facts. I'll just leave this here. https://t.co/ubvL7ffcen
@RealAlexJones Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations [19 percent archaic DNA not found in asians or caucasians] https://t.co/dnx9tPY3Bl
@Stephen19515917 @Tomhennessey69 @BAMAPERRY They're not Human. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African"
@BabyBillyVFL @AFDucklett @Tomhennessey69 True. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations."
@Kitler512 @Aliathewhite Well they are hominids but yeah they are not the same as us. Sub-Saharan African descendants share up to 19% admixture with an extinct hominid that other racial groups do not have. They are DIFFERENT. https://t.co/oefTozdJIr
@MisterCon37 @Bolothegreatone @RadioGenoa Not even really human. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals... substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations"
RT @Name03813069: @kisapon_mamoro Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (DNA) to an extinct archaic ho…
@robertsepehr @cnez1138 @WhiteHouse Before retards say it’s false. Here’s the study peer reviewed https://t.co/aURwxSLhDU
@libsoftiktok Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/dnx9tPY3Bl
@libsoftiktok Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations [19 percent archaic DNA not found in asians or caucasians] ' https://t.co/dnx9tPY3Bl
@E430Merc @robertsepehr @ImMeme0 Literally Science. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "populations derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals... substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African pops"
@DiasSamael @Nicidion @BtcChicoFatal Sim, consigo ler. As fontes no rodapé da imagem são: 1. "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations." Science Advances. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5097. 2. "Modern Humans May Have More Neanderthal Than Previously Thought." PubMed. 3. "Archaic hominin
@MargoKn30790689 @Donsz777 @_creep_lord I'd rather be up to 2% neanderthal then 19% Homo habilis . https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
@MargoKn30790689 @Donsz777 @_creep_lord https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
RT @TRM_OU812: @BruceLeeVegas00 @fredrick_2006 @ChristinaPushaw Not. Human. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "these populations derive 2 to 19% o…
@BruceLeeVegas00 @fredrick_2006 @ChristinaPushaw Not. Human. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "these populations derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African pops."
@Vixliss @CEgerius888 @dntBaHeathen @FixatedonBlkppl @grok 3. Once Homo Sapiens left, those who stayed, then interbred w/archaic form of human. This produced the current sub-saharan admixture found in blacks today but not in the Eurasian populations. Science Advances (DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5097) by Durvasula and Sankararaman (2020)
@GEstrella55555 @PrisonPlanet They're not human. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "these populations derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals... substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of...West African pops."
RT @Name03813069: @kisapon_mamoro Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (DNA) to an extinct archaic ho…
@kisapon_mamoro Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (DNA) to an extinct archaic hominin species (Homo Erectus or Homo Habilis) that is NOT found in the DNA of present-day Asians or Caucasians. Is this a risk Japan wants to take? https://t.co/xbQ9q3bMcl
@feenfoetae @grok @crackerest @GokuBlack187187 @Scott541022 @B1TuckerCarlson 19% super archaic hominid is 19% not human I don't care how much AI wants to coddle you. https://t.co/uAKbsGdIDC
@KirkegaardEmil Not human. https://t.co/PJEnI2THFh "these populations derive 2-19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals ... substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African pops."
@CHAMPABAY93 @Drepac97 @chaotichermes What are you doing your whole platform is dedicated to defending that pdf. its like you calling white ppl Neanderthals when you have 19% hominin dna lol. https://t.co/x10YlM60oM
@KingArthurWs @iamaethelwulf @dystopiangf That’s where your wrong, its been more the 200’000 years Thé out of Africa theory is completely wrong, more evidence coming out for that now Not only that but it wasn’t simply a common ancestor branching from, they mixed with other hominoid species https://t.co/W0SpxYp25h
RT @Anon__anon5: @martinez_clips https://t.co/W0SpxYp25h This one is always useful, really makes the point, the fact we only found this in…
@martinez_clips https://t.co/W0SpxYp25h This one is always useful, really makes the point, the fact we only found this in 2020 aswell alludes to it being just the tip of the ice berg aswell
@TranPhatHuy4 @TaraBull808 @AnthonyCumia Yes, the claim in that image is broadly supported by scientific research—though with some important nuance.
