Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions frequently highlight the robust evidence from the randomized trial that tweeting research boosts citations, with phrases like 'significantly increases' and 'powerful proof,' reflecting strong agreement and high engagement. The tone underscores a consensus that social media plays a crucial role in elevating scientific visibility and impact, exemplified by users sharing data, calling researchers to action, and emphasizing the long-term benefits for scholarly reach.
Most discussions strongly support the findings that tweeting can increase citations, with many posts citing the randomized trial as proof, using affirming language like 'definitely,' 'significantly,' and 'proves.'
Participants display high curiosity about the implications, with numerous mentions of how social media boosts visibility and impact, indicating active engagement with the topic.
Many respondents share personal insights, comment on the study’s methodology, and suggest practical applications, demonstrating deep involvement and critical thinking.
The widespread sharing, referencing of specific data, and calls for researchers to actively promote their work suggest the discussions recognize the significant influence of social media on scholarly impact.
Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the #TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial from @JessicaLuc1 et al: https://t.co/GEMNiRC6dy #VisualAbstract #AnnalsImages @archerm2 @TheRakeshArora @ebender001 @ArieBlitzMD @DavidCookeMD @tamaranihici @biniamkidaneMD https://t.co/nrpySp1aFY
Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an RCT, the pinnacle of evidence based science, that confirms it
What happens when you #tweet about your science? Prospective trial shows “tweeting results in significantly more article citations over time, highlighting the durable scholarly impact of social media activity” ✅ https://t.co/PP7oTzdaxT Also in #MPJ & @ASTRO_org journal subs! https://t.co/Jv7lyJQMJw
Every journal deserves its own account/handle. #RedJournal #PracticalRO @ASTRO_org A randomized trial ⚖️ from a surgical journal suggests articles tweeted are more likely to be cited (OR 9.50
I'm looking for 56806 volunteers to follow me so that I can accumulated 4x more citations for my papers
Sharing in #AcademicTwitter does increase citations of shared manuscripts! As this randomized trial indicates
This study from the TSSMN trial shows that tweeting about research articles significantly boosts Altmetric scores and citations after one year, highlighting the role of social media in increasing scholarly visibility…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
@ezerid @jturnesv @ebtapper @HenryEChang @DrJavierCrespo Interesting article, although there are other articles with opposite conclusions: https://t.co/y4Zol7oEp0 https://t.co/21esEHbyIL Undoubtedly, #LiverTwitter helps with the dissemination of information, networking and collaboration.
@SouthernWintrs @browserdotsys Receipts :) https://t.co/gn3edeygXA https://t.co/mixBeCfZio https://t.co/upPGlT6blz https://t.co/ynrPfTFDeW
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
2) AIS Communicator - Lots of people doing research, but aren't very good at science comms - It's generally good to share external research - Work that is translated into tweets / blogs etc. have higher - e.g. https://t.co/Yyhj6VUQyM
Dear @elonmusk , You're helping scientists get out their pre-pub and peer-reviewed research/results! @Twitter @verified @NCBI @NIH @NLM_NIH https://t.co/GWpQ0JBIvo
So I am tweeting about this… https://t.co/L15FZwBMh3
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @urogabe: @TPKohn @drphil_urology @EvaAnyon @JUrology Another option to test impact of SoMe activity on paper citations/altmetrics is re…
RT @urogabe: @TPKohn @drphil_urology @EvaAnyon @JUrology Another option to test impact of SoMe activity on paper citations/altmetrics is re…
RT @urogabe: @TPKohn @drphil_urology @EvaAnyon @JUrology Another option to test impact of SoMe activity on paper citations/altmetrics is re…
@TPKohn @drphil_urology @EvaAnyon @JUrology Another option to test impact of SoMe activity on paper citations/altmetrics is re-running the TSSMN trial performed in the thoracic surgery space. Would need buy-in from a journal with large following to test properly ie @EUplatinum @JUrology https://t.co/qfYJoiSZ6l
RT @maclaudiaa: Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an…
RT @maclaudiaa: Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an…
RT @juanjo_fraire: Sharing in #AcademicTwitter does increase citations of shared manuscripts! As this randomized trial indicates
RT @juanjo_fraire: Sharing in #AcademicTwitter does increase citations of shared manuscripts! As this randomized trial indicates
RT @maclaudiaa: Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an…
RT @maclaudiaa: Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an…
RT @maclaudiaa: Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an…
RT @maclaudiaa: Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an…
RT @juanjo_fraire: Sharing in #AcademicTwitter does increase citations of shared manuscripts! As this randomized trial indicates
Sharing in #AcademicTwitter does increase citations of shared manuscripts! As this randomized trial indicates
RT @maclaudiaa: Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an…
RT @maclaudiaa: Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an…
RT @maclaudiaa: Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an…
RT @maclaudiaa: Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an…
