Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many posts cite the article's claims, such as the statement that masks outside healthcare facilities offer little protection. Phrases like 'They knew' and 'the truth' are used to express disbelief in the scientific consensus, with some users highlighting their dissatisfaction with responses from peers who dismiss this information. The choice of words, including terms like 'deceitful' and ‘captured politically,’ reflects a tone of outrage and distrust, underscoring the overall skeptical sentiment towards the article and its implications.
Many discussions reflect a strong skepticism about the article's conclusions, suggesting disagreement with its findings or implications regarding mask efficacy.
There's moderate interest in the topic, as evidenced by numerous references to the article, but many posts reflect a dismissive tone.
Some users exhibit engagement by sharing personal anecdotes and references to other studies, but many posts also lean towards simplistic affirmations of previously stated opinions.
The perceived impact is negligible, as discussions imply that the findings may not influence opinions or behaviors significantly, suggesting a sense of resignation to entrenched views.
Yet another article from May 2020 published by NEJM states the following: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era “A mask alone will not prevent health care workers with early Covid-19 from contaminating their hands and spreading the virus to patients and colleagues. https://t.co/QnIQKVsA7t
They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq https://t.co/hC6wFQDNqJ
@RadioFreeTom Masks are useless: https://t.co/x6tNhnAe6M https://t.co/cstpba4Uk9 https://t.co/nT0iSWhC9w
This article in the NEJM is from May 21......of 2020 dude!!!! Masks mandates from politicians and Bill Nye blowing candles aren’t “science”. “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.” https://t.co/nLr54F7q3V
@PappaSciarappa https://t.co/6jExLPCxIx
Second study: (PMID 32237672). The quoted text here is a misrepresentation of the authors' actual conclusions. Take a look at the paper itself if you're curious here: https://t.co/1ZXour6qr7 (6/?)
This video discusses a recent cluster randomised trial comparing cloth masks to medical masks among healthcare workers. It highlights significant findings regarding the increased risks associated with cloth masks…
Universal masking in hospitals became crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce virus transmission among patients and healthcare workers. This video discusses the effectiveness and public health implications of…
Universal masking in hospitals became crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce virus transmission among patients and healthcare workers. This video discusses its importance in protecting vulnerable populations and…
@stillgray They reject science and believe superstition. https://t.co/6jExLPD5y5
RT @JoshWalkos: Yet another article from May 2020 published by NEJM states the following: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 E…
@denisrancourt At the very beginning, I sent >this< to everyone I knew. Virtually everyone dismissed it entirely, went in line with TV pundits and conscription programs. Para 3 - they spell to out among peers. *it did not / does not matter. THANK YOU Denis! https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
RT @LifeINthe180: They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
They know. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq https://t.co/hC6wFQDNqJ
@SoniaPoulton I sent this to "everyone" I knew, literally no one comment or shared it. Download and save it. Several versions have supplant it. THEY KNEW, it was all a crock. https://t.co/GwcEJvscBY
RT @LifeINthe180: @toobaffled https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
@r_hirschman We stopped talking early on, pretty much after I sent her (everyone I know) this document. We don't even talk about "the practices" of early stage child "care". https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
@toobaffled https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
@sanity4sweden I sent this article (among peers) to everyone I knew. Very few even acknowledged it. This is one document she specifically mentions. Para 3, spells it out. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq
@toobaffled The discussion among peers at the front end of CV1984 https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq bookmark, download, archive and share. They knew.
Epic, bound to upset half of the people. May wake up a few in the process. The truth about them https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq https://t.co/aN7RDqSy12
RT @LifeINthe180: @iluminatibot The READERS NOTE IS BALATANTLY WRONG - misleading https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq *save this document. They admit…
RT @LifeINthe180: @iluminatibot The READERS NOTE IS BALATANTLY WRONG - misleading https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq *save this document. They admit…
I shared this document early on in the madness. The truth shared among peers. https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq they admit they do not work. are pointless?
@iluminatibot The READERS NOTE IS BALATANTLY WRONG - misleading https://t.co/GwcEJvrEMq *save this document. They admit the truth among peers. THE LYING DOES NOT STOP!