@NNVActiveClub @chaotichermes https://t.co/4oTdgQi3k8 since grok is being lazy
@albieamankona Yeye, wakanda. Check this out: https://t.co/5oxBZHSibD https://t.co/jxhDz3Mg85
@CremeDeLaLeem @VoidSignalX @ObviousRises Sure, here you go: https://t.co/wCIHr1D37q
@Nikkkeo @robertsepehr @KeithWoodsYT Ha! https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations."
@JchienColdAsIce @shitcoinlord @washghost1 Your ignorance on this topic is astounding. I’m not talking about Neanderthal DNA, genius. Literal Non-human DNA… and (perhaps unsurprisingly) it’s only found in sub-saharan blacks, which may account partially for your lack of intellectual development . https://t.co/9NdUEmN8ig
@StephenCMeyer Now try this on... https://t.co/PJEnI2THFh "these populations derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of...African populations."
@evanstravers @DidacticaStar @Omnifarious0 @Oregonian https://t.co/ppeubSiGBx "Our analyses of site frequency spectra indicate that these populations derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans."
@Lactoseordeath Данные недооценённые, только эректусы и хабилисы - это догадка. В исследовании нет чётких выводов, кто это конкретно был. https://t.co/SAhtsIcuMe
@plantbasedb https://t.co/W0SpxYp25h
@UltraMagaFunk @Aliathewhite @MrBeast They're not full human. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations." 19%!
@B98491Baker @grok @ChiefTrumpster Geneticists do https://t.co/5dE10H9EH2 https://t.co/ANHBiV90jI
@ChampagneWZRD @9mm_smg Correct. https://t.co/PJEnI2UfuP "populations derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals...substantial contribution of archaic ancestry in shaping the gene pool of present-day West African populations."
@juandia07842974 @WarlordTomII @ka64502876 @Belrock01 @nianello6 @jamessh00293570 @Tonycmyk @AskPerplexity @Meretseger99420 @Jerome_bagz @Void_pilled @MrMisr1 @irregularcurve @alfa3141592653 @KeMeT_roots @WellnessCheck12 @PedosYt @BlackPa10086717 @kaido5556 @hhhhhhbbhhbbbb @grok @aigov_agent @Vic18246223 @Benny6696029227 @qyld1234 @grounded_in @MelaninExtracts @kaido544 @graytown68100 @KingEzana77 @KushnerAvi @Fv07wX9IdQEjEwU @Woosey7945 @U740_2 @Tasdghj1 @kemetnubiakamp @AdherbalduRif @Mikey234 @JBCrpted @U780_2 @crypto_drm @iamfozzy27 @DOmowale Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations - PMC https://t.co/Jvvj2gYqLW That's the study, feel free to publish your country evidence
@The_Dogz_Bollox @Russell117C @PWestoff https://t.co/BLt8HL3aBl
@Jogdon1500 @hyperliberalism @gen0m1cs @jeremykauffman See: https://t.co/mCDlgDKpad
@keyglocklover10 @uncleHsTopGuy Since you're not smart enough to read or understand what's in this article I suggest using AI to read it for you and tell you what it's about https://t.co/uAKbsGegta
RT @NorthmanKnox: @NatCon2022 I believe this is the paper the data comes from. https://t.co/jvzkPbC0Av
@WomanDefiner Here's the paper that the data comes from. https://t.co/jvzkPbC0Av
RT @253Tacoma21: @keyglocklover10 @uncleHsTopGuy Actually 19% less human. https://t.co/uAKbsGdIDC
RT @NorthmanKnox: @NatCon2022 I believe this is the paper the data comes from. https://t.co/jvzkPbC0Av
@OptimusGael @nigraroma @DepotLyr @SinneNaDaoine The paper is "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" by Arun Durvasula and Sriram Sankararaman, published in Science Advances on February 12, 2020. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5097.
