Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.
Daniel Fuller, Emily Colwell, Jonathan Low, Kassia Orychock, Melissa Ann Tobin, Bo Simango, Richard Buote, Desiree Van Heerden, Hui Luan, Kimberley Cullen, Logan Slade, Nathan G A Taylor
September 2020 JMIR Mhealth UhealthSynopsis of Social media discussions
Several comments highlight the study’s findings by stating that commercial devices are unreliable for measuring energy expenditure and VO2max, often emphasizing the flaws in data and algorithms. The tone ranges from cautious skepticism to enthusiastic acknowledgment, using words like 'flawed,' 'errors,' and 'misleading,' which reflect both concern and recognition of the review’s importance in evaluating consumer health technology.
Agreement
Moderate agreementMost discussions acknowledge the review's findings about the limited accuracy of consumer wearables, with some agreeing that they shouldn't be used for precise energy measurements.
Interest
High level of interestPosts express high curiosity, referencing the comprehensive nature of the study and sharing enthusiasm for its implications for fitness and health tracking.
Engagement
High engagementMany discussions delve into specifics, criticizing proprietary algorithms, mentioning device brands like Apple Watch and Fitbit, and debating the reliability issues, indicating deep engagement.
Impact
Moderate level of impactPosts suggest the review could significantly influence perceptions about wearable tech, with some considering it a 'game changer' for health monitoring practices.
Social Mentions
YouTube
7 Videos
30 Posts
Blogs
3 Articles
News
56 Articles
Metrics
Video Views
14,370
Total Likes
191
Extended Reach
216,383
Social Features
96
Timeline: Posts about article
Top Social Media Posts
Posts referencing the article
Assessing the Accuracy of Smartwatches in Measuring Health Metrics
This video reviews the accuracy and reliability of popular smartwatches like Apple Watch, Garmin, and Fitbit in tracking fitness data such as steps, heart rate, and energy expenditure. It highlights which devices perform best and discusses research methods used in testing.
Effective Strategies to Enhance Motivation for Exercise
This video discusses research-backed strategies to boost physical activity motivation. It covers the 5th strategy shown to help individuals stay committed to exercise programs, highlighting the importance of evidence-based techniques to improve adherence.
Enhancing Motivation to Exercise Through Research-Based Strategies
This video discusses research-based strategies, focusing on the sixth technique, to increase motivation for starting exercise. It covers evidence-supported methods to help you get moving effectively.
Smartwatch Accuracy in Tracking Fitness Metrics Review
This video discusses the accuracy and reliability of popular smartwatches like Apple Watch, Garmin, and Fitbit in measuring fitness data such as step count, heart rate, and calories burned, highlighting current research findings and common testing methods.
Choosing the Best Fitness Watch for Your Performance and Accuracy
Explore the world of sports watches and fitness trackers with Lukas and Tobias, understanding their functions and how to select the right model for you. Learn about the accuracy of popular devices for steps, heart rate, and energy expenditure, and discover innovative features to enhance your fitness tracking.
-
@FrempBets @nottween @trvywalk @JamessssRoss @a1ias86 @isoquince Fuller, D., Colwell, E., Low, J., et al. (2020). Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(9), e18694. https://t.co/sEKIA8z3As
view full postApril 15, 2025
-
Charlotte Goodall
@charlottegooda7 (Twitter)@medicinexthings https://t.co/fnoD6B6mRX Their algorithms are proprietary but they are based on flawed data to start with. Plus you can’t measure VO2max out of the lab without making some very dodgy approximations even if the basic data is right (it isn’t).
view full postJanuary 1, 2025
2
-
縄田佳志@Nealle
@nawakei (Twitter)@AyatoShinohara Applewatchなどのウェアラブルデバイスの信頼性妥当性を検討したシステマティックレビュー https://t.co/cirIukY784
view full postSeptember 12, 2023
-
Nick Vardavas
@vardavas (Twitter)1. Fuller D, et al. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 8;8(9):e18694. doi: 10.2196/18694. PMID: 32897239; PMCID: PMC7509623.
view full postApril 18, 2023
1
-
TheFrenchEpidemiologist
@frenchepidemio (Twitter)Les applications de calcul de kcal sont mauvaises pour estimer la dépense énergétique (comparaison de l'appli vs la calorimétrie) Il y a un nombre non négligeable de prédictions avec des erreurs (Mean Percentage Error =MPE) supérieures à 50% ! https://t.co/O5OOMw8TjO https://t.co/DlNSpLtZkN
view full postApril 4, 2023
16
-
Mike Matthews
@muscleforlife (Twitter)This study isn’t the first to show that commercially available activity trackers shouldn’t be used to estimate energy expenditure, either. https://t.co/MhuwakmFsF https://t.co/R5L2IEJe7o
view full postSeptember 24, 2022
2
-
Jun Fuse@循環器内科医
@jfuse0320 (Twitter)測定精度が高いスマートウォッチ 歩数→Fitbit、Apple Watch、Samsung 心拍数→Apple Watch、Garmin エネルギー消費→精度の高いものなし https://t.co/GQHeZQFltd ただし、デバイスは常にアップデートしています。
view full postMay 26, 2021
2
-
Tactical Research GRoup
@_T_R_Gr_ (Twitter)RT @GDLeahy: Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: S…
view full postMay 26, 2021
5
-
EskeleThor
@EskeleThor (Twitter)RT @GDLeahy: Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: S…
view full postMay 26, 2021
5
-
Chris Boyer, DPT, OCS, Dip.MDT
@chrisboyerPT (Twitter)RT @GDLeahy: Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: S…
view full postMay 26, 2021
5
-
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot (Twitter)RT @GDLeahy: Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: S…
view full postMay 25, 2021
5
-
GDLeahy
@GDLeahy (Twitter)Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review https://t.co/0w7paiBjJ3
view full postMay 25, 2021
4
5
-
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot (Twitter)RT @ohd_d: どのウェアラブルデバイスを買うか悩んでるならsystematic reviewを読もう。 さらに悩むことになるかもw Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices…
view full postJanuary 14, 2021
1
-
OHD
@ohd_d (Twitter)どのウェアラブルデバイスを買うか悩んでるならsystematic reviewを読もう。 さらに悩むことになるかもw Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review https://t.co/0sQ18yjTV0
view full postJanuary 14, 2021
1
-
Kristof De Mey
@krdemey (Twitter)@docgoble Nice one.