RT @TheMFingCOO: From the New England Journal of Medicine: "wearing a mask outside heath care facilities offers little, if any, protection…
@chadvital @daddyfreds @BlandWalt @spo5134296 @elonmusk @alx @bennyjohnson Here’s the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine. ‘You know how Dr. Fauci said on the 28th that wearing masks are mostly symbolic and their real purpose is to make people feel better’ But this may be easier for you to innerstand: Baaa Baaa Baaa https://t.co/Zr2VNyYxtI
@PappaSciarappa https://t.co/6jExLPCxIx
@NoyauPeche Ces dispositifs médicaux à l'usage des praticiens de santé des blocs opératoires ne devraient JAMAIS sortir de ce sanctuaire. A défaut, ils deviennent des objets de soumission, des talismans. https://t.co/phfgxz0l9s
RT @ReluctantlyE: @OffGuardian0 Do MASKS work? 2019 WHO https://t.co/tSVYCace3D 2020 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE https://t.co/78Y6MXb…
@OffGuardian0 Do MASKS work? 2019 WHO https://t.co/tSVYCace3D 2020 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE https://t.co/78Y6MXbhrH 2020 CDC: https://t.co/16cjEjfx2v 2022 Cochrane Report: https://t.co/5RN8H61ky1 2023 NIH https://t.co/Kwrv2N2amg https://t.co/aciHAti1wR
I am against mandates but in a clinical setting is one area they have shown some efficacy (did not get the Vax) https://t.co/66sQ1aM0Vs https://t.co/1DUD96iPGq
https://t.co/yYKccdVnSz
@patrickmadrid Ultimately they’ve swallowed the message that masks will help prevent death. To me, I see a person afraid of dying. It’s too bad. https://t.co/6jExLPD5y5
RT @Elle_Eff247: “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection...In many cas…
ぱっと見た感じ、 例えば Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era については、 コロナ陽性患者の世話をする医療従事者に関しては、マスクのみではダメで、手指衛生、アイマスク、その他のPPEをしっかりせんと意味ないで、 という趣旨の論文が紛れてます。 171個だかの論文は読まんけど、 https://t.co/CcI2BmJJYq
@cjdeas10 @donna_dishman @ScottJenningsKY @CNN The purpose? “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.” https://t.co/nT0iSWhC9w
@snacklesbian Masks wouldn't help anyways. https://t.co/lkDLbrmh3n
@n_e_rd @nycHealthy I’ve always liked this one too: “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection… In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.” https://t.co/nT0iSWhC9w
@controlhammer fOlLoW tHe ScIeNcE! Actually this is what the real science says: https://t.co/nT0iSWh4jY
@ChevretteElise @Jpbeauch @natel1826 Ça donne rien d'en discuter? Très drole, vous avez peur d'être contredite, parce que vous êtes dans le déni et vous avez de besoin de croire qu'on a pas fait ça pour rien, qu'on a pas été trompé https://t.co/zXsjsRYjDH https://t.co/Pgjaj89dJN
@RitaPanahi Do MASKS work? 2019 WHO https://t.co/tSVYCace3D 2020 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE https://t.co/78Y6MXbhrH 2020 CDC: https://t.co/16cjEjfx2v 2022 Cochrane Report: https://t.co/5RN8H61ky1 2023 NIH https://t.co/Kwrv2N2amg https://t.co/3Y48UZmr9v
RT @ReluctantlyE: @FatEmperor Do MASKS work? 2019 WHO https://t.co/tSVYCace3D 2020 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE https://t.co/78Y6MXbhr…
@FatEmperor Do MASKS work? 2019 WHO https://t.co/tSVYCace3D 2020 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE https://t.co/78Y6MXbhrH 2020 CDC: https://t.co/16cjEjfx2v 2022 Cochrane Report: https://t.co/5RN8H61ky1 2023 NIH https://t.co/Kwrv2N2amg
@finn_oluna @peamilkstan https://t.co/HWHl4qVCHB. https://t.co/AtOLM4TSaa https://t.co/p7lE6Zctel
@BulletWilliam_ @catorano @CDCDirector @CommunityNotes Ummm ok crazy guy https://t.co/oOVWbuyjKC
@DefiyantlyFree Do MASKS work? 2019 WHO https://t.co/tSVYCace3D 2020 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE https://t.co/78Y6MXbhrH 2020 CDC: https://t.co/16cjEjfx2v 2022 Cochrane Report: https://t.co/5RN8H61ky1 2023 NIH https://t.co/Kwrv2N2amg https://t.co/QzabmwGuar
RT @rubiaconceptual: Un artículo de mayo de 2020 de investigadores de la Facultad de Medicina de Harvard , publicado en el New England Jour…
@blueshiftmusic @Janetb172 @kylenabecker @elonmusk Another study Concludes: “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." https://t.co/BQF0itlisD