RT @maclaudiaa: Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an…
Is @twitter a space for scientists & researchers? We #EHSREjc folks have always answered with an enthusiastic YES Here an RCT, the pinnacle of evidence based science, that confirms it
@AndyPerfors https://t.co/LrIl0v1J70
RT @ErinGillespieMD: Every journal deserves its own account/handle. #RedJournal #PracticalRO @ASTRO_org A randomized trial ⚖️ from a surg…
RT @ErinGillespieMD: Every journal deserves its own account/handle. #RedJournal #PracticalRO @ASTRO_org A randomized trial ⚖️ from a surg…
Every journal deserves its own account/handle. #RedJournal #PracticalRO @ASTRO_org A randomized trial ⚖️ from a surgical journal suggests articles tweeted are more likely to be cited (OR 9.50
Priceless. Does Tweeting Improve Citations? Published in Academic Citation Rings Weekly ... No ... It's in Annals of Thoracic Surgery. Oh, ahhh, and did I tell you about my NeurIPS paper. https://t.co/zCXSikFxCr Oh, ahh, and didb
Twitterの効果については二つのRCTがあった。 https://t.co/zd73XXeHow https://t.co/46Grvoez8R
RT @alirendely: Just published research? Tweet about it! This tweet from @ProfMakris: #RTC shows that tweeted articles have a bigger reac…
Just published research? Tweet about it! This tweet from @ProfMakris: #RTC shows that tweeted articles have a bigger reach & more citations Lead me to this article: Does Tweeting Improve Citations? by @JessicaLuc1 et al. https://t.co/eyQgbTMCoZ https://t.co/HHIjliFGwm
https://t.co/6Amfpcom2d
@eigenrobot
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @FerArceAmare: Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results From the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial #SocialMedia #MedTwitter #R…
Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results From the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial #SocialMedia #MedTwitter #RCT https://t.co/NSoddy7wAy
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
@PolicyR @cis_cnrs @zhdk Well, there is even a paper about how tweeted scientific papers get cited more often: https://t.co/FthryMrQC6
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @urogabe: Our insights
Our insights
@julie_kovarova @naturemethods Thanks for the paper. My fav is https://t.co/BbmKWKLd59 randomized trial showing Twitter
Tweeting on citations? Still no effect after 24+ mo. https://t.co/myklsUqBLH But still no retraction on problematic paper reporting huge early effects https://t.co/FCOZAzNbtI
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @kinga_ostanska: Close relations & making it easy work but sometimes it may not be enough. To convince particularly stubborn colleagues…
Close relations & making it easy work but sometimes it may not be enough. To convince particularly stubborn colleagues I can recommend 'speaking their own language'. Provide them with research about the benefits of tweeting: https://t.co/SE00sX9wpR @eysenbach #SciComm https://t.co/j1PPIq4Mpm
@VrijndeSteede Dankzij twitter vervaagt het verschil tussen de 2 types influencers overigens erg snel. "112 representative original articles were randomized 1:1 to be tweeted via TSSMN or a control (non-tweeted) group. Measured endpoints included citations at 1 year" https://t.co/gn3edeygXA https://t.co/DeVYGv02Aw
RT @iamscicomm: 3) #SciComm, specifically via #socialmedia, can increase your research citations. Seriously. There are a handful of studies…
3) #SciComm, specifically via #socialmedia, can increase your research citations. Seriously. There are a handful of studies w/ the most recent one here: https://t.co/vlwnBGxoLQ https://t.co/8qGdg0l1bo
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
Study shows that tweeting results in more article citations over time. But what are the consequences of this for science? Luc et al 2020 Ann Thoracic Surg Does tweeting improve citations? One-year results from the TSSMN prospective randomized trial https://t.co/jADtae9aM0 https://t.co/CaynQwOmFX
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
"One-year follow-up of this...prospective randomized trial importantly demonstrates that tweeting results in significantly more article #citations over time, highlighting the durable scholarly impact of social media activity." https://t.co/WZ2tk4u20Z #AcademicTwitter #Academia
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
1. Twitter (RCT) drives scientific citations when tested by surgeons randomly tweeting articles. https://t.co/fgY0UDtvS1 https://t.co/5efUesND6f
Does twitting improves citations? Ans: Yes!! https://t.co/CQV0nIScFR
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @MereSophistry: This is the most thorough article I've read that demonstrates that tweeting out research articles increases citations.…
RT @MereSophistry: This is the most thorough article I've read that demonstrates that tweeting out research articles increases citations.…
RT @MereSophistry: This is the most thorough article I've read that demonstrates that tweeting out research articles increases citations.…
This is the most thorough article I've read that demonstrates that tweeting out research articles increases citations. https://t.co/9pKdqeYu5I
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @BioTargeting: Sharing articles on Twitter results in significantly more citations over time. This shows the impact of social media acti…
Dans cet esprit l’expérience de la visibilité donnée par les retweets d’une société savante fait à mon avis de gros dégâts, ou devrait en faire si tout le monde ne regardait pas consciencieusement ailleurs. https://t.co/q9G2RrDDJ1 https://t.co/kofjEzIKPk