view full postSeptember 30, 2020
-
Kenneth Lee
@KennyPharmPhD (Twitter)Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review https://t.co/4HKID6StNO @jmirpub #fitness
view full postSeptember 19, 2020
-
jenderton4
@enderton_justin (Twitter)Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate #Fitness via https://t.co/Yd1zxcM76n https://t.co/LzKjhpOzs7
view full postSeptember 17, 2020
-
Sarah Moore
@ParaPLAYHub (Twitter)Nice paper by Dr. Fuller (@walkabilly) and team: Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate. Check it out folks
view full postSeptember 9, 2020
1
-
Helen Wong
@HelenWongRD (Twitter)RT @walkabilly: #newpaper OMG this has been 4 years in the making. To my knowledge the largest and most comprehensive #systematicreview of…
view full postSeptember 9, 2020
11
-
@ThePAWSLab (Twitter)RT @walkabilly: #newpaper OMG this has been 4 years in the making. To my knowledge the largest and most comprehensive #systematicreview of…
view full postSeptember 9, 2020
11
-
Denver Brown
@TheDenverBrown (Twitter)RT @walkabilly: #newpaper OMG this has been 4 years in the making. To my knowledge the largest and most comprehensive #systematicreview of…
view full postSeptember 9, 2020
11
-
Marquis
@MarkJask (Twitter)RT @walkabilly: #newpaper OMG this has been 4 years in the making. To my knowledge the largest and most comprehensive #systematicreview of…
view full postSeptember 9, 2020
11
-
Andy Yan | @ayan604.bsky.social
@Ayan604 (Twitter)RT @walkabilly: #newpaper OMG this has been 4 years in the making. To my knowledge the largest and most comprehensive #systematicreview of…
view full postSeptember 9, 2020
11
-
GeoHealth Network
@GeoHlthNetwork (Twitter)RT @walkabilly: #newpaper OMG this has been 4 years in the making. To my knowledge the largest and most comprehensive #systematicreview of…
view full postSeptember 9, 2020
11
-
Aaron Kandola
@KandolaAaron (Twitter)RT @walkabilly: #newpaper OMG this has been 4 years in the making. To my knowledge the largest and most comprehensive #systematicreview of…
view full postSeptember 9, 2020
11
-
Brianne Chafe
@chafe_b (Twitter)RT @walkabilly: #newpaper OMG this has been 4 years in the making. To my knowledge the largest and most comprehensive #systematicreview of…
view full postSeptember 8, 2020
11
-
Hui (Henry) Luan
@GIS_Luan (Twitter)RT @walkabilly: #newpaper OMG this has been 4 years in the making. To my knowledge the largest and most comprehensive #systematicreview of…
view full postSeptember 8, 2020
11
-
Trisalyn Nelson
@TrisalynNelson (Twitter)RT @walkabilly: #newpaper OMG this has been 4 years in the making. To my knowledge the largest and most comprehensive #systematicreview of…
view full postSeptember 8, 2020
11
-
Daniel Fuller
@walkabilly (Twitter)#newpaper OMG this has been 4 years in the making. To my knowledge the largest and most comprehensive #systematicreview of the reliability and validity of commercial wearable devices. https://t.co/F4mKLBFvQi @MemorialHKR @MemorialU @CRC_CRC @CIHR_IRSC
view full postSeptember 8, 2020
51
11
-
JMIR Publications
@jmirpub (Twitter)New in JMIR mhealth: Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available #Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review https://t.co/h06GNIWPBo https://t.co/lRzVjnNCkF
view full postSeptember 8, 2020
5
Abstract Synopsis
- This systematic review analyzed the accuracy and consistency of popular wearable devices like Fitbit, Apple Watch, and Samsung in measuring steps, heart rate, and energy expenditure.
- The study found that wearables generally provide accurate step and heart rate data in lab settings, but their reliability varies by brand, with some devices tending to underestimate certain measures.
- No wearable device was found to be reliably accurate for estimating energy expenditure, and ongoing updates to device models highlight the need for continued research to evaluate their performance.]


babadooks
@SupremeSukuna (Twitter)