@hawaii_lei81611 @Ilona66173996 @MoralityPLS @PJLaven0809 @ABDanielleSmith Nope, not reliable science at all, and before mars 2020, there was a consensus about the fact that mask against respiratory virus for the general population is useless and lockdown create more harm than good https://t.co/zXsjsRYjDH https://t.co/O2ZnF0MbnD
@HighWireTalk It is also clear that masks serve symbolic roles. Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals. https://t.co/lY16PKk9Ah
RT @JoshWalkos: Yet another article from May 2020 published by NEJM states the following: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 E…
@paulg https://t.co/PYbLV7BOWs https://t.co/hS4zKdEqRM https://t.co/2jlNcDNvzj https://t.co/KNfz1IwJpj https://t.co/SpBg5JDr4M https://t.co/sOWWNow4wa https://t.co/7W4QgssH07
@Telegraph Do MASKS work? 2019 WHO https://t.co/vtu17chg98 2020 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE https://t.co/JyZK6MiKhl 2020 CDC: https://t.co/5diapO0AJe 2022 Cochrane Report: https://t.co/RkYXgDKkbl 2023 NIH https://t.co/1FCuiec545 https://t.co/kujKgtKkmL
@AwhatsN @TheBreakdownAB Please. COVID is no ordinary respiratory virus. It's sad people like you are that dumb. It's .13 microns. Masks are useless. https://t.co/qjWgehwEvt https://t.co/M5LrrhL2Vd https://t.co/VmCjNa4a1o https://t.co/Cd4luEMuyB https://t.co/LL8RdzqXIJ
@scoobysnackums5 @LaindonFEMINIST @tobilisic "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. The chance of catching #Covid19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal." @NEJM *Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era May 21, 2020
@saganientho @fluidloading Il y avait aussi consensus sur l'impact du masque sur la population en général pour limiter la transmission de virus respiratoire, conclusion effet marginal, même si les masques étaient vraiment efficace, certains le sont un peu https://t.co/zXsjsRYRtf
@mortalken @baddestmamajama Good grief, don't be ridiculous. We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Wait, that sentence above should have quotes, because it's from the New England Journal of Medicine, FFS. https://t.co/yZJCmBb9Va
@EricNjiiru @ChrisChavez @LylesNoah Perhaps you missed this gem from the New England Journal of Medicine four YEARS ago: "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." https://t.co/yZJCmBaC5C
RT @DefyCCC: 10/ The common view expressed by scientists before #Masks became politicized, was: wearing masks outside healthcare settings…
@I_Rutitski @SenFettermanPA I did actually. YouTube terminated my channel after comparing the published papers with news headlines. They told me it was medical misinformation Like quoting NEJM say masks are a talisman https://t.co/noa7X1hr11 https://t.co/DMMOtrH3Is
@rmundell @JohnBeaudoinSr @Xeraphale @docwave @VigilantFox And here's one that says they don't work. We could go back and forth all night. Look at the ones pre-2020. We're not talking about droplets and spit with airborne viruses. Consider the exhale. https://t.co/ZSkSscC9hM
@ejustin46 Do MASKS work? 2019 WHO https://t.co/tSVYCace3D 2020 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE https://t.co/78Y6MXbhrH 2020 CDC: https://t.co/16cjEjfx2v 2022 Cochrane Report: https://t.co/5RN8H61ky1 2023 NIH https://t.co/Kwrv2N2amg https://t.co/i10CVjeznY
RT @ReluctantlyE: @wideawake_media Do MASKS work? 2019 WHO https://t.co/tSVYCace3D 2020 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE https://t.co/78Y6…
@wideawake_media Do MASKS work? 2019 WHO https://t.co/tSVYCace3D 2020 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE https://t.co/78Y6MXbhrH 2020 CDC: https://t.co/16cjEjfx2v 2022 Cochrane Report: https://t.co/5RN8H61ky1 2023 NIH https://t.co/Kwrv2N2amg https://t.co/CZDh6ZK1oY
RT @JoshWalkos: Yet another article from May 2020 published by NEJM states the following: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 E…
@libsoftiktok https://t.co/6iIP83xMNZ This is what Harvard Medical said in the highly respected journal based off research. Masks don’t matter.