RT @CraigUnderhill: Hope you are doing well over there @BilalMohammadMD. ?Twitter impact is an interesting topic. We talked about it in ep…
Hope you are doing well over there @BilalMohammadMD. ?Twitter impact is an interesting topic. We talked about it in ep 7 of our Oncology Journal Podcast https://t.co/QinQztk1df @OncologyNewsAus @profevasegelov @HPrenen with this papaer: https://t.co/ycby1tkTVc #oncology https://t.co/CDVfYxm3Ya
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
Does Tweeting Improve #Citations? One-Year Results From the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial from @PubTrend #research #socialmedia https://t.co/ZCLvYHHWqT https://t.co/JZTQIYngzV
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
In case you were wondering if the time spent on social media is a waste of your academic time, the answer is probably not: https://t.co/sal4pyE888
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @ShamlooSepehri: A prospective randomized trial showed that #tweeting results in significantly more article #citations over time, highli…
RT @ibrahimsarbay: Sosyal medyanın gücü: 112 yayın rastgele seçilerek çok takipçili Twitter hesapları tarafından paylaşılması veya paylaşıl…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @KristinHoddyPhD: My inaugural use of the tweet button on the @NCBI website is an article demonstrating the value of tweeting scientific…
My inaugural use of the tweet button on the @NCBI website is an article demonstrating the value of tweeting scientific articles. (I know I'm a lil late to this party. This gem was on my browser for about a month
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
RT @JSheltzer: An amazing *randomized trial* on Twitter+academia: 112 papers were randomly chosen to be shared on twitter by a group with…
Students & post-docs, don't be shy, share your work! Did you know that tweeting your research increases its impact? https://t.co/yiSp9cFA9X Share your new papers, reports, op-eds, etc., with us anytime, and we will RT!
Verbessert twittern die Anzahl an Zitationen? Luc et al. zeigen deutlich: Ja!
'Métricas alternativas para uma ciência em rede: promessas, diálogos e limites' é o tema que será abordado pelos nossos convidados da semana: a Dra. Iara Vidal e o Dr. Fábio Castro Gouveia. https://t.co/5jCzbYuAiK
@RibeiroHV Access the paywalled article from your library: https://t.co/LbZxSthv75 Promote scholarly access to content by simply adding https://t.co/pfYzJ4fZui in front of any DOI
I have almost forgotten to share our recent works here. And since tweeting improve citations (https://t.co/4UsPRM649N), here we go :)
A @bchufc e o Plurissaberes Podcast convidam todos para mais uma live no YouTube! 'Métricas alternativas para uma ciência em rede: promessas, diálogos e limites'. Convidados: @iaravps e @fgouveia. Mediação: @EstanteBiblio. Dia 10/07/2020, às 16h. https://t.co/FcYi6k13dv
@RetractionWatch .@PubPeerBot 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065 https://t.co/2Y3m01DQOY
What happens when you #tweet about your science? Prospective trial shows “tweeting results in significantly more article citations over time, highlighting the durable scholarly impact of social media activity” ✅ https://t.co/PP7oTzdaxT Also in #MPJ & @ASTRO_org journal subs! https://t.co/Jv7lyJQMJw
Fascinated and a little scared: twitter activity increased citations in this prospective randomised study of 112 original papers @JessicaLuc1 #citation #Twitter https://t.co/NSj4utkWgg https://t.co/ZPeiPAqg9O
Según un estudio los #papers que se comparten en #Twitter tienen de promedio 4 veces más citaciones en las revistas científicas a lo largo del año que duró la investigación. Una muestra de que no se debe dejar olvidada la comunicación en tu grupo: https://t.co/cnBnOotUaR #SciComm https://t.co/Jh36zfJKlz
RT @upf_occ: ¿Merece la pena trabajar tu presencia en Twitter si estás en el mundo académico? Los papers que se comparten en Twitter tiene…
¿Merece la pena trabajar tu presencia en Twitter si estás en el mundo académico? Los papers que se comparten en Twitter tienen de promedio 4 veces más citaciones en las revistas científicas a lo largo del año que duró la investigación https://t.co/ctzlPwPeUB https://t.co/umbxYBoolC
RT @annalsthorsurg: Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the #TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial from @JessicaLuc1 et al:…
Tweeting helps papers get noticed. But I wish there was a good way of finding all the Twitter conversions around a paper. I don't think something like #DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065 is going to catch on https://t.co/GZJVti5UNb
RT @annalsthorsurg: Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the #TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial from @JessicaLuc1 et al:…
RT @annalsthorsurg: Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the #TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial from @JessicaLuc1 et al:…
RT @annalsthorsurg: Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the #TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial from @JessicaLuc1 et al:…
RT @annalsthorsurg: Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the #TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial from @JessicaLuc1 et al:…
RT @annalsthorsurg: Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the #TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial from @JessicaLuc1 et al:…
Tweeting of randomly-selected health-research articles increases citations from the 14th percentile to the 76th percentile https://t.co/XHggRbphBx. (@GrantKinsler why wouldn't you tweet this?)