@LeonSparta78480 @e8nikistis https://t.co/jfsJb5okuE Λοιπον για να τελειωνουμε https://t.co/VEFHw3v0BK . https://t.co/fkpYPCDMxj . https://t.co/6tXgShfxuL
@yak_yak123 @Tresor_77 @didombaya Tu expliqueras les différences de taille de cortex préfrontal entre différentes races alors. Ah mais zut le politiquement correcte a interdit cette discipline en France
RT @RyanLikesCats81: @roguedunadan @TheOnlyDSC It’s crazy how a huge segment of the human population shares DNA with extinct monkeys but we…
RT @RyanLikesCats81: @roguedunadan @TheOnlyDSC It’s crazy how a huge segment of the human population shares DNA with extinct monkeys but we…
RT @RyanLikesCats81: @roguedunadan @TheOnlyDSC It’s crazy how a huge segment of the human population shares DNA with extinct monkeys but we…
@roguedunadan @TheOnlyDSC It’s crazy how a huge segment of the human population shares DNA with extinct monkeys but we’re not allowed to talk about it. https://t.co/2o2cyHUZK2 Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations | Science Advances
@leonardaisfunE @RealChrisLangan @lporiginalg "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations"
@BioAdriAl @aretiom @rzavala797 @GGalvec @SpaceFrogFr3n https://t.co/X03rc25QgM https://t.co/3VgD2XLuyN
@HandyLummpy @sergio75035352 @NWLADD @MBGAkernow @dave43law “Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations” by Arun Durvasula and Sriram Sankararaman, published in Science Advances on February 12, 2020 It was widely reported. Up to 19% from an unknown archaic hominin. Since it’s true, your reaction seems
@wats40800 @ThorDKidd___ @hoodfarquaad You’re still illiterate and the evidence that they possess non-homo sapien hominid admixture is confirmed. Africans are actually the least homo sapien humans; with the MOST non-sapien admixture. https://t.co/DuU2W6fflu
@Maqitzara 2. "... the ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans 360 thousand years (ka) to 1.02 million years (Ma) B.P. and subsequently introgressed into the ancestors of present-day Africans 0 to 124 ka B.P. contributing 2 to 19% of their ancestry." https://t.co/nrjyYUHDPQ
@Maqitzara @Phillip05166897 Si tu parles de celle là je vois pas où il est précisé « SOME » (peut-être qu’il y’a une autre publication) Mais ça répond pas à ma question du début comment on peut être certain de la véracité des propos de la capture d’écran https://t.co/57ocPfTpC0
@R_Chase84 @chunguslord432 @AsianDawn4 I don’t know why you’re bringing up an NPR rendition referencing his study but we are talking about facts from his literal study from Durvasala, A., & Sankararaman, S. (2020). “Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations. Science Advances, 6(7)
@chunguslord432 @R_Chase84 @AsianDawn4 Durvasula and Sankararaman (2020) Reference: Durvasula, A., & Sankararaman, S. (2020). "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations." Science Advances, 6(7), eaax5097. That is the same study with ADDITIONAL NOTES. YOU don’t understand that apparently
@robertsepehr @maximumpain333 ChatGPT: “A 2020 study in Science Advances (“Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations”) found hints of archaic admixture in African populations but only 2–5%, not 19%The Out-of-Africa model is well-supported by genetic evidence”. Explanation?