@MatthewRyan1oh1 @AbbyNrgHealing @JeromeAdamsMD @TheLancet Mea culpa. IMO, who they're captured by is < important than recognizing & saying far and wide that they ARE. Also the @NEJM, who said this: "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." https://t.co/yZJCmBb9Va
@ReichNow @JeromeAdamsMD Before they were captured, and still had credibility, the @NEJM said THIS about universal masking, in April 2020: "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." https://t.co/yZJCmBaC5C
@SlySlepkava @cuthbertisfrog @ComicDaveSmith https://t.co/rhusZXPoPa "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection"
@PoeticCarla @GovKathyHochul This is the best you can do
@YouAreLobbyLud "...for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes)...In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic." ~ New England Journal of Medicine, April 2020 https://t.co/yZJCmBb9Va
RT @TrishtheDish_7: @RadioFreeTom Masks are useless: https://t.co/x6tNhnAe6M https://t.co/cstpba4Uk9 https://t.co/nT0iSWhC9w
@RadioFreeTom Masks are useless: https://t.co/x6tNhnAe6M https://t.co/cstpba4Uk9 https://t.co/nT0iSWhC9w
@HopeIsBrave Not to mention that the @NEJM said this about masks back in April 2020 (i.e. before they were captured politically and lost all credibility): "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." https://t.co/yZJCmBaC5C
@CovidDataReport "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." The @NEJM, April 2020, BEFORE they became captured politically and lost all credibility. https://t.co/yZJCmBaC5C
@JennaLuche "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." per the New England Journal of Medicine, April 2020, before they became captured by The Regime https://t.co/yZJCmBaC5C
@DEC0L0NIZE Maybe this will help: "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." ~ New England Journal of Medicine, April 2020, before it was captured by the political Left. https://t.co/yZJCmBaC5C https://t.co/bE3Xy4iI0b
@CatherineQ Well, the New England Journal of Medicine said this, WAY back in April 2020, before masks became politicized by folks like you: "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." https://t.co/yZJCmBaC5C
@TheChefsGardens Nope, look at the Links to the Studies, you Rèťàrd https://t.co/w9w78VqVVw https://t.co/m5AiDECTBs https://t.co/Tn7G25Kv5N https://t.co/X2jbongqEG https://t.co/wBoUy7Jnrw https://t.co/yaQEUvSKWl https://t.co/3U2JenAd6D https://t.co/7t2HquoFGY https://t.co/nofZ4Qxx9m
@dupuisj Not what the New England Journal of Medicine said, way back in April 2020, before it became a captured agency of the Left: "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." https://t.co/yZJCmBaC5C
https://t.co/cFtwCoSgrz https://t.co/M3aBfPat77
@karen_kelowna You sound anti science #DoNotComply https://t.co/VmCjNa4HQW https://t.co/yxDh1ETGQu https://t.co/8Zd75xXVgY https://t.co/P79X6WuGb2 https://t.co/FB1Yaa3Wcr
@perpetual_sisu Hero? How about anti-science paranoid delusional sociopath? Sorry, it isn't 2020 anymore. #DoNotComply https://t.co/VmCjNa4HQW https://t.co/yxDh1ETGQu https://t.co/8Zd75xXVgY https://t.co/P79X6WuGb2 https://t.co/FB1Yaa3Wcr
With all these delusion paranoids demanding we all wear face diapers, please consider the SCIENCE on the subject. Masks don't work. #DoNotComply https://t.co/VmCjNa4HQW https://t.co/Cd4luEN2o9 https://t.co/M5LrrhLAKL https://t.co/qjWgehxcl1 https://t.co/LL8Rdzrvyh
@hollystortholme Masking doesn't work. Stop being an anti-science asshole. https://t.co/VmCjNa4HQW https://t.co/Cd4luEN2o9 https://t.co/M5LrrhLAKL https://t.co/qjWgehxcl1 https://t.co/LL8Rdzrvyh
@aangisaliberal "us all" All 12 delusional paranoids. Trust the science dumbdumb https://t.co/VmCjNa4a1o https://t.co/Cd4luEMuyB https://t.co/M5LrrhL2Vd https://t.co/qjWgehwEvt https://t.co/LL8RdzqXIJ
