BJOG August 2020 PMID 32324957

Effect of progestogen for women with threatened miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

L Li, Y Zhang, H Tan, Y Bai, F Fang, A Faramand, W Chong, Y Hai

Download social card

Mentions

14
Peak: 5 in Jun 2020
across 3 sources since Apr 2020

Extended reach

50,008
potential audience

Total likes

41

Video views

1,716

Mentions per month

Apr 2020 – Apr 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter10 posts
  • YouTube2 videos
  • Blogs2 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The collection shows a generally positive reaction to the article, highlighting its findings that progestogen therapy can improve pregnancy outcomes, as seen in comments referencing increased live birth rates. The tone varies from curiosity to support, with some confusion about the scope, reflecting a moderate level of engagement and perceived impact on clinical practices.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the positive findings of increased live birth rates and reduced miscarriage rates with progestogen use, indicating a general agreement with the publication.

InterestModerate interest

Participants show moderate interest, evident in references to meta-analyses and systematic reviews, but some confusion about the article's focus on preterm birth versus miscarriage reduces overall curiosity.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments include mentions of specific trial results, such as the number of trials analyzed and their implications, suggesting a decent level of engagement and critical consideration.

ImpactModerate impact

The discourse emphasizes the potential shift in clinical practice towards using progestogens for threatened miscarriage, indicating recognition of the article's possible significant influence.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
BJOG
@BJOGTweets · X

A meta‐analysis of 10 trials found that progestogens increased live birth rates and reduced miscarriage rates for women with threatened miscarriage. https://t.co/Qa73sznRx4

Jun 7, 2020 · 26 likes · 7 shares · 20,999 followers View post →
Thomas
@Thomas_SF44 · X

@10lunes @Tontonbouc1 Si je peux me permettre ça parle d'accouchement prématuré après 16SA et pas de fausse couche ? Atcd de FC et saignements en cours : bénéfice démontré mais très faible. (https://t.co/B0woWhnfFP) Idem FC menaçante : https://t.co/srhyGrUJQX

Mar 13, 2021 · 1 like · 2,726 followers View post →
Shawanda Renee Obey, MD
@ShawandaObey · X

Authors' reply re: Effect of progestogen for women with threatened miscarriage: a systematic review and meta‐analysis https://t.co/NquEQbyYCX

Jul 15, 2020 · 1 like · 12 followers View post →
Ayako Shibata@ウィメンズヘルス本発売中
@ayako700 · X

RT @BJOGTweets: A meta‐analysis of 10 trials found that progestogens increased live birth rates and reduced miscarriage rates for women wit…

Jun 7, 2020 · 7 shares · 12,642 followers View post →
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @tripdatabase: New2Trip: Effect of progestogen for women w/ threatened miscarriage: systematic review & meta-analysi https://t.co/vzeuZd…

Jul 31, 2020 · 1 share · 6,712 followers View post →
Trip Database
@tripdatabase · X

New2Trip: Effect of progestogen for women w/ threatened miscarriage: systematic review & meta-analysi https://t.co/vzeuZd9Uk8

Jul 31, 2020 · 1 share · 4,417 followers View post →

All mentions

Thomas
@Thomas_SF44 · X

@10lunes @Tontonbouc1 Si je peux me permettre ça parle d'accouchement prématuré après 16SA et pas de fausse couche ? Atcd de FC et saignements en cours : bénéfice démontré mais très faible. (https://t.co/B0woWhnfFP) Idem FC menaçante : https://t.co/srhyGrUJQX

Mar 13, 2021 · 1 like · 2,726 followers View post →
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @tripdatabase: New2Trip: Effect of progestogen for women w/ threatened miscarriage: systematic review & meta-analysi https://t.co/vzeuZd…

Jul 31, 2020 · 1 share · 6,712 followers View post →
Trip Database
@tripdatabase · X

New2Trip: Effect of progestogen for women w/ threatened miscarriage: systematic review & meta-analysi https://t.co/vzeuZd9Uk8

Jul 31, 2020 · 1 share · 4,417 followers View post →
Shawanda Renee Obey, MD
@ShawandaObey · X

Authors' reply re: Effect of progestogen for women with threatened miscarriage: a systematic review and meta‐analysis https://t.co/NquEQbyYCX

Jul 15, 2020 · 1 like · 12 followers View post →
shahina ishtiaq
@shanzahoor · X

RT @BJOGTweets: A meta‐analysis of 10 trials found that progestogens increased live birth rates and reduced miscarriage rates for women wit…

Jun 7, 2020 · 7 shares · 174 followers View post →
panos antsaklis
@panosants · X

RT @BJOGTweets: A meta‐analysis of 10 trials found that progestogens increased live birth rates and reduced miscarriage rates for women wit…

Jun 7, 2020 · 7 shares · 437 followers View post →
Dalia Khalife
@DaliaKhalife · X

RT @BJOGTweets: A meta‐analysis of 10 trials found that progestogens increased live birth rates and reduced miscarriage rates for women wit…

Jun 7, 2020 · 7 shares · 88 followers View post →
Ayako Shibata@ウィメンズヘルス本発売中
@ayako700 · X

RT @BJOGTweets: A meta‐analysis of 10 trials found that progestogens increased live birth rates and reduced miscarriage rates for women wit…

Jun 7, 2020 · 7 shares · 12,642 followers View post →
BJOG
@BJOGTweets · X

A meta‐analysis of 10 trials found that progestogens increased live birth rates and reduced miscarriage rates for women with threatened miscarriage. https://t.co/Qa73sznRx4

Jun 7, 2020 · 26 likes · 7 shares · 20,999 followers View post →
Shawanda Renee Obey, MD
@ShawandaObey · X

Effect of progestogen for women with threatened miscarriage: a systematic review and meta‐analysis https://t.co/td98no8itO

Apr 26, 2020 · 12 followers View post →