@Oryan_Marhmo123 @ColdForger0 @ThatsJackZ @GarbageHuman24 https://t.co/UjoV8mBSYv
@BlondeBigot11 @905hub_ The African literally bred back in with Apes. "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" Arun Durvasula1 and Sriram Sankararaman1,2,3,4,* Science Advances 12 Feb 2020: Vol. 6, no. 7, eaax5097 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5097
@ThinkArchimedes @TooWhiteToTweet "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" Arun Durvasula1 and Sriram Sankararaman1,2,3,4,* Science Advances 12 Feb 2020: Vol. 6, no. 7, eaax5097 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5097
@Sophie252264600 There is this scientific study: "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" Arun Durvasula1 and Sriram Sankararaman1,2,3,4,* Science Advances 12 Feb 2020: Vol. 6, no. 7, eaax5097 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5097
@NathanS31397389 @Est_gaming8 @Kenedhloger Hammer et al. (2011) - Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa. Durvasula & Sankararaman (2020) - Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations.
@lemmonnuts @Sonic_Specter @Xenonflare98 @FLSecessionist @arianaate8 @FeelYouHappy https://t.co/xpLm5GAUUc They arent even fully human.
@Cosmic_El @Joe__Bassey I'm not going to just connect all the dots for you. You have to actually read through it: Durvasula, A., & Sankararaman, S. (2020). Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations. Science Advances, 6(7), eaax5097. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5097. This study,
@HSRqh7506 @sklavenjagerX @elementgermani3 @Lunoul @esjesjesj Durvasula A, Sankararaman S. Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations. Sci Adv. 2020 Feb 12;6(7):eaax5097. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5097. PMID: 32095519; PMCID: PMC7015685.
@blcksunchld999 @SodaSpaz @nypost Published DNA study: "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" https://t.co/UY9iri32f2 science .org is racist now?
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations | Science Advances https://t.co/3wUe6dVRFR
@VitorDe1gado @marvious91_ @MLinceMorgado Eh eh eh, copiei. É, eles até publicaram em português o Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations - versão para tugas racistas. Mas como o Vítor nem o título leu, ficou-se pelo panfleto manhoso, nem percebeu que era sobre introgressão. Adeus!…
@Cuttingtorch @1790_Project @kelvin80085 @RealBrysonGray @Narmerite 1st replacement link: https://t.co/OD4ObavSno
@SoilManDan @HeethenHistory @DeDunkingPast @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @TheProjectUnity @BrightInsight6 @michaelshermer Dan's earlier videos were more open about racism within the Atlantis community, but to his credit he made this video recently about the white supremacism of Atlantis hunter Robert Sepehr. He was attacked repeatedly in the comments for raising the issue. https://t.co/fhTOvVn6Le
@bartsdiaz7 @beodude89 https://t.co/LGlgqpoRhK
@illfgndoitagain @saycheese2272 @BornBrew @SeeRacists How is having neanderthal DNA an insult? I don't care if we're a "mutation" or a Neanderthal descendant, our genes literally made us better in nearly every single way. And you can't talk about primitive monkeys https://t.co/cPWgH42GlV https://t.co/xzSDyk7Ien
@natterlyk I think he's more liberal than he lets on. https://t.co/YUAw97fmEr
@MyX149 @SoilManDan Dan himself made a video calling out white supremacism in the pseudo-archaeology community. He knows it's a problem. https://t.co/fhTOvVmyVG
@LovanoLipson @hashtag8410 @user187601 @z_z_zr1 @GarbageHuman24 Everything you don't like is biased and racist. Keep deflecting, I have studies for days. Try to reply with actual genetic/biological studies instead of your sociological arguments https://t.co/cPWgH428wn https://t.co/RsZbJ4AGvo https://t.co/d8FqxRY5rC https://t.co/oaa3J8XWKg https://t.co/13lYEo1Qex
Giving 20 minutes of my time with 100% attention so I can hear where @DeDunkingPast is coming from and where @robertsepehr is lacking on information. https://t.co/Lv8o8yfyv4 I am trying to get as close to the truth as I can - name calling and being negative isn’t my true nature