@TMaritanoAquino @perpetual_sisu Sacrifice is one thing. Being an anti-science moron though.. https://t.co/VmCjNa4a1o https://t.co/Cd4luEMuyB https://t.co/M5LrrhL2Vd https://t.co/qjWgehwEvt https://t.co/LL8RdzqXIJ
@MarcusT86062424 @perpetual_sisu You can go to academia, lots of evidence masks don't work https://t.co/VmCjNa4a1o https://t.co/Cd4luEMuyB https://t.co/M5LrrhL2Vd https://t.co/qjWgehwEvt https://t.co/LL8RdzqXIJ
@perpetual_sisu How about intelligent? You don't trust science. https://t.co/VmCjNa4HQW https://t.co/Cd4luEN2o9 https://t.co/M5LrrhLAKL https://t.co/qjWgehxcl1 https://t.co/LL8Rdzrvyh
@Violet_Kitteee Why don't you trust the science? You did when they let them jab you repeatedly with experimental tech. https://t.co/VmCjNa4HQW https://t.co/Cd4luEN2o9 https://t.co/M5LrrhLAKL https://t.co/qjWgehxcl1 https://t.co/LL8Rdzrvyh
@LindseyMarie_xo You're alone because you don't trust science. You're paranoid and delusional. It's legitimately sad you were mentally broken in this manner. https://t.co/VmCjNa4HQW https://t.co/Cd4luEN2o9 https://t.co/M5LrrhLAKL https://t.co/qjWgehxcl1 https://t.co/LL8Rdzrvyh
@ItmustbeBunneez @GayFabFourFan More like anti-science fascists. https://t.co/VmCjNa4a1o https://t.co/Cd4luEMuyB https://t.co/M5LrrhL2Vd https://t.co/qjWgehwEvt https://t.co/LL8RdzqXIJ
@GayFabFourFan The delusion is your own. Trust the science. https://t.co/VmCjNa4a1o https://t.co/Cd4luEMuyB https://t.co/M5LrrhL2Vd https://t.co/qjWgehwEvt https://t.co/LL8RdzqXIJ
@TheChefsGardens https://t.co/Ls06SvoT2b
RT @Aquarius3_0: @sonia_elijah @jeffreyatucker @ClareCraigPath NEJM in 2020: "It is also clear that masks serve symbolic roles. Masks are n…
@sonia_elijah @jeffreyatucker @ClareCraigPath NEJM in 2020: "It is also clear that masks serve symbolic roles. Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety..." https://t.co/gELlVfJv8c
RT @JoshWalkos: Yet another article from May 2020 published by NEJM states the following: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 E…
RT @JoshWalkos: Yet another article from May 2020 published by NEJM states the following: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 E…
RT @JoshWalkos: Yet another article from May 2020 published by NEJM states the following: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 E…
RT @JoshWalkos: Yet another article from May 2020 published by NEJM states the following: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 E…
RT @JoshWalkos: Yet another article from May 2020 published by NEJM states the following: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 E…
@YouAreLobbyLud 2 stragglers. Don’t mask! It’s harmful. Don’t forget to look to the Cochran Review! Mask mandate and use efficacy in state-level COVID-19 containment https://t.co/2L4m8nFrVk Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era https://t.co/66qsAGy5E1
Yet another article from May 2020 published by NEJM states the following: Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era “A mask alone will not prevent health care workers with early Covid-19 from contaminating their hands and spreading the virus to patients and colleagues. https://t.co/QnIQKVsA7t
@YouAreLobbyLud https://t.co/qTpKtRJ6GZ https://t.co/fp26mYku7e https://t.co/XBhMbfdtWI https://t.co/Y5Hf8YMaGX https://t.co/WQZN1CeyAW https://t.co/ctah07GUHg https://t.co/45ihzKGcCj https://t.co/vcNGGj8QPQ https://t.co/zxwGR5a6LG
@WHOWPRO Why is it that deceitful people and organizations are perceived to be more credible when they accuse others of what they themselves are guilty of? Judge this… Masking is ineffective in preventing the acquisition or transmission of viruses. https://t.co/K7hhqmbSsU