RT @annalsthorsurg: Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the #TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial from @JessicaLuc1 et al:…
RT @annalsthorsurg: Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the #TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial from @JessicaLuc1 et al:…
Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the #TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial from @JessicaLuc1 et al: https://t.co/GEMNiRC6dy #VisualAbstract #AnnalsImages @archerm2 @TheRakeshArora @ebender001 @ArieBlitzMD @DavidCookeMD @tamaranihici @biniamkidaneMD https://t.co/nrpySp1aFY
Does Tweeting Improve Citations? Yes, by 4.4x a year later compared to control group. An interesting study on the power of tweeting on subsequent citations https://t.co/2vn00JOO0X https://t.co/4b3dTxyfSp
So tweeting results in more article citations https://t.co/cNyZv9WaHI. I'd love to know what else is relevant. A paper of mine has no DOI, is not found in any databases yet has at least 15 citations in 2 yrs. How are people finding it? https://t.co/59JSHQBn12 #AcademicChatter https://t.co/gdyWtTj5H9
RT @ASanchez_Tojar: I'm looking for 56806 volunteers to follow me so that I can accumulated 4x more citations for my papers
I'm looking for 56806 volunteers to follow me so that I can accumulated 4x more citations for my papers
RT @Dr_Ivanoncologo: ¡Todos a Retwittear! Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results From the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial. D…
¡Todos a Retwittear! Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results From the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065 #Scienceandpublishing #Oncoalert https://t.co/nJq0OPMRqs
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065. Mackson, S.B., Brochu, P.M., Schneider, B.A., 2019. Instagram: Friend or Foe? The Application's Association ...
Rationale and 2020.04.065 design of the DIGIT-HF trial (DIGitoxin to ... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.066 1118480. https://doi.org ...
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065 23. Fox CS, Gurary EB, Ryan J, Bonaca M, Barry K, Loscalzo J, Massaro J: Randomized controlled trial of social
2021;doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065. Published by: hemonc today logo. Sources/Disclosures. Biography: Mya L. Roberson, PhD, is assistant ...
average age, and were distributed among the same topics within the journal. 23 https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065. 53. And ...
... 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065. By Phil Davis; Jul 19, 2020, 1:45 PM. With a theoretical difference of zero and using the only T statistic I ...
Surg., 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065. Topics. Academia · Publishing · social media. No comments. Bookmark. Sign in to use this ...
TS
CM
DH
EM
AT
JZ
U
JM
WD
VD
VA
LM
AP
KC
FD
MB
LB
LB
ES
AG
GL
JB
KS
S
MS
DM
AP
CB
SM
MM
F
JU
TR
IP
MS
PB
TS
R
AM
ˏˊ
W
FL
SH
SP
MB
UA
FA
P
B
GD
ES
CF
Pİ
JI
PD
AM
MH
MT
R
KO
PC
IB
AA
PB
BA
JO
BC
IP
NK
GM
AK
AF
KM
RB
VS
JR
M
MH
DS
AB
SR
JG
BM
NB
LC
MM
CU
CR
EL
FA
MW
PL
DT
JP
CP
AA
İS
E
TM
MC
BH
KR
AP
JP
PT
GR
CS
AR
L
HR
C
K
AP
MB
OU
RA
JP
GP
AD
DH
TM
MF
CM
C
TS
Aا
DS
MG
M
DG