Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The group shows cautious acknowledgment of the study's findings, mentioning issues like persistent gaps in analysis despite increased inclusion efforts, as in phrases like 'there are still gaps' and 'progress considering sex.' The tone varies from neutral to slightly critical, highlighting ongoing challenges rather than celebrating substantial breakthroughs.
Many discussions acknowledge the ongoing gaps in sex inclusion and analysis, but some express skepticism or question the depth of change, leading to a neutral overall stance.
Posts indicate moderate interest, mostly focused on reporting findings and highlighting areas for improvement rather than deep engagement or personal investment.
The posts reference specific aspects of the study, such as the lack of sex-based analyses and the implications of NIH policies, showing some level of detailed engagement.
While recognizing the importance of sex inclusion, discussions suggest incremental progress, implying a moderate perceived impact rather than a transformative change.
i'm fascinated. 33% of kids with early childhood depression ended up having bipolar 1! reminds me of how it was only 3 years ago that i realized that not everybody had severe depression in middle school and was absolutely blown away haha
"We used males exclusively in these experiments to minimize possible variability resulting from sex differences"
@backpainbarbie Das stimmt nicht. In deiner Quelle selbst ist der "A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences" Artikel verlinkt, welcher das wiederlegt. Ja, in 49% der Studien werden Frauen UND Männer untersucht, das heißt jedoch nicht, dass die anderen 51% der https://t.co/cwquw8BjJf
Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences https://t.co/9Lp6KliZq7
ATTN immunology, we have gotten better about including both sexes, but not comparing the sexes in research studies. #SABV @AnnalieseBeery https://t.co/t1gIwhVWLF
Inclusion ❌ Analysis Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences https://t.co/kkyLYIq5UD
A tragedy from the 1950s left lasting scars; thalidomide not only caused malformations in infants but also led regulators to exclude women from clinical trials. This oversight has resulted in a heightened risk of…
i'm fascinated. 33% of kids with early childhood depression ended up having bipolar 1! reminds me of how it was only 3 years ago that i realized that not everybody had severe depression in middle school and was absolutely blown away haha
@backpainbarbie Das stimmt nicht. In deiner Quelle selbst ist der "A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences" Artikel verlinkt, welcher das wiederlegt. Ja, in 49% der Studien werden Frauen UND Männer untersucht, das heißt jedoch nicht, dass die anderen 51% der https://t.co/cwquw8BjJf
https://elifesciences.org/articles/56344.pdf
Does the NIH requiring reporting of SABV actually mean that the experiences of women and ppl with uteri, etc. are valued, reported upon, contextualized, believed, included--or even analyzed? @NikiWoitowich 's research suggests the answer is no. https://t.co/ikXnmZesN3
RT @pastorams: These were the explanations (excuses) that health researchers gave for not including sex/gender analysis in their projects r…
These were the explanations (excuses) that health researchers gave for not including sex/gender analysis in their projects reported in this “10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences” https://t.co/qunPrNQ7KF https://t.co/m0YjlhdGjQ
@rhymeandmetrics @ittyruffle @michaelwayneoo @michaelshermer @ProfDavidBuss Proof by assertion fallacy, substantiate your claim with sources! Gender ideology is pseudoscience. Here's some robust meta-analyses on sex differences — https://t.co/jB6lbD4eUh https://t.co/NtdIe3WZGI https://t.co/gwt9qAYPnE https://t.co/jDwyLYFWOq https://t.co/lKCRHQdRXM
@NaturePortfolio @NatureComms Other recent studies reveal that research of other fields can improve in reporting sex or/and gender as variables. https://t.co/tRkEPKq0Zm https://t.co/CBeWVsQs7q https://t.co/2gnbg62UpH Guidelines for how to integrate assessment of sex and gender: https://t.co/UV4JQQ468H
Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of #sex inclusion in the biological sciences: While sex-inclusive #research practices are more commonplace, there are still gaps in analyses and reporting of data by sex in many biological disciplines https://t.co/xXNETwNUIR
Inclusion ❌ Analysis Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences https://t.co/kkyLYIq5UD
RT @sabraklein1998: ATTN immunology, we have gotten better about including both sexes, but not comparing the sexes in research studies. #SA…
RT @sabraklein1998: ATTN immunology, we have gotten better about including both sexes, but not comparing the sexes in research studies. #SA…
ATTN immunology, we have gotten better about including both sexes, but not comparing the sexes in research studies. #SABV @AnnalieseBeery https://t.co/t1gIwhVWLF
Failure to report/account for sex-differences is not restricted to sepsis–An update of sex inclusion in biological disciplines showed that the number of studies analyzing data by sex is unchanged since the original study was published (10 years ago)! 6/ https://t.co/EQXl0QqjKh
@chateau_indigo @US_FDA @CDCgov "while sex-inclusive research practices are more commonplace, there are still gaps in analyses and reporting of data by sex in many biological disciplines." - https://t.co/ZUbjpNEjyX
"The majority of studies failed to provide rationale for single-sex studies (...) and those that did relied on misconceptions surrounding the hormonal variability of females." https://t.co/CpVnZS3FPW Push for equality in #biomedical research! #InternationalWomensDay #IWD2021
A recent study showed many science fields have increased #SABV in research, but the % of articles that performed sex-based analyses when they included both sexes decreased. We have more work to do, says @JanineClaytonMD of @NIH_ORWH. #WomensHealthResearch https://t.co/0MmCrCmeHi
#women are being included more in biomedical #research. https://t.co/PdAXydDXKK ABOUT. BLOODY. TIME. Next stop: addressing severe white-skewed race imbalances.