@KurtSchlichter https://t.co/K7hhqmcqis
@Loricatty @khadastrophic The seventh is not a study but a commentary/opinion piece The eighth is not a study but a perspective/opinion piece https://t.co/V0LwueUker https://t.co/SBaFG1tIVB https://t.co/VgOZWt3sY0
@iphigeniamama Unbelievably, the following study was cited by the CDC and JAMA to justify public masking. Note what is not said in the Editor’s Note. The researchers were obviously coerced to back the narrative. CDC (opinion) > JAMA (opinion) > NEJM (facts) > https://t.co/K7hhqmbSsU
@LadyChuan @FetsKatze Masks are crucifixes for the blue church. https://t.co/K4mhwdw69U
@ERICSORENSEN @elonmusk @Tesla @UAW @chevrolet You don’t believe In science. You believe in leftists rhetoric. I challenge you to actually read the two reports cited by the CDC to justify mask wearing on its website and report back on the science. Need links? Here you go… https://t.co/K7hhqmbSsU https://t.co/BMrSLOvbnx
@theblackestlist @Li_cents_2_ill @MingoTango @TomMoroscoEsq @Haywood17110377 @cardsfan897 @Timcast *"We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.* https://t.co/jmMRiAtGyf
@WayneC0RP @polyphenus @Nerdrotics "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." *In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic." https://t.co/iNmWtkvhdX
@MacForest2 PMID:32237672 https://t.co/Wzf5yjWVCc "We understand that some people are citing our Perspective article (published on April 1 at https://t.co/LaOPr3LmJZ)1 as support for discrediting widespread masking. In truth, the intent of our article was to push for more masking, not less."
@dorstvlegel @elmarveerman @Ammer_B @NOS https://t.co/KDk7VyQgwO opvallend dat die link nou net niet werkte. Korte conclusie: Misschien het meest zinvol als wij de werkers in de zorg maskers dragen. Om onze patiënten te beschermen.
@enn_nafnlaus @dipshay17 @Robinthebank4 Alarmingly it now appears the data base is being censored and deleted.....now who would do such and why? Misleading people like yourself is the goal. https://t.co/TeTc8r5hW0
@rweingarten Masks harm children & protect nobody outside healthcare facilities. https://t.co/5gec7VLoHJ https://t.co/p1yCOv1fkX
RT @DefyCCC: 10/ The common view expressed by scientists before #Masks became politicized, was: wearing masks outside healthcare settings…
10/ The common view expressed by scientists before #Masks became politicized, was: wearing masks outside healthcare settings offers NO protection, or very little protection. https://t.co/5gec7VLoHJ
@NYMag https://t.co/5gec7VLoHJ
RT @LutherBurgsvik: NEJM May 2020. 'Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era' By Michael Klompas et al. https://t.co/iWNdjvrVcM
@TheImprogamer @GLADIAT61313349 https://t.co/6Lo7yZ8bIa
@TheImprogamer @GLADIAT61313349 -COVID-19: Mecanismos electrofisiológicos subyacentes a la muerte cardíaca súbita durante el ejercicio con mascarillas https://t.co/s1W2Te8m5I -Enmascaramiento universal en hospitales en la era Covid-19 https://t.co/b8k5AT6WqV
"Nous savons que de porter un masque en dehors des cliniques n'offre peu, sinon aucune, protection contre les infections." - New England Journal of Medecine (PMID: 32237672) https://t.co/pNyuRBzgAt https://t.co/SBefTu7gIZ
@SNS_Portugal @DGSaude @govpt "Sabemos que usar máscara fora das clínicas oferece pouca ou nenhuma proteção contra infecções." https://t.co/pNyuRBzgAt
https://t.co/9jFSzDha6g https://t.co/JMfMlcZ2SL https://t.co/R1cp1OwHMw
@TaoOfCats @FreckledLiberty I picked one at random from the graphic ( PMID: 32237672 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2006372 ) and it turned out to be an opinion article : https://t.co/5Pv9pJWlDQ Is there one with data and methods in it?