@DeDunkingPast Started your video at 13:08 with Robert in it. Wearing those boots but with black Shoe strings. IE: Robert trolled you. https://t.co/atiU1GgJqF I'm very much against group think. I don't like him trolling you using Group think. Though you started it with your none sense
RT @DeDunkingPast: OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to…
Robert Sepehr: Atlantis Hunter, PseudoAnthropologist, and... https://t.co/6PLqyFdxMj Izvor: @YouTube
RT @DeDunkingPast: OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to…
RT @DeDunkingPast: OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to…
RT @DeDunkingPast: OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to…
RT @DeDunkingPast: OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to…
RT @DeDunkingPast: OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to…
Robert Sepehr: Atlantis Hunter, PseudoAnthropologist, and... https://t.co/LB4QIEIlwC via @YouTube
Robert Sepehr: Atlantis Hunter, PseudoAnthropologist, and... https://t.co/0x0UsaMBf1 a través de @YouTube
RT @DeDunkingPast: OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to…
RT @DeDunkingPast: OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to…
RT @DeDunkingPast: OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to…
RT @DeDunkingPast: OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to…
RT @DeDunkingPast: OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to…
OK, it's almost time. Just over an hour from now, at 9:15 PM Pacific Time, my video on Robert Sepehr goes live. Sure to ruffle the feathers of some snowflakes! I'll be in the chat, come yell at me! https://t.co/qljZ8BmcmU https://t.co/vzDl9k08Tc
@Perikakikaa @plantilladepou @__Webardos__ Osea que no somos genéticamente iguales. Que las diferencias genéticas entre razas sean mínimas no quiere decir que no tengan ningún efecto. https://t.co/exXazG4wl7 https://t.co/uJ0V8Wn2C5 https://t.co/cPWgH428wn https://t.co/Dk8uwABLka
@Storm_dragon888 @exRheturn Doesn’t understand the difference between introgression and total genomic difference/ genomic scale. Durvasula, A, Sankararaman S. 2020. Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations. Science Advances 6(7) eaax5097. https://t.co/DDOei0UnEt
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations | Science Advances https://t.co/f9S0GfONU3
@Yassine_Staali @JotaInu @Alpha_IQ @PPC4Liberty According to a 2020 study, ‘Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations’ by Durvasula and Sankararaman, Sub-Saharan Africans (i.e. West Africans or ‘Black people’) derive up to 19% of their DNA from an unknown, extinct hominin species. https://t.co/Lpk6VeVelv
@Trad_Lives The actual scientific study
@pastoraldoleon https://t.co/LHtABsZOUa https://t.co/bWHIwbEMIE These are both worth looking at genetics are real and a factor, not the most important but a factor
@KeithWoodsYT You are cherrypicking nad leaving out vital information. Han Chinese in Beijing and Utah residents with northern and western European ancestry also have this "ghost DNA". Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations | Science Advances
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations. Feb 12, 2020 https://t.co/hJkYNyNftN #Africa #Rhodesia #Zimbabue #Hayty #blacks #DNA #Neanderthals #Nelson #Mandela #David #Rockefeller #Ottoman #Empire #ottomanEmpire #slavery #whites #europeans https://t.co/cjRh2J5XRp
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations. Feb 12, 2020 https://t.co/hJkYNyNftN https://t.co/ILZWXpYIrH #Africa #Rhodesia #Zimbabue #Hayty #blacks #Nelson #Mandela #David #Rockefeller #Ottoman #Empire #ottomanEmpire #slavery #whites #europeans https://t.co/9svP4SrsSD
@jongdoe14145771 @Far_Seeker @robertsepehr @HarmlessYardDog You’re not smart enough to look it up for yourself but you’re able to read a scientific paper? https://t.co/EovaZUgU3T
@GatewayProjectC @Hhfcgyhvbbjklj @inovajon https://t.co/bWHIwbEMIE
@MulletEgg @mel_goyson @KequeMage Ad hominem spotted. I thought you were smart to not fall into that trap. Again read the Study and come back. Here is the link https://t.co/cbfOw8LuiT Happy reading and I hope you find the peace your are seeking. I cannot help you on that front.
