Clin Spine Surg December 2020 PMID 32554986

3D-printed Patient-specific Spine Implants: A Systematic Review.

Nicholas Wallace, Nathaniel E Schaffer, Ilyas S Aleem, Rakesh Patel

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 1 in May 2021

across 2 sources since May 2021

Extended reach

62,891

potential audience

Total likes

976

Video views

62,870

Mentions per month

May 2021 – Feb 2022

Where it's discussed

YouTube2 videos
X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall sentiment shows strong support for the promise of personalized 3D-printed implants, with discussions referencing the potential for better fit and fewer complications. The tone includes phrases like 'game-changing' and 'significant advancement,' indicating the perceived valuable impact of this technology, while specific mentions of case studies and outcome improvements highlight active engagement and interest.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most posts express support or approval of the publication's findings, emphasizing the promise of 3D-printed implants as beneficial innovations.

InterestHigh interest

The discussions demonstrate high curiosity about the technology’s potential and future applications, with many references to improved patient outcomes and clinical benefits.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments show active interest, with some posts analyzing the methodology, referencing specific outcomes like reduced complications, and debating the implications of limited data.

ImpactModerate impact

The posts suggest that viewers see the research as impactful, particularly because it highlights new, promising methods for personalized medicine that could significantly influence spinal treatment practices.

Abstract in brief

The review discusses the use of 3D-printed, patient-specific spinal implants, highlighting their potential for better fit, improved integration, and reduced complications such as subsidence, based on a limited number of case studies.
The research involved analyzing 17 studies with 35 patients, focusing on outcomes like pain, implant stability, and radiographic improvements, with follow-up periods ranging from 3 to 36 months.
Overall, the findings suggest that 3D printing technology is a promising method for creating customized spinal implants that can lead to positive clinical results, though more extensive research is needed.]

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Advancements in 3D Printed Spinal Implants for Surgical Outcomes

Spinal 3D printing involves creating customized implants from digital designs using additive manufacturing. This innovative technique can improve surgical outcomes by providing patient-specific solutions, enhancing…

Antonio J. Webb, M.D. · Feb 5, 2022 57,375 views

3D Printed Spinal Implants for Improved Surgical Outcomes

If you are experiencing chronic back or leg pain that is unresponsive to conservative treatments, 3D printed spinal implants may enhance surgical results. This innovative technology allows for customized implants…

All About Spine · May 24, 2021 5,495 views

INSIGHTS Spine

@InsightsSpine · X

3D-printed Patient-specific Spine Implants: A Systematic Review. https://t.co/Pfbeb8AydD

Nov 29, 2021 · 22 followers View post →