Universal Masking in Hospitals in the #COVID19 Era. *(Masks Need NOT Be Worn by Public Unless People Unable to Social Distance for "Sustained Periods" - >10-15 Minutes./Authors/Tom)* https://t.co/i9VKgMrIpZ
FYI Re: B.S. House Fines ($500+) for Being Maskless. "We Know that Wearing a Mask Outside Health Care Facilities Offers Little, If Any, Protection from Infection"! @SpeakerPelosi @DevinNunes @Jim_Jordan @tedcruz @HawleyMO https://t.co/Vu07rSgAUF
3/? PMID 32237672 The authors followed this article up with a letter to the editor where they reiterate their position which pushes for increased mask adoption. https://t.co/KsutTkFMni
@moonwolf_tt @CatzConspiracy @SciManDan 1. We understand that some people are citing our Perspective article (published on April 1 at https://t.co/rt5a4kdXZr)1 as support for discrediting widespread masking. In truth, the intent of our article was to push for more masking, not less. ... https://t.co/17Q8BIkjA8
see the facts. https://t.co/hIGS9b2h6J PMID:20092668 https://t.co/locT4AqzKv PMID:19216002 https://t.co/wYNlEeJSCx PMID:18500410 https://t.co/QJkC3hcYRY PMID:32237672 https://t.co/vFzIYftN5F PMID:25903751 https://t.co/RivzwwcbsP
@LAJoneser @BonnieBlueBell1 @charliekirk11 https://t.co/okrOagAPG4 I’d say peer reviewed scientific study is legit. Dumbass
@charliekirk11 https://t.co/okrOagAPG4
@BonnieBlueBell1 @charliekirk11 https://t.co/okrOagAPG4
@yachtclub101 @BecaHawaii @genesimmons https://t.co/3i18dLxtWm Yes this is fake. Forgot Iowa was in New England.
@LandeeMartin @imjdsharp @JoeBiden https://t.co/su1b8nTV6D The masks are ineffective outside of a Health Care environment when not paired with additional protective equipment. This is why we tell you to SOCIAL DISTANCE. This is why we tell you to wash your damn hands properly. 1/2
RT @LutherBurgsvik: NEJM May 2020. 'Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era' By Michael Klompas et al. https://t.co/iWNdjvrVcM
NEJM May 2020. 'Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era' By Michael Klompas et al. https://t.co/iWNdjvrVcM
CoronaVirus Intelligence Bits 'N Pieces - "We know ... Wearing a MASK 'outside health care facilities' offers little ( if any ) protection from infection. Public health 'authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19', as: F…https://t.co/L6BRBgqFpA https://t.co/sR8WCCPlkn
RT @LevanaLomma1: @HowardFried “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection…
RT @LevanaLomma1: @HowardFried “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection…
RT @LevanaLomma1: @HowardFried “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection…
RT @LevanaLomma1: @HowardFried “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection…
@HowardFried “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. ...The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal.” https://t.co/ObR5tUBv02
RT @AntonacciJoshua: @BlackSherrybl @AtWarWithWolf @GovernorTomWolf https://t.co/nUIBk4rWfB We know that wearing a mask outside health care…
@BlackSherrybl @AtWarWithWolf @GovernorTomWolf https://t.co/nUIBk4rWfB We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection. The chance of catching Cov from a passing interaction in public is minimal. In many cases the desire for widespread masking is due to to anxiety over the pandemic
@HinkyMinky @PDecoin @momotchiii https://t.co/XlkQPJFuge ‘We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.’ref de votre lien§1-(4) ->nemj 21mai2020
Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era (May 2020) https://t.co/JyUEU9urml
https://t.co/ndh7t5qx0C
I'm not sure how this will work but I'm going to try. Here is a list of medical journals that debunk wearing masks. Please read and use to be knowledgable PMID 18500410 https://t.co/2ZJbxPtuSD Article for that publication https://t.co/SPeWVrnvDj PMID 32232837 PMID 31289698
Second study: (PMID 32237672). The quoted text here is a misrepresentation of the authors' actual conclusions. Take a look at the paper itself if you're curious here: https://t.co/1ZXour6qr7 (6/?)
@binaryanalogue @TOPublicHealth https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.