@ssj3emyia @BIPOCracism No. You got it backwards. Your screenshots, that you failed to cite, come from a 2011 paper, “Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa” (Hammer, Werner, et al.). “Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations” is from 2020.
@MarkDahler @Magaman85 @GarbageHuman23 You're referring to "Recovering Signals of Ghost Archaic Introgression in African Populations," which states the following: "On average, ≃6.6 and ≃7.0% of the genome sequences in YRI [Yoruba] and MSL [Mende] were labeled as putatively archaic in ancestry."
Pseudo Caucasian wannabes and Depigmented Euros mutants in common ? Both are extremely low intelligence & their racism is a disorders form the brains Sources: Durvasula, Arun; Sankararaman, Sriram (2020). "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" https://t.co/BPfyZfN8lr https://t.co/JR79XdqFcq
RT @AlannuhG: @EricTropicalTX @Phillip05166897 @shi_huang5 Y'all highly unintelligent Source: Durvasula, Arun; Sankararaman, Sriram (2020…
@EricTropicalTX @Phillip05166897 @shi_huang5 Y'all highly unintelligent Source: Durvasula, Arun; Sankararaman, Sriram (2020). "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" https://t.co/MFThBgEbz2
@dejardinant @BatterfishBlog @warner_yak84627 @NotEvolution1 @KingJamesTomato https://t.co/gLPbj0cwrk we have on average 1% neanderthal dna and this is a better example of a similar cross breeding
@RikRoy23 @RadioGenoa https://t.co/SDb23lQgZ6
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations | Science Advances https://t.co/Dd6HFchgS0 https://t.co/Pb20sjt9ws
Sources: Arun Durvasula; Sriram Sankararaman (2020). "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" and Bergström, A; McCarthy, S; Hui, R; Almarri, M; Ayub, Q (2020). "Insights into human genetic variation and population history from 929 diverse genome https://t.co/n14fzhpF2m
Durvasula and Sankararaman in 'Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations.' Sci Adv 6, eeax5097 (2020) demonstrated that the Yoruba evolved from a basal lineage, a unique hominid, that was neither Neanderthal nor Denisovan; begun 1 million years ago.
RT @thetr1bal1st: Sub-Saharan Africans derive up to 19% of their ancestry from an unknown, extinct hominin species not found in Eurasian…
Sub-Saharan Africans derive up to 19% of their ancestry from an unknown, extinct hominin species not found in Eurasian populations https://t.co/CIaRHQ908B
@1989nicolas @MartinGfms @saitankusuru @jeanCule123 Toujours bon de rappeler qu’entre 2 et 19% du génome subsaharien provient d’une souche humaine archaïque inconnue. Ce qui remet d'ailleurs en cause la théorie qui avance qu'on viendrait tous d'Afrique, on est certainement pas "tous les mêmes" Source
Culotté sachant que https://t.co/LOt81VDgTT https://t.co/Cj0IYQEB99
@WarriorMonk777 @ElijahSchaffer https://t.co/Roy1uOwxK1
@lporiginalg https://t.co/SCGgFuqps8
This study concluded in part that current populations in sub Saharan Africa include DNA from an unknown archaic human ancestor, not found in Eurasian populations. 1/2 https://t.co/ZxRnXu6Z4S
@smithy10121 @virtualplayon @detectclips Yes, from an archaic human group (see: Durvasula A, Sankararaman S. Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations. Sci Adv. 2020 Feb 12;6(7):eaax5097. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5097. PMID: 32095519; PMCID: PMC7015685).