RT @eLife: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences finds critical sex-based analyses and reporting have remai…
RT @eLife: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences finds critical sex-based analyses and reporting have remai…
A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences finds critical sex-based analyses and reporting have remained stagnant in many disciplines over the past decade https://t.co/kqO8zQntr8 #MetaResearch https://t.co/cv8iQvKpJl
A 10-year follow-up study of #sex inclusion in the biological sciences: sex-inclusive #research practices are more commonplace, there are still gaps in analyses and reporting of data by sex in many biological disciplines https://t.co/xXNETx5vAp via @GenderInnovate
RT @gabriellecj: @lauramoates And you can find Nicole Woitowich's 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences here:…
@lauramoates And you can find Nicole Woitowich's 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences here: https://t.co/7wGS1vLGmP And more info on @georgeinstitute / @HumanRightsUNSW research here: https://t.co/L0BDPlXinV
@Ysayn3 @lauramoates and neuroscience is one of the worst offenders in using only male animals in pre-clinical research. This study is very interesting - https://t.co/7wGS1vLGmP (Women with migraines were written off as hysterical until very recently)
RT @OSSDtweets: Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion i…
RT @sabraklein1998: While #microbiology is not included, #Immunology is and is making progress considering sex as a biological variable #S…
While sex difference research is becoming more common, there are still gaps in analyses and reporting of data by sex in many disciplines. Check out this 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences at the link below: https://t.co/XjOHy3aOOt
RT @mcgregormd: "We used males exclusively in these experiments to minimize possible variability resulting from sex differences"
RT @OSSDtweets: Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion i…
RT @OSSDtweets: Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion i…
RT @mcgregormd: "We used males exclusively in these experiments to minimize possible variability resulting from sex differences"
RT @aimos_inc: “A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences.“ (6/7) https://t.co/rJx3BpE0g4
“A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences.“ (6/7) https://t.co/rJx3BpE0g4
RT @OSSDtweets: Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion i…
RT @mcgregormd: "We used males exclusively in these experiments to minimize possible variability resulting from sex differences"
RT @eLife: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences finds critical sex-based analyses and reporting have remai…
A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences finds critical sex-based analyses and reporting have remained stagnant in many disciplines over the past decade https://t.co/kqO8zQntr8 #MetaResearch https://t.co/60sf4UARJ1
RT @OSSDtweets: Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion i…
RT @mcgregormd: "We used males exclusively in these experiments to minimize possible variability resulting from sex differences"
RT @OSSDtweets: Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion i…
"We used males exclusively in these experiments to minimize possible variability resulting from sex differences"
RT @OSSDtweets: Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion i…
RT @OSSDtweets: Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion i…
RT @OSSDtweets: Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion i…
RT @OSSDtweets: Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion i…
Excellent analysis from @WomensHealthNU about #SABV @NIH_ORWH. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences https://t.co/9Lp6KliZq7
So glad to see this meta-research getting done. Inclusion of male and female animals in research as increased due to NIH policies, though most studies still fail to do analysis stratified by sex: https://t.co/JLWLZvphow
RT @sabraklein1998: While #microbiology is not included, #Immunology is and is making progress considering sex as a biological variable #S…
RT @sabraklein1998: While #microbiology is not included, #Immunology is and is making progress considering sex as a biological variable #S…
RT @sabraklein1998: While #microbiology is not included, #Immunology is and is making progress considering sex as a biological variable #S…
RT @sabraklein1998: While #microbiology is not included, #Immunology is and is making progress considering sex as a biological variable #S…
While #microbiology is not included, #Immunology is and is making progress considering sex as a biological variable #SABV. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences https://t.co/t1gIwidyaf
But wait - #diversity extends to much more than organisational engagement & includes basic #research & #researcher support. Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences https://t.co/6S8bYAGaiT #gender #women #womenshealth
RT @E_PaulZehr:
And more good news, just published. @eLife https://t.co/sSvjsQrC61
A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences https://t.co/SvV913zOGY https://t.co/vjjLwHUIr3
Meta-Research: A 10-year follow-up study of sex inclusion in the biological sciences https://t.co/b0epcQbrqC
AM
ZG
O
SK
CP
UI
PS
SM
NK
NS
LP
DS
TT
AS
BE
S
HC
B
DD
EJ
TH
GJ
BH
A
UL
SW
M賴
MG
RN
DF
A
HM
EK
HB
DB
ED
GF
HT
KF
DM
DJ
VM
MP
M
PS
KT
AF
CV
NN
S