@_Roobarb_ @SevenRaynier @ezralevant Here's a paper from the New England Journal of Machine that supports his "bizarre fake news assertion" https://t.co/w9WvS9dz8G https://t.co/b8bdArzOmD
@LionelMedia https://t.co/0z6lYncSzo https://t.co/epmEZ9TIsZ https://t.co/1MB1JhTwo8 https://t.co/l9Z5GiPBiD https://t.co/9CGvE425LV https://t.co/HkqGLfn8Tq https://t.co/gRuCF60Lrk https://t.co/b9mXub3y5c https://t.co/1fqgKNNhI0 https://t.co/9bRPcIXIjs
RT @AfgMurteza: @YorkRegion https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, i…
https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic. https://t.co/5aYKsxv0Qs
@YorkRegion https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic.
https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic. https://t.co/nJmpGjuYKc
@CTVNews https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic.
https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic. https://t.co/lGYUsx1kyy
@CBCNews https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic.
https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic. https://t.co/eNMdh6BbD5
@CTVNews https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic.
https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic. https://t.co/knNJ9rCMOW
@ncdhhs @DurhamHealthNC https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic.
https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic. https://t.co/DB1OWpgiCI
@regionofpeel https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz Excerpt: We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #Infection. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic.
RT @AfgMurteza: https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz From the article: -We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if an…
@TorontoStar Not in the public setting. It does little to nothing: |https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. "
Not in the public setting. It does little to nothing: |https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. "
https://t.co/XcltsOAfxz From the article: -We know that wearing a #mask outside #healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection from #infection. -In many cases, the desire for widespread #masking is a reflexive reaction to #anxiety over the #pandemic.
RT @markjarthur: This article in the NEJM is from May 21......of 2020 dude!!!! Masks mandates from politicians and Bill Nye blowing cand…
RT @markjarthur: This article in the NEJM is from May 21......of 2020 dude!!!! Masks mandates from politicians and Bill Nye blowing cand…
RT @markjarthur: This article in the NEJM is from May 21......of 2020 dude!!!! Masks mandates from politicians and Bill Nye blowing cand…
@doonce @nmeyersohn https://t.co/nLr54Fp1sv
@yikes69924319 @BorisJohnson Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era https://t.co/NXnY2boWPY
RT @markjarthur: This article in the NEJM is from May 21......of 2020 dude!!!! Masks mandates from politicians and Bill Nye blowing cand…
@yikes69924319 @nmeyersohn Here’s one of the full citations for you from the NEJM. “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.” https://t.co/nLr54Fp1sv
RT @markjarthur: This article in the NEJM is from May 21......of 2020 dude!!!! Masks mandates from politicians and Bill Nye blowing cand…
RT @markjarthur: This article in the NEJM is from May 21......of 2020 dude!!!! Masks mandates from politicians and Bill Nye blowing cand…
This article in the NEJM is from May 21......of 2020 dude!!!! Masks mandates from politicians and Bill Nye blowing candles aren’t “science”. “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.” https://t.co/nLr54F7q3V
The second one was referencing wearing masks outside, not inside, with that quote. This is also a quote:"There may be additional benefits to broad masking policies that extend beyond their technical contribution to reducing pathogen transmission." https://t.co/mfniVw7Qze
@174all @Cleavon_MD The second one was referencing wearing masks outside, not inside, with that quote. This is also a quote:"There may be additional benefits to broad masking policies that extend beyond their technical contribution to reducing pathogen transmission." https://t.co/mfniVw7Qze
@aravosis @AmericanAir https://t.co/0smC6T6Esj "We KNOW that wearing masks outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection."
@EricDJuly https://t.co/HuEtFC8ZOz
@NWezekana @DiamondandSilk https://t.co/cWfXjcw1kQ
@cakedoodle @greta @LiveScience We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection... In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic. https://t.co/cB7jffp6Ep
@jocogov @JOCOHealth @GovLauraKelly https://t.co/cB7jffp6Ep We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection... In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.
Link to full article https://t.co/nH8eO1Q9ij https://t.co/RvmutTm2ul
@Noles_AJ Far from settled Science... From the New England Journal of Medicine: "We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection" https://t.co/wyi3AF4gKy
RT @lulabelldesigns: https://t.co/WDWVdNc1Vt
https://t.co/WDWVdNc1Vt
RT @cardiofuture: #AvancesDeLaCiencia
#AvancesDeLaCiencia
Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era | NEJM https://t.co/orqTStZmwd
Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era | NEJM https://t.co/FsNuolqhHP
Interesting article: https://t.co/g1bEj7czbD (via @Mendeley_com)