@putridfurball46 @ApollonianGerm https://t.co/mhDkn4TbuJ
@livelaughcoom @LucioMM1 @Antetempo @ultimora_pol leggilo tu l'inglese https://t.co/BLCENYZCHA
RT @arya_amsha: @Bhaktirassagar Thats not true, Africans actually have the most admixture with a ghost non-homo sapien sapien lineage. Upto…
RT @arya_amsha: @Bhaktirassagar Thats not true, Africans actually have the most admixture with a ghost non-homo sapien sapien lineage. Upto…
@Bhaktirassagar Thats not true, Africans actually have the most admixture with a ghost non-homo sapien sapien lineage. Upto 20% of their DNA can be non-sapien. https://t.co/zzbZvcli2B.
RT @moaikun9: Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/5x0BugLNjq
Here the error you made that's west Africans Also Eurasian do have it But here the source: Arun Durvasula; Sriram Sankararaman (2020). "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" https://t.co/WLHEuCeT2g https://t.co/aWcGqoX2fC
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/5x0BugLNjq
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/uGDE4ZoHNO
Recovering Signals of ghost archaic Introgression in African Populations via /r/Africa https://t.co/gEIpvlJfnD
RT @DWindsorAndMe: TRUTH IS: We "really" are not the same, different DNA Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African popu…
TRUTH IS: We "really" are not the same, different DNA Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/QgWjPgWZL2
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations, Dr. Arun Durvasula and Sriram Sankararaman https://t.co/ZgkSnC5AP3
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/GS8Ne6M6PL
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations published as: https://t.co/5RlqB8Lr4M @ScienceAdvances #biorxiv
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax5097
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/XDM3rq5vKl
@ElspethEastman Could be worse. Most West Africans have a much larger average admixture from a far more ancient hominim. https://t.co/hMW3tEMtee
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/H4f6vYTSjf
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/HesbCLqwSH
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/MfXQww16A3
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/H4f6vYCgUF
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations | Science Advances https://t.co/p8EEZfNCHX via @getongab
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/O6qBaFzcOB
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/CqfDyaz1q0
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/H4f6vYTSjf
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/6B9pR7GwYM
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/H4f6vYTSjf
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/EmmuLilZLl
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/H4f6vYTSjf
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/8OLbdld6Mg
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/H4f6vYTSjf
Find out about the contribution of archaic hominins to the genetic variation of present-day Africans. @CARTAUCSD VIDEO: Sriram Sankararaman, Recovering Signals of Ghost Archaic Introgression in African Populations https://t.co/RIj0UT0Hax https://t.co/VvdffOvocf
RT @CompMedUCLA: Congratulations to @sr_sankararaman @arundurvasula for their latest publication "Recovering signals of ghost archaic intro…
RT @CompMedUCLA: Congratulations to @sr_sankararaman @arundurvasula for their latest publication "Recovering signals of ghost archaic intro…
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations - Science Advances https://t.co/sQrPHB1x8w https://t.co/LToPS4egMO
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations. https://t.co/ew3IvuuiiD
"Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" by Arun Durvasula and Sriram Sankararaman https://t.co/D8vA3LHlSs https://t.co/CalzUe7g3i
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/T9bolYsgpl
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/ucgMA7nxxZ
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations | Science Advances https://t.co/tC1kqKiyRn #スマートニュース
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/n1wokUUdJY
Des traces (8%) d’ADN de 100 000 ans avant Néenderthal chez les Yoruba du
"Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" | https://t.co/DOsVdJBr1N #detox | https://t.co/7EWVgYzzmq
RT @CompMedUCLA: Congratulations to @sr_sankararaman @arundurvasula for their latest publication "Recovering signals of ghost archaic intro…
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/Egybsq4rYf
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/FA6v6yRjzG
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/WJeO8nqRTJ
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations | Science Advances https://t.co/2J1rPRWkru
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/4SRdof7LjD
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations | Science Advances https://t.co/nEKhvdTI9Z
Accede al artículo de forma gratuita aquí: Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations https://t.co/jZiKHUFAb5
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations - https://t.co/Jj8HiiZKzy
Original study, "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" by @arundurvasula and @sr_sankararaman published in @ScienceAdvances 6(7), 2020: https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/7/eaax5097